Multi-criteria decision-making for equipment selection: A review focused on the triple bottom line
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22456/1983-8026.133285Palavras-chave:
Equipment selection, Decision-making, MCDM, Sustainability, EnvironmentResumo
The selection of equipment is a fundamental decision for the business’s future. Several methodologies have been proposed to assist in this kind of decision, one of them being the Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods. However, over the years, new themes have gained strength such as Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG), and Circular Economy (CE). This study’s objective to identify the main multicriteria methods that are applied in equipment selection, and to recognize how researchers incorporate sustainability concepts are incorporated in decision-making regarding equipment selection. A systematic review of the literature was conducted using the Methodi Ordinatio to rank the articles. The Bibliometrix tool was used for bibliometric analysis. The results demonstrate low concern with sustainability in the decision-making process in equipment selection. It was identified that the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method was the most used method in equipment selection, appearing in more than half of the analyzed articles (24 studies). To better integrate MCDM decisions, the authors intend to study a multicriteria model through the sustainable approach.
Downloads
Referências
ABDELKAREEM, Mohammad Ali et al. Environmental aspects of fuel cells: A review. Science of The Total Environment, v. 752, p. 141803, 2021.
AFIF, Karima; REBOLLEDO, Claudia; ROY, Jacques. Drivers, barriers and performance outcomes of sustainable packaging: a systematic literature review. British Food Journal, v. 124, n. 3, p. 915-935, 2022.
AKRAM, Muhammad; ARSHAD, Maham. Ranking of trapezoidal bipolar fuzzy information system based on total ordering. Applied Mathematics E-Notes, v. 19, p. 292-309, 2019.
ALOINI, Davide; DULMIN, Riccardo; MININNO, Valeria. A peer IF-TOPSIS based decision support system for packaging machine selection. Expert Systems with Applications, v. 41, n. 5, p. 2157-2165, 2014.
ALPAY, Serafettin; IPHAR, Melih. Equipment selection based on two different fuzzy multi criteria decision making methods: Fuzzy TOPSIS and fuzzy VIKOR. Open Geosciences, v. 10, n. 1, p. 661-677, 2018.
ARIA, Massimo; CUCCURULLO, Corrado. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics, v. 11, n. 4, p. 959-975, 2017.
AYAĞ, Zeki; ÖZDEMIR, Rifat Gürcan. A fuzzy AHP approach to evaluating machine tool alternatives. Journal of intelligent manufacturing, v. 17, p. 179-190, 2006.
BAG, Surajit et al. Procurement 4.0 and its implications on business process performance in a circular economy. Resources, conservation and recycling, v. 152, p. 104502, 2020.
BASÍLIO, Marcio Pereira et al. A systematic review of the applications of multi-criteria decision aid methods (1977–2022). Electronics, v. 11, n. 11, p. 1720, 2022.
BAZZAZI, Abbas Aghajani; OSANLOO, Morteza; KARIMI, Behrooz. Deriving preference order of open pit mines equipment through MADM methods: Application of modified VIKOR method. Expert Systems with Applications, v. 38, n. 3, p. 2550-2556, 2011.
BISCAIA, Ricardo Vinícius Bubna; JUNIOR, Aldo Braghini; COLMENERO, João Carlos. Selection of projects for automotive assembly structures using a hybrid method composed of the group-input compatible, best-worst method for criteria weighting and TrBF-TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, v. 184, p. 115557, 2021.
CAMCI, Alper; TEMUR, Gül Tekin; BESKESE, Ahmet. CNC router selection for SMEs in woodwork manufacturing using hesitant fuzzy AHP method. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, v. 31, n. 4, p. 529-549, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-01-2018-0017
CHAKRABORTY, Shankar; BANIK, Debabrata. Design of a material handling equipment selection model using analytic hierarchy process. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, v. 28, p. 1237-1245, 2006.
CHAN, F. T. S.; CHAN, M. H.; TANG, N. K. H. Evaluation methodologies for technology selection. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, v. 107, n. 1-3, p. 330-337, 2000.
CHAN, F. T. S.; IP, R. W. L.; LAU, H. Integration of expert system with analytic hierarchy process for the design of material handling equipment selection system. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, v. 116, n. 2-3, p. 137-145, 2001.
JABBOUR, Charbel Jose Chiappetta et al. First-mover firms in the transition towards the sharing economy in metallic natural resource-intensive industries: Implications for the circular economy and emerging industry 4.0 technologies. Resources policy, v. 66, p. 101596, 2020.
