Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Academic Rankings: implications for university governance of Brazilian Catholic universities

ABSTRACT

This article aims to analyze the implications of academic rankings, as external assessment tools, in the governance structure of Brazilian Catholic universities. For the development of this study, exploratory research was carried out through documentary and bibliographic analyses, taking as reference scientific production found in indexed bases, federal legislation, apostolic constitutions, canon law, statutes, regulations and Institutional Development Plans (IDPs) of these institutions. In light of the numerous existing rankings, their use is evident in the strategic planning process of most Catholic universities, through their respective performances in establishing goals and objectives.

Palavras-chave
Catholic Universities; Academic Rankings; University Governance; Higher Education; Institutional Assessment

RESUMO

O presente artigo tem como objetivo analisar as implicações dos rankings acadêmicos, como instrumentos de avaliação externa, na estrutura de governança das universidades católicas brasileiras. Para o desenvolvimento do estudo foi realizada pesquisa exploratória por meio de análises documentais e bibliográficas, tomando como referência produção científica obtida em bases indexadas, legislação federal, constituições apostólicas, direito canônico, estatutos, regimentos e Planos de Desenvolvimento Institucional (PDI’s) dessas instituições. Diante dos inúmeros rankings existentes, evidencia-se em grande parte das universidades católicas, o uso desse ferramental no processo de planejamento estratégico, por meio de seus respectivos desempenhos para o estabelecimento de metas e objetivos.

Keywords
Universidades Católicas; Rankings Acadêmicos; Governança Universitária; Educação Superior; Avaliação Institucional

Introduction

Brazilian Catholic universities are aligned with each other under the spectrum of Christian identity present in their missions, principles and ethical-moral values. The governance of these institutions brings together elements that respect their characteristics and distinguish them from the others, as in addition to following the norms of the Federal Education System, they are governed by guidelines determined by the Holy See. However, it is clear that such particularities do not overlap with market-imposed logic, subjecting them to the flexibility of their management processes to adapt to the current scenario of higher education.

These universities seek to preserve their confessional identities in the face of challenges and external pressures of the educational market (Calderón, 2000CALDERÓN, Adolfo Ignacio. Universidades mercantis: a institucionalização do mercado universitário em questão. São Paulo em Perspectiva, São Paulo, v. 14, n. 1, p. 61-72. 2000. DOI: 10.1590/S0102-88392000000100007.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-8839200000...
; Traina Chacon; Calderón, 2015TRAINA CHACON, José Marcelo; CALDERÓN, Adolfo Ignacio. A expansão da educação superior privada no Brasil: do governo de FHC ao governo de Lula. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior, v. 6, n. 17, p. 78-100, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.rides.2015.10.004.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rides.2015.10....
), in which they compete with for-profit Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). With threatening characteristics, such pressures influence their actions and overload them with contradictions, given the noticeable drop in demand for students at this level of education and the emergence of large educational groups, which further intensify competition in this segment of Brazilian HEIs.

The expansion of academic rankings, whether global, regional or local, since the creation of the Shanghai ranking – Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) –, is now on the spotlight and, as stated by Albatch (2006)ALTBACH, Philip G. International higher education: reflections on Policy and practice. EUA: Boston College Center for international higher education, 2006., they are here to stay. For Hazelkorn (2011)HAZELKORN, Ellen. Globalization and the reputation race in rankings and the reshaping of higher education: the battle for world class excellence. London: Palgrave MacMillan, 2011., these are parameters in the battle for excellence: they are linked to greater accountability and transparency in the quest to achieve an outstanding level among institutions. These rankings have assumed the position of external evaluators and challenge university governance. Fanelli and Carranza (2018)FANELLI, Ana García de; CARRANZA, María Pita. Los rankings y sus usos en la gobernanza universitária. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad – CTS, v. 13, n. 37, 2018. point out that the impact of rankings on HEIs is increasingly evident: the internal governance structure of universities uses them in strategic plans and in benchmarking.

Studies on the performance of Catholic universities in academic rankings indicate a certain heterogeneity and, although supported by their quality-wise traditional prestige, not all of them stand out. There is a group with excellent performance made up of research universities; on the other hand, there is a group with below average performance (Wandercil; Calderón; Ganga-Contreras, 2019WANDERCIL, Marco; CALDERÓN, Adolfo Ignacio; GANGA-CONTRERAS, Francisco. Qualidade da educação superior no Brasil: desempenho das universidades católicas à luz dos rankings acadêmicos, índices e tabelas classificatórias estatais e do setor privado. EccoS – Revista Científica, São Paulo, n. 51, out./dez. 2019. DOI: 10.5585/EccoS.n51.14581.
https://doi.org/10.5585/EccoS.n51.14581...
; Righetti; Gamba, 2019RIGHETTI, Sabine; GAMBA, Estevão. Categorização do Ensino Superior no Brasil: Diversidade e Complementaridade. In: Jacques Marcovitch. (Org.). Repensar a Universidade II: Impactos para a Sociedade. 1. ed. São Paulo: Com-Arte; Fapesp, 2019. P. 139-157.).

Among the Brazilian private universities, there are only four institutions (2% of the total) with similar characteristics when it comes to an administrative, research activity and institutional maturity point of view. UNISINOS (University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos) and the Pontifical Catholic Universities of Rio de Janeiro, Rio Grande do Sul and Paraná make up a group of non-profit confessional private universities with over 31 years of activity, in the South-Southeast axis of Brazil and with moderate research activity. These are Universities, therefore, that do not ‘compete’ with the group of internationalized Brazilian public institutions, but converse with the set of moderate public universities such as, for example, UERJ (University of the State of Rio de Janeiro) and the Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF)

(Righeti; Gamba, 2019RIGHETTI, Sabine; GAMBA, Estevão. Categorização do Ensino Superior no Brasil: Diversidade e Complementaridade. In: Jacques Marcovitch. (Org.). Repensar a Universidade II: Impactos para a Sociedade. 1. ed. São Paulo: Com-Arte; Fapesp, 2019. P. 139-157., p. 149).

In the current scenario of higher education, marked by competition and academic rankings, Catholic universities began to adopt management methods based on business paradigms that are gradually adapted and shaped to university governance (Santos, 2010SANTOS, Boaventura de Sousa. A Universidade no século XXI: para uma reforma democrática e emancipatória da Universidade. São Paulo: Editora Cortez. 3. Ed. 2010.; Sampaio, 2014SAMPAIO, Helena. Diversidade e diferenciação no ensino superior no Brasil: conceitos para discussão. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, São Paulo, v. 29, n. 84, p. 43-55, 2014.).

In light of the foregoing, this article aims to analyze and discuss the implications and uses of academic rankings as external assessment tools, a phenomenon that has gained more and more legitimacy in the scope of university governance in these universities as they are incorporated into the management tools.

Although academic rankings have achieved evident primacy and technical legitimacy as assessment tools, and although they are covered with actuality and originality, their approach in university governance documents is rarely addressed in Brazilian academic literature, as they analyze an emerging and little explored field of study, including in the Ibero-American space (Calderón; França, 2018CALDERÓN, Adolfo Ignacio; FRANÇA, Carlos Marshal. Rankings acadêmicos na educação superior: tendências da literatura ibero-americana. Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior, v. 23, p. 448-466, 2018.).

This article is divided into four parts: the first presents the methodology adopted and contextualizes Catholic universities in the Brazilian higher education scenario; the second analyzes the mission, vision and royal governance documents of Catholic universities; the third addresses the similarities and distinctions between these HEIs; and finally, the fourth addresses Catholic universities in the context of quality indicators adopted by academic rankings.

Methodological Aspects of the Study and Catholic Universities in Context

For the development of this article, exploratory research was carried out through document and bibliographic analyses, referencing the scientific production obtained in databases such as the Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), the Journal Portal and the Theses Bank of the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES); Brazilian legislation; the apostolic constitutions and canon law; the Agreement between Brazil and the Holy See; statutes and regulations of Catholic universities, the resolutions of their university councils and councils for teaching, research, and continued education, the normative instruments and internal ordinances, the acts of the Grand Chancellors and Deans, as well as the Institutional Development Plans (IDPs) of these institutions.

