Viabilidade econômica e ambiental do uso de resíduos suínos para a produção de biogás e hidrogênio: uma revisão sistemática da literatura

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22456/1983-8026.156138

Palavras-chave:

Biogás, Hidrogênio, Resíduos Suínos, Viabilidade Econômica, Viabilidade Ambiental

Resumo

A crescente demanda por geração sustentável e manejo de resíduos impulsiona tecnologias que convertem dejetos suínos em biogás e hidrogênio. Este trabalho realiza uma revisão sistemática para avaliar a viabilidade econômica e ambiental dessas rotas. A análise identificou a digestão anaeróbia como principal tecnologia para biogás, enquanto a fermentação escura e a gaseificação destacam-se para o hidrogênio. Do ponto de vista econômico, a viabilidade depende da escala, incentivos públicos, venda de subprodutos e modelos de cogeração ou purificação. Ambientalmente, ambas as rotas mitigam gases de efeito estufa e reduzem os impactos do descarte de resíduos. Contudo, altos custos iniciais, limitações tecnológicas e gargalos logísticos ainda limitam a ampla adoção. Conclui-se apontando oportunidades para pesquisas futuras em otimização de processos, políticas públicas e modelos de negócios sustentáveis.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Gabriela Valter Santin, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)

Possui graduação em Engenharia de Produção pelo Instituto Federal de Santa Catarina(2023), especialização em Gestão de projetos: Fundamentos, Metodologias e Ferramentas pela Universidade Comunitária da Região de Chapecó(2024) e ensino-medio-segundo-graupela E.E.B. Professora Adelina Régis(2013). Atualmente está cursando mestrado na Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) em Engenharia de Produção pelo PPGEP.

Caroline Rodrigues Vaz, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)

Atualmente Professora Adjunta do Departamento de Engenharia de Produção e Sistemas e docente permanente do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de Produção, da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Campus Florianópolis. Pós-Doutora (PNPD/CAPES) pelo Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de Produção, área Gestão das Operações (2016 - 2018) e Doutora em Engenharia de Produção (CNPq) pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (2016). Realizou o Doutorado Sanduíche (PDSE/CAPES) na Ecolé Nationale d'Engenieurs de Tarbes (ENIT) França (2013). Possui Mestrado em Engenharia de Produção (2010), Especialização em Educação Científica e Tecnológica (2008), Especialização em Gestão Industrial: Produção e Manutenção (2009) e graduação em Tecnologia em Alimentos (2007), pela Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná. É líder do grupo de pesquisa SINERGIA - Sustentabilidade e Inovação nas Energias Renováveis da UFSC. Participa como pesquisadora no Núcleo de Gestão e Sustentabilidade (NGS/UFSC) e no grupo ''Desarrollo empresarial, gestión del conocimiento e innovación'' da Universidad de Lima, Peru. As suas áreas de pesquisas são: Sustentabilidade, Eco-Inovação, Energias Renováveis e Logística Reversa. Trabalha fortemente com análise de revisão de literatura estruturadas, tais como: bibliometria, cientometria e análise de conteúdo. Tem publicado em periódicos de alto impacto tais como: Journal of Cleaner Production, Sustainability e IEEE Latin America Transitions. E tem apresentado o resultado de suas pesquisas em Congressos Nacionais e Internacionais. Além, de publicar livros e capítulos de livros nas áreas de pesquisa.

Mauricio Uriona Maldonado, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)

