A Concentração de Progesterona e a Estação Reprodutiva Interferem na Dinâmica Folicular e na Fertilidade de Ovelhas Leiteiras

Autores

  • Cláudio Francisco Brogni Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina. Lages, SC, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9329-9173
  • Maicon Gaissler Lorena Pinto Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina-EPAGRI. Lages, SC, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8515-4516
  • Vilmar Francisco Zardo Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina-EPAGRI. Lages, SC, Brazil.
  • Alceu Mezzalira Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina. Lages, SC, Brazil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.134993

Resumo

Background: The use of high and low doses of progesterone in vaginal pessaries directly interferes with the response of follicular dynamics in ewes specialized in dairy production. Within the season, greater ovarian activity is observed, and outside the breeding season, the high dose of progesterone favors conception rates, number of live born lambs and gestational corpus luteum size. This work evaluated the response of the follicular dynamics of dairy ewes in and out of the breeding season, during the six-day stay of the vaginal pessary containing high and low doses of progesterone.

Materials, Methods & Results: The experiment was conducted within the breeding season in April/May and out of season in October/November, evaluating the ovarian response to the use of vaginal pessaries containing 60 or 120mg of progesterone during six days of permanence. of the device, 75µg of sodium cloprostenol and 400IU of eCG were applied to remove the pessaries and reincarnation 50 hours after removal. As a result, it was observed that the ovulatory follicle has a larger diameter inside the station with 5.95mm and outside the station with 4.98mm. The size of the dominant follicle on D0 of the protocol was 4.77mm inside the season versus 1.55mm outside and without the presence of a corpus luteum, showing seasonal anestrus. The time of ovulation after the removal of the pessaries occurred around 48.68h inside the season and 53.40h outside the season. As for the size of the CL, it was larger within the breeding season with 12.15mm against 11.45mm out of season. For the conception rate inside the station, 71.4% and outside 50% were obtained. Out of season with 60mg, 41.2% was obtained and with 120mg, 58.8% for conception rate. For the number of live-born lambs/ewe, within the season it was found 2.32 and outside the season 1.59.

Discussion: Seasonality in sheep is a remarkable factor, and out of season the ovarian activity was in anestrus, with only small follicles without the presence of a corpus luteum. In-station FO emerged at 3.79 days after device placement and out-of-station at 4.02 days. The possible explanation for this is the sum of the device's progesterone, associated with the CL. The average period of ovulation happened around 48.68 hours inside the season, and outside the season this value was 53.40 days, this variation in sheep is already described, but the mapping in dairy sheep is the first study. The number of ovulations differed between the evaluated seasons and between the progesterone doses, which suggests a direct effect of the dose and the season on the number of ovulations. The conception rate in the breeding season reached a much higher value, since the ovarian activity and the presence of the CL on D0 make the female respond better to the protocol, a fact that can be observed with the largest size of the CL at 30 days. In the off season, the protocol with 120mg resulted in a higher conception rate, and a higher dose of progesterone better prepares the ovulatory wave of each cycle, providing better oocyte viability and, therefore, a higher conception rate in this period.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Baby T.E. & Bartlewski P.M. 2011. Progesterone as the driving regulatory force behind serum FSH concentrations and antral follicular development in cycling ewes. Reproduction, Fertility and Development. 23: 303- 310. DOI: 10.1071/RD10121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/RD10121

Bartlewski P.M., Aravindakshan J., Beard A.P., Nelson M.L., Batiasta-Arteaga S. & Cook J. 2004. Effects of medroxyproges testoterone acetate (MAP) on ovarian antral follicle development, gonadotrophin secretion and response to ovulation induction with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) in seasonally anoestrous ewes. Animal Reproduction Science. 81: 63-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2003.10.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2003.10.002

Bartlewski P.M., Beard A.P. & Rawlings N.C. 1999. Ovarian function in ewes at the onset of the breeding season. Animal Reproduction Science. 57: 67-88. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4320(99)00060-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(99)00060-3

Brogni C.F. & Souza A.F.D. 2021. Ultrasonography in Ovine Follicular Dynamics. Open Journal of Agricultural Research. 1(1): 25-29. DOI: 10.31586/ojar.2021.010105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31586/ojar.2021.010105

Campbell B.K., Scaramuzzi R.J. & Webb R. 1995. Control of follicle development and selection in sheep and cattle. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 49: 335-350. DOI: 10.1530/biosciprocs.3.026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/biosciprocs.3.026

Cumming I.A., Brown J.M., Blockey M.A. & Goding J.R. 1971. Regulation of oestrous cycle in the ewe. Journal Reproduction Fertillity. 241: 148-159. DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0430583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0240148

Evans A.C. 2003. Ovarian follicle growth and consequences for fertility in sheep. Animal Reproduction Science. 78: 289-306. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4320(03)00096-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(03)00096-4

Lassoued N., Rekik M., Khenissi S. & Merai A. 2014. Seasonality of oestrus, ovulation and ovulation rate of Sicilo-Sarde sheep. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 98(4): 686-692. DOI: 10.1111/jpn.12123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12123

Menchaca A. & Rubianes E. 2004. New treatments associated with timed artificial insemination in small ruminants. Reproduction, Fertility and Development. 16(1): 403-413. DOI: 10.10371/RD04037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/RD04037

Menchaca A., Santos Neto P.C., Cuadro F., Souza-Neves M. & Crispo M. 2018. From reproductive technologies to genome editing in small ruminants: an embryo’s journey. Animal Reproduction. 15: 984-995. DOI: 10.21451/1984-3143-AR2018-0022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21451/1984-3143-AR2018-0022

Manca M.E., Manunta M.L., Spezzigu A., Torres-Rovira L., Gonzalez-Bulnes A., Pasciu V., Piu P., Leoni G.G., Succu S., Chesneau D., Naitana S. & Berlinguer F. 2014. Melatonin deprival modifies follicular and corpus luteal growth dynamics in a sheep model. Reproduction. 147: 885-895. DOI: 10.1530/REP-13-0405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-13-0405

Oliveira M.E.F., Ayres H., Oliveira L.G., Oba E., Kridli R.T., Bartlewski P.M. & Vicente W.R.R. 2016.

Follicular wave emergence in Santa Inês ewes subjected to long-term, progesterone-based estrous synchronization protocols at different times of the year. Animal Reproduction Science. 174: 80-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.09.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.09.008

Schrick F.N., Surface R.A., Pritchard J.Y., Dailey R.A., Townsend E.C. & Inskeep E.K. 1993. Ovarian structures during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy in ewes. Biology of Reproduction. 49(5): 1133-1140. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod49.5.1133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod49.5.1133

Arquivos adicionais

Publicado

2024-03-13

Como Citar

Brogni, C. F., Maicon Gaissler Lorena Pinto, Vilmar Francisco Zardo, & Alceu Mezzalira. (2024). A Concentração de Progesterona e a Estação Reprodutiva Interferem na Dinâmica Folicular e na Fertilidade de Ovelhas Leiteiras . Acta Scientiae Veterinariae, 52(1). https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.134993

Edição

Seção

Articles