Triple Antiluxation Patellar Suture Surgery for Medial Patellar Luxation in Dogs - a Pilot Study with Short-Term Outcomes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.154359Keywords:
medial patellar luxation, small-breed dogs, surgery without arthrotomyAbstract
Background: Patellar luxation surgery in dogs is aimed at correction of patellar misalignment in relation to the trochlear groove, stabilization of the joint and tension balance in the peripatellar soft tissues. Timely surgery especially in immature dogs, is essential to shape a trochlear groove of adequate width and depth, to modify abnormal forces on growing bones and prevent long-term joint damage. In dogs up to 2 years of age, soft tissue techniques may be attempted to mitigate the negative effects of the abnormal loading on the developing joint and the potential risk of joint disease associated with arthrotomy and trochleoplasty. Recent advancements in veterinary orthopaedics are focused on the development of less invasive surgical techniques. They not only enhance the return of patients to normal activity levels, but also offer several potential benefits, as smaller incisions, reduced anaesthesia time and blood loss compared to traditional open surgeries. The present pilot study describes a new, less invasive surgical method for treatment of low-grade medial patellar luxation (MPL) in young dogs - the triple antiluxation patellar suture (TAPS) and presents the short-term outcomes on the basis of clinical and diagnostic imaging data.
Materials, Methods & Results: The TAPS surgery was applied in 19 dogs (23 joints) with grade II MPL. The technique does not involve arthrotomy: only the skin, subcutaneous tissue and fascia latae are incised while the joint capsule remained intact. After alignment of the patella in the centre of the trochlear groove, the soft tissues are fixed in 3 points with non-absorbable Mayo sutures arranged in a checkerboard pattern. The results were monitored at the end of the 2nd and 6th postoperative months using the Bologna Healing Stifle Injury Index (BHSII) and computed tomography imaging. The median (IQR) time for the TAPS method was 29 (26-30.75) min. The dogs began to bear weight on the operated leg after median (IQR) 4 (2-4) days. The evaluation of the patients’ condition by the BHSII tool showed a statistically significant increased scores 2 months after surgery in all groups of parameters with exception of the joint stiffness. By the 6th post-operative month, the differences were significant (P < 0.001) for all studied indicators. The greatest improvement occurred in the parameters assessed visually (gait, lameness) - by 71.5% compared to the preoperative period. The limb function scores increased by 26.3% on the 2nd month and by 47.4% on the 6th month.
Discussion: Apart the lower risk of postoperative infection, the short TAPS surgery time, respectively the short time under anaesthesia is especially suited for juvenile and young patients as the immaturity of their hepatic and renal systems associated with slower drug metabolism and elimination poses specific risks from prolonged effect of anaesthetics. One of the main advantages of the presented operative technique is that it is less invasive as the joint remains intact. That is probably the cause for the substantially earlier beginning of weight bearing with the operated leg - on the 4th post-operative day. Although trochleoplasty was not performed in our study, the rate of reluxation was relatively moderate. This may be due to the fact that all dogs had grade II MPL, weighed less than 5 kg; moreover, although shallower, the trochlear groove morphology was preserved. The reluxation rate is comparable to that obtained in dogs treated with arthroscopic fascia imbrication without trochleoplasty. The presented surgical technique can be suitable for correction of intermittent MPL in dogs with trochlear groove shallower than normal but with preserved trochlear morphology due to the short recovery period and the lack of some risks associated with open joint surgery (e.g. infection).
Keywords: medial patellar luxation, small-breed dogs, surgery without arthrotomy.
Downloads
References
1 Arthurs G.I. & Langley-Hobbs S.J. 2006. Complications associated with corrective surgery for patellar luxation in 109 dogs. Veterinary Surgery. 35(6): 559-566. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2006.00189.x.
2 Ballatori C., Modenato M. & Sbrana S. 2005. Comparison of trochlear block recession and trochlear wedge recession in four dogs with bilateral patellar luxation. Annali della Facoltà di medicina veterinaria di Pisa. 58: 295-303.
3 Bosio F., Bufalari A., Peirone B., Petazzon M. & Vezzoni A. 2017. Prevalence, treatment and outcome of patellar luxation in dogs in Italy. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 30(5): 364-370. DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-16-05-0073.
