Effectiveness of Polyaxial Clamp-Rod Internal Fixation Method in Distal Femoral Fractures

Experimental Study in a Sheep Model

Authors

  • Nahit Saylak Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Dicle. Diyarbakir, Turkey. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2008-5403
  • Semih Altan Dokuz Eylül University (DEU), İzmir, Turkey.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.152872

Keywords:

sheep, distal femur, CRIF, locking screw, osteosynthesis, experimental model

Abstract

Background: Distal femoral fractures remain a challenging orthopedic condition due to complex regional anatomy and limited availability of suitable implant options for stable fixation. Optimal stabilization must adhere to biological osteosynthesis principles while maintaining rigid mechanical support - particularly in periarticular fractures. The clamp-rod internal fixation (CRIF) system has previously demonstrated satisfactory clinical outcomes; however, the use of conventional cortical screws may predispose to screw loosening and compromised stability. The modified CRIF (M-CRIF) system, redesigned to incorporate polyaxial locking functionality, has the potential to enhance implant stability and improve healing quality. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and clinical performance of the M-CRIF implant compared with the conventional CRIF system in an experimental sheep fracture model.

Materials, Methods & Results: Twelve clinically healthy adult Akkaraman crossbred sheep were randomly assigned to 2 equal groups: Group I (n = 6) treated with standard CRIF and Group II (n = 6) treated with M-CRIF. A standardized supracondylar femoral fracture was created in all subjects, followed by internal fixation according to group allocation. Postoperative monitoring included serial clinical examinations, pain assessment using facial expression and clinical scoring systems, gait and weight-bearing evaluations, vertical force plate analyses, and radiographic examinations on days 0, 3, 7, 14, 28, 45, and 60. On day 60, harvested femurs underwent histopathological assessment of fracture healing characteristics. Intraoperative reduction was achieved in all cases; however, clamp advancement over the bent rod portion was technically more demanding in Group I. Pain scores improved over time in both groups, but Group II showed faster reduction in discomfort, with significant differences observed between early and late time points (P < 0.05). Functional assessments revealed significantly superior gait and weight-bearing in Group II on days 28 and 45 (P < 0.05). Pressure mat data supported these findings, demonstrating higher peak vertical force values in Group II at the same time points (P < 0.05). Radiographic evaluations indicated progressive healing in both groups without significant intergroup differences; however, Group II displayed a more uniform and advanced callus formation pattern. Implant-related complications were limited to 1 case of cortical screw loosening in Group I and one postoperative soft-tissue infection in Group II, the latter resolving without affecting final healing. Histopathological findings revealed nearly complete replacement of cartilage templates by bone, abundant osteoblastic activity, and organized trabecular architecture in both groups, with slightly enhanced tissue remodeling in Group II.

Discussion: The results indicate that incorporation of polyaxial locking screws into the clamp mechanism provides improved construct stability, encourages earlier weight-bearing, and contributes to more consistent functional recovery. Although radiographic outcomes alone were insufficient to discriminate between groups, multidimensional assessment methods - including force plate analysis and clinical scoring - clearly demonstrated the mechanical advantages of the M-CRIF system during the early healing phase. The reduced risk of screw-related complications further supports the superiority of this design in anatomically restricted distal femoral fractures. Considering current trends favoring systems that preserve local vascularity while providing rigid fixation, M-CRIF appears to satisfy both biological and biomechanical requirements more effectively than conventional CRIF.

Keywords: sheep, distal femur, CRIF, locking screw, osteosynthesis, experimental model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1 Beale B. 2004. Orthopedic clinical techniques femur fracture repair. Clinical Techniques in Small Animal Practice.19:134-150. DOI:ORG10.1053/J.CTSAP.2004.09.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ctsap.2004.09.006

2 Berset C.M., Lanker U. & Zeiter S. 2020. Survey on sheep usage in biomedical research. Animals. 10: 1528. DOI.ORG/10.3390/ANİ10091528 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091528

3 Bonin G.A., Baker S.T., Davis C.A., Bergerson C.M., Hildebrandt A.A., Hulse D.A., Kerwin S.C., Moreno M.R. & Saunders W.B. 2014. In vitro biomechanical comparison of 3.5 mm LC-DCP/intramedullary rod and 5 mm clamp-rod internal fixator (CRIF)/intramedullary rod fixation in a canine femoral gap model. Veterinary Surgery. 43: 860-868. DOI.ORG/10.1111/J.1532-950X.2014.12130.X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2014.12130.x

4 Cancedda R., Giannoni P. & Mastrogiacomo M. 2007. A tissue engineering approach to bone repair in large animal models and in clinical practice. Biomaterials. 28: 4240-4250. DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.06.023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.06.023

5 DeCamp C.E. 2015. Femur fracture repair. In: Brinker, Piermattei and Flo’s Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Repair. 5th edn. St. Louis: Elsevier Health Sciences, pp.411-419.

6 Delisser P., McCombe G., Trask R., Etches J., German A., Holden S., Wallace A. & Burton N. 2013. Ex vivo evaluation of the biomechanical effect of varying monocortical screw numbers on a plate-rod canine femoral gap model. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 26: 177-185. DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-12-05-0061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-12-05-0061

7 Field E.J., Parsons K., Etches J.A., Hamilton K. & Burton N.J. 2016. Effect of monocortical and bicortical screw numbers on the properties of a locking plate-intramedullary rod configuration. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 29: 459-465. DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-16-03-0040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-16-03-0040

8 Glowacki J., Bartkowiak T., Paczos P., Mietlinski P., Zawadzki P. & Lapaj L. 2023. Effect of screw angulation and multiple insertions on load-to-failure of polyaxial locking system. Plos One. 18: e0295526. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295526

9 Gündemir O., Alpak H., Erdikmen D.O. & Kaya D.A. 2020. Evaluation of gait character of Akbaş and Kangal shepherd dogs by using pressure-sensitive walkway. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences. 44: 427-434. DOI: 10.3906/vet-1907-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-1911-56

10 Harasen G. 2002. Fractures involving the distal extremity of the femur: Part 2—The mature patient. The Canadian Veterinary Journal. 43: 131.