It should be noted that this research was also based on a survey of the organizational structures of these universities and the relationship with their stakeholders2 2 The use of this term within the article comprises a person or entity with a legitimate interest in higher education. They are students, parents, employers, the State, society, the higher education institutions themselves (in relation to the system), etc. These HEIs serve the interests of various publics, their administration needs to converge these interests (Amaral; Magalhães, 2000). , in the light of institutional documents. Achieving the proposed objective required a survey of institutional documents (statutes and regulations) and IDPs of these universities, considering aspects of their respective missions and vision of the future, analysis of topics that address institutional objectives and goals, as well as identifying aspects that theoretically guide decision-making within the scope of governance, and whether they directly or indirectly point to concerns in relation to academic rankings.

Also note that for the purposes of this analysis Catholic universities were divided by size, adopting the criterion of the university ranking promoted by Folha (Ranking Universitário Folha…, 2019), defined by the number of students enrolled. Among the large universities, there are five, four of which are Pontifical3 3 A title that some Catholic and ecclesiastical universities receive, such an honor is only bestowed by the Holy See to grant academic degrees in sacred theology, canon law, sacred scriptures and philosophy. In practice, many of these universities also award other academic degrees. They are governed by the Apostolic Constitutions and Canon Law. A university honored with this title will seek to stand out, both for its qualities as a university and for the quality of its Catholic identity and witness. : those of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Minas Gerais (PUC MINAS), Paraná (PUCPR) and Goiás (PUC GOIÁS), together with the University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS), headquartered in the city of São Leopoldo – RS. Within medium-sized universities, nine contemplate this structure, three of which are Pontifical: Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO), São Paulo (PUCSP) and Campinas (PUC-Campinas), São Paulo; the São Francisco University (USF) of Bragança Paulista, also in the State of São Paulo; the Catholic Universities of Pernambuco (UNICAP), Salvador (UCSAL), Brasília (UCB), the Catholic University of Dom Bosco (UCDB), Campo Grande – MS, and the La Salle University (UNILASALLE) of the city of Canoas – RS. Grouped among the small ones are the Catholic Universities of Pelotas (UCPEL), Petrópolis (UCP), Santos (UNISANTOS) and the Franciscan University (UFN) located in Santa Maria – RS.

Catholic Universities: their missions and visions and their royal governance documents

Catholic universities are governed by Brazilian legislation and, with regard to confessionality, they are also governed by apostolic constitutions; by canon law; by the agreement between Brazil and the Holy See (Brazil, 2010BRASIL. Decreto nº 7.107, de 11 de fevereiro de 2010. Promulga o Acordo entre o Governo da República Federativa do Brasil e a Santa Sé relativo ao Estatuto Jurídico da Igreja Católica no Brasil, firmado na Cidade do Vaticano, em 13 de novembro de 2008. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, 11 fev. 2010. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2007-2010/2010/decreto/d7107.htm. Acesso em: 08 set. 2019.
http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_at...
); by statutes and bylaws; by the resolutions of the university councils and of the councils for teaching, research and continued education; by regulatory instruments and internal ordinances; by the acts of the Grand Chancellors and Deans, and by their respective IDPs.

As suggested by Pope John Paul II (1990) in the Apostolic Constitution Ex Corde Ecclesiae4 4 Apostolic Constitution whose name in Latin means “From the heart of the Church”. , Catholic universities must manifest their confessionality through their missions expressed in their official documents (statutes, general regulations, IDPs, self-assessment reports) and/or institutional portals. However, their mission – a mechanism of aspirations and expectations described as institutional guidelines – needs to go beyond institutional documents, as its implementation must be verified in the actions that precede such registration.

The mission sets the cause that the institution supports and must clearly reflect the way it positions itself before society, its reason for being, its social role, objectives and strategies through effective and transparent management (Takeski; Rezende, 2000TAKESKI, Tachizawa; REZENDE, Wilson. Estratégia Empresarial: Tendências e Desafios – um enfoque na realidade brasileira. São Paulo: Makron Books, 2000.; Bart, 2001BART, Christopher K. Exploring the application of mission statements on the World Wide Web. Journal of Electronic Commerce, v. 11, n. 4, p. 360-368. 2001.; Valadares, 2002VALADARES, Mauricio Castelo Branco. Planejamento Estratégico Empresarial. Rio de Janeiro: QualityMark, 2002.).

This article analyzes to what extent the mission statement is in fact effective, as a tool to support university governance, since this statement is reflected in the directions of an institution. Chart 1 highlights the mission of the 18 Brazilian Catholic universities as identified in their official documents.

Chart 1
Mission of the 18 Brazilian Catholic Universities According to Official Institutional Documents

The similarities between Catholic universities are evident and their missions are effectively linked to the apostolic constitutions, as they contemplate catalysts of the Christian faith and the universalization of knowledge. It is also observed that they expose their philosophy and values based on ethical-Christian principles, always referring to their stakeholders, making their commitment to society clear; especially when they refer to their commitment to the integral development of the human person, the reason why these philanthropic-community and confessional institutions exist. It is worth mentioning that the terms with the highest incidence in the missions of these HEIs highlight integral human development; ethical and Christian principles and values; Catholic identity; building a fair and solidary society, production and socialization of knowledge; excellence in teaching, research and continued education; commitment to society and quality and social duties (responsibility and sustainability); search for truth; diffusion of universal culture; freedom of investigation, teaching and expression of thought.

Their missions play an important role in directing university governance by bringing together elements that justify their existence. Having a main purpose is the starting point for the elaboration of their strategic planning and institutional development.

Another relevant aspect is the foresight of Catholic universities expressed through their vision. Maximiano (2011)MAXIMIANO, Antonio Cesar Amaru. Administração para empreendedores. 2. ed. São Paulo: Pearson, 2011. highlights the importance of having a “mission”, the reason why the company exists, followed by the “vision”, an aspect established by the medium and long-term objectives it wishes to accomplish, strengthened by decision-making and, in the case of these HEIs, in line with their values, which are guided by the conservation of Catholic identity.

Considering the missions as starting points, the arrivals are references in different ways in space and time, that is, they depend on the horizon of their strategic plans or their IDPs. Chart 2 presents the vision of the future of Catholic universities, identified in their respective documents and/or institutional portals.

Chart 2
Vision of the 18 Brazilian Catholic Universities According to Official Institutional Documents

It is worth noting that, in their vision of the future, Brazilian Catholic universities take into account their institutional moment. When writing the IDPs, a reference that determines what they aim for within the planned time limit (objectives and goals for the coming years), it establishes, for example, if the university has the goal of being recognized as the greatest or best in the set time. In this sense, universities define measurable indicators in their IDPs or strategic plans to monitor their achieving the proposed objectives.

The views of Catholic universities were analyzed in light of the quality indicators present in national and international academic rankings, more specifically those present in more than two rankings: 1) teaching; 2) research; 3) internationalization; 4) innovation; and 5) employability.

It should be noted that it was not possible to identify the “vision of the future” of PUC-Rio, PUCSP and UNISANTOS in official documents or institutional portals. Thus, analyzing the quality indicators of the academic rankings was restricted to 15 of the 18 Brazilian Catholic universities.

UNISINOS was the only Brazilian Catholic University not to mention the “teaching” quality indicator of academic rankings in their “vision”. However, this indicator is present in the “vision” of all the others, showing that this is the institutional focus of most of them, as identified in the study conducted by Righetti and Gamba (2019)RIGHETTI, Sabine; GAMBA, Estevão. Categorização do Ensino Superior no Brasil: Diversidade e Complementaridade. In: Jacques Marcovitch. (Org.). Repensar a Universidade II: Impactos para a Sociedade. 1. ed. São Paulo: Com-Arte; Fapesp, 2019. P. 139-157..

Regarding the “research” indicator, it was found that, although all HEIs have graduate programs, research is explicitly present in the “vision” of two (UNICAP and UNISINOS), reinforcing the focus of these institutions. UNISINOS (2014)UNISINOS. Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos. Plano de desenvolvimento Institucional – PDI: 2014-2017 / UNISINOS. São Leopoldo: UNISINOS, 2014. established this indicator as a goal and did so vehemently, giving it strong emphasis, translating its vision of the future into a single assertion “[…] to be a global research university”.

