Construction of Rolled Digital for Newborns Using Image Registration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22456/2175-2745.143514Keywords:
Fingerprint, Newborn, Image Registration, CompositionAbstract
This work aimed to reconstruct rolled fingerprint images from multiple flat fingerprints using image registration and composition techniques. The methodology involved selecting high-quality frames through a quality network, the application of preprocessing with remapping, cropping the area of interest, and adjusting colors. In addition to image registration steps, like key point identification, feature matching, and image distortion. Results indicated that while classical image registration had limitations, the composition technique significantly increased the number of features extracted, enhancing fingerprint identification. It was demonstrated that the composition method effectively captures important fingerprint details, offering a potential improvement in newborn biometric identification.
Downloads
References
LI, S. Z. Encyclopedia of Biometrics: I-Z. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media, 2009. v. 1.
DARGAN, S.; KUMAR, M. A comprehensive survey on the biometric recognition systems based on physiological and behavioral modalities. Expert Systems with Applications, v. 143, p. 113–114, 2020.
SOUTHIER, L. F. P. et al. Systematic Literature Review on Neonatal Fingerprint Recognition. 2023. Preprint.
JAIN, A. K.; CAO, K.; ARORA, S. S. Recognizing infants and toddlers using fingerprints: Increasing the vaccination coverage. In: IEEE. IEEE international joint conference on biometrics. [S.l.], 2014. p. 1–8.
BAY, H.; TUYTELAARS, T.; GOOL, L. V. Surf: Speeded up robust features. In: LEONARDIS, A.; BISCHOF, H.; PINZ, A. (Ed.). Computer Vision – ECCV 2006. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006. p. 404–417.
KWON, D.; YUN, I. D.; LEE, S. U. Rolled fingerprint construction using MRF-based nonrigid image registration. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, v. 19, n. 12, p. 3255–3270, 2010.
MOON, Y. et al. Template synthesis and image mosaicking for fingerprint registration: an experimental study. In: 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. [S.l.: s.n.], 2004. v. 5, p. V–409.
JAIN, A.; ROSS, A. Fingerprint mosaicking. In: 2002 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. [S.l.: s.n.], 2002. v. 4, p. IV–4064.
QIU, Y. et al. IFViT: Interpretable Fixed-Length Representation for Fingerprint Matching via Vision Transformer. 2024.
GU, S. et al. Latent fingerprint registration via matching densely sampled points. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, v. 16, p. 1231–1244, 2021.
JAIN, A. K.; ROSS, A. A.; NANDAKUMAR, K. Introduction to Biometrics. [S.l.]: Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, 2011.
LI, S. Z.; JAIN, A. Encyclopedia of Biometrics. [S.l.]: Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, 2015. ISBN 148997489X.
BAZEN, A. M.; GEREZ, S. H. Segmentation of fingerprint images. In: CITESEER. ProRISC 2001 Workshop on Circuits, Systems and Signal Processing. [S.l.], 2001. p. 276–280.
INFANTID. InfantID. 2024. Disponível em: https://natosafe.com.br/. Acesso em: 20 de maio 2024.
MEDEIROS, J. A importância dos testes de qualidade na captura biométrica. [S.l.], 2023.
MATOS, R. M. d. Autenticação de usuários através da utilização de sistemas biométricos. 2000.
KAMOUN, E. Image Registration: From Scale-invariant Feature Transform to Deep Learning. 2022.
SHAN, B. A novel image correlation matching approach. J. Multim., Citeseer, v. 5, n. 3, p. 268–275, 2010.
VAGHELA, D.; NAINA, P. et al. A review of image mosaicing techniques. arXiv preprint arXiv:1405.2539, 2014.
RUBLEE, E. et al. Orb: An efficient alternative to SIFT or SURF. In: 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision. [S.l.: s.n.], 2011. p. 2564–2571.
ALCANTARILLA, P. F.; BARTOLI, A.; DAVISON, A. J. Kaze features. In: FITZGIBBON, A. et al. (Ed.). Computer Vision – ECCV 2012. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012. p. 214–227.
ALCANTARILLA, P.; NUEVO, J.; BARTOLI, A. Fast explicit diffusion for accelerated features in nonlinear scale spaces. In: British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC). [S.l.]: Bristol, 2013.
TAREEN, S. A. K.; SALEEM, Z. A comparative analysis of SIFT, SURF, KAZE, AKAZE, ORB, and BRISK. In: 2018 International Conference on Computing, Mathematics and Engineering Technologies (iCoMET). [S.l.: s.n.], 2018. p. 1–10.
APPANA, V. et al. Similarity score of two images using different measures. In: 2021 6th International Conference on Inventive Computation Technologies (ICICT). [S.l.: s.n.], 2021. p. 741–746.
HECKBERT, P. S. Fundamentals of texture mapping and image warping. Citeseer, 1989.
GONZALES, R. C.; WINTZ, P. Digital image processing. [S.l.]: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., 1987.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Wesley de Bona, Jefferson Tales Oliva, Luiz Fernando Puttow Southier, Fabio Favarim, Marcelo Teixeira, Dalcimar Casanova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Autorizo aos editores a publicação de meu artigo, caso seja aceito, em meio eletrônico de acordo com as regras do Public Knowledge Project.Accepted 2024-12-02
Published 2025-02-20













