Urethropreputial Fistula in a Mixed Breed Dog - Urethrostomy

Authors

  • Gislaine Mariel de Souza Vasconcelos Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco. Recife, PE. Brazil. https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7245-059X
  • Lucas Felipe Oliveira Nascimentos Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE), Recife, PE, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5952-9343
  • Gleydson Breno Alves Cabral Silva Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE), Recife, PE, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1878-4512
  • Edvaldo Lopes de Almeida Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE), Recife, PE, Brazil.
  • Anísio Francisco Soares UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL RURAL DE PERNAMBUCO https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1493-7964
  • Neuza de Barros Marques Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE), Recife, PE, Brazil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.130625

Keywords:

Dog, urological anomaly, urology, surgery., Dog, Urological anomaly, Urology, surgery

Abstract

Background: Urethropreputial fistulas are communicative conduits between the urethra, prepuce, and environment whose origin deviates the urinary flow from its physiological path. The condition has a multifactorial cause and is considered uncommon in dogs. By the scarce occurrence of this malformation, as well as the scarcity of case reports on the subject, the present work aims to report a case of congenital urethropreputial fistula in a mixed breed dog and the surgical procedures performed to correct this genitourinary abnormality. In addition, it seeks to cross information available in the literature with the changes found during the case attendance.

Case: An approximately 1-year-old male canine, mixed breed, was attended at the Veterinary Hospital of the Federal Rural University of Pernambuco (HOVET - UFRPE) with a complaint of dysuria, where the urinary flow occurred by dripping through an orifice caudal to the external urethral ostium. According to the tutor, the animal presented the condition since its adoption at 2 months old. The general physical examination did not show any changes in the physiological parameters. The mucous membranes were normal in color, the capillary refill time was 2 s, there was no pain or discomfort on superficial and deep palpation of the abdomen, and the heart and respiratory rates were within the range considered normal for the species. The specific examination found the existence of a fistula on the ventral aspect of the foreskin, whose resolution required a surgical intervention that consisted of obliteration of the fistula communication channel by suturing the defect using an absorbable suture thread. However, this was not effective in solving the problem of the animal, which returned to the hospital complaining of ischuria, leading to the need for 2 other surgical procedures: A scrotal urethrostomy, whose result was also inadequate due to the displacement of the urethral catheter given the postoperative conditions and the animal's temperament, and, to guarantee the proper functioning of the lower urinary tract, avoiding recurrences, a new urethrostomy dorsal to the first, in the perineal region, was performed. The animal did not present episodes of urinary retention after the third procedure and had a significant improvement in the condition in which it was before the initial treatment.

 Discussion: Urogenital anomalies are rare in dogs and can be acquired or congenital. With an etiology still not fully elucidated, the variety of fistula presentations indicates that the condition probably has multifactorial causes. The affection may be confused with hypospadias. However, in this case, the external urethral ostium is out of its anatomical location, and several other abnormalities are present, like cryptorchidism, intersexuality, and penile underdevelopment. The history obtained through the anamnesis, associated with the absence of traumatic episodes in the region and other associated congenital alterations, leads to the understanding that it is a urethral fistula not associated with hypospadias and has a congenital origin. The failure of the first surgical intervention provides relevant data in search of the probable causes of fistula formation. The impossibility of urethral catheterization associated with ischuria consequent to the obliteration of the defect is indicative that the urethral path was blind-ended or with a significant reduction of the lumen, and the resulting increase in pressure can be considered a factor for the formation of the fistula.

Keywords: dog, urological anomaly, urology, surgery.

Título: Fístula uretro-prepucial em cão sem raça definida - Uretrostomia

Descritores: cão, anomalia urogenital, urologia, cirurgia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Campbell M. 1951. Embryology of the Genito Urinary tract. In: Campbell M. (Ed). Clinical Paediatric Urology. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders., pp.531-536.

Cavalcante L.F.H., Rosa D.M., Contesini E.A., Pöppl A. G., Stedile R. & Sessegolo G. 2018. Fístula uretral em cão. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae. 34(2): 205-209. DOI:10.22456/1679-9216.15274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.15274

Cunningham J.G. & Klein B.G. 2021 Controle do Desenvolvimento Gonadal e dos Gametas. In: Cunningham J.G. (Ed). Tratado de Fisiologia Veterinária. 5.ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier Guanabara Koogan S.A., pp.1030-1047.

Goldstein M. 1975. Congenital Urethral Fistula with Chordee. The Journal of Urology 13(1): 138-140. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)59427-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)59427-6

Gupta A.K., Kumar M., Singh K. & Sokhal A.K. 2017. Rare association of congenital penile urethrocutaneous fistula with Y-type urethral duplication. BMJ Case Reports. 24: 2017:bcr2016217331. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2016-217331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2016-217331

Lin Y., Deng C. & Peng Q. 2018. Congenital anterior urethrocutaneous fistula: A systematic review. African Journal of Paediatric Surgery. 15: 63-68. DOI: 10.4103/ajps.AJPS_97_17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ajps.AJPS_97_17

Macphail C. 2019. Cirurgia de Bexiga e Uretra. In: Fossum T.W. (Ed). Cirurgia de Pequenos Animais. 5.ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, pp.2086-2137.

Oliveira C.M. 2015. Doenças do Sistema Genital e Reprodutor In: Jericó M. (Ed). Tratado de Medicina Interna de Cães e Gatos. Rio de Janeiro: Roca, pp.4563-4856.

Osborne C.A., Engen M.H., Yano B.L., Brasmer T.H., Jessen C.R. & Blevins W.E. 1975. Congenital urethrorectal fistula in two dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 166(10): 999-1002.

Schwartz A., Lipowitz A.J. & Burt J. 1974. Urinary Incontinence due to Multiple Urogenital Anomalies in Mature Dog. Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association. 164: 1021-1024.

Tobias K.S. & Barbee D. 1995. Abnormal micturition and recurrent cystitis associated with multiple congenital abnormalities of the urinary tract in a dog. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 207(2): 191-193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.1995.207.02.191

Volpato R., Ramos R.S., Magalhães L.C.O., Lopes M.D. & Sousa D.B. 2010. Afecções do pênis e prepúcio dos cães – revisão de literatura. Veterinária e Zootecnia. 17(3): 312-323.

Additional Files

Published

2024-02-05

How to Cite

Vasconcelos, G. M. de S., Felipe Oliveira Nascimentos, L., Breno Alves Cabral Silva, G., Almeida, E. L. de, Soares, A. F., & de Barros Marques, N. (2024). Urethropreputial Fistula in a Mixed Breed Dog - Urethrostomy. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae, 52. https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.130625

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.