With regard to the “internationalization” indicator, eight Catholic universities (PUC Goiás, PUC Minas, PUCPR, PUCRS, UCP, UNILASALLE, UCSAL and UNISINOS) established international relevance as a vision of the future, two of them (PUCPR and UNISINOS) aim for “World-Class University” (WCU)5 5 Concisely, a WCU has a complex structure, offers an extensive variety of courses at both undergraduate and postgraduate levels, invests and promotes research, enjoys substantial resources and budgets, and has the possibility to recruit faculty and students from other nationalities (Altbach, 2004). status; four (PUC Goiás, PUC MINAS, PUCRS and UNILASALLE) aim for international recognition; and two (UCP and UCSAL) aim at international cooperation in the coming years. Based on these indications, Catholic universities have focused on internationalization. However, expanding institutional boundaries does not detract from the community role and local regional relevance of the others, as their profiles appeal to relevant demands of social development, sociocultural promotion, commitment to environmental issues and social justice. These elements are present in the vision of these universities, which cherish both quality and reputation.

Six Catholic universities (PUC-Campinas, PUC MINAS, PUCRS, UCPEL, UNICAP and USF) have made an express commitment to the “innovation” indicator in their “visions of the future”. This indicator refers to industrial partnerships for fundraising or knowledge transfer.

It was not possible to identify aspects that make direct reference to the “employability” indicator; however, one can see this implicit commitment in the “vision” of the universities, in terms of loco-regional development and social demands.

When it comes to governance matters, although the term does not appear explicitly, virtually all Catholic universities agree that they must be conducted and managed within parameters of sustainable, social, environmental, scientific, cultural and economic development, with excellence in efficient and agile management practices, consolidation of alliances and committed to loco-regional development.

This survey shows that few Brazilian Catholic universities indicate in their official documents and/or institutional portals a “vision of the future” articulated with quality indicators measured by academic rankings, a fact clearly observed in only three of them (PUCPR, UCDB and UNISINOS). The fact that other Catholics universities do not explicitly mention such indicators does not infer a lack of concern with improving performance and/or positioning in academic rankings, as they compose a set of institutions with a respected reputation that have always stated in their missions and visions the commitment to the quality of human formation. They are reference institutions in the regions where they operate and, in some cases, of national and international recognition. In addition, they make use of these classifications on their portals as a way of strengthening their institutional image.

Chart 3
Official documents (Statute, Regulations and IDP) made available by Catholic universities in their respective institutional portals and/or forwarded in response to the author’s request

When referring to these royal documents, the term “governance” is used only in the IDPs of PUC-Campinas, UCPEL, UCSAL and UNICAP, and in the folder publicizing the Strategic Planning (SP) of PUCRS; the term is not mentioned in other universities. However, university governance, regardless of the terminology used by these institutions when referencing strategic actions, seeks to broaden the understanding of what management is by the managers themselves, emphasizing both the decision and its maker, i.e., governance is the way in which these universities are organized and operated internally, and how they ally with their stakeholders to achieve their goals (Parnoff, 2007PARNOFF, Leonice. O Processo Decisório em uma Burocracia Profissional - Implicações Políticas e Racionalidade Administrativa – O Caso da UNIJUÍ. 2007. 175f. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Desenvolvimento, Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Ijuí, 2007.; Brunner, 2011BRUNNER, Jose Joaquín. Gobernanza Universitaria: tipologia, dinámica y tendências. Revista de Educación, v. 355, p. 137-159, 2011; Kehm, 2012KEHM, Barbara M. Gobernanza: ¿Qué es? ¿Es importante? In: KEHM, Barbara M. La nueva gobernanza de los sistemas universitários. Barcelona: Editorial Octaedro, 2012. P. 19-43.; Barros, 2014BARROS, Moreno. O Modelo Brasileiro de Governança Acadêmica e seus Efeitos na Produtividade Científica. 2014. 136 f. Tese (Doutorado) - Programa de Pós-Graduação em História das Ciências e das Técnicas e Epistemologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 2014.; Sassaki, 2016SASSAKI, Alexandre Hideo. Governança e Conformidade na Gestão Universitária. 2016. 141f. Tese (doutorado) - Programa de Pós-Graduação da Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2016.; Félix; Furtado, 2016FÉLIX, Glades Tereza; FURTADO, Daniele Barros Vargas. Autoavaliação Institucional e (In)Cultura de Participação na Universidade. Holos, Natal, v. 1, p. 69-80, 2016. DOI: 10.15628/holos.2016.2151.
https://doi.org/10.15628/holos.2016.2151...
, Balbachevsky, 2017BALBACHEVSKY, Elizabeth. Governança na pesquisa científica: reflexões sobre a prática da pesquisa contemporânea e a experiência brasileira. Sociologias, Porto Alegre, v. 19, n. 46, p. 76-101, 2017. DOI: 10.1590/15174522-019004603.
https://doi.org/10.1590/15174522-0190046...
; Schmal; Cabrales, 2018SCHMAL, Rodolfo; CABRALES, Fernando. El desafío de la gobernanza universitaria: el caso chileno. Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação, Rio de Janeiro, v. 26, n. 100, p. 822-848, 2018. DOI: 10.1590/s0104-40362018002601309.
https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-4036201800...
; Klein; Pizzio; Rodrigues, 2018).

In the Brazilian scientific literature (Wandercil; Calderón; Ganga-Contreras, 2021WANDERCIL, Marco; CALDERÓN, Adolfo Ignacio; GANGA-CONTRERAS, Francisco. Governança universitária e rankings acadêmicos à luz da literatura acadêmica brasileira. Roteiro, v. 46, 2021. DOI: 10.18593/r.v46i.22391.
https://doi.org/10.18593/r.v46i.22391...
), the authors analyzed expand the notion of university governance. Klein, Pizzio and Rodrigues (2018)KLEIN, Karla; PIZZIO, Alex; RODRIGUES, Waldecy. Governança Universitária e Custos de Transação nas Universidades da Amazônia Legal Brasileira. Educação & Sociedade, Campinas, v. 39, n. 143, apr./jun. 2018. DOI: 10.1590/es0101-73302018176926.
https://doi.org/10.1590/es0101-733020181...
address how universities are actually organized and governed in practice, how they work and how they are transformed, according to their structure of representation of power for decision-making – of highly condensed authority and with autonomy in its basic units. This statement is broadly shared by Parnoff (2007)PARNOFF, Leonice. O Processo Decisório em uma Burocracia Profissional - Implicações Políticas e Racionalidade Administrativa – O Caso da UNIJUÍ. 2007. 175f. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Desenvolvimento, Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Ijuí, 2007. and Sassaki (2016)SASSAKI, Alexandre Hideo. Governança e Conformidade na Gestão Universitária. 2016. 141f. Tese (doutorado) - Programa de Pós-Graduação da Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2016., when they also state that the term is related to structures of representation of power for decision-making.

With the notion of university governance expanded by the aforementioned authors, Félix and Furtado (2016)FÉLIX, Glades Tereza; FURTADO, Daniele Barros Vargas. Autoavaliação Institucional e (In)Cultura de Participação na Universidade. Holos, Natal, v. 1, p. 69-80, 2016. DOI: 10.15628/holos.2016.2151.
https://doi.org/10.15628/holos.2016.2151...
complement its importance as a central role in decision-making, since it may contribute to problem mitigation and building of a permanent evaluation culture that provides feedback to all management processes. As a document that supports external evaluation and institutional self-assessment, the IDP should be periodically updated (as identified in the data collection, this is not the case of some Catholic universities) to fulfill its role in university governance and to shape an evaluation that provides effective feedback for management processes. After all, the IDP is also used as a reference for programs and projects developed by the institutions themselves.

The structure of power, mission and vision of Catholic universities plays a relevant role in this investigation, since, according to the theoretical framework adopted herein (Balbachevsky, 2017BALBACHEVSKY, Elizabeth. Governança na pesquisa científica: reflexões sobre a prática da pesquisa contemporânea e a experiência brasileira. Sociologias, Porto Alegre, v. 19, n. 46, p. 76-101, 2017. DOI: 10.1590/15174522-019004603.
https://doi.org/10.1590/15174522-0190046...
; Klein; Pizzio; Rodrigues, 2018KLEIN, Karla; PIZZIO, Alex; RODRIGUES, Waldecy. Governança Universitária e Custos de Transação nas Universidades da Amazônia Legal Brasileira. Educação & Sociedade, Campinas, v. 39, n. 143, apr./jun. 2018. DOI: 10.1590/es0101-73302018176926.
https://doi.org/10.1590/es0101-733020181...
), theoretical approaches to university governance are defined according to the identified models of higher education, such as: Humboldtian, instrumental, democratic and entrepreneurial. The Humboldtian model is characterized by a strong convergence of values that sustain strong hierarchies of authority within the institution; in the instrumental model, administrative logic tends to predominate, the institution’s internal dynamics are strongly conditioned and its characteristic is to respond to decisions made by the State; in the democratic model, authority is legitimized because it is a representation of the different interests coexisting within the institution; and the entrepreneurial model is marked by a competitive environment, in which HEIs are encouraged to explore the opportunities available in the internal and external environments.

