Investigations of Pathological Immunohistochemical and Immunocytochemical Findings in Natural Infection with Mycoplasma gallisepticum in Laying Hens

Authors

  • Özgür Özdemir Aksaray University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pathology, Aksaray, Turkey.
  • Orhan Yavuz Aksaray University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pathology, Aksaray, Turkey.
  • Hüdaverdi Erer Aksaray University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pathology, Aksaray, Turkey.
  • Zafer Sayın Aksaray University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pathology, Aksaray, Turkey.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.91349

Abstract

Background: Mycoplasmosis is an infectious disease caused by Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG), usually seen in the respiratory system of chickens, chick and turkeys, that causing great economic loss. The disease is characterized by respiratory system lesions such as sinusitis, tracheitis, airsacculitis, pneumonia and other symptoms such as loss of yield, arthritis, tenosynovitis.  In this study, it was aimed to investigate diagnose of the disease by pathologic and molecular techniques in hens that naturally infected with MG as well as the usability of immunocytochemical (ICC) method in diagnose of the disease.

Materials, Methods & Results: For this purpose, 98 hens were collected from 10 different coops that serologically positive. After necropsy, routine pathological procedures were performed to samples taken from nose, sinus, larynx, trachea, lung and air sacs. Scraping samples taken from lungs and tracheas were evaluated by ICC. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was performed to samples taken from nose, sinus, larynx, trachea, lung and air sacs. Indirect immunoperoxidase method was applied in the both IHC and ICC staining.  Rabbit polyclonal anti MG antibody was used as primer antibody in the IHC and ICC staining. Additionally, culture and PCR techniques were applied to tracheas of all hens for MG. The GPO3 and MGSO genes were made for PCR analysis.

In the tracheal examinations, 23 cases were positive for PCR, 17 cases ICC positive, 16 cases IHC positive and 10 culture samples found positive. All of culture positive cases were also positive for other three methods. When findings in all organs were evaluated, in 37 cases were detected positive by IHC (38%) and 23 cases were positive by ICC (23.5%). In the IHC positive cases, the first order was trachea in 16 cases followed by in 11 cases in sinus, in 8 cases in lung, in 6 cases air sac and 4 cases in nose, respectively. In 8 cases, IHC positivity was found in at least two organs. IHC positivity was detected in the nose, sinus and tracheal epithelia as well as in the macrophages within subepithelial lymphoid infiltration, vascular walls and endothelium. As the disease became chronic, it was found that the agents were seen more in the lymphoid tissue than the epithelium. In ICC staining positivity was found in 17 cases in the trachea and 11 cases in the lung. There were only 5 cases positive by ICC in both organs.

Discussion: Clinical and pathological findings as well as serological, microbiological, molecular techniques and immunohistochemical methods are to be important methods in the diagnosis of the disease. While the culture results are shown as the gold standard in diagnosis of the disease, it is possible to obtain the results in the earliest 7-10 days in cultures and at least 20 days must be passed in order to say a cultural negative. In addition, in the field studies, it mentioned the use of vaccines, antibiotics and protective drugs affected the results of microbiology and serology; the importance of using techniques such as IHC and PCR for the diagnosis of the causative agents. The results of the present study indicate that the most important organ in the diagnosis of the disease is the trachea, and the most effective method is PCR followed by IHC and ICC methods. It was concluded that the results of ICC staining close to IHC staining, and ICC could be used for diagnostic purposes in positive reactions obtained from the tracheas or the other organs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akan M. 2008. Mycoplasma infections in chickens: Protection and Control. Mektup Ankara. 6: 21-24.

Amer M.M., Hanafei A.E., El-Bayomi K.M. & Zohair G.A. 2009. Comparative study on the efficacy of some antiMycoplasma drugs on the performance of commercial broiler flocks from infected breeders. Global Veterinaria. 3: 69-74.

Buim M.R., Mettifogo E., Timenetsky J., Kleven S. & Ferreira A.J.P. 2009. Epidemiological survey on Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Mycoplasma synoviae by multiplex PZR in commercial poultry. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira. 29: 552-556.

Clyde W.A. & Thomas L. 1973. Tropism of Mycoplasma gallisepticum for arterial walls. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 70: 1545-1549.

Dakman A., Günaydın E., Türkyılmaz M.A., Güleç M., Coşar M. & Özdemir Ü. 2009. Mycoplasma infections in breeder chicken establishments. Etlik Vetereiner Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi. 20: 27-34.

Gharaibeh S. & Hailat A. 2011. Mycoplasma gallisepticum experimental infection and tissue distribution in chickens, sparrows and pigeon. Avian Pathology. 40: 349-354.

Güler L. 1992. Konya bölgesindeki kümes hayvanlarında serolojik yoklamalarla müspet bulunan CRD vakalarından etken izolasyon çalışmaları. Konya.