11 Johnston S.A. & Tobias K.M. 2017. Veterinary Surgery: Small Animal Expert Consult-E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences.

12 Kim J. & Breur G.J. 2008. Temporospatial and kinetic characteristics of sheep walking on a pressure sensing walkway. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research. 72: 50-55.

13 Libardoni R.d.N., Costa D.d., Menezes F.B., Cavalli L.G., Pedrotti L.F., Kohlrausch P.R., Minto B.W. & Silva M.A.M. 2018. Classification, fixation techniques, complications and outcomes of femur fractures in dogs and cats: 61 cases (2015-2016). Ciência Rural. 48. DOI: 10.1590/0103-8478cr20170730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20170028

14 Margolis D.S., Figueroa G., Barron Villalobos E., Smith J.L., Doane C.J., Gonzales D.A. & Szivek J.A. 2022. A large segmental mid-diaphyseal femoral defect sheep model: Surgical technique. Journal of Investigative Surgery. 35: 1287-1295. DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2021.1884934. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2022.2045393

15 Martini L., Fini M., Giavaresi G. & Giardino R. 2001. Sheep model in orthopedic research: A literature review. Comparative Medicine. 51: 292-299.

16 McLennan K.M., Rebelo C.J., Corke M.J., Holmes M.A., Leach M.C. & Constantino-Casas F. 2016. Development of a facial expression scale using footrot and mastitis as models of pain in sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 176: 19-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2016.01.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2016.01.007

17 Moolchand M., Kachiwal A., Soomro S. & Bhutto Z. 2014. Comparison of sedative and analgesic effects of xylazine, detomidine, and medetomidine in sheep. Egyptian Journal of Sheep and Goats Sciences. 9: 1-6.

18 Öztaş E. & Avki S. 2015. Evaluation of acrylic pin external fixation (APEF) system in metacarpal fractures of newborn calves: Cheap but effective? Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 21: 453-460. DOI: 10.9775/kvfd.2014.12325.

19 Peric M., Dumic-Cule I., Grcevic D., Matijasic M., Verbanac D., Paul R., Grgurevic L., Trkulja V., Bagi C.M. & Vukicevic S. 2015. The rational use of animal models in the evaluation of novel bone regenerative therapies. Bone. 70: 73-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.07.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2014.07.010

20 Perren S.M. 1991. The concept of biological plating using the limited contact-dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP). Injury. 22: 1-41. DOI: 10.1016/0020-1383(91)90167-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1383(91)90123-V

21 Reems M.R., Beale B.S. & Hulse D.A. 2003. Use of a plate-rod construct and principles of biological osteosynthesis for repair of diaphyseal fractures in dogs and cats: 47 cases (1994–2001). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 223: 330-335. DOI: 10.2460/javma.2003.223.330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2003.223.330

22 Roberts V.J. & Meeson R.L. 2022. Feline femoral fracture fixation: What are the options? Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery. 24: 442-463. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X211033985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X221090391

23 Seebeck P., Thompson M., Parwani A., Taylor W., Schell H. & Duda G. 2005. Gait evaluation: A tool to monitor bone healing? Clinical Biomechanics. 20: 883-891. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.05.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.05.010

24 Silveira F., Monotti I.C., Cronin A.M., Macdonald N.J., Rutherford S., Tiffinger K., Faux I., Rincon-Alvarez J., Kulendra E. & Tavola F. 2020. Outcome following surgical stabilization of distal diaphyseal and supracondylar femoral fractures in dogs. The Canadian Veterinary Journal. 61: 1073.

25 Tan C. & Johnson K. 2016. Stabilisation of periarticular fractures and osteotomies with a notched head locking T-plate. Australian Veterinary Journal. 94: 377-383. DOI: 10.1111/avj.12489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/avj.12487

26 Yayla S., Altan S., Çatalkaya E., Kanay B.E. & Saylak N. 2022. Evaluation of supracondylar femur fractures in cats: A retrospective study. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Science and Technology. 14: 37-41. DOI: 10.22067/ijvst.2022.77843.

27 Zahn K., Frei R., Wunderle D., Linke B., Schwieger K., Gueorguiev B., Pohler O. & Matis U. 2008. Mechanical properties of 18 different AO bone plates and the clamp-rod internal fixation system tested on a gap model construct. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 21: 185-194. DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-07-04-0038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1617359

28 Zahn K. & Matis U. 2004. The clamp-rod internal fixator application and results in 120 small animal fracture patients. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 17: 110-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1632808

29 Zentrich E., Wassermann L., Struve B., Selke K., Buettner M., Keubler L.M., Reifenrath J., Angrisani N., Kempfert M. & Krause A. 2023. Postoperative severity assessment in sheep. European Surgical Research. 64: 27-36. DOI: 10.1159/000527450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000526058

30 Zurita M. & Craig A. 2022. Feline diaphyseal fractures: Management and treatment options. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery. 24: 662-674. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X221085321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X221106354

Additional Files

Published

2026-02-04

How to Cite

Nahit Saylak, & Semih Altan. (2026). Effectiveness of Polyaxial Clamp-Rod Internal Fixation Method in Distal Femoral Fractures: Experimental Study in a Sheep Model. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae, 54. https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.152872

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.