Since university governance is related to its processes, objectives and decision-making structures, it can be said that Catholic universities, object of this study, have a pyramidal organizational structure, due to their centralized and vertical organization of power, as exemplified in Figure 1.

Figure 1
Model of organizational structure adopted by most Brazilian Catholic universities

These Universities come very close to the Humboldtian model, although the democratic model does appear, since, at the top of the pyramid, there is the University Council or the Superior Council, deliberative bodies that, due to the way in which they are composed, open spaces for a more democratic and less centralized management in the hands of the Grand Chancellor6 6 The most important position in the organizational structure of a Catholic university, in most cases held by the supreme ecclesiastical authority of a local order or of a city or metropolitan region. and/or the Rector, as can be seen in the decision-making bodies of Brazilian Catholic universities. With rare exceptions, there is a vertically hierarchical structure with power distribution from the Catholic Church in the figures of its Grand Chancellors, who grant power to their Rectors. The latter transfer, determine and/or delegate powers to their Vice-Rectories and/or Provosts, and to their respective Complementary and Auxiliary Bodies.

According to Chiavenato (1998)CHIAVENATO, Idalberto. Introdução a Teoria Geral da Administração. São Paulo: Makron Books, 1998., this model of functional pyramidal structure favors the specialization of each organ and intradepartmental cooperation. However, it produces undesirable consequences, such as subjectivation, that is, departmental objectives become more important than institutional ones because, when pressured to show results of each specific field, decision-making and top management support instances end up generating a myopic view of the institutional whole.

It is necessary to consider the organizational structure prevailing in Catholic universities, since, by not renouncing their traditions and their philanthropic character – either because they shouldn’t, couldn’t or wouldn’t –, they have to focus on the present, gradually giving way to innovation, towards a new posture, in which archaic management concepts must be replaced by new ways of thinking about decision-making processes.

According to John Paul II (1990, p. 3), nowadays, “[…] characterized by such a rapid development of science and technology, the tasks of the Catholic university assume an ever greater importance and urgency”. The current Supreme Pontiff reinforces that “[…] today, we are not just living in an era of change, but a true and proper change of era [...], increasing symptoms of a breaking point, due to the high speed of changes” (Francisco, 2017FRANCISCO. Sobre as Universidades e as Faculdades Eclesiásticas. In: A SANTA SÉ. Constituição Apostólica Veritatis Gaudium. Vaticano: Dicastero per la Comunicazione - Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 2017. Disponível em: http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/pt/apost_constitutions/documents/papa-francesco_costituzione-ap_20171208_veritatis-gaudium.pdf. Acesso em: 22 out. 2018.
http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/p...
, p. 4-5).

In this sense, the rapid, unforeseen and unexpected changes of scenario began to influence universities. In the analysis of this situation, from the perspective of Chiavenato (2010)CHIAVENATO, Idalberto. Gestão de Pessoas: o novo papel dos recursos humanos nas organizações. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 2010., the organizations most exposed to environmental changes abandoned their power structures with fixed and stable bodies based on mechanistic models, with hierarchical structures and high bureaucratic control, to be based on multifunctional teams with a more organic, agile and flexible structure focused on management in times of change.

Logically, these aspects related to the culture of change need a longer maturation time in a university than in business organizations. And, particularly, Catholic universities have more components, which are closely linked to the symbolism of the Catholic Church, such as the rite when a new representative takes office, symbolically consecrated to the position of rector. In Bourdieu’s (2008)BOURDIEU, Pierre. A economia das trocas linguísticas: o que falar quer dizer. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo, 2008. analytical perspective, such investiture shifts the representation that other agents have of this person, and, by changing people’s behavior towards them, the investiture transforms the image that the invested person makes of themselves, as well as the new behaviors adopted to adjust to that attribute.

Bourdieu’s (2008)BOURDIEU, Pierre. A economia das trocas linguísticas: o que falar quer dizer. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo, 2008. statement is characterized by the liberality of a Catholic university granting degrees and the symbolic respect associated with this grant. It is due to the context of the symbology present in the power structure of Catholic universities that their governance incorporates such distinct aspects, reinforced by the Apostolic Constitution Ex Corde Ecclesiae (John Paul II, 1990, p. 2), which give them an almost divine character, i.e., consecrated in truth, serving at “the same time the dignity of man and the cause of the Church [distinguished] by its free investigation of the whole truth about nature, man and God”. This Constitution was established as a Magna Carta, addressed to those responsible for these universities, their respective academic communities and all those interested in them.

Given the symbolic aspects that involve Catholic universities and the changes influenced by the private market of higher education, these HEIs will only remain perennial if they are efficiently and effectively managed7 7 In Administration, efficiency and effectiveness are similar words and often considered synonymous. However, there are subtle differences in the definition and usage of both terms. Efficiency would be the act of “doing things right”, while effectiveness consists of “doing the right things” (Drucker, 1989). . However, attributing the reasons for its problems only to the market and external environment is to blur the reflection of its governance. This fact is evident when referring to the history of crises experienced by Catholic universities that, in given situations, took place in times of low competition (Calderón, 2000CALDERÓN, Adolfo Ignacio. Universidades mercantis: a institucionalização do mercado universitário em questão. São Paulo em Perspectiva, São Paulo, v. 14, n. 1, p. 61-72. 2000. DOI: 10.1590/S0102-88392000000100007.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-8839200000...
), when there was not yet a massive presence of private HEIs in the higher education market.

According to Alves (2006, p. 130)ALVES, Manoel. Perspectivas para o ensino católico no Brasil. Diálogo Educacional, Curitiba, v. 6, n.19, p.127-140, 2006., if these institutions persist in their current organizational structures and prevailing management models, even if Catholic education has a favorable educational market and abundant cash resources, the challenges will not be “[…] for the most part overcome, neither their problems solved nor their survival guaranteed”.

Catholic Universities: governance similarities and distinctions

The Brazilian Higher Education Assessment System (SINAES) brings in its evaluation concept the goal of identifying the profile and meaning of the performance of HEIs, through their activities, courses, programs, projects and sectors, considering ten different institutional dimensions (Brazil, 2004BRASIL. Lei nº 10.861, de 14 de abril de 2004. Institui o Sistema Nacional de Avaliação da Educação Superior – SINAES e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, nº 72, seção 1, p. 3-4, 2004.). Among them, the ones considered in this study are mission and IDP. In view of the evaluation dimensions established by SINAES, the Brazilian Ministry of Education (MEC) began to require HEIs to prepare an IDP and established instructions for its elaboration, which include general guidelines and a basic structure containing the key thematic axes (Brazil, 2017BRASIL. Ministério da Educação. Decreto Nº 9.235, de 15 dezembro de 2017. Dispõe sobre o exercício das funções de regulação, supervisão e avaliação das instituições de educação superior e dos cursos superiores de graduação e de pós-graduação no sistema federal de ensino. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, Seção 1, 18 dez. 2017. P. 2. Disponível em: https://www2.camara.leg.br/legin/fed/decret/2017/decreto-9235-15-dezembro-2017-785940-publicacaooriginal-154513-pe.html. Acesso em: 26 set. 2019.
https://www2.camara.leg.br/legin/fed/dec...
): institutional profile; institutional pedagogical project; schedule for implementation and development of the HEI and courses (in-person and distance learning); faculty profile; administrative organization of the HEI; student service policies; infrastructure; assessment and monitoring of institutional development; and financial and budgetary aspects (Gomes; Melo, 2018GOMES, Suzana dos Santos; MELO, Savana Diniz Gomes. Políticas de Avaliação e Gestão Educacional: articulações, interfaces e tensões. Educação & Realidade, Porto Alegre, v. 43, n. 4, out./dez. 2018. DOI: 10.1590/2175-623688386.
https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-623688386...
).

