Assessment of the Bilateral Block of the Trunk of the Pudendal Nerve in Cats with Urethral Obstruction

Kath Freire de Vasconcelos, Raquel Guedes Ximenes, Francisco Sávio de Moura Martins, Aline de Sousa Alves, Sabrina Barros Araújo, Jéssica Kária de Andrade, José Rômulo Soares dos Santos, Pedro Isidro da Nóbrega Neto

Abstract


Background: Clinical care of cats with urethral obstruction is a common routine in feline clinical medicine and the re-establishment of urinary flow is essential for long-lasting correction of the pathophysiological alterations presented. For this chemical restraint is usually employed, that together with the alteration, increases the anesthetic risk of these patients. Improvement in anesthetic techniques, especially the loco-regional, may contribute to reducing the anesthetic risk of these patients and facilitate maneuvers to clear the obstruction. Thus the objective of the present study was to describe and assess the bilateral block technique of the pudendal nerve in 16 cats with urethral obstruction.

Materials, Methods & Results: Sixteen male crossbred cats were used, with partial or total urethral obstruction, attended at the Veterinary Hospital of the Federal University of Campina Grande, PB, Brazil. The anesthetic block of the pudendal nerve trunk was carried out by placing the local anesthetic close to the ventral foramen of the second sacral vertebra, using a 13 x 0.45 mm needle attached to a 1 mL syringe. To assess the effectiveness of the bilateral block, the analgesia promoted was assessed using the substitute (“Reaction to Palpating the Surgical Wound” of subscale 1 (pain expression) of the “Compound Multi-dimensional Scale to Assess Post Operational Pain in Cats”.  This assessment was made before the bilateral block (M0) and 10 min afterwards (M1) and the scores ranged from 0 to 3. In addition, a segmental assessment of the urethra was made, where, by passing a probe the sensitivity was assessed of the urethral ostium, penile and pelvic urethra and the relaxing of the external urethral sphincter. This assessment was made at M1 and classified as present or absent. In the cases where the bilateral block was inefficient, the technique was repeated, in the same locations and at the same dose as initially administered, and a new assessment (M2) was made 10 minutes after the second administration. In 12 of the 16 patients assessed the bilateral block was made once. The following were observed in these patients at M1: reduction in the reaction to penile manipulation (P = 0.003), total relaxation of the external urethral sphincter and absence of sensitivity to passing the probe through the penile urethra (P = 0.000) and insensitivity of the ostium urethrae (P = 0.006). In the animals in which the anesthetic bilateral block was repeated (4/16) the value of p adjusted for penile manipulation was 0.05. There was no reaction to the probe passage through the ostium urethrae and the penile urethra or contraction of the external urethral sphincter in 3 of the 4 animals (P = 0.625). Considering the total number of animals assessed, the urethral obstruction of the pudendal nerve trunk, carried out one or twice, caused statistically significant (P = 0.004) insensitivity to penile manipulation, probing of the ostium urethrae and the penile urethra and total relaxation of the external urethral sphincter in 14 of the 16 animals. In three patients concomitant anesthetic bilateral block was observed of the sciatic nerve, bilateral (two animals) or unilateral (one animal).

Discussion: studies on the feline pudendal nerve have demonstrated that the sensitive and motor bilateral block of this nerve is possible, as corroborated by the present study. Although an atomic study had shown the possibility of concomitant bilateral block of the sciatic nerve, and therefore, according to the authors, the technique should not be recommended, this finding did not demonstrate great clinical relevance, because in most cases the patients remained under fluid therapy throughout the anesthetic recovery period (about two hours) and therefore with restricted movement. Nevertheless, studies should be carried out to improve this technique.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Adami C., Angeli G., Haenssgen K., Stoffel M.H. & Spadavecchia C. 2013. Development of an ultrasound-guided technique for pudendal nerve block in cat cadavers. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery. 15(10): 901-907.

Adami C., Dayer T., Spadavecchia C. & Angeli G. 2014. Ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block in cats undergoing perineal urethrostomy: a prospective, randomised, investigator-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery. 16(4): 340-345.

Ahmed A.F., Al-Sobayl F.A. & Al-Halag M.A. 2011. Topographical anatomy and desensitization of the pudendal nerve in adult male dromedary camels. Theriogenology. 76(4): 772-777.

Brondani J.T., Mama K.R., Luna S.P.L., Wright B.D., Niyom S., Ambrosio J., Vogel P.R. & Padovani C.R. 2013. Validation of the English version of the UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional composite pain scale for assessing postoperative pain in cats. BMC Veterinary Research. 9(143): 2-15.