CEGAN, Jeffrey C. et al. Trends and applications of multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: literature review. Environment Systems and Decisions, v. 37, p. 123-133, 2017.
CIOCA, Lucian-Ionel; BREAZ, Radu-Eugen; RACZ, Sever-Gabriel. Reducing the risks during the purchase of five-axis CNC machining centers using AHP method and fuzzy systems. Sustainability, v. 11, n. 2, p. 315, 2019.
CRAWLEY, Michael J. The R book. John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
DAĞDEVIREN, Metin; YÜKSEL, İhsan. Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behavior-based safety management. Information sciences, v. 178, n. 6, p. 1717-1733, 2008.
DAĞDEVIREN, Metin; YAVUZ, Serkan; KILINÇ, Nevzat. Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment. Expert systems with applications, v. 36, n. 4, p. 8143-8151, 2009.
ĐALIĆ, Irena et al. A novel integrated fuzzy PIPRECIA–interval rough SAW model: Green supplier selection. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, v. 3, n. 1, p. 126-145, 2020.
DELESPOSTE, Jamile Eleutério et al. Use of multicriteria decision aid methods in the context of sustainable innovations: bibliometrics, applications and trends. Environment Systems and Decisions, v. 41, n. 4, p. 501-522, 2021.
DE WEERDT, Loïc et al. The effect of waste incineration taxation on industrial plastic waste generation: A panel analysis. Resources, conservation and recycling, v. 157, p. 104717, 2020.
EFE, Burak. Fuzzy cognitive map based quality function deployment approach for dishwasher machine selection. Applied Soft Computing, v. 83, p. 105660, 2019.
ERSOY, Yusuf. Equipment selection for an e-commerce company using entropy-based topsis, edas and codas methods during the COVID-19. LogForum, v. 17, n. 3, 2021.
ERTUĞRUL, İrfan; ÖZTAŞ, Tayfun. The application of sewing machine selection with the multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis method (MOORA) in apparel sector. Textile and Apparel, v. 25, n. 1, p. 80-85, 2015.
GARCÍA, Silvia et al. Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and adherence to Mediterranean diet in an adult population: the Mediterranean diet index as a pollution level index. Environmental Health, v. 22, n. 1, p. 1, 2023.
GOLDENBERG, Marat; SHAPIRA, Aviad. Systematic evaluation of construction equipment alternatives: case study. Journal of construction engineering and management, v. 133, n. 1, p. 72-85, 2007.
GOSWAMI, Shankha Shubhra; BEHERA, Dhiren Kumar. Solving material handling equipment selection problems in an industry with the help of entropy integrated COPRAS and ARAS MCDM techniques. Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability, v. 5, n. 4, p. 947-973, 2021.
GOUMAS, MetVLYGEROU; LYGEROU, V. An extension of the PROMETHEE method for decision making in fuzzy environment: Ranking of alternative energy exploitation projects. European Journal of Operational Research, v. 123, n. 3, p. 606-613, 2000.
HAFEZALKOTOB, Ashkan et al. A decision support system for agricultural machines and equipment selection: A case study on olive harvester machines. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, v. 148, p. 207-216, 2018.
HORŇÁKOVÁ, Natália et al. AHP method application in selection of appropriate material handling equipment in selected industrial enterprise. Wireless Networks, v. 27, n. 3, p. 1683-1691, 2021.
HUARACHI, Diego Alexis Ramos et al. Life cycle assessment of traditional and alternative bricks: A review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 80, p. 106335, 2020.
HUTAHAEAN, Junko; CILLIERS, Jan; BRITO-PARADA, Pablo R. A multicriteria decision framework for the selection of biomass separation equipment. Chemical Engineering & Technology, v. 41, n. 12, p. 2346-2357, 2018.
JENKINS, Donald J.; KEISLER, Jeffrey M. A decision analytic tool for corporate strategic sustainable energy purchases. Environment Systems and Decisions, p. 1-17, 2022.
KABAK, Mehmet; DAGDEVIREN, Metin. A hybrid approach based on ANP and grey relational analysis for machine selection. Tehnicki Vjesnik-Technical Gazette, v. 24, 2017.
KAMISSOKO, Daouda; ZARATÉ, Pascale; PÉRÈS, François. Decision process in large-scale crisis management. Environment Systems and Decisions, v. 34, p. 277-287, 2014.
KARABASEVIC, Darjan et al. An approach to personnel selection in the IT industry based on the EDAS method. Transformations in Business & Economics, v. 17, p. 54-65, 2018.