4 Brattstrom H. 1964. Shape of the intercondylar groove normally and in recurrent dislocation of patella: A clinical and X-ray anatomical investigation. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 68 (Suppl. 68): 11-48.
5 Browe B.E., Kowalesk M.P., Peruski A.M., Pozzi A., Dyce J., Johnson K.A. & Boudrieau R.J. 2017. Distal femoral lateral closing wedge osteotomy as a component of comprehensive treatment of medial patellar luxation and distal femoral varus in dogs. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 30(1): 20-27. DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-16-07-0103
6 Candela Andrade M., Slunsky P., Klass L. & Brunnberg L. 2020. Risk factors and long-term surgical outcome of patellar luxation and concomitant cranial cruciate ligament rupture in small breed dogs. Veterinarni Medizina (Praha). 65(4): 159-167. DOI: 10.17221/155/2019-VETMED.
7 Carrera A.L.C., Minto B.W., Curuci E.H.P., Paula C.G., Jassniker J.B. & Cunha O. 2024. Early surgical management of medial patellar luxation in juvenile dogs. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 37(3): 156-161. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1777347.
8 Cashmore R.G., Havlicek M., Perkins N.R., James D.R., Fearnside S.M., Marchevsky A.M. & Black A.P. 2014. Major complications and risk factors associated with surgical correction of congenital medial patellar luxation in 124 dogs. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 27(4): 263-270. DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-13-08-0100
9 Choi H., Kim S., Han C., Jang A., Jung H., Hwang T., Lee H.C., Hwang Y.H., Lee W.J., Lee S.L. & Lee J.H. 2018. Surgical correction of medial patellar luxation including release of vastus medialis without trochleoplasty in small breed dogs: a retrospective review of 22 cases. Journal of Veterinary Clinics. 35(3): 71-76. DOI: 10.17555/jvc.2018.06.35.3.71.
10 Cunha A.F. 2015. Neonatal, pediatric, and geriatric concerns. In: Snyder L.B.C. & Johnson R.A. (Eds). Canine and Feline Anesthesia and Co-existing Disease. Ames: Wiley Blackwell, pp.310-319.
11 Denny H.R. & Butterworth S.J. 2000. The stifle. In: A Guide to Canine and Feline Orthopedic Surgery. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, pp.517-525.
12 Garnoeva R.S. 2019. Comparative studies on canine patellar luxation. PhD thesis, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Trakia University, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria.
13 Grubb T.L., Perez Jimenez T.E. & Pettifer G.R. 2015. Neonatal and pediatric patients. In: Grimm K.A., Lamont L.A, Tranquilli W.J., Greene S.A. & Robertson S.A. (Eds). Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia. Ames: Wiley Blackwell, pp.983-987.
14 Harasen G. 2006. Patellar luxation. Canadian Veterinary Journal. 47(10): 817-818.
15 Jervan M., Szlosek D.A., Friis H., Coyne M.J., DeNicola D. & Johnsen O.H. 2020. Characterization of C-reactive protein in dogs undergoing medial patellar luxation surgery. PLoS One. 15(5): e0231445. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231445.
16 Kowaleski M.P., Boudrieau R.J. & Pozzi A. 2012. Stifle joint. In: Tobias K.M. & Johnston S.A. (Eds). Veterinary Surgery: Small Animal, St. Louis: Elsevier Saunders, pp.973-988.
17 Laurin C.A., Levesque H.P., Dussault R., Labelle H. & Peides J.P. 1978. The abnormal lateral patellofemoral angle: A diagnostic roentgenographic sign of recurrent patellar subluxation. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 60(1): 55-60.
18 L’Eplattenier H. & Montavon P. 2002. Patellar luxation in dogs and cats: Management and prevention. Compendium on Continuing Education for The Practicing Veterinarian. 24(4): 292-298.
19 Longo F. & Pozzi A. 2024. Early experience with arthroscopic imbrication in dogs with patellar luxation: a case series in 8 dogs. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 37(05): S111-S142. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1791295.
20 Mckechnie D. 2025. Determining clinically significant patient change with effect sizes: considerations for clinicians and researchers. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing. 42(2): 43-53. DOI: 10.37464/2025.422.1949
21 Perry K.L., Adams R.J., Andrews S.J., Tewson C. & Bruce M. 2017. Impact of femoral varus on complications and outcome associated with corrective surgery for medial patellar luxation. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 30: 288-298.
