Electoral punishment and creative accounting in mayors’ elections (2004-2016)

Authors

  • Maria Augusta Teixeira de Oliveira Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
  • Marjorie Corrêa Marona Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-5269.88960

Keywords:

Accountability, Elections, Corruption.

Abstract

The main purpose of this work is to measure the effect of "creative accounting" in mayoral election. We want to measure the effect of creative accounting judged by Tribunal de Contas da União (TCU) in elections. Our unit of analysis are the mayoral elections between 2004-2016. We look for agents with creative accounting judged by TCU, whether they hold public office or not. As control variables we used campaign finance, incumbent or not, party switching, population size and per capita income. Using a logistic regression, we try to estimate the effect of one or more independent variables in a dependent binary variable. Our results indicated that 35% of candidates responsible for creative accounting were elected. The model also indicates that between challenger and incumbent with creative accounting, incumbents have more chances to be reelected than challengers have to win.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Maria Augusta Teixeira de Oliveira, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

Graduada em Ciências Sociais pela Universidade Federal de Alagoas. Mestre em Ciência Política pela Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Doutoranda em Ciência Política pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.

Published

2019-08-28

How to Cite

Oliveira, M. A. T. de, & Marona, M. C. (2019). Electoral punishment and creative accounting in mayors’ elections (2004-2016). Revista Debates, 13(2), 113–137. https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-5269.88960

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.