Approach to Classification of Cavitary Effusion and Comparison between Manual and Automatic Methods for Total Nucleated Cell Count

Nilson Júnior da Silva Nunes, Naila Cristina Blatt Duda, Juliana Pereira Matheus, Ana Paula Soares Borenstein, Bruno Albuquerque de Almeida, Stella de Faria Valle

Abstract


Background: Two classifications are used to categorize cavitary effusions using total nucleated cell count (TNCC): protein concentration and pathophysiology of its formation. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the correlation between the TNCC values of cavitary effusions obtained in the automatic and the manual method, and also evaluating the classification methodology.

 Materials, Methods & Results: Cavitary effusions were analyzed for physical, chemical and cytological aspects, as well as manual and automatic cell counts for the correlation between the traditional methods and those suggested by Stockham & Scott. Bland-Altman regression and Spearman correlation analysis were performed. Of the total, 44 were abdominal effusions (73.3%), 15 thoracic (25%) and 1 pericardial (1.7%). According to the traditional classification, most of the effusions were classified as modified transudates (40%) and according to the classification of Stockham and Scott, as transudates poor in protein (31.7%). The correlation between cell counting techniques between pure, modified and exudate transudates was 0.94, 0.97 and 0.94, respectively, indicating an excellent correlation between the parameters (p = 0.95%).

Discussion: Considering the concentration of proteins and CCNT, the effusions classified as modified transudate were mainly caused by neoplastic processes (carcinomas/adenocarcinomas), since there are several mechanisms of their formation, such as large variation of protein concentration. According to the Stockham & Scott classification a unique classification is considered for exfoliative neoplastic effusions, the variation of the protein concentration of the effusion does not alter its classification. In neoplastic effusions, classified as exudates, lymphomas were the most prevalent, and hypercellularity (approximately 150,000 cells / μL) allowed this classification. When considering low-protein transudates, the findings related to low concentrations did not differ much from the traditional classification. In the ruptures of viscera and vessels, the hemorrhagic ones were the most frequent, thus, the cytological diagnosis is essential, since it can give information about the contamination with blood during the collection. Most of these were due to neoplasia as the underlying cause. A case of chylotorax was diagnosed by comparing cholesterol and triglyceride values of effusion and serum. In cases of uroperitoneum, the presence of urine in the abdominal cavity promotes the dilution of the fluid from the cavity, being initially classified as pure transudate and, with its permanence in the cavity, increasing the CCNT, becomes an exudate. As in cases of exfoliative neoplastic effusions, the classification of the uroperitoneum, according to Stockham & Scott, is classified directly into effusion due to rupture of the viscera, giving a quick and clear diagnosis. According to Stockham & Scott, cases classified as nonseptic exudates (n = 3), two of which resulted from feline infectious peritonitis (PIF). The effusive form of PIF presents with accumulations of fluid in the abdomen, having an inflammatory character, but according to the traditional classification, they enter the category of modified transudates, because, despite containing protein concentrations close to or above the serum level, they present a CCNT lower than an exudate. Cavitary effusions were classified as septic exudates when intracellular bacteria were present and in the present study, two effusions were classified as such in two patients, one with septic peritonitis and in the other the final diagnosis was not found. The high values of Spearman correlation coefficients found when comparing the automatic counts with the manual demonstrate that there is an excellent correlation between the methods and, the Bland-Altman test showed significant agreement between them.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alleman A.R. 2003. Abdominal, thoracic, and pericardial effusions. Veterinary Clinics of North American: Small Animal Practice. 33: 89-118.

Balakrishnan A. & Drobatz K.J. 2013. Management of urinary tract emergencies in small animals. Veterinary Clinics of North American: Small Animal Practice. 43: 843-867.

Bohn A.A. 2017. Analysis of canine peritoneal fluid analysis. Veterinary Clinics of North American: Small Animal Practice. 47: 123-133.

Bonczynski J., Ludwig L.L., Barton L.J., Loar A. & Peterson M.E. 2003. Comparison of peritoneal fluid and peripheral blood pH, bicarbonate, glucose, and lactate concentration as a diagnostic tool for septic peritonitis in dogs and cats. Veterinary Surgery. 32: 161-166.

Dempsey S.M. & Ewing P.J. 2011. A review of the pathophysiology, classification, and analysis of canine and feline cavitary effusions. Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association. 47: 1-11.

Fischer Y., Sauter-Louis C. & Hartmann K. 2012. Diagnostic accuracy of the Rivalta test for 793 feline infectious peritonitis. Veterinary Clinical Pathology. 41: 558-567.

Goldmann F., Bauer N. & Moritz A. 2014. Evaluation of the IDEXX ProCyte Dx analyzer for dogs and cats compared to the Siemens ADVIA 2120 and manual differential. Comparative Clinical Pathology. 23: 283-296.

Hetzel N., Papasouliotis K., Dodkin S. & Murphy K. 2012. Biochemical assessment of canine body cavity effusions using three bench-top analysers. Journal of the Small Animal Practice. 53: 459-64.

Nakamura R.K., Rozanski E.A. & Rush J.E. 2008. Non-coagulopathic spontaneous hemothorax in dogs. Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care. 18: 292-297.

Ritz S., Egberink H. & Hartmann K. 2007. Effect of feline interferon-omega on the survival time and quality of life of cats with feline infectious peritonitis. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine. 21: 1193-1197.

Rose A., Funk D. & Neiger R. 2016. Comparison of refractometry and biuret assay for measurement of total protein concentration in canine abdominal and pleural fluid specimens. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 248: 789-794.

Stockham S.L. & Scott M.A. 2008. Cavitary effusions. In: Fundamentals of veterinary clinical pathology. 2nd edn. Ames: Blackwell Publishing, pp.831-868.

Tasker S. 2018. Diagnosis of feline infectious peritonitis: Update on evidence supporting available tests. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery. 20: 228-243.

Thawley V. 2017. Acute liver injury and failure. Veterinary Clinics of North American: Small Animal Practice. 47: 617-630.

Thompson C.A. & Rebar A.H. 2016. Body cavity fluids. In: Raskin R.E. & Meyer D.J. (Eds). Canine and feline cytology: a color atlas and interpretation guide. 3rd edn. St. Louis: Elsevier Saunders, p. 191-294.

Wallace K.A., Goldschmidt M.H. & Patel R.T. 2015. Converting fluid-based cytologic specimens to histologic specimens for immunohistochemistry. Veterinary Clinical Pathology. 44: 303-309.

Zoia A., Slater L.A., Heller J., Connolly D.J. & Church D.B. 2009. A new approach to pleural effusion in cats: markers for distinguishing transudates from exudates. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery. 11: 847-855.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.84760

Copyright (c) 2018 Nilson Júnior da Silva Nunes, Naila Cristina Blatt Duda, Juliana Pereira Matheus, Ana Paula Soares Borenstein, Bruno Albuquerque de Almeida, Stella de Faria Valle

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.