As can be seen on the guidelines for preparing the IDP (Brazil, 2017BRASIL. Ministério da Educação. Decreto Nº 9.235, de 15 dezembro de 2017. Dispõe sobre o exercício das funções de regulação, supervisão e avaliação das instituições de educação superior e dos cursos superiores de graduação e de pós-graduação no sistema federal de ensino. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, Seção 1, 18 dez. 2017. P. 2. Disponível em: https://www2.camara.leg.br/legin/fed/decret/2017/decreto-9235-15-dezembro-2017-785940-publicacaooriginal-154513-pe.html. Acesso em: 26 set. 2019.
https://www2.camara.leg.br/legin/fed/dec...
), the structuring of this document literally converts into a “navigation chart”. So much so that some Catholic universities use this terminology as a synonym. This is the case of UCDB, whose IDP title is precisely Navigation Chart. Another example is that of PUC-Campinas: in the presentation of the IDP, its magnificent rector, Prof. Dr. Germano Rigacci Júnior, states that “[…] good navigators know that the direction of the winds and the movement of the waves are worth little without the navigation charts indicating the destination and the work of the crew, which result in speed, agility and safety” (PUC-Campinas, 2018PUC-CAMPINAS. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas. Plano de desenvolvimento Institucional – PDI: 2018-2020 / PUC-Campinas . Campinas: PUC, 2018., p. 5).

UNICAP (2017)UNICAP. Universidade Católica de Pernambuco. Plano de Desenvolvimento Institucional - PDI: 2017-2022 / UNICAP. Recife: UC. 2017., in turn, when preparing its IDP concomitantly with its first strategic plan, states that the interfaces of these various “navigation maps” strengthen the IDP, as they reinforce a culture of evaluation, planning and management of the university as a community institution.

Also, the document is presented by the other Catholic universities with the same importance. For example: PUCRS (2011, p. 9.)PUCRS. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul. Plano de desenvolvimento Institucional – PDI: 2011-2015 / PUCRS. Porto Alegre: PUC, 2011. states that “[…] the IDP constitutes an important institutional document that helps the decision-making process and the construction of PUCRS’ future trajectory”. UNISINOS (2014, p. 5), in its perspective of development and expansion, understands that the set of academic policies and institutional management “[…] express the guidelines to orient actions and decisions”. For PUC Goiás (2017, p. 13)PUC GOIÁS. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás. Plano de desenvolvimento Institucional – PDI: 2017-2027 / PUC Goiás. Goiânia: PUC, 2017., its IDP “[…] will give consistency and solidity to the future of the educational project [...] and the thousands of projects resulting from it”. For PUCSP (2015, p. 6)PUCSP. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo. Plano de desenvolvimento Institucional – PDI: 2015-2019 / PUCSP. São Paulo: PUC, 2015. it is an “[…] instrument of practical utility to be observed step by step by managers [...] when facing future challenges”. UCSAL’s IDP (2016, p. 14)UCSAL. Universidade Católica do Salvador. Plano de Desenvolvimento Institucional. PDI: 2016-2020 / UCSAL. Salvador: UC, 2016. “[…] has the role of guiding institutional decisions”. Likewise, UCPEL (2018, p. 7)UCPEL. Universidade Católica de Pelotas. Plano de desenvolvimento Institucional – PDI: 2018-2022 / UCPEL. Pelotas: UC, 2018., also considers it “[…] as a guide for firm and responsible management”. The UFN (2018)UFN. Universidade Franciscana. Plano de desenvolvimento Institucional – PDI: 2018-2022 / UFN. Santa Maria: UFN, 2018. points to the need of professionalizing management.

Most Catholic universities do not use the term “governance” in their IDPs, since the term is understood as synonymous with management. The importance of using IDP in decision-making and future orientation processes is undeniable. As a reference document for HEIs, whose academic institutional characteristics and administrative organization are addressed, the IDP became the guiding thread for this article.

Félix and Furtado (2016)FÉLIX, Glades Tereza; FURTADO, Daniele Barros Vargas. Autoavaliação Institucional e (In)Cultura de Participação na Universidade. Holos, Natal, v. 1, p. 69-80, 2016. DOI: 10.15628/holos.2016.2151.
https://doi.org/10.15628/holos.2016.2151...
add to the discussion the importance of university governance as a central role in decision-making, since it may contribute to problem mitigation and building of a permanent evaluation culture that provides feedback to all management processes. This role is theoretically attributed to the IDP, which subsidizes the processes of external evaluation and institutional self-assessment and should be periodically updated, as it is also used as a reference for programs and projects developed by the institutions themselves.

It should be noted that the term “governance” was used in only five IDPs of the following universities: PUC-Campinas, PUCRS, UCPEL, UCSAL, UNICAP, and in the PUCRS Strategic Planning (SP) dissemination folder. In relation to other Catholic universities, the governance approach is not used directly, since the terminology is not present in most institutional documents and has not yet been appropriated by the Brazilian academic-scientific literature (Wandercil; Calderón; Ganga-Contreras, 2021WANDERCIL, Marco; CALDERÓN, Adolfo Ignacio; GANGA-CONTRERAS, Francisco. Governança universitária e rankings acadêmicos à luz da literatura acadêmica brasileira. Roteiro, v. 46, 2021. DOI: 10.18593/r.v46i.22391.
https://doi.org/10.18593/r.v46i.22391...
).

Catholic universities and the quality indicators of academic rankings

For the most part, academic rankings have clear evaluation criteria to measure HEIs through their quality indicators, some objective, others subjective; some focused on products, others on inputs; that is, with the combined and variable presence of indicators constructed simultaneously from products and/or inputs and collected through simultaneously objective and/or subjective information (Calderón; França; Gonçalves, 2017CALDERÓN, Adolfo Ignacio; FRANÇA, Carlos Marshal; GONÇALVES, Armando. Tendências dos rankings acadêmicos de abrangência nacional de países do espaço ibero-americano: os rankings dos jornais El Mundo (Espanha), El Mercurio (Chile), Folha de São Paulo (Brasil), Reforma (México) e El Universal (México). EccoS – Revista Científica, São Paulo, n. 44, p. 117-141, set./dez. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5585/eccos.n44.7943.
https://doi.org/10.5585/eccos.n44.7943...
). By doing so, they wish to make the ranking process more transparent. Considering the statement to be a true premise, being present in a certain ranking is synonymous with prestige for many Catholic universities.

The IDPs of Catholic universities have different validity periods, some starting a new period, others currently in the middle, and others ending and/or still in the planning phase of the next period. As follows, it appears that they do not share the same logic in space and time, as the HEIs that started their IDPs in 2007, for example, had a different scenario from those that have recently started. However, it is possible to identify converging strategic objectives and actions in some of them.

UCPEL, PUCRS, PUC GOIÁS, UCSAL, UNICAP, for example, have structured IDPs, according to the Roadmap for Institutional Self-Assessment Report established by INEP/DAES/CONAES Technical Note No. 65 (Brazil, 2014BRASIL. Ministério da Educação. Nota técnica INEP/DAES/CONAES nº 65. Brasília, 09 out. 2014.) and MEC assessment instruments (in their several editions, which, in this regard, kept their structure organized by evaluation and self-evaluation axes and dimensions). To achieve the objectives established for the period in their IDPs, these universities organized them in alignment with the SINAES evaluation structure. By following the regulatory agency’s booklet, management of the proposed actions is easier to be monitored and subsequently evaluated.

In relation to what is described in the IDPs of Catholic universities, we also sought to identify some objectives, goals and/or actions indicated by them as improving their performance and/or meeting the quality standards established by the academic rankings.

Of the Catholic universities that made their IDPs available, it was possible to identify actions in the institutional objectives of six of them: PUC-Rio, PUCRS, PUCSP, UCDB, UNICAP, and UNISINOS. Valuing the evaluation system established by several academic rankings, PUC-Rio, in addition to proposing to update its database of researchers and collaborating companies for research on the reputation of international rankings, also showed in its IDP that:

[...] it values participation in different modalities, understanding that the external look at its reality and the conclusions arising from it contribute to the diagnosis and improvement of its mission [...], PUC-Rio participates annually in the evaluations of the Abril Student Guide and the Ranking by Folha de São Paulo and, in the international context, the rankings prepared annually by the assessment institutes THE Times Higher Education and QS Quacquarelli Symonds, based in London, and the UI Greenmetric Ranking of World Universities, organized by the University of Indonesia

(PUC-Rio, 2018PUC-RIO. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro. Plano de desenvolvimento Institucional – PDI: 2018-2022 / PUC-RIO. Rio de Janeiro: PUC, 2018., p. 112).

