The Foramen Magnum in the Chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera) - Computed Tomography and Anatomical Study

Authors

  • Omer Gurkan Dilek Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Turkey. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5717-3928
  • Erdi Topuz Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Turkey. https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0096-8281
  • Gülcihan Aybike Dilek Kart Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Turkey. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3815-0138
  • Rosen Dimitrov Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Turkey.
  • Kamelia Stamatova-Yovcheva Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Turkey.
  • Mehmet Ersen Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Turkey. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5999-9195
  • David Yovchev Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Turkey. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4357-0858
  • Emine Karakurum Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Turkey. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3324-3271

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.146870

Keywords:

chinchilla lanigera, computed tomography, foramen magnum, morphometry

Abstract

Background: The foramen magnum (FM) is a crucial anatomical aperture situated in the occipital bone, forming the primary communication between the cranial cavity and the vertebral canal. It transmits critical neurovascular structures, including the medulla spinalis, vertebral arteries, spinal accessory nerves, and associated meninges. Morphological and morphometric analysis of the FM is essential for various disciplines including clinical neurology, veterinary neuroanatomy, forensic anthropology, and surgical planning. In contrast to well-documented FM data in humans and domestic species, available literature on exotic species, particularly Chinchilla lanigera, is remarkably limited. The current study aims to fill this knowledge gap by offering detailed CT-based morphometric data on the FM in chinchillas, thereby contributing a novel anatomical reference for this species.

Materials and Methods & Results: The study was conducted on 12 clinically healthy, 18-month-old adult C. lanigera specimens (6 males, 6 females), each weighing approximately 0.6 kg. Animals were housed under controlled conditions with a 12:12 h light-dark cycle and received a standard pellet diet and water ad libitum. CT imaging was performed under anesthesia induced by intramuscular administration of Zoletil® 50 (15 mg/kg). Imaging was carried out using a Toshiba Alexion 16-slice CT scanner with standardized parameters. The following parameters were measured from axial, sagittal, and coronal slices: transverse diameter (TD), anteroposterior diameter (AP), foramen magnum area (FMA), and foramen magnum index (FMI). The mean AP in males was 6.15 ± 0.62 mm, TD was 6.35 ± 0.59 mm, and FMA was 0.3176 ± 0.028 cm². In females, AP was 6.12 ± 0.66 mm, TD was 6.37 ± 0.61 mm, and FMA was 0.311 ± 0.0257 cm². FMI values were 103.25 ± 0.93 (males) and 104.08 ± 0.89 (females). No statistically significant sex-based differences were observed (P > 0.05).

Discussion: This is the 1st study to provide CT-based morphometric data of the FM in Chinchilla lanigera. The results show no significant sexual dimorphism in FM dimensions, which contrasts with findings in humans, cats, and some non-human primates where male-female differences are marked. The observed anatomical uniformity in chinchillas may be reflective of limited intraspecific cranial variation. Similar findings have been noted in camels and certain canine breeds where sex-based osteometric differences are also minimal. While in human studies the FMI often aids in sex estimation, in this study, FMI showed no discriminatory value between male and female chinchillas. These findings suggest that FM metrics are not reliable indicators of sex in this species. Nonetheless, the data provide a critical baseline for clinical applications involving neurological diagnostics, radiologic assessments, and surgical procedures in exotic rodents. Furthermore, FM morphology may be relevant for interpreting evolutionary trends in skull base organization among hystricomorph rodents. This study establishes reference values for FM morphometry in C. lanigera, contributing essential data for veterinary anatomical databases and clinical practice. Future studies incorporating different age groups, pathological samples, and 3D volumetric reconstruction methods may offer further insight into the developmental, functional, and evolutionary aspects of the foramen magnum in exotic and laboratory rodents.

Keywords: Chinchilla lanigera, computed tomography, foramen magnum, morphometry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1 Ahern J.C. & McCollum M. 2005. Foramen magnum position variation in Pan troglodytes, Plio-Pleistocene hominids, and recent Homo sapiens: Implications for recognizing the earliest hominids. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 127: 267-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20082

2 Akbaş Z.S., Duro S., Yalın E.E., Gündemir O., Özkan E. & Szara T. 2023. Detection of sexual dimorphism of the foramen magnum in cats using computed tomography. Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia. 52: 595-602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ahe.12920

3 Anderson P., Yong R., Surman T., Rajion Z. & Ranjitkar S. 2014. Application of three-dimensional computed tomography in craniofacial clinical practice and research. Australian Dental Journal. 59: 174-185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12154

4 Avci E., Dağtekin A., Öztürk A.H., Engin K.A.R.A., Ozturk N.C., Kutluay U. L.U.C. & Baskaya M.K. 2011. Anatomical variations of the foramen magnum, occipital condyle, and jugular tubercle. Turkish Neurosurgery. 20: 307-313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.3838-10.1

5 Bodon G., Choi P.J., Iwanaga J. & Tubbs R.S. 2017. The atlanto-occipital joint: A concise review of its anatomy and injury. Anatomy. 11: 141-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2399/ana.17.046

6 Dasegowda G., Padmalatha K., Priyanka B.P. & Mirmire S. 2020. Morphology and morphometric analysis of foramen magnum in adult human skulls. International Journal of Anatomy Research. 8: 7771-7776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2020.212

