Computational Thinking Tools: Analyzing concurrency and its representations

Authors

  • Cleyton Slaviero Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro
  • Edward Herman Haeusler Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro

Keywords:

computer science education, programming, concurrent programming, semiotic engineering

Abstract

Computational thinking (CT) tools, as a software system, express their designers' perspective on how a selected set of Computer Science concepts should be introduced, typically hiding details to avoid unnecessary complexity. This paper focuses on how concurrency is dealt with by five well-known tools in this domain: Scratch, Alice, AgentSheets, NetLogo and Greenfoot. We present the results of a systematic analysis contrasting their model of concurrent behavior with the corresponding metamessages, the messages about messages of concurrency, that trigger users' interpretation and learning of concurrency-related concepts. We present and discuss the conceptualizations that potentially emerge from using these five tools and compare them with established concurrency concepts. Our findings indicate opportunities for an explicit exploration of how some concurrency aspects are implemented in games and simulations built with CT tools. We believe that this might facilitate future learning and comprehension of complex concurrency concepts, considering that the knowledge embedded in these tools can also influence students’ understanding of concurrency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-08

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2018)

Section

Special Issue - IHC 2015

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors maintain the author's rights, under de Brazilian legal system, and retain copyright of the work. Authors license the work under a Creative Commons Attribution License. The authors grant the SBC Journal on Interactive Systems the right of its long term archiving and publication under this same licence, without restrictions of time and media, as well to make the required transformations to maintain the work archivable, accessible and of open access.
     
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
     
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).