Mauricio Uriona Maldonado é Professor Associado no Departamento de Engenharia de Produção e Sistemas da UFSC e docente permanente do Programa de Pós-graduação em Engenharia de Produção da mesma instituição. A sua área de atuação centra-se no estudo de políticas energéticas, planejamento energético e fontes alternativas de energia nos Setores Elétrico e de Transportes. Para o período 2022-2025 ocupou a posição de Professor Associado Extra-Ordinário no Departament of Industrial Engineering da University of Stellenbosch (África do Sul). O Prof. Mauricio é Doutor e Mestre em Engenharia e Gestão do Conhecimento - UFSC com co-supervisão pela Duke University (EUA) e graduação em Engenharia Industrial pela Escuela Militar de Ingenieria (Bolívia). Realizou cursos de atualização nas área de simulação (dinâmica de sistemas), energias renováveis e economia da energia no Massachussetts Institute of Technology (MIT) e na área de ciência, tecnologia e inovação na University of Tampere (Finlândia). Mauricio teve experiência como consultor em gestão da inovação da Federação da Indústrias de Santa Catarina (FIESC), participou em projetos nos setores de Energia, Software e Telecom financiados pela The Degrees Initiative, FAPESC, 7th Framework Programme da União Europeia, GIZ, DAAD, CNPq e CAPES. Também foi professor visitante no Centro ALGORITMI da Universidade do Minho (Portugal), Universidad Militar Nueva Granada (Colômbia), Universidad Nacional del Sur (Argentina), Universität Bremen (Alemanha), University of Tampere (Finlândia), Universidad Autonoma de Madrid (Espanha). As pesquisas do Prof. Mauricio têm sido publicadas em journals internacionais de prestígio e apresentadas em conferências nacionais e internacionais.

Referências

ADNANE, I. et al. Valorization of crop residues and animal wastes: Anaerobic co-digestion technology. Heliyon, v. 10, n. 5, p. e26440, 15 mar. 2024.

ANKATHI, S. K. et al. Sustainability of Biogas Production from Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste and Animal Manure. Applied Microbiology, v. 4, n. 1, p. 418–438, 21 fev. 2024.

AVACI, A. B. et al. Financial economic scenario for the microgeneration of electric energy from swine culture-originated biogas. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 25, p. 272–276, 1 set. 2013.

AWOGBEMI, O.; OJO, A. A.; ADELEYE, S. A. Advanced Thermochemical Conversion Approaches for Green Hydrogen Production from Crop Residues. Journal of Renewable Materials, v. 12, n. 1, p. 1, 1 jan. 2024.

BHATT, A. H.; TAO, L. Economic Perspectives of Biogas Production via Anaerobic Digestion. Bioengineering, v. 7, n. 3, p. 74, 14 jul. 2020.

BOEKER, M.; VACH, W.; MOTSCHALL, E. Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough. BMC Medical Research Methodology, v. 13, n. 1, p. 131, 26 out. 2013.

BOLDRIN, A. et al. Optimised biogas production from the co-digestion of sugar beet with pig slurry: Integrating energy, GHG and economic accounting. Energy, v. 112, p. 606–617, 1 out. 2016.

BONMATÍ, A. et al. Study of thermal hydrolysis as a pretreatment to mesophilic anaerobic digestion of pig slurry. Water Science and Technology. Anais...IWA Publishing, 2001.

BONMATÍ, A.; CAMPOS, E.; FLOTATS, X. Concentration of pig slurry by evaporation: Anaerobic digestion as the key process. Water Science and Technology. Anais...IWA Publishing, 2003.

CASTRO E SILVA, H. L. DE et al. Lab-scale and economic analysis of biogas production from swine manure. Renewable Energy, v. 186, p. 350–365, 1 mar. 2022.

CHATELLARD, L. et al. Trends and challenges in biohydrogen production from agricultural waste. In: Biohydrogen Production: Sustainability of Current Technology and Future Perspective. Springer India, 2016. p. 69–95.

CHETAWAN, W. et al. Practical approaches for retrofitting plug flow digester and process control to maximize hydrolysis and methane yield from piggery waste. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, v. 9, n. 4, p. 105620, 1 ago. 2021.

CÓRDOVA, M. E. H. et al. Analysis of viable biogas production from anaerobic digestion of swine manure with the magnetite powder addition. Environmental Technology & Innovation, v. 25, p. 102207, 1 fev. 2022.

DENG, C. et al. Economic viability of two-stage biohydrogen and biomethane production from cassava stillage residue focusing on solids content and pretreatment. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, v. 52, p. 110–121, 2 jan. 2024.