22 Perry K.L. & Déjardin L.M. 2021. Canine medial patellar luxation. Journal of Small Animal Practice. 62(5): 315-335. DOI: 10.1111/jsap.13311
23 Pfirrmann C.W., Zanetti M., Romero J. & Hodler J. 2000. Femoral trochlear dysplasia: MR findings. Radiology. 216(3): 858-864. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00se38858
24 Pinna S., Lambertini C., Grassato L. & Romagnoli N. 2019. Evidence-based veterinary medicine: a tool for evaluating the healing process after surgical treatment for cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 6: 65. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00065
25 Rossanese M., German A.J., Comerford E., Pettitt R., Tomlinson A. & de Vicente F. 2019. Complications following surgical correction of medial patellar luxation in small-to-medium-size dogs. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 32(4): 332-340. DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1683872.
26 Roush J.K. 1993. Canine patellar luxation. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice. 23(4): 855-868. DOI: 10.1016/s0195-5616(93)50087-6.
27 Schmökel H.G., Stein S., Radke H., Hurter K. & Schawalder P. 2007. Treatment of tibial fractures with plates using minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis in dogs and cats. Journal of Small Animal Practice. 48(3): 157-160. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2006.00260.x.
28 Singleton W.B. 1969. The surgical correction of stifle deformities in the dog. Journal of Small Animal Practice. 10(2): 59-69. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1969.tb04021.x
29 Stanke N.J., Stephenson N. & Hayashi K. 2014. Retrospective risk factor assessment for complication following tibial tuberosity transposition in 137 canine stifles with medial patellar luxation. Canadian Veterinary Journal. 55(4): 349-356.
30 Swiderski J.K., Radecki S.V., Park R.D. & Palmer R.H. 2008. Comparison of radiographic and anatomic femoral varus angle measurements in normal dogs. Veterinary Surgery. 37(1): 43-48. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2007.00347.x
31 Treuting R. 2000. Minimally invasive orthopedic surgery: arthroscopy. Ochsner Journal. 2(3): 158-163.
32 Velich N., Vidoni B., Ludewig E., Tichy A. & Schnabl-Feichter E. 2025. Comparative radiographic analysis of trochleoplasties for patellar luxation correction: inter-observer agreement of a modified osteoarthritis scoring system. Animals (Basel.) 15(11): 1639. DOI: 10.3390/ani15111639.
33 Vodnarek J., Schneider E., Bockstahler B. & Schnabl-Feichter E. 2024. Outcome of surgical correction of medial patellar luxation in dogs weighing less than 10 kg. The Veterinary Record. 194(8): e3994. DOI: 10.1002/vetr.3994.
34 Wangdee C., Theyse L.F.H., Techakumphu M., Soontornvipart K. & Hazewinkel H.A.W. 2013. Evaluation of surgical treatment of medial patellar luxation in Pomeranian dogs. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 26(6): 435-439. DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-12-11-0138.
35 Willauer C.C. & Vasseur P.B. 1987. Clinical results of surgical correction of medial luxation of the patella in dogs. Veterinary Surgery. 16(1): 31-36. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1987.tb00910.x.
36 Yoon D.Y., Kang B.J., Kim Y., Lee S.H., Rhew D., Kim W.H. & Kweon O.K. 2015. Degenerative joint disease after medial patellar luxation repair in dogs with or without trochleoplasty. Journal of Veterinary Clinics. 32(1): 22-27. DOI: 10.17555/jvc.2014.02.32.1.22.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Radka Stayova Garnoeva

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides open access to all of its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Such access is associated with increased readership and increased citation of an author's work. For more information on this approach, see the Public Knowledge Project and Directory of Open Access Journals.
We define open access journals as journals that use a funding model that does not charge readers or their institutions for access. From the BOAI definition of "open access" we take the right of users to "read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles" as mandatory for a journal to be included in the directory.
La Red y Portal Iberoamericano de Revistas Científicas de Veterinaria de Libre Acceso reúne a las principales publicaciones científicas editadas en España, Portugal, Latino América y otros países del ámbito latino