Decolonizing Visualizations

Anthropology as a Critique of Universalism in Information Design

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22456/1984-1191.147278

Keywords:

Information Design, Applied Anthropology, Ethonography, Data Visualization, Decoloniality

Abstract

This article explores the intersection between anthropology and information design as a fertile territory for translating ethnographic knowledge into accessible languages beyond academia. We identify that the instrumentalization of ethnography in design constitutes both a methodological challenge and a unique opportunity to rethink visualization practices. We aim to demonstrate how fundamental anthropological principles (alterity, relativism, critique of universalism) can be operationalized in visual forms that challenge hegemonic conventions. We critically analyze the epistemological, ontological, and ethical-political dimensions of this relationship, examining cases such as indigenous mapping platforms and participatory educational visualizations. The results point to an informational design that recognizes the diversity of ways of knowing, representing, and interpreting information, countering the naturalization of Western perspectives as universal. We conclude that this approach transforms design into a laboratory for a public and undisciplined anthropology, capable of reimagining both specific visualizations and the very production and circulation of knowledge in culturally diverse contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ANDERSON, R. J.; KOLKO, J. On addressing wicked problems, imperfect solutions, and design expertise. Interactions, 16(6), p.80-83, 2009.

APPADURAI, Arjun. Fear of Small Numbers: An Essay on the Geography of Anger. Durham: Duke University Press, 2006.

BEZAITIS, Maria; ROBINSON, Rick E. VALUABLE TO VALUE: how “user research” ought to change. In: CLARKE, Alison J. (ed.). Design Anthropology: object culture in transition. London & New York: Bloomsbury, 2018. p.56-68.

DUDLEY, E.; HAALAND, A. Communicating buildings for safety. Intermediate Technology Publications, 1993.

DE LA CADENA, Marisol. Earth Beings: Ecologies of Practice Across Andean Worlds. Durham: Duke University Press, 2015.

ESCOBAR, Arturo. Designs for the Pluriverse: radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Durham: Duke University Press, 2018.

HALE, T. People are not users. Journal of Business Anthropology, 7(2), p.163-183, 2018.

HERZFELD, Michael. Anthropological realism in a scientistic age. Anthropological Theory, 18(1), p.129-150, 2018.

INDOLG, Tim. Anthropology and/as education. London & New York: Routledge, 2017.

KRESS, G,; VAN LEEUWEN, T. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London & New York: Routledge, 2006.

LATOUR, Bruno. Pandora's Hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999.

LUCCHESI, A. Mapping as embodied practice in Indigenous cartography. Society for Visual Anthropology News, 36(1), p.16-20, 2020.

MARCUS, George. Ethnography in/of the world-system: the emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology 24, p.95-117, 1995.

MARCUS, George. Ethnography Through Thick and Thin. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.

MILLEN, D. R. Rapid ethnography: Time deepening strategies for HCI field research. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 280-286), 2000.

NICOLAU, B. M.; OLIVEIRA, A. S. Níveis de interatividade em mídias sociais. Anais do Congresso Internacional de Design da Informação, 7, p.112-129, 2015.

PASSOS, S. G.; SOUSA, Á;. VALOTO, A.; PEREIRA, D.; NICKEL, E. M. Antropologia, design e alteridade: (algumas) relações e implicações metodológicas. In: Proceeding do 10º ETD – Congresso Internacional Ergotrip Design: Design, Ergonomia e Interação Humano Computador. Artigos Completos (pp. 927-936). Universidade de Aveiro, 2015.

PEIRANO, Mariza. Etnografia não é método. Horizontes Antropológicos, 20(42), p.377-391, 2014.

PINK, S.; MORGAN, J. Short-term ethnography: Intense routes to knowing. Symbolic Interaction, 36(3), p.351-361, 2013.

ROBERTS-MAHONEY, H.; MEANS, A. J.; GARRISON, M. J. Netflixing human capital development: Personalized learning technology and the corporatization of K-12 education. Journal of Education Policy, 31(4), p.405-420, 2016.

SALVADOR, T.; BELL, G.; ANDERSON, K. Design ethnography. Design Management Journal, 10(4), p.35-41, 1999.

SELWYN, N. Is technology good for education?. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2016.

SPINILLO, C. An analytical approach to procedural pictorial sequences. Departamento de Tipografia e Comunicação Gráfica, University of Reading, 2000.

STRATHERN, Marilyn. Commons and Borderlands: working papers on interdisciplinarity, accountability and the flow of knowledge. Canon Pyon: Sean Kingston Publishing, 2004.

WALLER, R. Learning from Vernon's Isotype test: A design history footnote. Information Design Journal, 25(3), p.264-276, 2019.

WILLIAMSON, B. Big data in education: The digital future of learning, policy and practice. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2017.

WILLIS, A. M. Ontological designing. Design Philosophy Papers, 4(2), p.69-92, 2006.

HANDWERKER, W. P. Quick ethnography. Lanham: AltaMira Press, 2001.

WOGALTER, M. S.; DEJOY, D. M.; LAGHERY, K. R. Organising theoretical framework: A consolidated communication-human information processing (C-Hip) model. In: M. S. WOGALTER, M. S.; DEJOY, D. M.; LAGHERY, K. R (eds.). Warnings and Risk communication. London: Taylor & Francis, 2009. p.15-23.

Published

2025-07-08

How to Cite

GOUVEIA DOS PASSOS, Sheila; RUSSO, João Pedro. Decolonizing Visualizations: Anthropology as a Critique of Universalism in Information Design. ILUMINURAS, Porto Alegre, v. 26, n. 71, p. 126–146, 2025. DOI: 10.22456/1984-1191.147278. Disponível em: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/iluminuras/article/view/147278. Acesso em: 11 sep. 2026.