ELLACURIAGA, M.; GARCÍA-CASCALLANA, J.; GÓMEZ, X. Biogas Production from Organic Wastes: Integrating Concepts of Circular Economy. Fuels, v. 2, n. 2, p. 144–167, 29 abr. 2021.

FERRARESI DE ARAUJO, G. J.; WALTER BORGES DE OLIVEIRA, S. V. Economic, energetic and environmental analysis of the utilization of swine manure in Brazil: Opportunities and challenges. Energy Strategy Reviews, v. 47, p. 101089, 1 maio 2023.

FERREIRA, A. et al. Combining biotechnology with circular bioeconomy: From poultry, swine, cattle, brewery, dairy and urban wastewaters to biohydrogen. Environmental Research, v. 164, p. 32–38, 1 jul. 2018.

GONZÁLEZ-FERNÁNDEZ, C.; MOLINUEVO-SALCES, B.; GARCÍA-GONZÁLEZ, M. C. Evaluation of anaerobic codigestion of microalgal biomass and swine manure via response surface methodology. Applied Energy, v. 88, n. 10, p. 3448–3453, 1 out. 2011.

GONZÁLEZ-GONZÁLEZ, A. et al. Energy-environmental benefits and economic feasibility of anaerobic codigestion of Iberian pig slaughterhouse and tomato industry wastes in Extremadura (Spain). Bioresource Technology, v. 136, p. 109–116, 1 maio 2013.

HADDAWAY, N. R. et al. The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching. PLOS ONE, v. 10, n. 9, p. e0138237, 17 set. 2015.

HOLLAS, C. E. et al. Life cycle assessment of waste management from the Brazilian pig chain residues in two perspectives: Electricity and biomethane production. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 354, p. 131654, 20 jun. 2022.

HU, Y. Y. et al. Study of an enhanced dry anaerobic digestion of swine manure: Performance and microbial community property. Bioresource Technology, v. 282, p. 353–360, 1 jun. 2019.

HUANG, W. et al. Low-temperature hydrothermal pretreatment followed by dry anaerobic digestion: A sustainable strategy for manure waste management regarding energy recovery and nutrients availability. Waste Management, v. 70, p. 255–262, 1 dez. 2017.

HUANG, W. et al. Enhancing hydrogenotrophic activities by zero-valent iron addition as an effective method to improve sulfadiazine removal during anaerobic digestion of swine manure. Bioresource Technology, v. 294, p. 122178, 1 dez. 2019.

IGLIŃSKI, B. et al. Agricultural biogas plants in Poland: Investment process, economical and environmental aspects, biogas potential. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 16, n. 7, p. 4890–4900, 1 set. 2012.

IPIALES, R. P. et al. Swine manure management by hydrothermal carbonization: Comparative study of batch and continuous operation. Environmental Research, v. 245, p. 118062, 15 mar. 2024.

JAIN, R. et al. Bio-hydrogen production through dark fermentation: an overview. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, 1 jun. 2024.

JIANG, Y. et al. Improved environmental sustainability and bioenergy recovery through pig manure and food waste on-farm co-digestion in Ireland. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 280, p. 125034, 20 jan. 2021.

JOANNA BRIGGS INSTITUTE, Checklist for Analytical Cross Sectional Studies Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross Sectional Studies 2 .Disponível em: <http://joannabriggs.org/research/critical-appraisal-tools.htmlwww.joannabriggs.org>.

JOHNSON, N. Fueling a Sustainable Future: Surmounting Challenges And Expanding The Frontisers Of Biogas Generation From Pig Slurry. 12 jan. 2024.

LI, Y. et al. Feasibility of biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of herbal-extraction residues with swine manure. Bioresource Technology, v. 102, n. 11, p. 6458–6463, 1 jun. 2011.

LIN, H. C. et al. Enhanced biomethane production with a low carbon footprint via anaerobic co-digestion of swine wastewater with rice husk. Science of The Total Environment, v. 891, p. 164612, 15 set. 2023.

LIN, K. S. et al. Hydrogen generation by gasification of pig hair biowaste over NiO/Al2O3 nanocatalyst. Materials Today Sustainability, v. 24, p. 100495, 1 dez. 2023.

