Determination of the Efficiencies of the Prokinetics in Ruminants with Postoperative Ileus Using Pro-Inflammatory Markers

Semih Altan, Kaan Dönmez, Feray Altan, Fahrettin Alkan

Abstract


Background: Recently, the role of inflammation triggered by handling of the intestine various gastrointestinal (GI) surgeries is generally accepted as the key event in postoperative ileus (POI). Because, prokinetics have been increased the smooth muscle contractions and may act by attenuating the inflammatory process in the GI tract, they have been used the treatment of POI in human and animals. There are many in vivo analysis techniques of GI motility. However, there have not yet been studied associated with the evaluation of the inflammatory response. Therefore, it was aimed to evaluate the efficiencies of 3 different prokinetics from inflammatory response during experimentally-induced POI.

Materials, Methods & Results: Twenty healthy lambs (30-45 days old) were randomly assigned to four groups. In all groups, enterotomy was performed on the ileum. Erythromycin and metoclopramide were administered to the ERT and MET groups before the surgery, respectively, while lidocaine was administered to the LID group as bolus before and continuous rate infusion during the surgery. Physiological saline was administered to the lambs in control group as placebo before the surgery. Blood samples were collected before surgery (~30-45 min), at the end of surgery (0 h), and at the postoperative 1, 3, 5, 10, 48, 72 and 96 h. The concentrations of serum amyloid A (SAA), haptoglobin (HPT), fibrinogen (FIB) as acute phase proteins (APPs), thiobarbituric acide reactant substrate (TBARs), myeloperoxidase (MPO) as reactive oxygen species, and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF- β) as a cytokine were measured with ELISA reader. In terms of time points, it was found that FIB was statistically higher in ERT group at the 1st h, in MET and LID groups at the 10th h, and in LID group at the 48th and in MET group at the 72 h (P < 0.05). It was found that SAA was higher in MET group at the 1st, 3rd, 5th, 10th, 24th, 48th and 72nd h. HPT was higher in CNTR group until 72th h and MET group at 48th, 72nd and 96th h. TBARs concentrations were statistically higher in MET and LID groups at 0 hour, in ERT and MET groups at the 1st h, in MET group at the 3rd h, in MET and LID groups at the 5th and 10th h, in MET group at the 48th, 72nd and 96th h (P < 0.05). MPO concentrations was higher in LID group at the 3rd, 5th, 10th and 96th h, and in ERT group at the 72nd h (P < 0.05). TGF-β concentrations were particularly high in MET group at the 3rd, 5th, 48th and 72nd h, and in LID group at the 10th, 24th, and 96th h (P < 0.05).

Discussion: APPs (HPT, SAA, FIB), which are important regulators of inflammation in cows and sheep, were higher generally in MET and LID groups and inflammation persists in these two groups and, therefore, metoclopramide and lidocaine are less effective in early postoperative POI treatment. Because, significant increase in serum TBARs and MPO concentrations was considered as an important indicator of oxidative stress and inflammatory response MPO concentrations was particularly high until 10th h in LID group, and TBARs concentrations was high both MET and LID groups throughout the study, this was correlated with higher neutrophil infiltration in the postoperative early period than the other groups. It is known that TGF-β, an inflammatory cytokine, is correlated with various smooth muscle disorders in humans. In this study, TGF-β concentration were higher in the MET and LID groups. High concentration of this cytokine might have led to decrease contractions in smooth muscles, thereby slowing down the intestinal transition. In conclusion, based on the presence of pro-inflammatory markers in this study, erythromycin seems to be the most suitable prokinetic drug in lambs. Moreover, lidocaine and metoclopramide are not as successful in small ruminants as reported in other species.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abell T.L., Bernstein R.K., Cutts T., Farrugia G., Forster J., Hasler W.L., McCallum R.W., Olden K.W., Parkman H.P., Parrish C.R., Pasricha P.J., Prather C.M., Soffer E.E., Twillman R. & Vinik A.I. 2006. Treatment of gastroparesis: a multidisciplinary clinical review. Neurogastroenterology and Motility. 18: 263-283.

Amanzada A., Malik I.A., Nischwitz M., Sultan S., Naz N. & Ramadori G. 2011. Myeloperoxidase and elastase are only expressed by neutrophils in normal and in inflamed liver. Histochemistry and Cell Biology. 135: 305-315.

Boeckxstaens G.E. & de Jonge W.J. 2009. Neuroimmune mechanisms in postoperative ileus. Gut. 58: 1300-1311.

Chemonges S., Tung J.P. & Fraser J.F. 2014. Proteogenomics of selective susceptibility to endotoxin using circulating acute phase biomarkers and bioassay development in sheep: a review. Proteome Science. 1: 12.

Chi C.H., Shiesh S.C. & Lin X.Z. 2002. Total antioxidant capacity and malondialdehyde in acute abdominal pain. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 20: 79-82.

Constable P., Hinchcliff K., Stanley H. & Grünberg W. 2017. Diseases of the Forestomach of Ruminants. In: Constable P., Hinchcliff K., Stanley H. & Grünberg W. (Eds). Veterinary Medicine: A textbook of the diseases of cattle, horses, sheep, pigs and goats. 11th edn. Philadelphia: Elsevier, pp.435-621.

Corum O., Er A. & Dik B. 2016. Investigation of the effect of tarantula cubensis extract on acute phase response. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae. 44: 1414.

