Correlation between Different Helicobacter Morphotypes and Histological Changes in Pig Gastric Mucosa

Authors

  • Nataša Pejčinovska Veterinary Faculty, ”St. Kliment Ohridski”, University of Bitola, Bitola, Macedonia.
  • Dušan Lalošević Faculty of Medicine, Faculty for Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
  • Vesna Lalošević Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty for Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
  • Ivan Čapo Faculty of Medicine, Faculty for Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
  • Aleksandar Potkonjak Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty for Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.84086

Abstract

Background: Two distinct morphologic types of bacteria which belong to the Helicobacter species, have been described in pigs: once or twice curved Helicobacter pylori-like bacteria (HLO) and the multicoiled, Gastrospirillum-like bacteria (GLO). The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of Helicobacter spp. using modified Giemsa stain and to define the relationship between presence of Helicobacter spp. and histopathological changes of gastric mucosa in pigs.

Materials, Methods & Results: A total of 120 pig stomachs (60 from intensive and 60 from extensive breeding) were enrolled in this study and 240 fragments of fundic and pyloric mucosa were taken for histopathological examination. By modified Giemsa staining of gastric mucosa, Helicobacter-like organisms were confirmed in 4/60 (6.67%) of pigs in intensive and 5/60 (8.33%) of pigs in extensive breeding. The incidence of tightly spiral shaped Gastrospirillum-like organisms in pigs of intensive and extensive breeding were 5/60 (8.33%) and 9/60 (15%), respectively. The severity of gastritis was scored to the Sydney System with some modifications. There was no significant difference between HLO-positive and HLO-negative fundic mucosa in pigs of both breeding systems. In contrary, there was significant difference between HLO-positive and HLO-negative pyloric mucosa of pigs in intensive (P < 0.001) and in extensive breeding (P < 0.05). In intensive breeding, there was significant difference between GLO-positive and GLO-negative fundic mucosa (P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference between GLO-positive and GLO-negative pyloric mucosa.

Discussion: The prevalence of Helicobacter spp. bacteria were in coherence with literature data. The higher prevalence of both morfological type of bacteria, were considered in pigs in extensive breeding. the hygienic conditions and managment factors in pigs farm are the possible impact for higher bacterial transmission. The association of high prevalence of H. pylori and poor hygienic condition was shown by epidemiological studies conducted on humans. In both, humans and pigs, the presence of H. pylori correlates with an inflammatory response, but there are differences in inflammatory cell population. In H. pylori infected humans, neutrophils composed the bulk of cellular infiltrate, while in pigs, the primary inflammatory cell was the lymphocyte, which is in accordance to results published by others autors. Thus it indicates that different hosts exhibit a different pathohistological response to the Helicobacter spp. infection. In human as well as in veterinary pathology, the fact of the different pathogenicity of various Helicobacter species is well known. In all HLO-positive pyloric mucosa, moderate to severe focal or diffuse infiltration of mononuclear cells and lymphoid follicles with germinal centers, were observed. A similar conclusion was drawn from results of an experimental infection study in pigs. There was signifficance between HLO-positive and HLO-negative pyloric mucosa in both, intensive and extensive breeding. In the contrast, GLO were not associated with the presence of severe gastritis, but only with mild to moderate superficial infiltration of lymphocytes and plasma cells in both, fundic and pyloric mucosa. There was no significant difference between GLO-positive and GLO-negative pyloric mucosa of pigs in both breeding systems. Despite the low gastritis score of fundic mucosa in pigs in intensive breeding, there was a significance difference between in GLO-positive and GLO-negative fundic mucosa. It is believed that the possible reason of such results is the meals with low fiber content and low particles size. These results suggest that the presence of HLO, but not of GLO is associated with the pyloric gastritis in pigs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barbosa A.J., Silva J.C., Nogueira A.M., Paulino E. & Miranda C.R. 1995. Higher incidence of Gastrospirillum spp. in swine with gastric ulcer of the pars oesophagea. Veterinary Pathology. 32(2): 134-139.

Bardhan P.K. 1997. Epidemiological features of Helicobacter pylori infection in developing countries. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 25(5): 973-978.

Bertram T.A., Krakowka S. & Morgan D.R. 1991. Gastritis associated with infection by Helicobacter pylori: Comparative pathology in humans and swine. Reviews of Infectious Diseases. 13(8): 714-722.

Bodger K. & Crabtree J.E. 1998. Helicobacter pylori and gastric inflammation. British Medical Bulletin. 54(1): 139-150.

De Groote D., Ducatelle R., Van Doorn L.J., Tilmant K., Verschuuren A. & Haesebrouck F. 2000. Detection of “Candidatus Helicobacter suis” in gastric samples of pigs by PCR: comparison with other invasive diagnostic techniques. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 38(3): 1131-1135.

Dixon M.F., Genta R.M., Yardley J.H. & Correa P. 1996. Classification and grading of gastritis: the updated Sydney system. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 20(10): 1161-1181.