KASOVIĆ, Mario et al. How Different Load Carriage Scenarios Impact the Gait in Police Officers. Applied Sciences, v. 13, n. 1, p. 144, 2022.
KERŠULIENE, Violeta; ZAVADSKAS, Edmundas Kazimieras; TURSKIS, Zenonas. Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). Journal of business economics and management, v. 11, n. 2, p. 243-258, 2010.
KESHAVARZ GHORABAEE, Mehdi et al. Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS). Informatica, v. 26, n. 3, p. 435-451, 2015.
KESHAVARZ GHORABAEE, Mehdi et al. A new combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method for multi-criteria decision-making. Economic Computation & Economic Cybernetics Studies & Research, v. 50, n. 3, 2016.
KHARLAMOV, Oleg; CHUKARIN, Alexander; FINOCHENKO, Tatiana. Processes of Noise Generation of Gear Hobbing Machines at Transport Engineering Enterprises. In: Networked Control Systems for Connected and Automated Vehicles: Volume 1. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. p. 423-430.
DRAGAN KRSTIĆ, Mladen et al. Intermodal terminal handling equipment selection using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model. Promet-Traffic&Transportation, v. 31, n. 1, p. 89-100, 2019.
KOSKO, Bart. Fuzzy cognitive maps. International journal of man-machine studies, v. 24, n. 1, p. 65-75, 1986.
KULAK, Osman; DURMUŞOĞLU, M. Bülent; KAHRAMAN, Cengiz. Fuzzy multi-attribute equipment selection based on information axiom. Journal of materials processing technology, v. 169, n. 3, p. 337-345, 2005.
KUMAR, Abhishek et al. A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 69, p. 596-609, 2017.
LASHGARI, Ali et al. Equipment selection using fuzzy multi criteria decision making model: key study of Gole Gohar iron min. Engineering economics, v. 23, n. 2, p. 125-136, 2012.
LE BLANC, D. The sustainable development goals as a network of targets. Monitoring and Evaluation NEWS. Sustainable Development, v. 23, n. 3, p. 176-187. 2015.
LIU, Xin et al. Service-oriented bi-objective robust collection-disassembly problem with equipment selection. International Journal of Production Research, v. 59, n. 6, p. 1676-1690, 2021.
LU, Haonan et al. Selection of agricultural machinery based on improved CRITIC-entropy weight and GRA-TOPSIS method. Processes, v. 10, n. 2, p. 266, 2022.
MARCHER, Carmen; GIUSTI, Andrea; MATT, Dominik T. On the design of a decision support system for robotic equipment adoption in construction processes. Applied Sciences, v. 11, n. 23, p. 11415, 2021.
MARDANI, Abbas et al. Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications–a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, v. 28, n. 1, p. 516-571, 2015.
MATHEW, Manoj; SAHU, Sagar. Comparison of new multi-criteria decision making methods for material handling equipment selection. Management Science Letters, v. 8, n. 3, p. 139-150, 2018.
MONGEON, Philippe; PAUL-HUS, Adèle. The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, v. 106, p. 213-228, 2016.
ONAT, Nuri C.; KUCUKVAR, Murat. A systematic review on sustainability assessment of electric vehicles: Knowledge gaps and future perspectives. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 97, p. 106867, 2022.
ONUT, Semih; KARA, Selin Soner; MERT, Sinan. Selecting the suitable material handling equipment in the presence of vagueness. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, v. 44, n. 7-8, p. 818-828, 2009.
OPON, Joel; HENRY, Michael. A multicriteria analytical framework for sustainability evaluation under methodological uncertainties. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 83, p. 106403, 2020.
OTT, Denise et al. LCA as decision support tool in the food and feed sector: evidence from R&D case studies. Environment Systems and Decisions, v. 43, n. 1, p. 129-141, 2023.
OWUSU-MENSAH, Francis; MUSINGWINI, Cuthbert. Evaluation of ore transport options from Kwesi Mensah Shaft to the mill at the Obuasi mine. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, v. 25, n. 2, p. 109-125, 2011.
ÖZCAN, Sami; ÇELIK, Ali Kemal. A comparison of TOPSIS, grey relational analysis and COPRAS methods for machine selection problem in the food industry of Turkey. International Journal of Production Management and Engineering, v. 9, n. 2, p. 81-92, 2021.
OZFIRAT, M. Kemal. Selection of tunneling machines in soft ground by fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, v. 20, n. 2, 2015.
ÖZGEN, Arzum et al. A multi-criteria decision making approach for machine tool selection problem in a fuzzy environment. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, v. 4, n. 4, p. 431-445, 2011.
