Intestinal Parasites in Ducks from Central Jiangsu, China
Epidemiological Survey
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.149327Keywords:
Ducks, intestinal parasites, molecular identification, epidemiology, rearing systemsAbstract
Background: Domestic ducks (Anas platyrhynchos domesticus) are essential to rural livelihoods, supplying meat and eggs. However, they are frequently affected by intestinal parasites, primarily helminths and protozoa, which reduce growth, egg yield, and survival. Coccidiosis severely impacts ducklings, with infection rates of 30-60%. As duck farming intensifies, parasite dynamics are shifting. While morphological identification is conventional, it lacks resolution for cryptic species. Molecular tools, particularly ribosomal markers, improve detection and phylogenetic accuracy. This study combines both approaches to assess parasite prevalence and diversity in central Jiangsu.
Materials, Methods & Results: Between June and November 2023, fecal samples were collected from 36 duck farms employing diverse rearing systems across 6 districts in 3 cities. Samples were analyzed using morphological methods and PCR amplification of 18S rDNA, ITS, and SSU rRNA gene regions, followed by sequencing. Morphological identification revealed several parasites, including Eimeria anatis, Isospora mandarin, Drepanidotaenia lanceolata, Capillaria spp., and trematode eggs. Molecular data confirmed these findings and further identified associations with reference strains such as Capillaria anatis, Echinostoma miyagawai, and Cryptosporidium baileyi. The overall prevalence of intestinal parasites was 86.11%, with Cryptosporidium spp. most prevalent (58.33%), followed by coccidia (30.56%) and helminths (16.66%). Infection rates varied by region, duck age, and rearing system. Ducks aged 21-50 days exhibited the highest prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. (71.43%), while older ducks showed higher Eimeria spp. infections. Intensive floor-rearing and water-based free-range systems had higher infection rates than courtyard pasture systems.
Discussion: This study revealed a high prevalence and diversity of intestinal parasites in domestic ducks. A 100% infection rate with Cryptosporidium spp. was observed in ducks reared in multilayer cages, despite the absence of helminths or coccidia-likely reflecting hygienic and automated management, though the limited sample size warrants cautious interpretation. Helminth eggs, including D. lanceolata, Capillaria spp., and trematodes, were recovered via nylon-sieve washing and saturated salt flotation. D. lanceolata eggs were distinguished from Fimbriaria fasciolaris by the absence of polar filaments. PCR targeting ITS and 18S rDNA identified trematodes clustering with E. miyagawai and Capillaria spp. with isolates from Gallus gallus domesticus. Coccidian oocysts were preliminarily identified as E. anatis and I. mandarin. The former were ovoid with thick walls and micropyles; high temperature hindered sporulation, complicating differentiation from Tyzzeria perniciosa or Wenyonella philiplevinei. Phylogenetic analysis confirmed E. anatis, while I. mandarin oocysts, containing 2 sporocysts with 4 sporozoites and refractile bodies, showed high similarity (PV785220.1) to waterfowl Eimeria. Close phylogenetic clustering reflects shared Eimeriidae traits in sporozoite development and host invasion. Ecological and immunological characteristics of waterfowl may promote co-infection and niche overlap. Nested PCR targeting SSU rRNA confirmed C. baileyi infection, showing 100% identity with a Passer montanus isolate. While C. baileyi typically infects avian respiratory and intestinal tracts, molecular data on duck-derived isolates in China remain scarce. Overall, this study underscores the substantial burden and diversity of intestinal parasites in ducks from central Jiangsu, emphasizing the importance of integrating morphological and molecular diagnostics. Long-term, large-scale studies are essential for designing targeted control strategies in duck farming systems.
Keywords: ducks, intestinal parasites, molecular identification, epidemiology, rearing systems.
