Spermatological Parameters In Vitro of Holstein Bulls and Relationship with Male Fertility

Authors

  • Halil Dönmez Private Veterinary Practitioner, Burdur, Turkey.
  • Muhammed Enes İnanç Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University (MAKU), Burdur, Turkey. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6954-6309

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.140919

Keywords:

artificial insemination, bull, fertility, flow cytometry, spermatological parameters

Abstract

Background: The main purpose of evaluating spermatological parameters is to assess the relationship between semen quality and fertility. Extensive research is currently being conducted on freezing, storage, and thawing of bovine semen. Therefore, it is crucial to assess the quality of frozen semen. The freezing of semen causes different degrees of damage to the sperm cell. damages reduce the ability of the spermatozoon to fertilize the oocyte. The ability of sperm to fertilize oocytes is reduced by this damage. This study aims to determine the relationship between fertility and spermatological parameters of frozen-thawed bull semen routinely used in artificial insemination (AI).  

Materials, Methods & Results: Frozen semen samples from 5 different imported Holstein bulls (5 different collection dates) and 175 cows 2-4 years of age were used. These bulls are commonly used by AI organizations in breeding. Frozen-thawed bull semen straws were analyzed for motility using a phase-contrast microscope with a heated stage, plasma membrane integrity (PMAI), viability, lipid peroxidation level, and mitochondrial oxidative stress were performed with a flow cytometer. PMAI was evaluated by The FITC/PNA-PI double staining protocol, lipid peroxidation level were detected by BODIPY/SYBR 14 double staining protocol; sperm viability was determined using SYBR-14/PI double staining protocol, and sperm mitochondrial oxidative stress was evaluated by MITOSOX/PI double staining protocol.  The flow cytometric tests were performed using a CytoFLEX flow cytometer Beckman Coulter equipped with emission filters at 610 ± 20 nm, 585 ± 42 nm, 525 ± 40 nm, and 50 mW (488 nm) laser output. An average of 10,000 spermatozoa were analyzed for each evaluation. Pseudocolor plots were used to compare the side scatter area (SSC-A) with the forward scatter area (FSC-A) of sperm cells to facilitate the selection process. For the AI, cows estrus was confirmed by detecting the graff follicle by rectal palpation and assessing uterine tone. Once clinical and observational signs confirmed estrus, AI was performed. Pregnancy rates were determined 60 days after AI using ultrasound. No significant correlations were found between in vitro spermatological parameters and pregnancy rates (P > 0.05). In one bull, motility scores correlated with pregnancy rate (P < 0.05). There were significant differences in PMAI and mitochondrial oxidative stress parameters (P < 0.05). Positive correlations were found between motility, PMAI, and viability. Furthermore, PMAI was positively correlated with viability and lipid peroxidation levels. Conversely, mitochondrial oxidative stress is negatively correlated with viability and lipid peroxidation. A positive correlation was observed between viability and lipid peroxidation levels. (P ˂ 0.05). No statistically significant difference was observed between the bulls with regard to pregnancy rates.  

Discussion: Different authors showed a positive correlation between motility and fertility results. Also, flow cytometric results correlated with non-return rate and other spermatological parameters. This study concluded that different organelles and structures within a cell work closely together to carry out metabolic processes. For the accurate prediction and correlation of fertility, it is necessary to create multiple combinations of spermatological parameters. It is also essential to study the associations and correlations between high- and low-fertility bulls and to investigate the pathways leading to their differences. 

 

Keywords: artificial insemination, bull, fertility, flow cytometry, spermatological parameters. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al Naib A., Hanrahan J.P., Lonergan P. & Fair S. 2011. In vitro assessment of sperm from bulls of high and low field fertility. Theriogenology. 76: 161-167. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.10.038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.10.038

Alm K., Taponen J., Dahlbom M., Tuunainen E., Koskinen E. & Andersson M. 2018. A novel automated fluorometric assay to evaluate sperm viability and fertility in dairy bulls. Theriogenology. 56: 677-684. DOI: 10.1016/s0093-691x(01)00599-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00599-4

Amann R.P. 1989. Can the fertility potential of a seminal sample be predicted accurately. Journal of Andrology. 10: 89-98. DOI: 10.1002/j.1939-4640.1989.tb00066.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.1989.tb00066.x