PAGANI, Regina Negri; KOVALESKI, João Luiz; RESENDE, Luis Mauricio. Methodi Ordinatio: a proposed methodology to select and rank relevant scientific papers encompassing the impact factor, number of citation, and year of publication. Scientometrics, v. 105, p. 2109-2135, 2015.
PAGSUYOIN, Sheree A. et al. A multi-attribute decision-making approach to the selection of point-of-use water treatment. Environment Systems and Decisions, v. 35, p. 437-452, 2015.
PALANISAMY, Manivel; PUGALENDHI, Arivazhagan; RANGANATHAN, Rajesh. Selection of suitable additive manufacturing machine and materials through best–worst method (BWM). The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, v. 107, p. 2345-2362, 2020.
PALANIYAPPAN, Sabarinathan et al. Sustainable solution to low-cost alternative abrasive from electric ceramic insulator waste for use in abrasive water jet machining. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, v. 120, n. 7-8, p. 5243-5257, 2022.
PANDIT, Sangeeta et al. Ergonomic Risk Assessment Among the Welders Working in Darbhanga District of Bihar. In: Recent Trends in Product Design and Intelligent Manufacturing Systems: Select Proceedings of IPDIMS 2021. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022. p. 71-76.
PATCHARACHAVALIT, Nuttapol; LIMSAWASD, Charinee; ATHIGAKUNAGORN, Nathee. Multiobjective Optimization for Improving Sustainable Equipment Options in Road Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, v. 149, n. 1, p. 04022160, 2023.
PATYK, Michał; BODZIONY, Przemysław. Application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process to Select the Most Appropriate Mining Equipment for the Exploitation of Secondary Deposits. Energies, v. 15, n. 16, p. 5979, 2022.
POPOVIC, Gabrijela; STANUJKIC, Dragisa; KARABASEVIC, Darjan. A framework for the evaluation of hotel property development projects. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, v. 23, n. 2, p. 96-107, 2019.
PURWANDANI, Junia A.; MICHAUD, Gilbert. What are the drivers and barriers for green business practice adoption for SMEs?. Environment Systems and Decisions, v. 41, n. 4, p. 577-593, 2021.
RAZA, Taqi et al. Impact assessment of COVID-19 global pandemic on water, environment, and humans. Environmental Advances, p. 100328, 2022.
SAATY, Thomas L. What is the analytic hierarchy process?. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1988.
SAHIN, Yusuf; AYDEMIR, Erdal. A Comprehensive Solution Approach for CNC Machine Tool Selection Problem. Informatica, v. 33, n. 1, p. 81-108, 2022.
SALVADOR, Rodrigo et al. Life cycle assessment of electricity from biogas: A systematic literature review. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, v. 38, n. 4, p. 13133, 2019.
SALVARAJI, L. et al. Effects of ambient air pollutants on cardiovascular disease hospitalization admission. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, v. 9, n. 1, p. 157-172, 2023.
SAPUTRO, Thomy Eko; DANESHVAR ROUYENDEGH, Babak. A hybrid approach for selecting material handling equipment in a warehouse. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, v. 11, n. 1, p. 34-48, 2016.
SHAH, Saurav et al. Prioritizing the Aggregate Source Based on Particle Packing Density Using Modified Toufar Model and MCDM Methods. In: Advances in Sustainable Construction Materials: Select Proceedings of ASCM 2019. Springer Singapore, 2020. p. 171-182.
SHAPIRA, Aviad; GOLDENBERG, Marat. AHP-based equipment selection model for construction projects. Journal of construction engineering and management, v. 131, n. 12, p. 1263-1273, 2005.
SHAPIRA, Aviad; SIMCHA, Meir; GOLDENBERG, Marat. Integrative model for quantitative evaluation of safety on construction sites with tower cranes. Journal of construction engineering and management, v. 138, n. 11, p. 1281-1293, 2012.
SHARMA, Manu et al. Developing a framework for enhancing survivability of sustainable supply chains during and post-COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, v. 25, n. 4-5, p. 433-453, 2022.
SITORUS, Fernando; BRITO-PARADA, Pablo R. Equipment selection in mineral processing-a sensitivity analysis approach for a fuzzy multiple criteria decision making model. Minerals Engineering, v. 150, p. 106261, 2020.
SITORUS, Fernando; CILLIERS, Jan J.; BRITO-PARADA, Pablo R. Multi-criteria decision making for the choice problem in mining and mineral processing: Applications and trends. Expert systems with applications, v. 121, p. 393-417, 2019.
