Multimodal Anesthesia in Gallus gallus domesticus for Therapeutic Ovariohysterectomy
Anestesia em aves
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.142033Keywords:
egg retention, analgesia, domestic hen, chicken, bird, surgeryAbstract
Background: Egg retention and yolks in the oviduct of birds is a common pathology that is treated by surgical removal of the oviduct itself and its appendages. For the bird's comfort and to reduce the painful stimulus, it is essential to use analgesia correctly, as well as systemic anti-inflammatories, in order to reach different phases of the nociceptive pathway. Local anesthetic blocks can also be used, which can reduce the need for systemic drugs and inhaled anesthetics. The aim of this report is to describe a multimodal analgesic approach with spinal anesthesia in a domestic hen who underwent ovariohysterectomy due to egg retention.
Case: A domestic hen (Gallus gallus domesticus) was referred to the University Veterinary Hospital (HVU) of the Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM) with egg retention in the oviduct and the treatment of choice was therapeutic ovarian-salpingohysterectomy (OSH). Pre-anesthetic medication was combined with opioid, dissociative and benzodiazepine. The hen was induced into general anesthesia with isoflurane diluted in 100% oxygen via face mask, followed by intubation and venous access puncture in the left medial tibiotarsal vein. After which it was placed in the sternal decubitus position for anesthetic block via local spinal anesthesia. Anesthesia was maintained using a Baraka non-rebreathing gas system, with spontaneous and manual assisted ventilation. During the surgical period, heart rate, respiratory rate, peripheral oxygen saturation, temperature and carbon dioxide fraction at the end of expiration were monitored. After the end of the procedure, within 1 h, the patient began to respond to external stimuli and 1 h and 30 min after the end of the procedure, she was released for anesthetic discharge and sent to hospital, demonstrating the immediate anesthetic success of the procedure.
Discussion: Surgical removal of the oviduct and its appendages, as the ovary, was performed as indicated in the literature. The anesthetic team used drugs from the opioid, benzodiazepine and disociative classes as pre-anesthetic medication, which proved to be beneficial, since previous studies show that the combination brings analgesic comfort, muscle relaxation and sedation, reducing the need for inhaled anesthetics at the time of induction. Induction was carried out using an isoflurane mask diluted in 100% oxygen and lasted just 2 min, allowing the bird to be intubated and monitored using the multiparameter monitor. The anesthesiologist in charge performed a spinal neuroaxis block, an uncommon practice in birds, which contributes to blocking different nociceptive pathways in the trans-operative period. During the trans-surgical period, bradycardia was noted through monitoring, which was soon corrected through the intravenous application of atropine. There was a decrease in the bird's spontaneous ventilation in the final 35 min of the procedure, so the bird was ventilated manually until it returned to spontaneous ventilation, which may have been due to the inhaled anesthetic and the dorsal decubitus position, plus the weight of the surgical drapes. The bird was then sent to anesthetic recovery, where it was warmed up using a neonatal incubator and discharged from anesthesia after 1 h and 30 min. This result proved satisfactory for the team, who quickly directed the patient, which was the expectation of the anesthetic and surgical teams.
Keywords: egg retention, analgesia, domestic hen, chicken, bird, surgery.
Título: Anestesia multimodal em Gallus gallus domesticus para ovariohisterectomia terapêutica.
Descritores: retenção de ovos, galinha doméstica, ave, multimodal, anestesia.
Downloads
References
Azcoitia I., Fernández B. & Fernandez A. 1987. The meningeal arrangement of the avian lumbosacral spinal cord. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 65(4): 920-927. DOI: 10.1139/z87-146
Bowles H., Lichtenberger M. & Lennox A. 2007. Emergency and critical care of pet birds. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice. 10(2): 345-394. DOI: 10.1016/j.cvex.2007.04.001
Cubas Z.S. & Rabelo R.C. 2014. Terapêutica de Emergência em aves. In: Cubas Z.S., Silva J.C. & Catão-Dias J.L. (Eds). Tratado de Animais Selvagens. 2.ed. São Paulo: Roca, pp.1898-1946
Deori P., Sarma K.K., Nath P.J., Singh P.K. & Nath R. 2017. Physiological alteration, quality of anesthesia and economy of isoflurane in domestic chickens (Gallus domesticus). Veterinary World. 10(5): 493-497. DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2017.493-497
Dzialowski E.M. & Crossley II D.A. 2015. The cardiovascular system. In: Scanes C.G. (Ed). Sturkie’s Avian Physiology. 6th edn. Cambridge: Academic Press, pp.193-283. DOI 10.1016/C2012-0-02488-X
Escobar A., Rocha R.W., Pypendop B.H., Zangirolami Filho D., Sousa S.S. & Valadão C.A. 2016. Effects of methadone on the minimum anesthetic concentration of isoflurane, and its effects on heart rate, blood pressure and ventilation during isoflurane anesthesia in hens (Gallus gallus domesticus). PLoS One. 11(3): e0152546. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152546
Fantoni D.T. & Pinheiro S.R. 2021. Anestesia em aves. São Paulo: Editora Payá, pp.97-119;165-231.