Anilkumar R., Devanathan T.G., Pattabiraman S.R. & Edwin M.J. 2001. Correlation between the spermatozoal characteristics and sperm penetration distance in polacrylamide gel and bovine cervical mucus. Theriogenology. 55: 685-691. DOI: 10.1016/s0093-691x(01)00436-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00436-8

Avdatek F., Inanc M.E., Yeni D., Gungor S., Acar A. & Ata A. 2020. Koç spermasının dondurulmasına lipoik asit ve trehalozun etkisi. Journal of Advances in VetBio Science and Techniques. 5: 121-127. DOI: 10.31797/vetbio.811078. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31797/vetbio.811078

Bailey J.L., Bilodeau J.F. & Cormier N. 2000. Semen cryopreservation in domestic animals: a damaging and capacitating phenomenon. Journal of Andrology. 21: 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.2000.tb03268.x

Bollwein H., Fuchs I. & Koess C. 2008. Interrelationship between plasma membrane integrity, mitochondrial membrane potential and DNA fragmentation in cryopreserved bovine spermatozoa. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 43: 189-195. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2007.00876.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2007.00876.x

Bucak M.N., Keskin N., Taspinar M., Coyan K., Baspinar N., Cenariu MC. & Kursunlu A.N. 2013. Raffinose and hypotaurine improve the post-thawed Merino ram sperm parameters. Cryobiology. 67: 34-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2013.04.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2013.04.007

Bucher K., Malama E., Siud M., Janett F. & Bollwein H. 2019. Multicolor flow cytometric analysis of cryopreserved bovine sperm: a tool for the evaluation of bull fertility. Journal of Dairy Science. 102: 11652-11669. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2019-16572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-16572

Evenson D.P. 1999. Loss of livestock breeding efficiency due to uncompensable sperm nuclear defects. Reproduction Fertility and Development. 11: 1-15. DOI: 10.1071/rd98023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/RD98023

Evenson D.P. 2016. The Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay (SCSA®) and other sperm DNA fragmentation tests for evaluation of sperm nuclear DNA integrity as related to fertility. Animal Reproduction Science. 169: 56-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.01.017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.01.017

Farell P.B., Presicce G.A., Brockett C.C. & Foote R.H. 1998. Quantification of bull sperm characteristics measured by computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) and the relationship to fertility. Theriogenology. 49(4): 871-879. DOI: 10.1016/S0093-691X(98)00036-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(98)00036-3

Ferramosca A., Provenzano S.P., Coppol L. & Zara V. 2012. Mitochondrial respiratory efficiency is positively correlated with human sperm motility. Urology. 79(4): 809-814. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.12.042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2011.12.042

Gliozzi T.M., Turri F., Manes S., Cassinelli C. & Pizzi F. 2017. The combination of kinetic and flow cytometric semen parameters as a tool to predict fertility in cryopreserved bull semen. Animal. 11: 1975-1982. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731117000684. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117000684

Gillan L. 2008. Kroetsch T, Maxwell WM, et al. Assessment of in vitro sperm characteristics in relation to fertility in dairy bulls. Animal Reproduction Science. 103: 201-214. DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.12.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.12.010

Hendricks K.E. & Hansen P.J. 2009. Can programmed cell death be induced in post-ejaculatory bull and stallion spermatozoa? Theriogenology. 71(7): 1138-1146. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.12.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.12.006

Hopkins F.M., & Spitzer J.C. 1997. The new Society for Theriogenology breeding soundness evaluation system. Veterinary Clinics of North America- Food Animal Practice 13(2): 283-293. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-0720(15)30341-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-0720(15)30341-8

Ibanescu I., Siuda M. & Bollwein H. 2020. Motile sperm subpopulations in bull semen using different clustering approaches-associations with flow cytometric sperm characteristics and fertility. Animal Reproduction Science. 215: 106329. DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2020.106329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2020.106329

Inanc M.E., Guzel F.N., Gungor S., Herdogan M., Mart F., Kahraman D., Cay H.A. & Ata A. 2023. The Interaction between seminal plasma biochemical constituents and short term semen preservation in Honamli and hair goats. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 58: 387-395. DOI: 10.1111/rda.14297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.14297