STANUJKIC, Dragisa; KARABASEVIC, Darjan; ZAVADSKAS, Edmundas Kazimieras. A New Approach for Selecting Alternatives Based on the Adapted Weighted Sum and the SWARA Methods: A Case of Personnel Selection. Economic Computation & Economic Cybernetics Studies & Research, v. 51, n. 3, 2017.
STANUJKIC, Dragisa et al. Improved OCRA method based on the use of interval grey numbers. Journal of Grey System, v. 29, n. 4, p. 49-60, 2017.
STOJČIĆ, Mirko et al. Application of MCDM methods in sustainability engineering: A literature review 2008–2018. Symmetry, v. 11, n. 3, p. 350, 2019.
TABUCANON, Mario T.; BATANOV, Dentcho N.; VERMA, Devendra K. Decision support system for multicriteria machine selection for flexible manufacturing systems. Computers in industry, v. 25, n. 2, p. 131-143, 1994.
TANG, Yu-Cheng; LIN, Thomas W. Application of the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to the lead-free equipment selection decision. International Journal of Business and Systems Research, v. 5, n. 1, p. 35-56, 2011.
TIAN, Guiliang et al. Ecological network analysis of industrial wastes metabolism based on input-output model for Jiangsu, China. Waste Management, v. 143, p. 23-34, 2022.
TORRA, Vicenc; NARUKAWA, Yasuo. On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision. In: 2009 IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems. IEEE, 2009. p. 1378-1382.
TUZKAYA, Gülfem et al. An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methodology for material handling equipment selection problem and an application. Expert systems with applications, v. 37, n. 4, p. 2853-2863, 2010.
ULUTAŞ, Alptekin. Stacker Selection with PSI and WEDBA methods. International Journal of Contemporary Economics and Administrative Sciences, v. 10, n. 2, p. 493-504, 2020.
ULUTAŞ, Alptekin; CENGİZ, Erol. CRITIC VE EVAMIX YÖNTEMLERİ İLE BİR İŞLETME İÇİN DİZÜSTÜ BİLGİSAYAR SEÇİMİ. Journal of International Social Research, v. 11, n. 55, 2018.
ULUTAŞ, Alptekin et al. Development of a novel integrated CCSD-ITARA-MARCOS decision-making approach for stackers selection in a logistics system. Mathematics, v. 8, n. 10, p. 1672, 2020.
WANG, Chen et al. An expert system for equipment selection of thin coal seam mining. gospodarka surowcami mineralnymi, v. 35, 2019.
WANG, Jiawei; XU, Tianyi. Environmental impact of Information Communication Technology: A review of econometric assessment methods, influential mechanism, and influential direction. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 89, p. 106590, 2021.
WANG, Shuhong; HE, Yuqing; CHEN, Hanxue. Can raising trade barriers curb industrial pollution emissions?. Energy & Environment, p. 0958305X221109606, 2022.
WARIS, Muhammad et al. An application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for sustainable procurement of construction equipment: Multicriteria-based decision framework for Malaysia. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, v. 2019, p. 1-20, 2019.
YANNIS, George et al. State-of-the-art review on multi-criteria decision-making in the transport sector. Journal of traffic and transportation engineering (English edition), v. 7, n. 4, p. 413-431, 2020.
YATSALO, Boris et al. Multi-criteria risk management with the use of DecernsMCDA: Methods and case studies. Environment Systems and Decisions, v. 36, p. 266-276, 2016.
YAVUZ, MAHMUT. Equipment selection based on the AHP and Yager's method. Journal of the southern african institute of mining and metallurgy, v. 115, n. 5, p. 425-433, 2015.
YILMAZ KAYA, Burcu; DAĞDEVIREN, Metin. Selecting occupational safety equipment by MCDM approach considering universal design principles. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, v. 26, n. 2, p. 224-242, 2016.
YILMAZ, Burcu; DAĞDEVIREN, Metin. A combined approach for equipment selection: F-PROMETHEE method and zero–one goal programming. Expert Systems with Applications, v. 38, n. 9, p. 11641-11650, 2011.
ZADEH, L. Fuzzy sets. Inform Control, v. 8, p. 338-353, 1965.
ZAHAIKEVITCH, Everaldo Veres et al. Contemporary Public Policies to Strengthen Family Farming in the International Perspective: A Bibliometric Study. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, v. 8, n. 1, p. 8, 2022.
ZAVADSKAS, Edmundas Kazimieras; TURSKIS, Zenonas. A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision‐making. Technological and economic development of economy, v. 16, n. 2, p. 159-172, 2010.