LOCKWOOD, C.; PORRITT, K.; MUNN, Z.; RIGGINS, R. Systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. In: AROMATARIS, E.; MUNN, Z. (ed.). Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer’s Manual. Adelaide: Joanna Briggs Institute, 2017.

LUCA CANTO, G. DE et al. Revisões sistemáticas da literatura: guia prático. Revisões sistemáticas da literatura: guia prático, 2020.

LUNA-DELRISCO, M. et al. Geospatial analysis of hydrogen production from biogas derived from residual biomass in the dairy cattle and porcine subsectors in Antioquia, Colombia. Renewable Energy Focus, v. 50, p. 100591, 1 set. 2024.

LYMPERATOU, A. et al. Improving the Anaerobic Digestion of Swine Manure through an Optimized Ammonia Treatment: Process Performance, Digestate and Techno-Economic Aspects. Energies, v. 14, n. 3, p. 787, 2 fev. 2021.

MACHHIRAKE, N. P. et al. Biohydrogen from waste feedstocks: An energy opportunity for decarbonization in developing countries. Environmental Research, v. 252, p. 119028, 1 jul. 2024.

MADEIRA, J. G. F. et al. Hydrogen production from swine manure biogas via steam reforming of methane (SRM) and water gas shift (WGS): A ecological, technical, and economic analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, v. 46, n. 13, p. 8961–8971, 19 fev. 2021.

MARTÍNEZ-RAMÓN, N. et al. Life-cycle assessment of hydrogen produced through chemical looping dry reforming of biogas. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, v. 78, p. 373–381, 12 ago. 2024.

MARTINS, F. M.; OLIVEIRA, P. A. V. DE. Economic analysis of the generation of electric energy from biogas in pig production. Engenharia Agrícola, v. 31, n. 3, p. 477–486, 2011.

MASSÉ, D. I.; RAJAGOPAL, R.; SINGH, G. Technical and operational feasibility of psychrophilic anaerobic digestion biotechnology for processing ammonia-rich waste. Applied Energy, v. 120, p. 49–55, 1 maio 2014.

MASSIGNAN, C.; STEFANI, C. M.; CANTO, G. L. Introdução à análise do risco de viés em revisões sistemáticas. In: CANTO, G. L.; STEFANI, C. M.; MASSIGNAN, C. (org.). Risco de viés em revisões sistemáticas: guia prático. Florianópolis: Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Baseadas em Evidências – COBE UFSC, 2021. Cap. 1. Disponível em: https://guiariscodeviescobe.paginas.ufsc.br/capitulo-1-introducao/. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2026.

MENEZES LIMA, J. A. et al. Techno-economic and performance evaluation of energy production by anaerobic digestion in Brazil: bovine, swine and poultry slaughterhouse effluents. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 277, p. 123332, 20 dez. 2020.

MICHAILIDOU, I. et al. Enhancing Biogas Production: An Assessment of Pasteurization Effects on Poultry, Swine, Bovine Manure and Food Waste Substrates. Sustainability, v. 16, n. 16, p. 7130, 20 ago. 2024a.

MICHAILIDOU, I. et al. Enhancing Biogas Production: An Assessment of Pasteurization Effects on Poultry, Swine, Bovine Manure and Food Waste Substrates. Sustainability, v. 16, n. 16, p. 7130, 20 ago. 2024b.

MYERS, G. M. et al. Cost Assessment of Centralizing Swine Manure and Corn Stover Co-Digestion Systems. Energies, v. 16, n. 11, p. 4315, 1 jun. 2023.

NAKASHIMA, R. N.; JUNIOR, S. O. Trade-offs between productivity, efficiency and costs of biogas plants for agriculture wastes. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EFFICIENCY, COST, OPTIMIZATION, SIMULATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF ENERGY SYSTEMS, 34., 2021. Proceedings [...]. ECOS 2021 Program Organizer, 2021.

PALOMAR, C. R. et al. Ozonation as Pretreatment of Digested Swine Manure Prior to Microalgae Culture. Water (Switzerland), v. 16, n. 12, p. 1740, 1 jun. 2024.

