The Effect of Mycotoxins Adsorbents Beta Glucans or Montmorillonite on Bovine Ruminal Fermentation In Vitro


  • Marcelo Dal Pozzo Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
  • Julio Viegas Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
  • Gilberto Vilmar Kozloski Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
  • Cristiano Miguel Stefanello Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
  • Alisson Minozzo da Silveira Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
  • Cimélio Bayer Departamento de Solos, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
  • Janio Morais Santurio Departamento de Microbiologia e Parasitologia, UFSM, Santa Maria.



ruminal fermentation, mycotoxins adsorbents, beta glucan, montmorillonite.


Background: The addition of adsorbents in foods has been the strategy used by nutritionists to reduce the toxic effects of mycotoxins in animals. Mycotoxins are found in a range of foods and commonly they present variations in the chemical structure therefore, it has been appropriate to include adsorbents from different sources in the diet of ruminants. However, few researches were conducted in order to better understand the interaction of adsorbents on ruminal fermentation. Our objective in this study was to investigate the possible effects of two adsorbent products on bovine ruminal fermentation. One consists of 65% of β-glucan (β-glu), originating cell wall of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and used at a concentration of 1% and natural sodium montmorillonite (MMT) at a concentration of 5%.

Materials, Methods & Results: The effects of β-glu adsorbents (1%) and MMC (5%) in culture medium that simulated ruminal fermentation were evaluated. Bottles, with a capacity of 120 mL, were used to be filled with substrate such as maize and ryegrass hay ground, nutrient solution (medium of Menke), liquid extracted rumen fistulated bovine and the two adsorbents evaluated, totaling 50 mL. The experiment was conducted with three treatments, named after: control (Cont), β-glu and MMT. In the control treatment adsorbents were not added. Six replicates were used for each treatment and two trials were conducted. One of the tests aimed to determine the fermentation kinetics by means of the gas production after 72 h’ incubation and quantifying the production of methane (CH4) at 48h. While another test aimed to quantify the production of short chain fatty acids (SCFA) - acetic, propionic and butyric acid - and the production of ammonia (NH3) in 24 h incubation. All assays were measured by gas chromatography. The highest total SCFA concentration was observed in β-glu treatment (67.71 mM) significantly superior to CONT (57.7 mM) treatment and MMT (53.28 mM), which was significantly lower than the β-glu treatment, but similar to CONT. The average representation (%) of acetic acid for the treatment MMT (62.9%) was significantly higher than the β-glu treatment (61.0%). The average proportions of propionic acid were similar between treatments, while the average representation (%) of butyric acid production was significantly higher for the β-glu treatment (13.1%) compared to CONT treatments (11.3%) and MMT (11.4%). The amount of NH3 was significantly reduced in MMT (9.6 mM) treatment compared to β-glu treatments (12.2 mM) and CONT (11.3 mM). In another test, the greater volume of gas (mL) was produced by β-glu treatment (103.4 mL), which was significantly greater than the treatments CONT (89.0 mL) and MMT (91.6 mL). The lag time, i.e. the time taken by the bacteria inoculum to develop lead-through in the substrate, in the MMT treatment took 6.2 h, slowing significantly compared to CONT treatments (4.8 h) and β Glu (4.33 h). The concentration of CH4 was significantly lower in MMT treatment (33.0%) compared to the CONT treatments (36.3%) and β-glu (35.68%).

Discussion: The glucans which constitute the main cell wall S. cerevisae are the β-glucans with β-1-3 and β-1,6 glycosidic bonds. The largest and most significant concentration of SCFA and gas volume in the β-glu treatment can be explained by the degradation of β-glucans by rumen bacteria. The possible reason of reduced concentration of methane (CH4) in samples collected during 48 h of incubation in MMT treatment stands on the reduction in symbiotic activity of methanogenic bacteria and protozoa. Also, the possible reason of reduction in the concentration of ammonia (NH3) in MMT treatment could be associated to damage on protozoa with proteolytic activity. Our results showed that the amount of montmorillonite in rumen fluid influenced negatively the fermentative activity, therefore, delaying the colonization of bacteria in rumen substrate composed of maize and ryegrass hay. Moreover, the use of β-glu (1%) significantly increased the amount of short chain fatty acids such as, acetic acid and butyric acid, with the exception of propionic acid.


Download data is not yet available.


Abdel-Rahman, M. A. 2010. In vitro Manipulation of Rumen Fermentation Efficiency by Fumaric acid - Bentonite Coupled Addition as an Alternative to Antibiotics. Journal of Agricultural Science. 2(2): 174-180.

Aitchison E.M., Rowe J.B. & Rix G.S. 1986. Effect of Bentonite Clays on Rumen Fermentation and Diet Digestibility. Proceeding Nutrition Society Australian. 11: 111-114.