Downloads
References
1 Anggrahini S., Widiyono I., Baihaqi Z.A., Sofyan A., Mulianda R., Wulandari W., Ekawasti F., Fauziah I., Sadarman S., Sigit M., Herdian H., Ahmad R.Z. & Rokana E. 2025. Occurrence of gastrointestinal parasites in local ducks at varying altitudes in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Veterinary World. 18(3): 616-623. DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2025.616-623. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2025.616-623
2 Augustine P.C. 2001. Cell: sporozoite interactions and invasion by apicomplexan parasites of the genus Eimeria. International Journal for Parasitology. 31(1): 1-8. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7519(00)00150-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(00)00150-8
3 Berto B.P., Brice B., Thomas G., Elloit A., Zahedi A. & Yang R. 2022. Eimeria spp. and Tyzzeria perniciosa Allen, 1936 (Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae) from a Pacific black duck, Anas superciliosa Gmelin (Aves: Anseriformes), in western Australia. Current Research in Parasitology & Vector-Borne Diseases. 2: 100075. DOI: 10.1016/j.crpvbd.2022.100075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crpvbd.2022.100075
4 Chan A.H.E., Chaisiri K., Morand S., Saralamba N. & Thaenkham U. 2020. Evaluation and utility of mitochondrial ribosomal genes for molecular systematics of parasitic nematodes. Parasites & Vectors. 13(1): 364. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-020-04242-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04242-8
5 Cháves-González L.E., Morales-Calvo F., Mora J., Solano-Barquero A., Verocai G.G. & Rojas A. 2022. What lies behind the curtain: Cryptic diversity in helminth parasites of human and veterinary importance. Current Research in Parasitology & Vector-Borne Diseases. 2: 100094. DOI: 10.1016/j.crpvbd.2022.100094. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crpvbd.2022.100094
6 Chubb J.C., Pool D.W. & Veltkamp C.J. 2010. A key to the species of cestodes (tapeworms) parasitic in British and Irish freshwater fishes. Journal of Fish Biology. 31(4): 517-543. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1987.tb05256.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1987.tb05256.x
7 Cornell K.A., Smith O.M., Crespo R., Jones M.S., Crossley M.S., Snyder W.E. & Owen J.P. 2022. Prevalence Patterns for Enteric Parasites of Chickens Managed in Open Environments of the Western United States. Avian Diseases. 66(1): 60-68. DOI: 10.1637/21-00079. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1637/21-00079
8 Dalal D., Saha S., Dalal D.D., Roy A., Talapatra S.N. & Ghosh P. 2024. Comparative study on the outbreak of helminth parasites in domestic duck and chicken. International Journal of Fauna and Biological Studies. 11(2): 23-26. DOI: 10.22271/23940522.2024.v11.i2a.1015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22271/23940522.2024.v11.i2a.1015
9 EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Animal Welfare (AHAW), Nielsen S.S., Alvarez J., Bicout D.J., Calistri P., Canali E., Drewe J.A., Garin‐Bastuji B., Gonzales Rojas J.L., Gortázar Schmidt C., Herskin M., Miranda Chueca M.Á., Padalino B., Pasquali P., Roberts H.C., Spoolder H., Stahl K., Velarde A., Viltrop A., Winckler C., Estevez I., Guinebretière M., Rodenburg B., Schrader L., Tiemann I., Van Niekerk T., Ardizzone M., Ashe S., Hempen M., Mosbach Schulz O., Rojo Gimeno C., Van der Stede Y., Vitali M. & Michel V. 2023. Welfare of laying hens on farm. EFSA Journal. 21(2): 1-188. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7789. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7789
10 Escalante G.C., Sweet A.D., Mccracken K.G., Gustafsson D.R., Wilson R.E. & Johnson K.P. 2016. Patterns of cryptic host specificity in duck lice based on molecular data. Medical and Veterinary Entomology. 30(2): 200-208. DOI: 10.1111/mve.12157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/mve.12157
11 Essam A., Abbas I., Elmishmishy B. & Elwafa S.A. 2024. Cryptosporidium infection in ducks and pigeons collected from live bird markets in two Nile Delta governorates (Dakahlia and Gharbia), Egypt. Mansoura Veterinary Medical Journal. 25(4): 1247. DOI: 10.35943/2682-2512.1247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35943/2682-2512.1247
12 Gomes-Gonçalves S., Rodrigues D., Santos N., Gantois N., Chabé M., Viscogliosi E. & Mesquita J.R. 2024. Molecular Screening and Characterization of Enteric Protozoan Parasites and Microsporidia in Wild Ducks from Portugal. Animals. 14(20): 2956. DOI: 10.3390/ani14202956. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14202956
13 Gong C., Cao X.-F., Deng L., Li W., Huang X.-M., Lan J.-C., Xiao Q.-C., Zhong Z.-J., Feng F., Zhang Y., Wang W.-B., Guo P., Wu K.-J. & Peng G.-N. 2017. Epidemiology of Cryptosporidium infection in cattle in China: a review. Parasite (Paris, France). 24: 1. DOI: 10.1051/parasite/2017001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2017001
14 Gong Z., Kan Z., Huang J., Fang Z., Liu X., Gu Y. & Li W.-C. 2021. Molecular prevalence and characterization of Cryptosporidium in domestic free-range poultry in Anhui Province, China. Parasitology Research. 120(10): 3519-3527. DOI: 10.1007/s00436-021-07191-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-021-07191-y
15 Graaf D.C., Vanopdenbosch E., Ortega-Mora L.M., Abbassi H. & Peeters J.E. 1999. A review of the importance of cryptosporidiosis in farm animals. International Journal for Parasitology. 29(8): 1269-1287. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7519(99)00076-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(99)00076-4
16 Investigations Operations Manual. 2022. United States: U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). [Fonte: <https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/inspection-references/investigations-operations-manual>].