7 Devadas P., Rao M.J., Yesender M. & Shiny Vinila B.H. 2017. Study on the morphometric analysis of the foramen magnum as an indicator for sex determination. International Journal of Anatomy Research. 5: 4163-4167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2017.274

8 Dilek Ö.G., Dimitrov R., Stamatova-Yovcheva K., Ersen M., Yovchev D., Sabancı S.S. & Karakurum E. 2024. Computed tomography and three-dimensional anatomical study of the liver in the chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera). Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia. 53: e13025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ahe.13025

9 Gathe N.F. & Bansod P.S. 2024. Sex determination and clinical importance of foramen magnum on basis of its morphometrical analysis in adult human dry skull in tribal region of Central India. Global Journal of Research Analysis. 7: 7-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36106/gjra/3600362

10 Karakurum E., Dimitrov R., Stamatova-Yovcheva K., Ersen M. & Dilek O. G. 2024. Anatomical computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging architecture of the kidneys in the chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera). Indian Journal of Animal Research. 58: 785-790.

11 Kumar A., Dave M. & Anwar S. 2015. Morphometric evaluation of foramen magnum in dry human skulls. International Journal of Anatomy Research. 3: 1015-1023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2015.154

12 Loftus J.R., Wassef C. & Ellika S. 2024. Chiari I deformity: Beyond 5 mm below the foramen magnum. Radiographics. 44: 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.230227

13 Mikkelsen E., Lauridsen H., Nielsen P.M., Qi H., Nørlinger T., Andersen, M. D., Ulbjerg N., Lausten C., Sandager P. & Pedersen M. 2017. The chinchilla as a novel animal model of pregnancy. Royal Society Open Science. 4: 161098. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.161098

14 Mishra S., Gupta P. & Prasad H. 2023. Clinical significance of morphological and morphometrical analysis of foramen magnum. Journal of Anatomical Sciences. 31: 132-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46351/jas.v31i2pp132-140

15 Mishra S., Gupta P. & Prasad H. 2024. Clinical significance of morphological and morphometrical analysis of foramen magnum. Journal of Anatomical Sciences. 32: 18-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46351/jas.v32i1pp18-26

16 Onar V., Pazvant G., İnce N.G., Alpak H., Janeczek M. & Kızıltan Z. 2013. Morphometric analysis of the foramen magnum of Byzantine dogs excavated in Istanbul Yenikapi at the site of Theodosius Harbour. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry. 13: 1-9.

17 Potdar A.K.P., Singh K. & Dhakar J.S. 2019. Comparative study of foramen magnum in dry cadaveric skull and 3D CT images. SSR Institute International Journal of Life Science. 5: 2372-2378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21276/SSR-IIJLS.2019.5.5.1

18 Potdar P., Kumar A., Singh K. & Dhakar J.S. 2020. A study of foramen magnum and its clinical relevance. Santosh University Journal of Health Sciences. 5: 72-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18231/j.sujhs.2019.015

19 Rocha P.V.P., Pedroza R.H.S., Oliveira V.F., Ribeiro R.M., Carioca L.C., Silva R.S. & Miranda J.A. 2022. Morphometric analysis of the foramen magnum in a Brazilian population. FASEB Journal. 36: R3052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.2022.36.S1.R3052

20 Rohinidevi M. & Vimala V. 2016. Morphometric analysis of foramen magnum and variations in its shape in dried human adult skulls: An original article. International Journal of Anatomy Research. 4: 2670-2673. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2016.298

21 Sahoo S. & Panda S.K. 2015. Morphometric analysis of the foramen magnum and the occipital condyles. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research. 33: 1-8.

22 Sandeep A., Sharma S.K., Siddiqui S.W. & Khatri S. 2017. Morphometry and surgical importance of foramen magnum. International Journal of Anatomy Research. 5: 3464-3469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2016.367

23 Sharma D.K. & Mehra S. 2018. Foramen magnum: A morphological and morphometric study in dried human skull bones of Rajasthan population and its surgical importance. Journal of Mahatma Gandhi University of Medical Sciences and Technology. 3: 41-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10057-0075

24 Tambawala S.S., Karjodkar F.R., Sansare K., Prakash N. & Dora A.C. 2016. Sexual dimorphism of foramen magnum using cone beam computed tomography. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 44: 29-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2016.08.005

25 Uysal S., Gokharman D., Kaçar M., Tuncbilek I. & Kosar U. 2005. Estimation of sex by 3D CT measurements of the foramen magnum. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 50: 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS2005058

26 Yahaya A., Olopade J.O. & Kwari H.D. 2013. Morphological analysis and osteometry of the foramen magnum of the one-humped camel (Camelus dromedarius). Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia. 42: 155-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0264.2012.01178.x

Additional Files

Published

2025-09-07

How to Cite

Dilek, O. G., Topuz, E., Dilek Kart, G. A., Dimitrov, R., Stamatova-Yovcheva, K., Ersen, M., … Karakurum, E. (2025). The Foramen Magnum in the Chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera) - Computed Tomography and Anatomical Study. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae, 53. https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.146870

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.