Bilateral Femoral Intraosseous Transcutaneous Amputation Prosthesis (ITAP) in a Cat
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.145883Keywords:
Osseointegration, limb sparing, orthopedics, endo-exo prosthesis, surgeryAbstract
Background: Intraosseous transcutaneous amputation prosthesis (ITAP) is a limb-salvage technique that involves anchoring an implant to the bone, enabling external prosthetic attachment via osseointegration. This approach offers an alternative to traditional amputation by preserving skeletal support and functional integration. Despite its increasing use in human medicine, ITAPs have been scarcely studied in veterinary practice, and no standardized guidelines exist for implant selection, considering the anatomical variability among species and breeds. This case report describes the successful application of ITAP in a cat following severe complications from bilateral femoral osteosynthesis, with a 27-month follow-up.
Case: A 1-year-old male cat, missing for 54 days, returned home with bilateral Salter-Harris type I femoral fractures. The patient underwent multiple unsuccessful surgical attempts, leading to complications such as contamination, bacterial resistance, Rush pin migration, plate exposure, osteomyelitis, and the need for muscle and skin flap reconstruction. Given the failure of all limb-preserving options, ITAP placement in the bilateral femoral diaphysis was proposed as an alternative to total limb amputation, aiming to restore independence and mobility. Preoperative planning involved computed tomography (CT) imaging, with Radiant® software used for image segmentation, bone viability assessment, and osteotomy height determination. A custom-designed titanium intramedullary implant was developed using CAD software. The surgical procedure was uneventful, and the patient was hospitalized for three days for postoperative monitoring. Fifteen days postoperatively, skin dehiscence and implant exposure were observed in the left femur. A revision surgery was performed, including implant coverage, bacterial culture, copious Betadine® lavage, and wound closure with 2-0 nylon sutures for the musculature and 3-0 for the skin. Enterococcus faecium was identified, and a three-week course of compounded marbofloxacin was prescribed, leading to complete wound healing without further complications.
Discussion: The failure of prior fracture management necessitated the use of ITAP as an alternative to bilateral femoral amputation, ultimately resulting in excellent adaptation and quality of life. This case highlights the potential of osseointegrated implants in veterinary patients, demonstrating that ITAP can provide a durable and functional limb-salvage solution. The implant was designed with a fully intramedullary titanium structure to promote osseointegration, ensuring long-term biomechanical stability. A key feature was the inclusion of an anti-rotational locking pin to counteract rotational forces that could compromise implant integrity and prosthetic function. One of the major challenges in ITAP application is dermal integration, which is crucial to preventing ascending infection and soft tissue breakdown. Poor skin adherence to the implant can lead to complications such as infection, retraction, implant exposure, and mechanical failure, as reported in similar cases. The necessity for surgical revision in this patient underscores the importance of meticulous implant design and strict postoperative wound management. Long-term implant success also relies heavily on owner compliance, as proactive care and infection monitoring are essential to maintaining functionality and preventing complications. ITAP offers a functional alternative to total limb amputation by preserving biomechanics, restoring mobility, and improving quality of life. After 27 months, the patient showed no signs of implant failure or mobility impairment. Continued advancements in implant technology and surgical techniques will be essential to optimizing ITAP outcomes and expanding its application in veterinary medicine.
Keywords: Osseointegration, limb sparing, orthopedics, endo-exo prosthesis, surgery.
Downloads
References
1 Boylan M.T., Boston S.E., Townsend S. & Cavalcanti J.V.J. 2019. Limb-shortening limb salvage (LSLS) in a cat with metatarsal osteosarcoma. Canadian Veterinary Journal. 60(7): 757-761.
2 Brånemark P.I., Adell R., Breine U., Hansson B.O., Lindström J. & Ohlsson A. 1969. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 3(2): 81-100. DOI: 10.3109/02844316909036699. PMID: 4924041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/02844316909036699
3 Dickerson V.M., Coleman K.D., Ogawa M., Saba C.F., Cornell K.K., Radlinsky M.G. & Schmiedt C.W. 2015. Outcomes of dogs undergoing limb amputation, owner satisfaction with limb amputation procedures, and owner perceptions regarding postsurgical adaptation: 64 cases (2005-2012). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 247(7): 786-792. DOI: 10.2460/javma.247.7.786. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.247.7.786
4 Drygas K.A., Taylor R., Sidebotham C.G., Hugate R.R. & McAlexander H. 2008. Transcutaneous tibial implants: a surgical procedure for restoring ambulation after amputation of the distal aspect of the tibia in a dog. Veterinary Surgery. 37(4): 322-327. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2008.00384.x. PMID: 18564255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2008.00384.x
5 Ephraim P.L., Dillingham T.R., Sector M., Pezzin L.E. & Mackenzie E.J. 2003. Epidemiology of limb loss and congenital limb deficiency: a review of the literature. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 84(5): 747-761. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(02)04932-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(03)04932-8
6 Faria L.G. & Rocha T.A.S.S. 2022. Orthoses and Prostheses. In: Minto B. W. & Dias L. G.G.G. (Eds). Treatise on Orthopedics for Dogs and Cats. São Paulo: Medvet, pp.464-481.
7 Fitzpatrick N., Smith T.J., Pendegrass C.J., Yeadon R., Ring M., Goodship A.E. & Blunn G.W. 2011. Intraosseous transcutaneous amputation prosthesis (ITAP) for limb salvage in 4 dogs. Veterinary Surgery. 40(8): 909-925. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2011.00891.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2011.00891.x
8 Golachowski A., Al Ghabri M.R., Golachowska B., Al Abri H., Lubak M. & Sujeta M. 2019. Implantation of an Intraosseous Transcutaneous Amputation Prosthesis Restoring Ambulation After Amputation of the Distal Aspect of the Left Tibia in an Arabian Tahr (Arabitragus jayakari). Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 11(6): 182. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00182
9 Gorshkov S.S., Ulanova N.V. & Manuilova V.V. 2017. Percutaneous osseointegrated limb prosthetics in dogs and cats after partial amputation based on a series of clinical cases/Percutaneous osseointegrated limb prosthetics in dogs and cats after partial amputation based on a series of clinical cases. Veterinary Pharma Magazine. 4: 38.
