Efficacy of the Modified Tumescent Technique on Vascularization in Canine Mammary Tumors

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.153189

Keywords:

dog, mammary tumor, tumescent, vascularization

Abstract

Background: Mammary tumors are among the most common neoplasms in dogs. As in various tumor types, angiogenesis plays a significant role in the development of mammary tumors. Since the nutritional requirements of newly formed tissues associated with malignancy increase, this situation is directly related to angiogenesis. The tumescent anesthesia technique, which is commonly used during this surgical procedure, involves the application of a sterile solution combined with a local anesthetic and vasoconstrictor. This approach aimed to determine the potential impact of the modified tumescent technique on tumor vascularization.

Materials, Methods & Results: The study included 28 dogs diagnosed with mammary tumors with medium breeds, aged over 8 to 13 years and weighing between 11-23 kg. For the preparation of the tumescent solution, 0.09% isotonic saline (Bioflex®, Turkey) was stored at 4°C for the cold group and kept at room temperature for the other group. After the prepared solution was dosed according to body weight, it was equally administered into the mammary tissue. Color Doppler was employed to assess the distribution of vascularization (peripheral, mixed), and diameter of the largest vessel at the pre- and posttumescent application. In colorflow mode, the frequency was set at 5 MHz, with a pulse repetition frequency (PRF) of 1 kHz and a gain of 38%. Finally, Pulsed Doppler was used to measure the PI and RI in both the pre- and post tumescent applications. After tumescent application, a significant reduction in VD and a significant increase in RI were observed in both temperature groups, indicating effective vasoconstriction. The decrease in VD was significantly greater in dogs receiving the cooled tumescent solution compared to those receiving the solution at room temperature. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 23.0 (IBM Corp., USA). Normal distribution of data and homogeneity of variances were evaluated by Shaphiro wilk test and Levene’s test, respectively. The comparisons of the ultrasonography parameters between the groups (+4°C vs +20°C) and prior/after tumescent application within groups were performed by Student’s t-test and Mann-Whitney U test.  When ultrasonographic changes were analyzed according to histological grade, statistically significant vasoconstriction was primarily observed in grade 1 tumors, whereas grade 2 and grade 3 tumors demonstrated a reduced vascular response.

Discussion:The findings of the present study demonstrate that the modified tumescent anesthesia technique induces a significant vasoconstrictive effect in canine mammary tumors, as evidenced by reduced vessel diameter and increased vascular resistance following application.  Importantly, no postoperative complications such as delayed wound healing or wound dehiscence were observed, indicating that the modified formulation is safe and well tolerated. the consistent and significant vasoconstriction observed at different temperature settings (+4°C and +20°C) and across all histological grades clearly demonstrates the efficacy of the technique in reducing local vascular perfusion. Overall, the results suggest that cooled modified tumescent anesthesia, may be a reliable and effective approach for improving intraoperative vascular control and surgical field management during canine mastectomy procedures.

Keywords: dog, mammary tumor, tumescent, vascularization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1 Abimussi C.J., Menegheti T.M., Wagatsuma J.T., Floriano B.P., Arruda A.M., dos Santos P.S. & Oliva V.N. 2014.Tumescent local anesthesia with ropivacaine in different concentrations in bitches undergoing mastectomy: plasma concentration and postoperative analgesia. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. 41: 516-525. DOI: 10.1111/vaa.12178.

2 Anderson H., Price P., Blomley M., Leach M.O. & Workman P. 2001. Measuring changes in human tumour vasculature in response to therapy using functional imaging techniques. British Journal of Cancer. 85: 1085-1093. DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.2077

3 Azhar Y. & Candrawinata V.S. 2023.Correlation of resistive index values using spectral Doppler ultrasound with histopathological results in breast tumors. Journal of Surgical Ultrasound. 10: 42-51. DOI: 10.46268/jsu.2023.10.2.42

4 Baştan A., Özenç E., Pir Yağcı İ. & Baki Acar D. 2009.Ultrasonographic evaluation of mammary tumors in bitches. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 15: 81-86. DOI: 10.9775/kvfd.2008.79-A

5 Bednarski R.M. 2015. Dogs and cats. In: Grimm K.A., Lamont L.A., Tranquilli W.J., Greene S.A. & Robertson S.A. (Eds). Lumb & Jones’ Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia. 5th edn. Ames: Wiley Blackwell, pp.819-826.

6 Bergfeld D., Sommer B. & Sattler G. 2001. Infiltration technique, tumescent local anesthesia. In: Hanke C.W., Sommer B. & Sattler G. (Eds). Tumescent Local Anesthesia. New York: Springer, pp.55-60.

7 Biaggioni I. & Robertson D. 2009. Adrenoceptor agonists & sympathomimetic drugs. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology. 12: 129-149.

8 Carvalho C.F., Chammas M.C. & Giovanni G.C. 2008. Physical principles of Doppler ultrasonography. Ciência Rural. 38: 872-879. DOI: 10.1590/S0103-84782008000300047

9 Credie L.F.A., Luna S.P.L., Futema F., Silva L, Gomes G.B., Garcia J.N. & Carvalho L.R. 2013. Perioperative evaluation of tumescent anaesthesia technique in bitches submitted to unilateral mastectomy. BMC Veterinary Research. 11: 178. DOI: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-178

10 Diessler M.E., Castellano M.C., Portiansky E.L., Burns S. & Idiart J.R. 2017. Canine mammary carcinomas: influence of histological grade, vascular invasion, proliferation, microvessel density and VEGFR2 expression on lymph node status and survival time. Veterinary and Comparative Oncology. 15: 450-461. DOI: 10.1111/vco.12189

11 Dumantepe M. & Uyar I. 2015. Comparing cold and warm tumescent anesthesia for pain perception during and after the endovenous laser ablation procedure with 1470 nm diode laser. Phlebology. 30: 45-51. DOI: 10.1177/0268355513512827

12 Fei D.Y., Fu C.T., Brewer W.H. & Kraft K.A. 1994. Angle independent Doppler color imaging: determination of accuracy and a method of display. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 20: 147-155. DOI: 10.1016/0301-5629(94)90079-5.