PUCRS aims to maintain its growing recognition by government bodies and, implicitly, by national and international rankings, as described in its Vision of the Future (PUCRS, 2016PUCRS. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul. Plano Estratégico – PEs: 2016-2022 / PUCRS. Porto Alegre: PUC, 2016.), and aims to become a reference in quality of education and relevance of research, innovation and sustainable management, contributing to scientific, cultural, social and economic development. With reference to their objectives and goals, they indirectly suggest attention to academic rankings, such as: reinforcing institutional visibility in the consolidation of the university’s positioning and increase the scientific production of quality and relevance in the great branches of knowledge. Such samples exemplify their concern to establish goals and objectives that improve institutional performance.

PUCSP (2015)PUCSP. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo. Plano de desenvolvimento Institucional – PDI: 2015-2019 / PUCSP. São Paulo: PUC, 2015. reinforced the importance of the following aspects: scientific dissemination as a mechanism to strengthen the institutional image, through the dissemination of academic production in renowned journals; the implementation of the institutional repository and obtaining better grades for the courses in external evaluation, in addition to the consolidation of an internationalization policy.

The UCDB (2018)UCDB. Universidade Católica Dom Bosco. Carta de Navegação (PDI) – 2018-2022 / UCDB. Campo Grande: UCDB, 2018., in its Navigation Chart, established the creation of instruments for monitoring institutional planning results, as well as the insertion and strengthening of the UCDB’s integration in the international scenario, through scientific, technological and innovation cooperation agreements.

UNICAP (2017)UNICAP. Universidade Católica de Pernambuco. Plano de Desenvolvimento Institucional - PDI: 2017-2022 / UNICAP. Recife: UC. 2017. established other goals, all addressing clearly quantitative criteria, for advances in research and internationalization indicators, such as: expand external partnerships by 40%; deepen the relationship with the network of international institutions of scientific cooperation; implement the Catholic Business School in partnership with national and international HEIs.

UNISINOS (2014)UNISINOS. Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos. Plano de desenvolvimento Institucional – PDI: 2014-2017 / UNISINOS. São Leopoldo: UNISINOS, 2014. uses the term governance and citizenship, in addition to establishing goals aligned with improving their performance in academic rankings, such as: consolidate the university’s academic and scientific performance evaluation practices; prioritize investments in teaching and research activities; achieve standards of excellence and revealed and perceived value in schools, programs and courses; develop competences for the global performance of the university; and continue improving its undergraduate courses, with a view to the perception of its excellence, supported by internal and external evaluations by students, professors, employees and the community.

Finally, UFN (2018) proposes to achieve the Preliminary Course Concept (Conceito Preliminar de Curso, CPC) 4 or 5 in undergraduate courses and Capes concept equal to or greater than 4 in stricto sensu graduate courses.

The other universities did not pay explicit attention to academic rankings; however, they addressed actions, objectives and goals in their respective IDPs, which suggest performance improvement in quality indicators established by academic rankings.

Conclusions

In the context of university governance in Catholic universities, their statutes, regulations and IDPs are essential management tools. Statutes and regulations underpin universities as private legal institutions of a community philanthropic character and public utility, with regard to the norms that regulate their functioning and their statutory provisions. Its IDPs define, in general terms, the institutional objectives for a certain period, which must be legitimized by the participation of the community, through medium and long-term goals and strategies.

It is verified that the IDPs, with their goals and objectives, create actions, even if indirectly, in attention to the quality indicators present in the academic rankings, especially when the following actions are addressed: expansion of research and publications; improvement of innovation projects; articulation and partnerships with companies; implementation of teacher training programs; improvement of institutional planning and evaluation methodologies; updating the database of researchers and collaborating companies for reputation surveys; promotion of internationalized scientific publication; among with proposals for the consolidation of internationalization policies; strengthening of the institutional image; and improvement of management and governance policies.

Of the Catholic universities that made their IDPs available and made explicit references to the quality indicators of the academic rankings promoted by the national government and national and international private sectors, four are small (UCP, UCPEL, UFN and UNISANTOS). UNISANTOS only specifies that its focus is to maintain the position of reference in quality in the Baixada Santista. UCPEL strives to set its goals in order to improve its performance and meet MEC’s quality standards. UFN (2018)UFN. Universidade Franciscana. Plano de desenvolvimento Institucional – PDI: 2018-2022 / UFN. Santa Maria: UFN, 2018. aims to improve its indexes in the CPC and in the Capes concept. The UCP did not make its IDP available, nor does it mention in its Self-Assessment Report actions to improve performance in the quality indicators (UCP, 2019UCP. Universidade Católica de Petrópolis. Relatório Geral da Autoavaliação Institucional – Versão Parcial. Comissão Própria de Avaliação – CPA-UCP. Petrópolis, 2019.).

Among the large Catholic universities, PUCRS and UNISINOS have clear goals aimed at improving performance in their IDPs. Despite pinpointing actions to improve quality indicators, PUC Goiás does not directly mention any of the academic rankings analyzed. Unfortunately, PUC MINAS and PUCPR, despite their excellent performance in academic rankings, did not make their respective IDPs available. However, in their respective institutional Self-Assessment Reports, they show their performance in academic rankings (PUC Minas, 2017PUC GOIÁS. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás. Plano de desenvolvimento Institucional – PDI: 2017-2027 / PUC Goiás. Goiânia: PUC, 2017.; PUCPR, 2017PUCPR. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná. Comissão Própria de Avaliação. Relatório de Autoavaliação da PUCPR. Paraná: PUC, 2017.).

In view of the above, it was identified that six Catholic universities established goals and objectives to improve performance in the indicators of academic rankings, and UNICAP aims to improve its results in the external evaluations promoted by MEC; PUC-Rio and UNISINOS proposed targets in line with international rankings; while PUCRS, PUCSP and UCDB presented more generic performance improvement goals in terms of national and international academic rankings. Regardless of the objectives and evaluating bodies, these universities used indicators as institutional development planning tools, with goals and objectives explained in their IDPs.

Due to the fact that the institutional documents analyzed have different validity periods and were elaborated in contexts prior to the increase in the debate on academic rankings and their uses, some comparisons were impossible to be made, especially in international contexts, which have gained prominence and recognition by universities only in recent years.

Considering that Catholic universities have their institutional focus on teaching, it is worth mentioning that, among them, there are four universities with a moderate focus on research (PUCRS, PUC-Rio, PUCPR and UNISINOS) “This small group [...] varied interest in higher education indicators” (Righetti; Gamba, 2019RIGHETTI, Sabine; GAMBA, Estevão. Categorização do Ensino Superior no Brasil: Diversidade e Complementaridade. In: Jacques Marcovitch. (Org.). Repensar a Universidade II: Impactos para a Sociedade. 1. ed. São Paulo: Com-Arte; Fapesp, 2019. P. 139-157., p. 149). The others, despite not focusing on it, show an attentive eye to the research indicator, especially when they reinforce concerns with knowledge governance in their IDPs. Barros (2014)BARROS, Moreno. O Modelo Brasileiro de Governança Acadêmica e seus Efeitos na Produtividade Científica. 2014. 136 f. Tese (Doutorado) - Programa de Pós-Graduação em História das Ciências e das Técnicas e Epistemologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 2014. and Balbachevsky (2017)BALBACHEVSKY, Elizabeth. Governança na pesquisa científica: reflexões sobre a prática da pesquisa contemporânea e a experiência brasileira. Sociologias, Porto Alegre, v. 19, n. 46, p. 76-101, 2017. DOI: 10.1590/15174522-019004603.
https://doi.org/10.1590/15174522-0190046...
contributed to substantiate the understanding of knowledge governance, defining the interaction between science or knowledge governance and ethics in management. This interaction, according to the authors, increases the scope of knowledge production management, reflecting on university autonomy in a professionalized way, aiming to organize it through objectives and goals towards improvement in research and scientific dissemination.