PARAMESWARAN, P.; RITTMANN, B. E. Feasibility of anaerobic co-digestion of pig waste and paper sludge. Bioresource Technology, v. 124, p. 163–168, 1 nov. 2012.

PINTO, J. A. et al. Study of the anaerobic co-digestion of bovine and swine manure: Technical and economic feasibility analysis. Cleaner Waste Systems, v. 5, p. 100097, 1 ago. 2023.

POSSO, F.; SIGUENCIA, J.; NARVÁEZ, R. Residual biomass-based hydrogen production: Potential and possible uses in Ecuador. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, v. 45, n. 26, p. 13717–13725, 11 maio 2020.

RAJAGOPAL, R. et al. Combined anaerobic and activated sludge anoxic/oxic treatment for piggery wastewater. Bioresource Technology, v. 102, n. 3, p. 2185–2192, 1 fev. 2011.

ROCHA-MENESES, L. et al. An Overview of the Socio-Economic, Technological, and Environmental Opportunities and Challenges for Renewable Energy Generation from Residual Biomass: A Case Study of Biogas Production in Colombia. Energies, v. 16, n. 16, p. 5901, 9 ago. 2023.

SAHOTA, S.; KUMAR, S.; LOMBARDI, L. Biohythane, Biogas, and Biohydrogen Production from Food Waste: Recent Advancements, Technical Bottlenecks, and Prospects. Energies, v. 17, n. 3, p. 666, 30 jan. 2024.

SALOMON, K. R.; SILVA LORA, E. E. Estimate of the electric energy generating potential for different sources of biogas in Brazil. Biomass and Bioenergy, v. 33, n. 9, p. 1101–1107, 1 set. 2009.

SHAMSEER, L. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ, v. 349, 2 jan. 2015.

SHI, B. et al. Opportunities for centralized regional mode of manure and sewage management in pig farming: The evidence from environmental and economic performance. Waste Management, v. 170, p. 240–251, 1 out. 2023.

SHIH, M. F. et al. Exploring the environmental and economic potential for biogas production from swine manure wastewater by life cycle assessment. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, v. 25, n. 2, p. 451–464, 1 mar. 2023.

VRIEZE, J. DE et al. Resource recovery from pig manure via an integrated approach: A technical and economic assessment for full-scale applications. Bioresource Technology, v. 272, p. 582–593, 1 jan. 2019.

WIJAYASEKERA, S. C. et al. Waste-to-hydrogen technologies: A critical review of techno-economic and socio-environmental sustainability. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, v. 47, n. 9, p. 5842–5870, 29 jan. 2022.

WIJESINGHE, D. T. N. et al. Developing an anaerobic digester with external Zeolite filled column for enhancing methane production from swine manure–A feasibility study. Journal of Environmental Science and Health - Part B Pesticides, Food Contaminants, and Agricultural Wastes, v. 53, n. 11, p. 751–760, 2 nov. 2018.

WODOŁAŻSKI, A.; MAGDZIARCZYK, M.; SMOLIŃSKI, A. Techno-Economic Analysis of Hydrogen Production from Swine Manure Biogas via Steam Reforming in Pilot-Scale Installation. Energies, v. 16, n. 17, p. 6389, 3 set. 2023.

WORAWIMUT, C. et al. Performance evaluation of biogas upgrading systems from swine farm to biomethane production for renewable hydrogen source. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, v. 44, n. 41, p. 23135–23148, 30 ago. 2019.

XU, J.; DESHUSSES, M. A. Fermentation of swine wastewater-derived duckweed for biohydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, v. 40, n. 22, p. 7028–7036, 15 jun. 2015.

ZHANG, Q. et al. Biological fermentation pilot-scale systems and evaluation for commercial viability towards sustainable biohydrogen production. Nature Communications, v. 15, n. 1, p. 1–12, 28 maio 2024.

ZHU, J. et al. Swine manure fermentation for hydrogen production. Bioresource Technology, v. 100, n. 22, p. 5472–5477, 1 nov. 2009.

Downloads

Publicado

2026-11-02