Gürbüz E. 2008. Tavuklarda Mycoplasma gallisepticum ve Mycoplasma synoviae’nın tanısında PZR kullanımı. Konya. http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/10099

Islam A., Aslam A., Chaudhry Z.I., Ahmed M.U.D., Rehman H.U., Saeed K. & Ahmad I. 2011. Pathology of Mycoplasma gallisepticum in naturally infected broilers and its diagnosis through PCR. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 13: 835-837.

Kahya S., Yılmaz Ö., Eyigör A., Temelli S. & Çarlı T. 2015. Detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Mycoplasma synoviae by Real-Time PCRs and Mycoplasma gallisepticum-antibody detection by an ELISA in chicken breeder flocks. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 213: 361-366.

Kempf I., Blanchard A., Gesbert F., Guittet M. & Bennejean G. 1993. The polymerase chain reaction for Mycoplasma gallisepticum detection. Avian Pathology. 22: 739-750.

Kerr K.M. & Olson N.O. 1967. Pathology in chickens experimentally inoculated or contact-infected with Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Avian Diseases. 11: 559-578.

Lam K.M. 2004. Morphological changes in chicken after in vivo exposure to Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Avian Diseases. 48: 488-493.

Mayor O.Y. 1968. Histopathological aids to the diagnosis of certain poultry disease. The Veterinary Bulletin. 38: 273-285.

Mayor O.Y. 1974. The histopathology of certain common poultry diseases, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome: Via delle Terme di Caracalla, pp.1-49.

Nascimento E.R., Yamomota R., Herrick K.R. & Tait R.C. 1991. Polymerase Chain reaction for detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Avian Diseases. 14: 62-69.

OIE. 2015. Avian Mycoplasmosis, chapter 2.3.5, 10p. Available in <http://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/tahm/2.03.05_%20AVIAN_MYCO.pdf> [Accessed online in December 2015].

Özdemir Ö. & Erer H. 2008. Pathological and microbiological investigations on the lesions of the respiratory systems of laying hens. Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences. 24: 55-68.

Özmen M. 2011. Real-time PCR techniques for detection Mycoplasma gallisepticum in chicken trachea and statistical analysis. Adana.

Radi Z.A., Trampel D.W., Smith B.S., Rosenbusch R.F. & Goll F. 2000. Immunohistochemical detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum antigens in turkey respiratory tissues. Avian Diseases. 44: 399-407.

Rauf M., Chaudhary Z.I., Younas M., Anjum A.A., Khan H.M. & Ali M.A. 2014. Detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum in experimentally inoculated layer birds by immunohistochemistry. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences. 24: 385-391.

Salisch H., Hinz K.H., Graack H. & Ryll M. 1998. A comparison of a common PCR-based test to culture methods for detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Mycoplasma synoviae in currently infected chickens. Avian Pathology. 27: 142-147.

Slavik M.F., Wang R.F. & Cao W.W. 1993. Development and evaluation of the polymerase chain reaction method for diagnosis of Mycoplasma gallisepticum infection in chickens. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 7: 459-463.

Toplu N., Avcı H. & Epikmen E.T. 2012. Pathomorphological and immunohistochemical examinations in naturally infected partridges (Alectoris chukar) and Japanese quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica) with Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 59: 29-34.

Tuzcu M., Özmen M., Karakoç S.R., Tuzcu N. & Yoldaş A. 2012. Diagnosis of Mycoplasmosis in chicks by pathological and Real Time-PCR methods. Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences. 28: 82-86.

Ülgen M. 1991. Comparative bacteriological and serological studies on Chronic Respiratory Disease of poultry. Bursa.

Ülgen M., Şen A. & Çarlı T. 1998. Investigation of pathogenicity of Mycoplasma strains from chickens in tracheal organ culture. Veterinarium. 9: 52-55.

Vogl G., Plaickner A., Szathmary S., Stipkovits L., Rosengarten R. & Szostak M.P. 2008. Mycoplasma gallisepticum invades chicken erythrocytes during infection. Infection and Immunity. 76: 71-77.

Yılmaz F. & Timurkaan N. 2011. Detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Mycoplasma synoviae Antigens by immunohistochemical method in pneumonic broiler chicken lungs. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 10: 2557-2560.

Yılmaz F., Timurkaan N., Kılıç A., Kalender H. & Kılınç Ü. 2011. Detection of Mycoplasma synoviae and Mycoplasma gallisepticum in chickens by immunohistochemical, PCR and culture methods. Revue de Médecine Vétérinaire. 16: 79-86.

Published

2019-01-01

How to Cite

Özdemir, Özgür, Yavuz, O., Erer, H., & Sayın, Z. (2019). Investigations of Pathological Immunohistochemical and Immunocytochemical Findings in Natural Infection with Mycoplasma gallisepticum in Laying Hens. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae, 47(1). https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.91349

Issue

Section

Articles