17 Jirků M., Jirků M., Oborník M., Lukeš J. & Modrý D. 2009. A Model for Taxonomic Work on Homoxenous Coccidia: Redescription, Host Specificity, and Molecular Phylogeny of Eimeria ranae Dobell, 1909, with a Review of Anuran‐Host Eimeria (Apicomplexa: Eimeriorina). Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 56(1): 39-51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2008.00362.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2008.00362.x
18 Kerroucha R., Medjoual I., Bourguig L. & Senouci K. 2022. Identification of The Main Intestinal Helminths of Local Breed Chickens (Gallus Gallus Domesticus Linnaeus, 1758) Reared in Traditional Mode in The Oran Region. Helminthologia. 59(2): 170-178. DOI: 10.2478/helm-2022-0015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/helm-2022-0015
19 Larki S., Alborzi A., Chegini R. & Amiri R. 2018. A Preliminary Survey on Gastrointestinal Parasites of Domestic Ducks in Ahvaz, Southwest Iran. Iran Journal of Parasitology. 13(1): 137-144.
20 Li Q., Wang C., Gong Z. & Liu G. 2019. Phylogenetic relationships of 52 Eimeria species based on COI sequences. Mitochondrial DNA. 4(2): 3956-3958. DOI: 10.1080/23802359.2019.1688709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23802359.2019.1688709
21 Li Y. 2019. Comparison and phylogenetic analyses of complete mitochondrial genomes of three trematodes in duck. 102f. Daqing, China. Dissertation (Master’s Degree in Preventive Veterinary Medicine) - Graduate Program in Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University.
22 Liu K., Wang M., Zhang Y., Fang C., Zhang R., Fang L., Sun J., Liu Y. & Liao X. 2024. Distribution of antibiotic resistance genes and their pathogen hosts in duck farm environments in south-east coastal China. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 108(1): 136. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-023-12842-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-023-12842-4
23 Lopez-Osorio S., Chaparro-Gutiérrez J.J. & Gomez-Osorio L.M. 2020. Overview of Poultry Eimeria Life Cycle and Host-Parasite Interactions. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 7: 384. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00384
24 Aboulaila M., El-Bahy N., Hilali M., Yokoyama N., Igarashi I. 2011. Prevalence of the enteric parasites of ducks from Behera governorate, Egypt. Journal of Protozoology Research. 21: 36-44. DOI: 10.32268/jprotozoolres.21.2_36.
25 Ma L., Lyu W., Zeng T., Wang W., Chen Q., Zhao J., Zhang G., Lu L., Yang H. & Xiao Y. 2024. Duck gut metagenome reveals the microbiome signatures linked to intestinal regional, temporal development, and rearing condition. iMeta. 3(4): e198. DOI: 10.1002/imt2.198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/imt2.198
26 Mejías-Alpízar M.J., Porras-Silesky C., Rodríguez E.J., Quesada J., Alfaro-Segura M.P., Robleto-Quesada J., Gutiérrez R. & Rojas A. 2024. Mitochondrial and ribosomal markers in the identification of nematodes of clinical and veterinary importance. Parasites & Vectors. 17(1): 77. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-023-06113-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-023-06113-4
27 Miller M.L., Rota C. & Welsh A. 2024. Transforming gastrointestinal helminth parasite identification in vertebrate hosts with metabarcoding: a systematic review. Parasites & Vectors. 17(1): 311. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-024-06388-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06388-1
28 Nakamura A.A. & Meireles M.V. 2015. Cryptosporidium infections in birds - a review. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária. 24(3): 253-267. DOI: 10.1590/S1984-29612015063. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612015063
29 Nisa R.U., Tantray A.Y. & Shah A.A. 2022. Shift from morphological to recent advanced molecular approaches for the identification of nematodes. Genomics. 114(2): 110295. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2022.110295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2022.110295
30 Ogedengbe M.E., Brash M. & Barta J.R. 2016. The complete mitochondrial genome sequence of an Isospora sp. (Eimeriidae, Eucoccidiorida, Coccidiasina, Apicomplexa) causing systemic coccidiosis in domestic Canaries (Serinus canaria Linn.). Mitochondrial DNA. 27(5): 3315-3317. DOI: 10.3109/19401736.2015.1018201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/19401736.2015.1018201
31 Ogedengbe M.E., El-Sherry S., Ogedengbe J.D., Chapman H.D. & Barta J.R. 2018. Phylogenies based on combined mitochondrial and nuclear sequences conflict with morphologically defined genera in the eimeriid coccidia (Apicomplexa). International Journal for Parasitology. 48(1): 59-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2017.07.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2017.07.008
32 Onyeabor A.I. & Onunkwo D.N. 2023. Preliminary survey on the intestinal protozoan and helminthes parasites of domestic ducks reared in Umuahia Area of Abia State. The International Journal of Agriculture, Management and Technology. 7(1): 637-640.
