Privatizando subjetividades: como a Nova Gestão Pública (NGP) está criando o “novo” profissional da educação


  • Gary Anderson



Políticas Públicas Educacionais, Nova Gestão Pública, meritocracia.


Este estudo apresenta uma análise crítica de como o ensino e a gestão vem sendo rearticulada pelas políticas neoliberais e pelas práticas da nova gestão política. Analisa essas mudanças nos setores sociais e compara com políticas internacionais. Essas novas organizações flexíveis fazem parte de um crescente modelo de negócios neoliberal que alguns teóricos sociais atribuem uma inautenticidade crescente nas organizações (Sennett, 1998), desenvolvem maior flexibilidade para responder aos mercados e não para satisfazer as necessidades humanas daqueles que trabalham neles. O estudo concluiu que o modelo concorrencial de gestão escolar não está mudando apenas o que os profissionais fazem, mas sim quem eles são. A concorrência está reconstruindo suas próprias identidades, tanto pessoais como profissionais.


Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Gary Anderson

Professor na Universidade de Nova York.


Achinstein, B., & Ogawa, R. (2006). (In) fidelity: What the resistance of new teachers reveals about professional principles and prescriptive educational policies. Harvard educational review, 76(1), 30-63.

Adamson, F., Astrad, B. Darling-Hammond, L. (2016). Global educational reform: How privatization and public investment influence education outcomes. New York: Routledge.

Anderson, G.L. & Montoro Donchik, L. (2015) The Privatization of education and policy-making: The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) and network governance in the United States. Educational Policy. Online First.

Apple, M. W., &Jungck, S. (1992). You don't have to be a teacher to teach this unit: Teaching, technology and control in the classroom. In A. Hargreaves & M. Fullan (Eds.), Understanding teacher development (pp. 20-42). New York: Teachers College Press.

Au, W. (2011). Teaching under the new Taylorism: high-stakes testing and the standardization of the 21st century curriculum, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 25-45.

Baker, B. (Sept. 9, 2017). Reality check: Trends in school finance. School Finance 101.

Ball, S. (2001). Performativities and fabrications in the education economy: Towards the performative society. In D. Gleason & C. Husbands (Eds.), The performing school: Managing, teaching and learning in a performance culture (pp. 210–226). London: Routledge/Falmer.

Ball, S. and Junemann, C. (2012). Networks, new governance and education. Chicago: Policy Press.

Barker, J. (1993). Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 408-437.

Barton, P. E., & Coley, R. J. (2010). The Black-White Achievement Gap: When Progress Stopped. Policy Information Report. Educational Testing Service.

Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. New Delhi: Sage.

Biesta, G. (2007). Why “what works” won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1-22.

Boggs, C. (2001). The End of Politics. New York: Guilford Press.

Bottery, M. (1996). The challenge to professionals from the New Public Management: Implications for the teaching profession. Oxford Review of Education, 22(2), 179-197.

Brown, E &Makris, M.V. (2017): A different type of charterschool: in prestige charters, a rise in cachet equals a decline in access, Journal of Education Policy,DOI: 10.1080/02680939.2017.1341552

Burch, P. (2009). Hidden markets: The new education privatization. New York: Routledge.

Burch, P. (2014). Equal Scrutiny: Privatization and accountability in digital education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

Burris, V. (2008). The interlock structure of the policy-planning network and the right turn in U.S. state policy. Research in Political Sociology, 17, 1-35.

Coleman, J., Campbell, E., Hobson, C. and McPartland, J. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Convertina, C. (2017). State disinvestment, technologies of choice and ‘fitting in’: Neoliberal transformations in U.S. public education. Journal of Education Policy, 32(6),832-854.

Cohen, M. (2013). In the back of our minds always’: reflexivity as resistance for the performing principal. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1-22.

Crawford, J. (June, 6, 2007). A Diminished Vision of Civil Rights: No Child Left Behind and the growing divide in how educational equity is understood. Education Week, 26(39), 31,40.

Denhardt J. &Denhardt, R. (2011). The new public service: Serving, nor steering. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

DiPaola, M. &Tschannen-Moran, M. (2005).Bridging or buffering? The impact of schools’ adaptive strategies on student achievement. The Journal of Educational Administration, 43(1), 60-71.

Driscoll, M.E. (1998). Professionalism versus Community: Is the Conflict between School and Community about to Be Resolved?. Peabody Journal of Education, 73(1), 89-127.

Evetts, J. (2009). New professionalism and New Public Management: Changes, continuities, and consequences. Comparative Sociology, 8, 247-266.

Evetts, J. (2011). A new professionalism? Challenges and opportunities. Current Sociology, 59(4), 406-422.

Exworthy, M., &Halford, S. (1999). Professionals and the new managerialism in the public sector. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Fang, L. (Aug. 9, 2017). Sphere of influence: How American libertarians are remaking Latin American politics. The Intercept.

Fenwick, T. (2016). Professional responsibility and professionalism: A sociomaterial examination. New York: Routledge.

Fisher, M. (2009). Capitalist realism: Is there no alternative? Hants, UK: Zero Books.

Foster, W. (1986). Paradigms and promises: New approaches to educational administration. Buffalo: Prometheus Books.

Foucault, M. (1991) [1978]. “Governmentality”, Lecture at the College de France, Feb. 1, 1978. In G. Burchell, C. Gorden& P. Miller (Eds.) The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Frankenberg, E., Siegel-Hawley, G., & Wang, J. (2011). Choice without equity: Charter school segregation. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 19 (1).

Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic. Cambridge: Polity

Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Friedrich, D. (2014). "We brought it on ourselves": University-based teacher education and the emergence of boot-camp-style routes to teacher certification. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(2), 21.

Gates, B. (Feb. 28, 2011). How teacher development could revolutionize our schools. Washington Post.

Gonzalez, N., Moll, L, Amanti, C. (2005). Funds of knowledge: theorizing practices in households and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Green, T. (2015). Leading for urban school reform and community development. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(5), 679-711.

Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Honig, M. & Rainey, L. (2012). Autonomy and school improvement: What do we know and where do we go from here? Educational Policy, 26(2), 465-495.

Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69, 3-19.

Jarl, M., Fredrikson, A. &Persson, S. (2011). New public management in public education: A catalyst for the professionalization of Swedish school principals. Public Administration. 90(2), 429-444.

Keil, R. (2009). The urban politics of roll-with-it neoliberalization, City, 13(2-3), 231-245.

Kickert, W. (1995). Steering at a distance: A new paradigm of public governance in Dutch higher education. Governance, 8(1), 135-157.

Koyama, J. (2014). Principals as bricoleurs: Making sense and making do in an era of accountability. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(2), 279-304.

Lakoff, G. (2008). The political mind: Why you can't understand 21st-century politics with an 18th-century brain. New York: Viking.

Levine, A. (2006). Educating school teachers. Princeton, N.J.: The Education Schools Project.

Meier, D. (1995). The Power of their ideas. Boston: Beacon Press.

Meyer, H. & Rowan, B. (2006). Institutional analysis and the study of education. In H. Meyer & B. Rowan (Eds.). The new institutionalism in education (pp. 1-14) Albany: SUNY Press.

Milstein, M. (1990). Plateauing as an occupational phenomenon among teachers and administrators. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 3(4), 325-336.

Mungal, A.S. (2016). Teach For America, Relay Graduate School, and the charter school networks: The making of a parallel education structure. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(17).

Payne, C. (2008). So much reform. So little change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.

Putnam, R. D., Frederick, C. B., &Snellman, K. (2012). Growing class gaps in social connectedness among American youth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School of Government.

Reardon, S. (May, 2013). The widening income achievement gap. Educational Leadership, 70(8), 10-16.

Robertson, S., Verger, A., Mundy, K., &Menashy, F. (Eds.) (2014). Public private partnerships in education: New actors and modes of governance in a globalizing world.Cheltonham, UK: Edward Edgar Pub.

Rogers, (2006), 110 Livingston Street: Politics and bureaucracy in New York City school system. Clinton Corners, NY: Eliot Werner Pub.

Rose, N. (1993). Government, authority, and expertise in advanced liberalism. Economy and Society, 22(3), 283-300.

Sahlberg, P. (2015). Finnish lessons, 2.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? New York: Teachers College Press.

Scott, J. (2009). The politics of venture philanthropy in charter school policy and advocacy. Educational Policy,23 (1), 106-136.

Scott, J. (2011). Market-driven education reform and the racial politics of advocacy. Peabody Journal of Education, 86, 580-599.

Selwyn, N. (2011). ‘It’s all about standardization’--Exploring the digital (re)configuration of school management and administration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(4), 473-488.

Sennett, R. (2006). The culture of the new capitalism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Sennett, R. (1998). The corrosion of character: The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. New York: Norton.

Shipps, D. (2012). Empowered or Beleaguered? Principals’ Accountability Under New York City’s Diverse Provider Regime. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20(1).

Shipps, D. and White, M. (2009) A new politics of the principalship? Accountability-driven change in New York City.Peabody Journal of Education, 84(3), 350-373.

Smith Richards, J. (2006, Oct. 22). Cheating is up — among teachers Pressure for state-test success driving some to break the rules The Columbus Dispatch, p. 4.

Solbrekke, T. &Sugrue, C. (2014). Professional accreditation of initial teacher education programs: Teacher educators’ strategies –between ‘accountability’ and ‘responsibility’, Teaching and teacher education, 37, 11-20.

Stillman, J. (2011). Teacher learning in an era of high-stakes accountability: Productive tension and critical professional practice. Teachers College Record, 113(1), 133-180.

Strathern, M. (Ed.) (2000). Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics, and the academy. London: Routledge.

Taylor, M. (2006). From Pinochet to the ‘third way’: Neoliberalism and social transformation in Chile. London: Pluto Press.

Trujillo, T. (2014). The modern cult of efficiency: Intermediary organizations and the new scientific management. Educational Policy, 28(2), 207-232.

Valli, L. & D. Buese. (2007). The changing roles of teachers in an era of high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 519-558.

Verger, A., Lubienski, C. & Steiner-Khamsi, G. (Eds.) (2016). World yearbook of education, 2016: The global education industry. London: Routledge.

Ward, S. (2011). The machinations of managerialism: New public management and the diminishing power of professionals. Journal of Cultural Economy, 4(2), 205-215.

Weick, K. (1976). Organizations as loosely-coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly. 21(1), 1-19.

Welch, A.R. (1998). The cult of efficiency in education: Comparative reflections on the reality and the rhetoric. Comparative Education, 34(2), 157-175.




Como Citar

Anderson, G. (2017). Privatizando subjetividades: como a Nova Gestão Pública (NGP) está criando o “novo” profissional da educação. Revista Brasileira De Política E Administração Da Educação - Periódico científico Editado Pela ANPAE, 33(3), 593–626.



Dossiê: A Nova Gestão Pública no contexto escolar: internacionalização de uma agenda para a educação do século XXI