The reconstruction process of the Public Prosecutor’s Office in the political transition (1974-1985)

Authors

  • Debora Alves Maciel Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
  • Andrei Koerner Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-5269.49977

Keywords:

Public Prosecutor’s Office, Diffuse Interests, Judicial Reform, Political Transition, Pro-Democracy Mobilizations.

Abstract

The article analyzes reconstruction dynamics of the Public Prosecutor’s Office, focusing on the mobilization of prosecutors and prosecuting attorney in the period from 1974 to 1985. We argue that the characteristics of Brazilian political transition were critical to the changing process of the institution, which gained constitutional status in 1988. Liberalization of the military regime changed the links between lawyers, opposition parties and pro-democracy movements. The connection of the institutional movement with dissident political elites and the dense activism network around new social conflicts allowed the Public Prosecutor’s Office to try new strategies of collective action, gain political visibility and thus become a viable alternative to political system to respond to social pressures for judiciary democratization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Debora Alves Maciel, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)

Professora do Departamento de Ciências Sociais da Escola de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas da Universidade Federal de São Paulo – EFLCH/UNIFESP, Membro do Grupo de Grupo de Pesquisas em Direito e Política do CEIPOC/IFCH/Unicamp e Pesquisadora do Cebrap.

Andrei Koerner, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)

Professor do Departamento de Ciência Política IFCH/Unicamp, Coordenador do Grupo de Pesquisas em Direito e Política do CEIPOC/IFCH/Unicamp, Pesquisador do Cedec e do INCT/Ineu.

Published

2014-12-19

How to Cite

Maciel, D. A., & Koerner, A. (2014). The reconstruction process of the Public Prosecutor’s Office in the political transition (1974-1985). Revista Debates, 8(3), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-5269.49977

Issue

Section

Dossier