33 Ozenturk U., Chen Z., Jamone L. & Versace E. 2024. Robotics for poultry farming: challenges and opportunities. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 226: 15-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2024.109411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2024.109411
34 Patil S.S., Shinduja R., Suresh K.P., Phukan S., Kumar S., Sengupta P.P., G. Amachawadi R., Raut A., Roy P., Syed A., Marraiki N., Elgorban A.M., Al-Harthi H.F., Bahkali A.H., Shivamallu C. & Shiva Prasad K. 2021. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of infectious diseases of Duck: A world perspective. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 28(9): 5131-5144. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.05.034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.05.034
35 Sato H., Ihara S., Inaba O. & Une Y. 2010. Identification of Euryhelmis costaricensis metacercariae in the skin of Tohoku hynobiid salamanders (Hynobius lichenatus), northeastern Honshu, Japan. Journal of Wildlife Diseases. 46(3): 832-842. DOI: 10.7589/0090-3558-46.3.832. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-46.3.832
36 Sherwin C.M., Nasr M.A.F., Gale E., Petek M., Stafford K., Turp M. & Coles G.C. 2013. Prevalence of nematode infection and faecal egg counts in free-range laying hens: relations to housing and husbandry. British Poultry Science. 54(1): 12-23. DOI: 10.1080/00071668.2012.757577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2012.757577
37 Stout L., Daffe G., Chambouvet A., Correia S., Culloty S., Freitas R., Iglesias D., Jensen K.T., Joaquim S., Lynch S., Magalhães L., Mahony K., Malham S.K., Matias D., Rocroy M., Thieltges D.W. & de Montaudouin X. 2024. Morphological vs. molecular identification of trematode species infecting the edible cockle Cerastoderma edule across Europe. International Journal for Parasitology. Parasites and Wildlife. 25: 101019. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2024.101019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2024.101019
38 Subagja H., Nadia Z.A. & Zubaidah S. 2025. Effect of Hygiene on Hatching Performance of Duck Eggs (Anas platyrhynchos domesticus). Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences. 13(5): 1060-1065. DOI: 10.17582/journal.aavs/2025/13.5.1060.1065. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2025/13.5.1060.1065
39 Tamaru M., Yamaki S., Jimenez L.A. & Sato H. 2015. Morphological and molecular genetic characterization of three Capillaria spp. (Capillaria anatis, Capillaria pudendotecta, and Capillaria madseni) and Baruscapillaria obsignata (Nematoda: Trichuridae: Capillariinae) in avians. Parasitology Research. 114(11): 4011-4022. DOI: 10.1007/s00436-015-4629-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-015-4629-2
40 Taylor M.A., Coop R.L. & Wall R.L. 2007. General parasitology including taxonomy, diagnosis, antiparasitics. In: Veterinary Parasitology. 3rd edn. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp.270-290.
41 University of New Mexico. 2001. Alphabetical list of the Eimeriidae of the world. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico. [Fonte: http://eimeria.unl.edu/list.html.].
42 Xiao L., Escalante L., Yang C., Sulaiman I., Escalante A.A., Montali R.J., Fayer R. & Lal A.A. 1999. Phylogenetic Analysis of Cryptosporidium Parasites Based on the Small-Subunit rRNA Gene Locus. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 65(4): 1578-1583. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.65.4.1578-1583.1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.65.4.1578-1583.1999
43 Yegani M. & Korver D.R. 2008. Factors Affecting Intestinal Health in Poultry. Poultry Science. 87(10): 2052-2063. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2008-00091. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00091
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yu Feng, Feiyan Wang, Jinjun Xu, Jianping Tao, Dandan Liu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides open access to all of its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Such access is associated with increased readership and increased citation of an author's work. For more information on this approach, see the Public Knowledge Project and Directory of Open Access Journals.
We define open access journals as journals that use a funding model that does not charge readers or their institutions for access. From the BOAI definition of "open access" we take the right of users to "read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles" as mandatory for a journal to be included in the directory.
La Red y Portal Iberoamericano de Revistas Científicas de Veterinaria de Libre Acceso reúne a las principales publicaciones científicas editadas en España, Portugal, Latino América y otros países del ámbito latino