Inanc M.E., Cil B., Tekin K., Alemdar H. & Daskin A 2018. The combination of CASA kinetic parameters and fluorescein staining as a fertility tool in cryopreserved bull semen. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Science. 42: 452-458. DOI: 10.3906/vet-1801-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-1801-83

Inanc M.E., Gungor S., Gul E., Uslu, B.A. & Ata A. 2021. Gallic acid improves the viability and mitochondrial membrane potential of post-thawed goat buck semen. Acta Veterinaria Hungarica. 69: 291-297. DOI: 10.1556/004.2021.00038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/004.2021.00038

Januskauskas A., Johannisson A. & Rodriguez-Martinez H. 2003. Subtle membrane changes in cryopreserved bull semen in relation with sperm viability, chromatin structure, and field fertility. Theriogenology. 60: 743-758. DOI: 10.1016/s0093-691x(03)00050-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00050-5

Januskauskas A., Johannisson A., Söderquist L. & Rodriguez-Martinez H. 2000. Assessment of sperm characteristics post-thaw and response to calcium ionophore in relation to fertility in Swedish dairy AI bulls. Theriogenology. 53: 859-875. DOI: 10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00235-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00235-1

Juonala T., Salonen E., Nurttila T. & Andersson M. 1999. Three fluorescence methods for assessing boar sperm viability. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 34: 83-87. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.1999.tb01388.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.1999.tb01388.x

Kathiravan P., Kalatharan J., Karthikeya G., Rengarajan K. & Kadirvel G. 2011. Objective sperm motion analysis to assess dairy bull fertility using computer‐aided system–a review. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 46: 165-172. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2010.01603.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2010.01603.x

Kim H.H., Funaro M., Mazel S., Goldstein SM., Schlegel P.N. & Paduch D.A. 2013. Flow cytometric characterization of apoptosis and chromatin damage in spermatozoa. Reproductive Biomedicine Online. 26(4): 393-395. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.12.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.12.005

Korkmaz F., Malama E., Siuda M., Leiding C. & Bollwein H. 2017. Effects of sodium pyruvate on viability, synthesis of reactive oxygen species, lipid peroxidation and DNA integrity of cryopreserved bovine sperm. Animal Reproduction Science. 185: 18-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2017.07.017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2017.07.017

Oura C. & Toshimori K. 1990. Ultrastructural studies on the fertilization of mammalian gametes. International Review of Cytology. 122: 105-151. DOI: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)61207-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7696(08)61207-3

Paoli D., Gallo M., Rizzo F., Baldi E., Francavilla S., Lenzi A., Lombardo F. & Gandini L. 2011. Mitochondrial membrane potential profile and its correlation with increasing sperm motility. Fertility and Sterility. 95: 2315-2319. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.03.059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.03.059

Pena A. & Johannisson A. 1999. Post-thaw evaluation of dog spermatozoa using new triple fluorescent staining and flow cytometry. Theriogenology. 52: 965-980. DOI: 10.1016/s0093-691x(99)00186-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00186-7

Rodriguez-Martinez H., Larsson B., Zhang B.R. & Soderquist L. 1997. In vitro assessment of viability and fertilizing capacity of bull spermatozoa. Journal of Reproduction and Development. 43: 1-11

Sellem E., Broekhuijse M.L.W.J., Chevrier L., Camugli S., Schmitt E., Schibler L. & Koenen E.P.C. 2015. Use of combinations of in vitro quality assessments to predict fertility of bovine semen. Theriogenology. 84: 1447-1454. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.07.035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.07.035

Stalhammar E.M., Janson L. & Philipsson J. 1994. The impact of sperm motility on non-retun rate in preselected dairy bulls. Reproduction Nutrition Development. 34: 37-45. DOI: 10.1051/rnd:19940104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:19940104

Watson P.F. 1995. Recent developments and concepts in the cryopreservation of spermatozoa and the assessment of their post-thawing function. Reproduction Fertility and Development. 7: 871-891. DOI: 10.1071/rd9950871. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/RD9950871

Additional Files

Published

2024-10-14

How to Cite

Halil Dönmez, & Muhammed Enes İnanç. (2024). Spermatological Parameters In Vitro of Holstein Bulls and Relationship with Male Fertility. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae, 52(1). https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.140919

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.