10 Gorshkov S.S. & Ulanova N.V. 2019. Interactive Traumatology and Orthopedics of Children Animals. Moscou: Scientific Library, pp.438-508.
11 Hagberg K. & Brånemark R. 2009. One hundred patients treated with osseointegrated transfemoral amputation prostheses--rehabilitation perspective. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 46(3): 331-344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2008.06.0080
12 Kang N.V., Pendegrass C., Marks L. & Blunn G. 2010. Osseocutaneous Integration of an Intraosseous Transcutaneous Amputation Prosthesis Implant Used for Reconstruction of a Transhumeral Amputee: Case Report. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 35(7): 1130-1134. DOI:10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.03.037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.03.037
13 Kirpensteijn J, van den Bos R. & Endenburg N. 1999. Adaptation of dogs to the amputation of a limb and their owners' satisfaction with the procedure. Veterinary Record. 144(5): 115-118. DOI: 10.1136/vr.144.5.115. PMID: 10070700. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.144.5.115
14 Kneringer C. & Schnabl-Feichter E. 2024. Intraosseous Transcutaneous Amputation Prosthesis (ITAP) compared to Exoprosthesis in veterinary medicine - a literature review. Veterinary Practice. 52(6): 359-366. DOI: 10.1055/a-2453-6622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2453-6622
15 Li Y. & Felländer-Tsai L. 2021. The bone anchored prostheses for amputees - Historical development, current status, and future aspects. Biomaterials. 273: 120836. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120836. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120836
16 Lundborg G., Brånemark P.I. & Rosén B. 1996. Osseointegrated thumb prostheses: a concept for fixation of digit prosthetic devices. Journal of Hand Surgery American Volume. 21(2): 216-221. DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(96)80103-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-5023(96)80103-1
17 Marcellin-Little D.J., Drum M.G., Levine D. & McDonald S.S. 2015. Orthoses and exoprostheses for companion animals Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice. 45(1): 167-183. DOI: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2014.09.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2014.09.009
18 Mendonça A.G.C, Braga V.A.A., Fernandes T.H.T., Oliveira G.C.R. & Beraldo G.S. 2023. Fixed bilateral endo-exo prostheses in feline femur - case report / Endo-exoprótese bilateral fixa em fêmur de felino - relato de caso. Brazilian Archives of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science. 75(1): 107-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-12661
19 Mendonça A.G. & Fernandes T.H.T. 2019. Exoprótese fixa em rádio de cão: relato de caso. Revista Nosso Clínico. 22(127): 12-16.
20 Meng M., Wang J., Sun T., Zhang W., Zhang J., Shu L. & Li Z. 2022. Clinical applications and prospects of 3D printing guide templates in orthopaedics. Journal of Orthopaedic Translation. 13(34): 22-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2022.03.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2022.03.001
21 Mich P.M. 2014. The emerging role of veterinary orthotics and prosthetics (V-OP) in small animal rehabilitation and pain management. Topics in Companion Animal Medicine. 29(1): 10-19. DOI: 10.1053/j.tcam.2014.04.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.tcam.2014.04.002
22 Pendegrass C.J., Goodship A.E. & Blunn G.W. 2006. Development of a soft tissue seal around bone-anchored transcutaneous amputation prostheses. Biomaterials. 27(23): 4183-4191. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.03.041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.03.041
23 Pendegrass C.J., Goodship A.E., Price J.S. & Blunn G.W. 2006. Nature's answer to breaching the skin barrier: an innovative development for amputees. Journal of Anatomy. 209(1): 59-67. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00595.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00595.x
24 St Jean G. 1996. Amputation and prosthesis. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice. 12(1): 249-261. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-0720(15)30446-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-0720(15)30446-1
25 Timercan A., Brailovski V., Petit Y., Lussier B. & Séguin B. 2019. Personalized 3D-printed endoprostheses for limb sparing in dogs: Modeling and in vitro testing. Medical Engineering & Physics. 71: 17-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.07.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.07.005
26 Wendland T.M., Seguin B. & Duerr F.M. 2023. Prospective evaluation of canine partial limb amputation with socket prostheses. Veterinary Medicine and Science. 9: 1521-1533. DOI:10.1002/vms3.1146 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.1146
27 Ziegler-Graham K., MacKenzie E.J., Ephraim P.L., Travison T.G. & Brookmeyer R. 2008. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 89(3): 422-429. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.005
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Itallo Barros de Freitas, Gilberto Serighelli Júnior, Adriana Marks, Milena Hauer Anfilo, Danielle Buch, Vanessa Wotkoski Benoni, Jéssica Gonçalves Clock, Peterson Triches Dornbuch

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides open access to all of its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Such access is associated with increased readership and increased citation of an author's work. For more information on this approach, see the Public Knowledge Project and Directory of Open Access Journals.
We define open access journals as journals that use a funding model that does not charge readers or their institutions for access. From the BOAI definition of "open access" we take the right of users to "read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles" as mandatory for a journal to be included in the directory.
La Red y Portal Iberoamericano de Revistas Científicas de Veterinaria de Libre Acceso reúne a las principales publicaciones científicas editadas en España, Portugal, Latino América y otros países del ámbito latino