It should be noted that the governance of science and knowledge is an ongoing process in Catholic universities. In most of them, such governance is not aimed at meeting the “research” indicator specifically, as evaluated by academic rankings, but it is possible to identify an evident concern with matters of research and scientific dissemination in the goals and objectives found in the IDPs, notably characterizing aspects of science or knowledge governance.

  • 1
    Article presented and discussed in the Working Group No. 11, Higher Education Policy, during the 40th National Meeting of the National Association of Graduate Studies and Research in Education (ANPEd), whose theme was “Education as a practice of Freedom: letters from the Amazon to the world!”, held in September to October 2021, at the Federal University of Pará (UFPA), Belém-PA, Brazil. It composes the project “University governance in times of RANKINTACs (rankings, indexes and league tables) in Brazilian higher education institutions” (Process No. 311333/2017-6), coordinated by DSc. Adolfo-Ignacio Calderón, research productivity fellow at the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq).
  • 2
    The use of this term within the article comprises a person or entity with a legitimate interest in higher education. They are students, parents, employers, the State, society, the higher education institutions themselves (in relation to the system), etc. These HEIs serve the interests of various publics, their administration needs to converge these interests (Amaral; Magalhães, 2000AMARAL, Alberto; MAGALHÃES, António. O conceito de stakeholder e o novo paradigma do ensino superior. Revista Portuguesa de Educação, Portugal, v. 13, n. 002, p. 7-28, 2000.).
  • 3
    A title that some Catholic and ecclesiastical universities receive, such an honor is only bestowed by the Holy See to grant academic degrees in sacred theology, canon law, sacred scriptures and philosophy. In practice, many of these universities also award other academic degrees. They are governed by the Apostolic Constitutions and Canon Law. A university honored with this title will seek to stand out, both for its qualities as a university and for the quality of its Catholic identity and witness.
  • 4
    Apostolic Constitution whose name in Latin means “From the heart of the Church”.
  • 5
    Concisely, a WCU has a complex structure, offers an extensive variety of courses at both undergraduate and postgraduate levels, invests and promotes research, enjoys substantial resources and budgets, and has the possibility to recruit faculty and students from other nationalities (Altbach, 2004ALTBACH, Philip G. Globalization and the university: myths and realities in an unequal world. Tertiary Education and Management. EUA: Boston, v. 10, n. 1, p. 3-25, 2004.).
  • 6
    The most important position in the organizational structure of a Catholic university, in most cases held by the supreme ecclesiastical authority of a local order or of a city or metropolitan region.
  • 7
    In Administration, efficiency and effectiveness are similar words and often considered synonymous. However, there are subtle differences in the definition and usage of both terms. Efficiency would be the act of “doing things right”, while effectiveness consists of “doing the right things” (Drucker, 1989DRUCKER, Peter F. O que as empresas podem aprender com as organizações sem fins lucrativos. Harvard Business Review, Massachusetts, v. 67, n. 4, p. 88-93, 1989.).