Dowling P.M. 1995. Prokinetic drugs: metoclopramide and cisapride. Canadian Veterinary Journal. 36(2): 115-116.

Gökçe H.İ. & Bozukluhan K. 2009. Çiftlik hayvanlarında önemli akut faz proteinleri ve bunların veteriner hekimlik alanındaki kullanımı. Dicle Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 1: 1-14.

Graves G.M., Becht J.L. & Rawlings C.A. 1989. Metoclopramide reversal of decreased gastrointestinal myoelectric and contractile activity in a model of canine postoperative ileus. Veterinary Surgery. 18: 27-33.

Huhn J.C. & Nelson D.R. 1997. The quantitative effect of metoclopramide on abomasal and duodenal myoelectric activity of goats. Zentralblatt für Veterinärmedizin. Reihe A 44: 361-371.

Johnson M.D. & Walsh R.M. 2009. Current therapies to shorten postoperative ileus. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. 76: 641-648.

Maden M., Ozturk A.S., Bulbul A., Avci G.E. & Yazar E. 2012. Acute-phase proteins, oxidative stress and enzyme activities of blood serum and peritoneal fluid in cattle with abomasal displacement. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine. 26: 1470-1475.

Marshall T.S., Constable P.D., Cronchik S.S. & Wittek T. 2005. Determination of abomasal emptying rate in suckling calves by use of nuclear scintigraphy and asetominophen absorption. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 66: 364-374.

Milligan M., Beard W., Kukanich B., Sobering T. & Waxman S. 2007. The effect of lidocaine on postoperative jejunal motility in normal horses. Veterinary Surgery. 36: 214-220.

Moore-Olufemi S.D., Olsen A.B., Hook-Dufresne D.M., Bandla V. & Cox Jr. C.S. 2015. Transforming growth factor-beta 3 alters intestinal smooth muscle function: implications for gastroschisis-related intestinal dysfunction. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 60: 1206-1214.

Navarre C.B. & Roussel A.J. 1996. Gastrointestinal motility and disease in large animals. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine. 10: 51-59.

Ness S.L. & Steiner A. 2017. Motility modifiers. In: Fubini S.L. & Ducharme N.G. (Eds). Farm Animal Surgery. 2nd edn. St. Louis: Elsevier, pp.89-98.

Nouri M. & Constable P.D. 2007. Effect of parenteral administration of erythromycin, tilmicosin and tylosin on abomasal emptying rate in suckling calves. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 68(12): 1392-1398.

Reynolds J.C. 1989. Prokinetic agents: a key in the future gastroenterology. Gastroenterology Clinics of North America. 18: 437-457.

Seta M.L. & Kale-Pradhan P.B. 2001. Efficacy of metoclopramide in postoperative ileus after exploratory laparotomy. Pharmacotherapy. 21: 1181-1186.

Shea-Donohue T., Notari L., Sun R. & Zhao A. 2012. Mechanisms of smooth muscle responses to inflammation. Neurogastroenterology and Motility. 24: 802-811.

Smith M.A., Edwards G.B., Dallap B.L., Cripps P.J. & Proudman C.J. 2005. Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of prokinetic drugs in the management of postoperative ileus: can retrospective data help us. The Veterinary Journal. 170: 230-236.

Sokolov A.V., Pulina M.O., Ageeva K.V., Ayrapetov M.I., Berlov M.N., Volgin G.N., Markov A.G., Yablonsky P.K., Kolodkin N.I., Zakharova E.T. & Vasilyev V.B. 2007. Interaction of ceruloplasmin, lactoferrin, and myeloperoxidase. Biochemistry. 72: 409-415.

Tihan D.C., Erbil Y., Seven R., Arkaya S., Türkoğlu U., Hepgül G. & Borucu I. 2011. The effect of glutamine on oxidative damage in an experimental abdominal compartment syndrome model in rats. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 17: 1-8.

Tropskaya N.S. & Popova T.S. 2017. Postoperative ileus: Pathophysiology and Treatment. In: Lule G. (Ed). Current concepts in colonic disorders. Intech Publisher open access pp.203-220. http://library.umac.mo/ebooks/b28358740. pdf. [Accessed online in September 2017].

Van Bree S.H., Nemethova A., Van Bovenkamp F.S., Gomez-Pinilla P., Elbers L., Di Giovangiulio M., Matteoli G., Van Vliet J., Cailotto C., Tanck M.W. & Boeckxstaens G.E. 2012. Novel method for studying postoperative ileus in mice. International Journal of Physiology, Pathophysiology and Pharmacology. 4: 219-227.

Van Hoogmoed L.M., Nieto J.E., Snyder J.R. & Harmon F.A. 2004. Survey of prokinetic use in horses with gastrointestinal injury. Veterinary Surgery. 33: 279-285.

Wang S., Liu J., Wu D.I., Pang X., Zhao J. & Zhang X. 2015. Pro-inflammatory effect of fibrinogen on vascular smooth muscle cells by regulating the expression of PPARα, PPARγ and MMP-9. Biomedical Reports. 3: 513-518.

Wittek T. & Constable P.D. 2005. Effect of erythromycin, neostigmine and metoclopramide on abomasal motility and emptying rate in Holstein-Freisian calves. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 66: 545-552.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.81816

Copyright (c) 2018 Semih Altan, Kaan Dönmez, Feray Altan, Fahrettin Alkan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.