13 Feliciano M.A.R., Ramirez R.A.U., Maronezi M.C., Maciel G.S., Avante M.L., Senhorello I.L.S., Mucédola T., Gasser B. & Vicente W.R.R. 2018.Accuracy of four ultrasonography techniques in predicting histopathological classification of canine mammary carcinomas. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound. 59: 444-452. DOI: 10.1111/vru.12606.

14 Feliciano M.A.R., Vicente W.R.R. & Silva M.A.M. 2012. Conventional and Doppler ultrasound for the differentiation of benign and malignant canine mammary tumours. Journal of Small Animal Practice. 53: 332-337. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2012.01227.x.

15 Fink B.R., Aasheim G.M. & Levy B.A. 1978. Neural pharmacokinetics of epinephrine. Anesthesiology. 48: 263-266. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-197804000-00008

16 Gal A., Catoi C., Rus I., Taulescu M., Bolfă P., Lakatos I. & Baba A.I. 2008. The study of the vascularisation in bitch mammary tumors. Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca. Veterinary. 65: 388-394.

17 Gedon J., Wehrend A., Failing K. & Kessler M. 2021. Canine mammary tumours: size matters–a progression from low to highly malignant subtypes. Veterinary and Comparative Oncology. 19: 707-713. DOI: 10.1111/vco.12649

18 Goldschmidt M., Peña L., Rasotto R. & Zappulli V. 2011. Classification and grading of canine mammary tumors. Veterinary Pathology. 48:117-31. DOI: 10.1177/0300985810393258

19 Hellemen E., Bergstrom R., Holmberg L., Spangberg I.B., Hansson K. & Lindgren A. 1993. Prognostic factors in canine mammary gland tumors: a multivariate study of 202 consecutive cases. Veterinary Pathology. 30: 20-27. DOI: 10.1177/030098589303000103

20 Hoon M.T., Pratt S. & Goodwin W. 2023. Local anesthetic agents in companion animal veterinary practice. Today's Veterinary Practice. (May/June): 26-32.

21 Klein J.A. 1987. Tumescent technique for liposuction surgery. The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery. 4: 263-267. DOI: 10.1177/07488068870040040

22 Lapid O. 2011. Syringe-delivered tumescent anesthesia made easier. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 35: 601-602. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-010-9625-4

23 MacEwen E.G. & Withrow S.J. 1996. Tumors of the mammary gland. In: Withrow S.J. & MacEwen E.G. (Eds). Small Animal Oncology. Philadelphia: Saunders Company, pp.356-372.

24 Martins M.S., Souza G.A., Derchain S.F.M., Roteli Martins C.M., Tadını V., Santos A.L. & Oliveira S.H.C. 2002. Evaluation of breast cancer response to chemotherapy: role of ultrasound and Doppler. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 24: 447-452. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-72032002000700004

25 Misdorp W. 2002. Tumors of the mammary gland. In: Meuten D.J. (Ed). Tumors in Domestic Animals. 4th edn. Ames: Iowa State Press, pp.575-606.

26 Nyman H.T., Nielsen O.L., McEvoy F.J., Lee M.H., Martinussen T., Hellmén E. & Kristensen A.T. 2006. Comparison of B-mode and Doppler ultrasonographic findings with histologic features of benign and malignant mammary tumors in dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 67: 985-991. DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.67.6.985.

27 Rocha F.D.L., Nunes N., Ido C.K., Vela D.B., Estrada C.R.V., Silva P. & Firmo B.F. 2022. Effects of heated tumescence solution in bitches after unilateral mastectomy. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae. 50: 1855. DOI: 10.22456/1679-9216.120564

28 Sleeckx N., De Rooster H.E.J.V.K., Veldhuis Kroeze E.J., Van Ginneken C. & Van Brantegem L. 2011. Canine mammary tumours, an overview. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 46(6): 1112-31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2011.01816.x.

29 Stanzani D., Chala L.F., Barros N., Cerri G.G. & Chammas M.C. 2014. Can Doppler or contrast-enhanced ultrasound analysis add diagnostically important information about the nature of breast lesions? Clinics. 69: 87-92. DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2014(02)03

30 Vullo C., Tambella A.M., Falcone A., Marino G. & Catone G. 2021. Constant rate infusion of lidocaine, tumescent anesthesia and their combination in dogs undergoing unilateral mastectomy. Animals. 11(5): 1280. DOI: 10.3390/ani11051280

31 Youssefzadeh S., Eibenberger K., Helbich T., Jakesz R. & Wolf G. 1996. Use of resistance index for the diagnosis of breast tumours. Clinical Radiology. 51: 418-420. DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(96)80161-9

Additional Files

Published

2026-06-17

How to Cite

Aslıhan Baykal Ugur, Zeynep Günay Uçmak, İsmail Kırşan, Merve Yilmaz, & Mert Sarilar. (2026). Efficacy of the Modified Tumescent Technique on Vascularization in Canine Mammary Tumors. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae, 54. https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.153189

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.