Referências

  • ALTBACH, Philip G. Globalization and the university: myths and realities in an unequal world. Tertiary Education and Management EUA: Boston, v. 10, n. 1, p. 3-25, 2004.
  • ALTBACH, Philip G. International higher education: reflections on Policy and practice. EUA: Boston College Center for international higher education, 2006.
  • ALVES, Manoel. Perspectivas para o ensino católico no Brasil. Diálogo Educacional, Curitiba, v. 6, n.19, p.127-140, 2006.
  • AMARAL, Alberto; MAGALHÃES, António. O conceito de stakeholder e o novo paradigma do ensino superior. Revista Portuguesa de Educação, Portugal, v. 13, n. 002, p. 7-28, 2000.
  • BALBACHEVSKY, Elizabeth. Governança na pesquisa científica: reflexões sobre a prática da pesquisa contemporânea e a experiência brasileira. Sociologias, Porto Alegre, v. 19, n. 46, p. 76-101, 2017. DOI: 10.1590/15174522-019004603.
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/15174522-019004603
  • BARROS, Moreno. O Modelo Brasileiro de Governança Acadêmica e seus Efeitos na Produtividade Científica 2014. 136 f. Tese (Doutorado) - Programa de Pós-Graduação em História das Ciências e das Técnicas e Epistemologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 2014.
  • BART, Christopher K. Exploring the application of mission statements on the World Wide Web. Journal of Electronic Commerce, v. 11, n. 4, p. 360-368. 2001.
  • BOURDIEU, Pierre. A economia das trocas linguísticas: o que falar quer dizer São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo, 2008.
  • BRASIL. Lei nº 10.861, de 14 de abril de 2004. Institui o Sistema Nacional de Avaliação da Educação Superior – SINAES e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, nº 72, seção 1, p. 3-4, 2004.
  • BRASIL. Decreto nº 7.107, de 11 de fevereiro de 2010. Promulga o Acordo entre o Governo da República Federativa do Brasil e a Santa Sé relativo ao Estatuto Jurídico da Igreja Católica no Brasil, firmado na Cidade do Vaticano, em 13 de novembro de 2008. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, 11 fev. 2010. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2007-2010/2010/decreto/d7107.htm Acesso em: 08 set. 2019.
    » http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2007-2010/2010/decreto/d7107.htm
  • BRASIL. Ministério da Educação. Nota técnica INEP/DAES/CONAES nº 65 Brasília, 09 out. 2014.
  • BRASIL. Ministério da Educação. Decreto Nº 9.235, de 15 dezembro de 2017. Dispõe sobre o exercício das funções de regulação, supervisão e avaliação das instituições de educação superior e dos cursos superiores de graduação e de pós-graduação no sistema federal de ensino. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, Seção 1, 18 dez. 2017. P. 2. Disponível em: https://www2.camara.leg.br/legin/fed/decret/2017/decreto-9235-15-dezembro-2017-785940-publicacaooriginal-154513-pe.html Acesso em: 26 set. 2019.
    » https://www2.camara.leg.br/legin/fed/decret/2017/decreto-9235-15-dezembro-2017-785940-publicacaooriginal-154513-pe.html
  • BRUNNER, Jose Joaquín. Gobernanza Universitaria: tipologia, dinámica y tendências. Revista de Educación, v. 355, p. 137-159, 2011
  • CALDERÓN, Adolfo Ignacio. Universidades mercantis: a institucionalização do mercado universitário em questão. São Paulo em Perspectiva, São Paulo, v. 14, n. 1, p. 61-72. 2000. DOI: 10.1590/S0102-88392000000100007.
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-88392000000100007
  • CALDERÓN, Adolfo Ignacio; FRANÇA, Carlos Marshal. Rankings acadêmicos na educação superior: tendências da literatura ibero-americana. Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior, v. 23, p. 448-466, 2018.
  • CALDERÓN, Adolfo Ignacio; FRANÇA, Carlos Marshal; GONÇALVES, Armando. Tendências dos rankings acadêmicos de abrangência nacional de países do espaço ibero-americano: os rankings dos jornais El Mundo (Espanha), El Mercurio (Chile), Folha de São Paulo (Brasil), Reforma (México) e El Universal (México). EccoS – Revista Científica, São Paulo, n. 44, p. 117-141, set./dez. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5585/eccos.n44.7943.
    » https://doi.org/10.5585/eccos.n44.7943
  • CHIAVENATO, Idalberto. Introdução a Teoria Geral da Administração São Paulo: Makron Books, 1998.
  • CHIAVENATO, Idalberto. Gestão de Pessoas: o novo papel dos recursos humanos nas organizações. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 2010.
  • DRUCKER, Peter F. O que as empresas podem aprender com as organizações sem fins lucrativos. Harvard Business Review, Massachusetts, v. 67, n. 4, p. 88-93, 1989.
  • FANELLI, Ana García de; CARRANZA, María Pita. Los rankings y sus usos en la gobernanza universitária. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad – CTS, v. 13, n. 37, 2018.
  • FÉLIX, Glades Tereza; FURTADO, Daniele Barros Vargas. Autoavaliação Institucional e (In)Cultura de Participação na Universidade. Holos, Natal, v. 1, p. 69-80, 2016. DOI: 10.15628/holos.2016.2151.
    » https://doi.org/10.15628/holos.2016.2151
  • FRANCISCO. Sobre as Universidades e as Faculdades Eclesiásticas. In: A SANTA SÉ. Constituição Apostólica Veritatis Gaudium Vaticano: Dicastero per la Comunicazione - Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 2017. Disponível em: http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/pt/apost_constitutions/documents/papa-francesco_costituzione-ap_20171208_veritatis-gaudium.pdf Acesso em: 22 out. 2018.
    » http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/pt/apost_constitutions/documents/papa-francesco_costituzione-ap_20171208_veritatis-gaudium.pdf
  • GOMES, Suzana dos Santos; MELO, Savana Diniz Gomes. Políticas de Avaliação e Gestão Educacional: articulações, interfaces e tensões. Educação & Realidade, Porto Alegre, v. 43, n. 4, out./dez. 2018. DOI: 10.1590/2175-623688386.
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-623688386
  • HAZELKORN, Ellen. Globalization and the reputation race in rankings and the reshaping of higher education: the battle for world class excellence. London: Palgrave MacMillan, 2011.
  • JOÃO PAULO II. Sobre as Universidades Católicas. In: A SANTA SÉ. Constituição Apostólica Ex Corde Ecclesiae Vaticano: Dicastero per la Comunicazione - Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 1990. Disponível em: http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/pt/apost_constitutions/documents/hf_jp-ii_apc_15081990_ex-corde-ecclesiae.html Acesso em: 22 out. 2018.
    » http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/pt/apost_constitutions/documents/hf_jp-ii_apc_15081990_ex-corde-ecclesiae.html
  • KEHM, Barbara M. Gobernanza: ¿Qué es? ¿Es importante? In: KEHM, Barbara M. La nueva gobernanza de los sistemas universitários Barcelona: Editorial Octaedro, 2012. P. 19-43.
  • KLEIN, Karla; PIZZIO, Alex; RODRIGUES, Waldecy. Governança Universitária e Custos de Transação nas Universidades da Amazônia Legal Brasileira. Educação & Sociedade, Campinas, v. 39, n. 143, apr./jun. 2018. DOI: 10.1590/es0101-73302018176926.
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/es0101-73302018176926
  • MAXIMIANO, Antonio Cesar Amaru. Administração para empreendedores 2. ed. São Paulo: Pearson, 2011.
  • PARNOFF, Leonice. O Processo Decisório em uma Burocracia Profissional - Implicações Políticas e Racionalidade Administrativa – O Caso da UNIJUÍ. 2007. 175f. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Desenvolvimento, Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Ijuí, 2007.
  • PUC GOIÁS. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás. Plano de desenvolvimento Institucional – PDI: 2017-2027 / PUC Goiás. Goiânia: PUC, 2017.
  • PUC MINAS. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais. Comissão Própria de Avaliação. Relatório de Autoavaliação Institucional: PUC MINAS – Ciclo 2015/2016. Minas Gerais: PUC, 2017.
  • PUC-CAMPINAS. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas. Plano de desenvolvimento Institucional – PDI: 2018-2020 / PUC-Campinas . Campinas: PUC, 2018.
  • PUCPR. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná. Comissão Própria de Avaliação. Relatório de Autoavaliação da PUCPR Paraná: PUC, 2017.
  • PUC-RIO. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro. Plano de desenvolvimento Institucional – PDI: 2018-2022 / PUC-RIO. Rio de Janeiro: PUC, 2018.
  • PUCRS. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul. Plano de desenvolvimento Institucional – PDI: 2011-2015 / PUCRS. Porto Alegre: PUC, 2011.
  • PUCRS. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul. Plano Estratégico – PEs: 2016-2022 / PUCRS. Porto Alegre: PUC, 2016.
  • PUCSP. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo. Plano de desenvolvimento Institucional – PDI: 2015-2019 / PUCSP. São Paulo: PUC, 2015.
  • RANKING de universidades. (RUF 2019: Ranking Universitário Folha). Folha, São Paulo, 2019. Disponível em: https://ruf.folha.uol.com.br/2019/ranking-de-universidades/principal/ Acesso em: 21 jul. 2021.
    » https://ruf.folha.uol.com.br/2019/ranking-de-universidades/principal/
  • RIGHETTI, Sabine; GAMBA, Estevão. Categorização do Ensino Superior no Brasil: Diversidade e Complementaridade. In: Jacques Marcovitch. (Org.). Repensar a Universidade II: Impactos para a Sociedade. 1. ed. São Paulo: Com-Arte; Fapesp, 2019. P. 139-157.
  • SAMPAIO, Helena. Diversidade e diferenciação no ensino superior no Brasil: conceitos para discussão. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, São Paulo, v. 29, n. 84, p. 43-55, 2014.
  • SANTOS, Boaventura de Sousa. A Universidade no século XXI: para uma reforma democrática e emancipatória da Universidade. São Paulo: Editora Cortez. 3. Ed. 2010.
  • SASSAKI, Alexandre Hideo. Governança e Conformidade na Gestão Universitária 2016. 141f. Tese (doutorado) - Programa de Pós-Graduação da Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2016.
  • SCHMAL, Rodolfo; CABRALES, Fernando. El desafío de la gobernanza universitaria: el caso chileno. Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação, Rio de Janeiro, v. 26, n. 100, p. 822-848, 2018. DOI: 10.1590/s0104-40362018002601309.
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-40362018002601309
  • TAKESKI, Tachizawa; REZENDE, Wilson. Estratégia Empresarial: Tendências e Desafios – um enfoque na realidade brasileira. São Paulo: Makron Books, 2000.
  • TRAINA CHACON, José Marcelo; CALDERÓN, Adolfo Ignacio. A expansão da educação superior privada no Brasil: do governo de FHC ao governo de Lula. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior, v. 6, n. 17, p. 78-100, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.rides.2015.10.004.
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rides.2015.10.004
  • UCDB. Universidade Católica Dom Bosco. Carta de Navegação (PDI) – 2018-2022 / UCDB. Campo Grande: UCDB, 2018.
  • UCP. Universidade Católica de Petrópolis. Relatório Geral da Autoavaliação Institucional – Versão Parcial. Comissão Própria de Avaliação – CPA-UCP. Petrópolis, 2019.
  • UCPEL. Universidade Católica de Pelotas. Plano de desenvolvimento Institucional – PDI: 2018-2022 / UCPEL. Pelotas: UC, 2018.
  • UCSAL. Universidade Católica do Salvador. Plano de Desenvolvimento Institucional. PDI: 2016-2020 / UCSAL. Salvador: UC, 2016.
  • UFN. Universidade Franciscana. Plano de desenvolvimento Institucional – PDI: 2018-2022 / UFN. Santa Maria: UFN, 2018.
  • UNICAP. Universidade Católica de Pernambuco. Plano de Desenvolvimento Institucional - PDI: 2017-2022 / UNICAP. Recife: UC. 2017.
  • UNISINOS. Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos. Plano de desenvolvimento Institucional – PDI: 2014-2017 / UNISINOS. São Leopoldo: UNISINOS, 2014.
  • VALADARES, Mauricio Castelo Branco. Planejamento Estratégico Empresarial Rio de Janeiro: QualityMark, 2002.
  • WANDERCIL, Marco; CALDERÓN, Adolfo Ignacio; GANGA-CONTRERAS, Francisco. Qualidade da educação superior no Brasil: desempenho das universidades católicas à luz dos rankings acadêmicos, índices e tabelas classificatórias estatais e do setor privado. EccoS – Revista Científica, São Paulo, n. 51, out./dez. 2019. DOI: 10.5585/EccoS.n51.14581.
    » https://doi.org/10.5585/EccoS.n51.14581
  • WANDERCIL, Marco; CALDERÓN, Adolfo Ignacio; GANGA-CONTRERAS, Francisco. Governança universitária e rankings acadêmicos à luz da literatura acadêmica brasileira. Roteiro, v. 46, 2021. DOI: 10.18593/r.v46i.22391.
    » https://doi.org/10.18593/r.v46i.22391

Edited by

Editor in charge: Carla Karnoppi Vasques

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    03 Oct 2022
  • Date of issue
    2022

History

  • Received
    13 Aug 2021
  • Accepted
    16 Dec 2021
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - Faculdade de Educação Avenida Paulo Gama, s/n, Faculdade de Educação - Prédio 12201 - Sala 914, 90046-900 Porto Alegre/RS – Brasil, Tel.: (55 51) 3308-3268, Fax: (55 51) 3308-3985 - Porto Alegre - RS - Brazil
E-mail: educreal@ufrgs.br