Fletcher T.F. 1996. Applied anatomy and physiology of the feline lower urinary tract. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice. 26(2): 181-196.

Freitas J.F. & Meinberg S. 2009. Analgesia de parto: bloqueios locorregionais e analgesia sistêmica. Rev Med Minas Gerais. 1(Suppl 9): 7-14.

Galvão A.L.B., Ondani A.C., Frazílio F.O. & Ferreira G.S. 2010. Obstrução uretral em gatos machos – revisão literária. Acta Veterinaria Brasilica. 4(1): 1-6.

Imbelloni L.E., Beato L., Beato C., Cordeiro J.A. & Souza D.D. 2005. Analgesia pós-operatória com bloqueio bilateral do nervo pudendo com bupivacaína S75:R25 a 0,25% - Estudo piloto em hemorroidectomia sob regime ambulatorial. Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia. 55(6): 614-621.

Iremashvili V.V., Chepurov A.K., Kobaladze K.M. & Gamidov S.I. 2010. Periprostatic local anesthesia with pudendal block for transperineal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a randomized trial. Urology. 75(5): 1023-1027.

Lulich J.P. & Osborne C.A. 2010. Safely unobstructing the urethra of male cats. In: Hill’s Symposium on Multimodal Management of FLUTD (Auckland, Nova Zealand) pp.1-7. Disponível em [Accessed in January 2015].

Mariz M.A.S., Silva Neto E.J. & Soares J.G.A. 2001. Anatomia do nervo pudendo e seu bloqueio anestésico em caprinos. Ciência Animal. 11(1): 27-33.

Martin J., Gigliotti A., Hirano B. & Franco R.P. 2011. Avaliação clínica-terapêutica e anestésica de felinos obstruídos: sua importância na prática clínica. Nucleus Animalium. 3(1): 61-67.

O’Hearn A.K. & Wright B.D. 2011. Coccygeal epidural with local anesthetic for catheterization and pain management in the treatment of feline urethral obstruction. Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care. 21(1): 50-52.

Osborne C.A., Kruger J.M. & Lulich J.P. 2004. Afecções do trato urinário inferior dos felinos. In: Ettinger S.J. & Feldman E.C. (Eds). Tratado de medicina interna veterinária: doenças do cão e do gato. Rio de janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, pp.1802-1841

Rabelo R.E., Silva L.A.F., Brito L.A.B., Silva O.C., Moura M.I., Daleck C.R. & Damasceno A.D. 2008. Desmotomia apical experimental em bovinos e efeitos na indução do desvio peniano. Veterinária e Zootecnia. 15(2): 312-324.

Rabelo R.E., Silva L.A.F., Lima C.R.O., Orlando C.F.P., Goulart D.S., Santos K.S., Caetano L.B. & Brito L.A.B. 2008. Aspectos clínicos e histológicos do uso da tela de polipropileno na correção cirúrgica de desvio peniano induzido em touros. 35th Congresso Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária (Gramado, Rio Grande do Sul). Disponível em [Accessed in January 2015].

Schumacher J., Bratton G.R. & Williams J.W. 1985. Pudendal and caudal rectal nerve blocks in the horse - An anesthetic procedure for reproductive surgery. Theriogenology. 24(4): 457-464.

Skarda R.T. & Tranquilli W.J. 2007. Local and regional anesthetic and analgesic techniques: horses. In: Tranquilli W.J., Thurmon J.C. & Grimm K.A. (Eds). Lumb & Jones Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia. 4th edn. Ames: Blackwell Publishing, pp.620-622.

Souza M.J.H. 1998. Condutas na desobstrução uretral. In: Souza M.J.H. (Ed). Coletânea em medicina e cirurgia felina. Rio de janeiro: AS Livros de Veterinária, pp.67-88.

Yang G., Wang J., Shen B., Roppolo J.R., Groat W.C. & Tai C. 2014. Pudendal Nerve Stimulation and Block by a Wireless-Controlled Implantable Stimulator in Cats. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface. 17(5): 490-496.

Zacchino M., Allegri M., Canepari M., Minella C.E., Bettinelli S., Draghi F. & Calliada F. 2010. Feasibility of pudendal nerve anaesthetic block using fusion imaging technique in chronic pelvic pain. European Journal of Pain Supplements. 4(Suppl 4): 329-333.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.81802

Copyright (c) 2018 Kath Freire de Vasconcelos, Raquel Guedes Ximenes, Francisco Sávio de Moura Martins, Aline de Sousa Alves, Sabrina Barros Araújo, Jéssica Kária de Andrade, José Rômulo Soares dos Santos, Pedro Isidro da Nóbrega Neto

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.