Bal M.A., Shaver R.D., Jirovec A.G., Shinners K.J. & Coors J.G. 2000. Crop processing and chop length of corn silage: effects on intake, digestion, and milk production by dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 83(6): 1264-1273.

Desheng Q., Fan, L., Yanhu Y. & Niya Z. 2005. Adsorption of aflatoxin B1 on montimorillonite. Poultry Science. 84(6): 959-961.

Diaz D.E., Hagler Jr. W.M., Blackwelder J.T., Eve J.A., Hopikins B.A., Anderson K.L., Jones F.T. & Whitlow L.W. 2004. Aflatoxin Binder II: Reduction of aflatoxin M1 in milk by sequestering agents of cows consuming aflatoxin in feed. Mycopathologia. 157(2): 233-241.

Diaz D.E. & Smith T.K. 2005. Micotoxin sequestering agents: practical tools for the neutralization of mycotoxins. In: Diaz E.D. (Ed). The Mycotoxin Blue Book. Nottingham: University Press, pp.323-339.

Dobicki A., Jerzy P., Andrzej Z. & Roman K. 2006. Saccharomyces cerevisiae preparations in the feeding of cows and their effect on milk yield and composition well as rumen microoganisms. Eletronic Journal Polish Agricultural Universities. 9(4),#48. Disponível em: <http://ps.oxford> [Acessed online March 2015].

Jouany J.P., Yiannikouris A. & Bertin G. 2009. Risk assessment of mycotoxins in ruminants and ruminants products. Options Mediterranéennes. A(85): 205-224.

Menke K.H., Raab L., Salewski A., Steigass H., Fritz D. & Schneider W. 1979. The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feeding stuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. Journal of Agricultural Science. 93(1): 217-222.

Phillips T.D., Kubena L.F., Harvey R.B., Taylor D.R. & Heidelbaugh N.D. 1998. Hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicate: a high affinity sorbent for aflatoxin. Poultry Science. 67(2): 243-247.

Schofield P., Pitt R.E. & Pell A.N. 1994. Kinetics of fiber digestion from in vitro gas production. Journal Animal Science. 72(11): 2980-2991.

Selinger L.B., Forsberg C.W. & Cheng K.J. 1996. The Rumen: A Unique Source of Enzymes for Enhancing Livestock Production. Anaerobe. 2(5): 263-284.

Silva L.S., Griebeler G., Freire D. & Bayer C. 2011. Dinâmica da emissão de metano em solos sob cultivo de arroz irrigado no Sul do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo. 35(2): 473-481.

Silveira, A. M. 2013. Efeito de ácidos orgânicos ou monensina sódica sobre a fermentação ruminal. 52f. Santa Maria, RS. Dissertação (Mestrado em Zootecnia) - Curso de Pós-graduação em Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria.

Smith E.E., Phillips T.D., Ellis J.A. Harvey R.B., Kubena L.F., Thompson J. & Newton G. 1994. Dietary hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicate reduction of aflatoxina M1 residue in dairy goat milk and effects on milk production and components. Journal Animal Science. 72(3): 677-682.

Upadhaya S.D., Sung H.G. & Lee C.H. 2009. Comparative study on the aflatoxin B1 degradation ability of rumen fluid from Holstein steers and Korean native goats. Journal of Veterinary Science. 10 (1): 29-34.

Váradyová Z., Baran M., Siroka P. & Styriaková I. 2003. Effect of silicate minerals (zeolite, bentonite, kaolin, granite) on in vitro fermentation of amorphous cellulose, meadow hay, wheat straw and barley. Berliner und Münchener tierärztliche Wochenschrift. 116(7-8): 317-321.

Wallace R.J. & Newbold C.J. 1991. Effect of bentonite on fermentation in the rumen simulation technique (Rusitec) and rumen ciliate protozoa. Journal of Agriculture Science Cambridge. 116(1): 163-168.

Waltz L.S., White T.W., Fernandez J.M., Gentry L.R., Blouin D.C., Froetschel M.A., Brown T.F., Lupton C.J. & Chapa A.M. 1998. Effects of fish meal and sodium bentonite on daily gain, wool growth, carcass characteristics, and ruminal and blood characteristics of lambs fed concentrate diets. Journal of Animal Science. 76(8): 2025-2031.

Yiannikouris A., André G., Poughon L., François J., Dussap C.G., Jeminet G., Bertin G. & Jouany J.P. 2006. Chemical and conformational study of the interactions involved in mycotoxin complexation with beta-D-glucans. Biomacromolecules. 7(4): 1147-1155.



How to Cite

Pozzo, M. D., Viegas, J., Kozloski, G. V., Stefanello, C. M., Silveira, A. M. da, Bayer, C., & Santurio, J. M. (2016). The Effect of Mycotoxins Adsorbents Beta Glucans or Montmorillonite on Bovine Ruminal Fermentation In Vitro. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae, 44(1), 6.




Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>