Guimarães L.D. & Morais A.N. 2000. Anestesia em aves: agentes anestésicos. Ciência Rural. 30(6): 1073-1081. DOI: 10.1590/S0103-84782000000600027
Guzman D.S. & Beaufrère H. 2021. Avian pain management and anesthesia. In: Graham J.E., Doss G.A., Beaufrère H. (Eds). Exotic Animal Emergency and Critical Care Medicine. Hobboken: John Wiley & Sons, pp.488-502. DOI: 10.1002/9781119149262.ch28
Hornak S., Liptak T., Ledecky V., Hromada R., Bilek J., Mazensky D. & Petrovic V. 2015. A preliminary trial of the sedation induced by intranasal administration of midazolam alone or in combination with dexmedetomidine and reversal by atipamezole for a short-term immobilization in pigeons. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. 42(2): 192-196. DOI: 10.1111/vaa.12187
Kazemi-Darabadi S., Akbari G. & Shokrollahi S. 2019. Development and evaluation of a technique for spinal anaesthesia in broiler chickens. New Zealand Veterinary Journal. 67(5): 241-248. DOI: 10.1080/00480169.2019.1618223
Khamisabadi A., Kazemi-Darabadi S. & Akbari G. 2021. Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of lidocaine and bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia in chickens. Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery. 35(1): 60-67. DOI 10.1647/1082-6742-35.1.60
Kubiak M., Roach L. & Eatwell K. 2016. The influence of a combined butorphanol and midazolam premedication on anesthesia in psittacid species. Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery. 30(4): 317-323. DOI 10.1647/2013-072
Lafferty K., Cital S.J. & Goldberg M.E. 2014. Analgesia in exotic animals. In: Goldberg M.E. (Ed). Pain Management for Veterinary Technicians and Nurses. Hobboken: John Wiley & Sons, pp.216-262. DOI: 10.1002/9781119421436.ch13
Ludders J.W. 2015. Comparative anesthesia and analgesia of birds In: Grimm K.A., Lamont L.A., Tranquilli W.J., Greene S.A. & Robertson S.A. (Eds.). Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia: The Fifth Edition of Lumb and Jones, 5th edn. Hobboken: John Wiley & Sons, pp.800-816.
Machin K.L. 2005. Controlling avian pain. Compendium April. 27(4): 299-307.
Malik A. & Valentine A. 2018. Pain in birds: a review for veterinary nurses. Veterinary Nursing Journal. 33(1): 11-25. DOI 10.1080/17415349.2017.1395304
McGrath C.J., Lee J.C. & Campbell V.L. 1984. Dose-response anesthetic effects of ketamine in the chicken. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 45(3): 531-534.
Otero P.E. 2013. Anestesia locorregional do neuroeixo. In: Klaumann P.R. & Otero P.E. (Eds). Anestesia Locorregional em Pequenos Animais. São Paulo: Roca, pp.135-176.
Posso I.P. & Ashmawi, H.A. 2012. Princípios gerais do tratamento da dor. In: Fantoni D.T. (Ed). Tratamento da Dor na Clínica de Pequenos Animais. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, pp.29-36.
Rupley A.E. 1998. Critical care of pet birds: procedures, therapeutics, and patient support. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice. 1(1): 11-42. DOI 10.1016/S1094-9194(17)30153-6
Santos E.A., Monteiro E.R., Mombach V.S., Boos M.Z., Gutierrez L.Z. & Alievi M.M. 2020. Total intravenous anesthesia in domestic chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) with propofol alone or in combination with methadone, nalbuphine or fentanyl for ulna osteotomy. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. 47(3): 347-355. DOI 10.1016/j.vaa.2020.01.008
Soares A.V., Pippi N.L. & Freitas G.C. 2007. Cetamina e midazolam como medicação anestésica indutora e manutenção com isofluorano e oxigênio a 100% para cirurgia em galo (Gallus gallus domesticus) - relato de caso. Veterinária Notícias. 13(1): 81-84
Steffey E.P., Mama K.R., Brosnan R.J. 2015. Inhalation anesthetics. In: Grimm K.A., Lamont L.A., Tranquilli W.J., Greene S.A. & Robertson S.A. (Eds.). Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia: The Fifth Edition of Lumb and Jones. 5th edn. Hobboken: John Wiley & Sons, pp.297-331.
Stout J.D. 2016. Common Emergencies in Pet Birds. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice. 19(2): 513-541. DOI: 10.1016/j.cvex.2016.01.002
Torkse K.E. & Dyson D.H. 2000. Epidural analgesia and anesthesia. Veterinary Clinics: Small Animal Practice. 30(4): 859-874. DOI 10.1016/S0195-5616(08)70011-1
Tranquilli W.J. & Grimm K.A. 2015. Introduction: use, definitions, history, concepts, classification and considerations for anesthesia and analgesia. In: Grimm K.A., Lamont L.A., Tranquilli W.J., Greene S.A. & Robertson S.A. (Eds). Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia: The Fifth Edition of Lumb and Jones, 5th edn. Hobboken: John Wiley & Sons, pp.3-10.
Trevisan G.A., Silva E.L., Carvalho A.L. & Luiz R.M. 2016. Efeitos anestésicos da administração intranasal ou intramuscular da associação de midazolam e cetamina racêmica ou s+ em periquito australiano (Melopsittacus undulatus). Ciência Animal Brasileira. 17(1): 126-132. DOI 10.1590/1089-6891v17i131271
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Júlia da Silva Lima, Júlia Odorissi Oliveira, Lisiane Saremba Vieira, Camila Borghetti, Catherine Konrad Nava Calva, Bernardo Nascimento Antunes, Beatriz Perez Floriano, Gabrielle Coelho Freitas

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides open access to all of its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Such access is associated with increased readership and increased citation of an author's work. For more information on this approach, see the Public Knowledge Project and Directory of Open Access Journals.
We define open access journals as journals that use a funding model that does not charge readers or their institutions for access. From the BOAI definition of "open access" we take the right of users to "read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles" as mandatory for a journal to be included in the directory.
La Red y Portal Iberoamericano de Revistas Científicas de Veterinaria de Libre Acceso reúne a las principales publicaciones científicas editadas en España, Portugal, Latino América y otros países del ámbito latino