Grasso G.M., Ripabelli G., Sammarco M.L., Ruberto A. & Iannitto G. 1996. Prevalence of Helicobacter-like organisms in porcine gastric mucosa: A study of swine slaughtered in Italy. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 19(3): 213-217.

Gray S.F., Wyatt J.I. & Rathbone B.J. 1986. Simplified techniques for identifying Campylobacter pyloridis. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 39(11): 1279-12780.

Hassall E. & Dimmick J.E. 1991. Unique feature of Helicobacter pylori disease in children. Digestive Diseases and Science. 36(4): 17-23.

Hellemans A., Chiers K., De Bock M., Decostere A., Haesebrouck F., Ducatelle R. & Maes D. 2007. Prevalence of Candidatus Helicobacter suis in pigs of different ages. The Veterinary Record. 161(6): 189-192.

Joosten M., Flahou B., Meyns T., Smet A., Arts J., Cooman L., Pasmans F., Ducatelle R. & Haesebrouck F. 2013. Case report: Helicobacter suis infection in a pig veterinarian. Helicobacter. 18(5): 392-396.

Koga T., Shimada Y., Sato K., Takahashi K., Kikuchi, Miura T., Takenouchi T., Narita T. & Iwata M. 2002. Experimental Helicobacter pylori gastric infection in miniature pigs. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 51: 238-246.

Krakowka S., Ringler S.S., Flores J., Kearns R.J., Eaton K.A. & Ellis J.A. 2005. Isolation and preliminary characterization of a novel Helicobacter species from swine. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 66(6): 938-944.

Krakowka S., Rings D.M. & Ellis J.A. 2005. Experimental induction of bacterial gastritis and gastric ulcer disease in gnotobiotic swine inoculated with porcine Helicobacter-like species. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 66(6): 945-952.

Krakowka S.T., Morgan D.R., Kraft W.G. & Leunk R.D. 1987. Establishment of gastric Campylobacter pylori infection in the neonatal gnotobiotic piglet. Infection and Immunity. 55(11): 2789-2796.

Mall A.S., Suleman N., Taylor K., Kidd M., Tyler M., Lotz Z., Hickman R. & Kahn D. 2004. The relationship of a Helicobacter heilmannii infection to the mucosal changes in abattoir and laboratory pig stomach. Surgery Today. 34(11): 943-949.

Mendes E.N., Queiroz D.M., Rocha G.A., Nogueira A.M., Carvalho A.C., Lage A.P. & Barbosa A.J. 1991. Histopathological study of porcine gastric mucosa with and without a spiral bacterium (“Gastrospirillum suis”). Journal of Medical Microbiology. 35: 345-348.

Millet S., Kumar S., De Boever J., Meyns T., Aluwe M., De Brabander D. & Ducatelle R. 2012. Effect of particle size distribution and dietary crude fibre content on growth performance and gastric mucosa integrity of growing–finishing pigs. The Veterinary Journal. 192: 316-321.

Park J.H., Lee B.J., Lee Y.S. & Park J.H. 2000. Association of tightly spiraled bacterial infection and gastritis in pigs. The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science. 62: 725-729.

Peyrol S., Lecoindre P. & Berger I. 1998. Differential pathogenic effect of two helicobacter-like organisms in dog’s gastric mucosa. Journal of Submicroscopic Cytology and Pathology. 30: 425-433.

Pirarat N., Sada V., Wangnaitham S. & Sunyasootcharee B. 2007. Pathological Study of Helicobacter spp. infection in pig stomachs. The Thai Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 37(1): 41-48.

Poutahidis T., Tsangaris T., Kanakoudis G., Vlemmas I., Iliadis N. & Sofianou D. 2001. Helicobacter pylori-induced gastritis in experimentally infected conventional piglets. Veterinary Pathology. 38: 667-678.

Queiroz D.M., Rocha G.A., Mendes E.N., Lage A.P., Carvalho A.C. & Barbosa A.J. 1990. A spiral microorganism in the stomach of pigs. Veterinary Microbiology. 24(2): 199-204.

Rauws E.A.J., Langenberg W., Houthoff H.J., Hendrik J., Houthoff H., Zanen C., Guido N. & Tytgat J. 1988. Campylobacter pyloridis associated chronic active antral gastritis. Gastroenterology. 94: 33-40.

Roosendaal R., Vos J.H., Roumen T., van Vugt R., Cattoli G., Bart A., Klaasen H.L., Kuipers E.J., Vandenbroucke-Grauls C.M. & Kusters J.G. 2000. Slaughter pigs are commonly infected by closely related but distinct gastric ulcerative lesion-inducing gastrospirilla. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 38(7): 2661-2664.

Warren J.D. & Marshall B.J. 1983. Unidentified curved bacilli on gastric epithelium in active chronic gastritis. The Lancet. 321(8336): 1273-1275.

Published

2018-01-01

How to Cite

Pejčinovska, N., Lalošević, D., Lalošević, V., Čapo, I., & Potkonjak, A. (2018). Correlation between Different Helicobacter Morphotypes and Histological Changes in Pig Gastric Mucosa. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae, 46(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.84086

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)