Histological and Morphometric Examination of the Testes of Boars and Male Pigs Immunocastrated with Improvac®
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.80582Palavras-chave:
pig, immunocastration, testicular morphology.Resumo
Background: Surgical castration of male piglets is frequently performed to prevent development of an unpleasant taste and flavor in meat of mature males, called boar taint. Disadvantages of this method are primarily related to the lower feed efficiency of surgically castrated male pigs, production of less lean meat and more fat on the carcasses than boars, as well as ethical issues associated with the procedure itself. Immunocastration is a method of immunization against gonadotropinreleasing hormone (GnRH) and represents an alternative to avoid boar taint. This study aimed to examine the influence of immunocastration on histological and morphometric parameters of male pig testes.
Materials, Methods & Results: A total of 60 crossbred male pigs selected from 30 litters were assigned to two experimental groups: boars (n = 30) and immunocastrated males (n = 30). Two doses (2 mL per dose) of the Improvac® vaccine were given to pigs scheduled for immunocastration. The first injection was given at 10 weeks of age, and the second injection at 20 weeks of age. All pigs were fed the same commercial diet ad libitum, group-housed (15 pigs/pen) and slaughtered at 25 weeks of age. After slaughter, testicle weights were measured and samples of testicular tissue were taken for histological examination. Immunocastrated males had lower testicle weights than boars (P < 0.01). Furthermore, structural damage to the germinal epithelium was visible in the seminiferous tubules of vaccinated pigs. In the testicular interstitium of these animals, the number of Leydig cells were reduced; almost all of these cells exhibited different degrees of abnormality. Moreover, the diameter of the seminiferous tubules and thickness of the germinal epithelium were greater (P < 0.01), and the percentage of germinal epithelium in the seminiferous tubules as well as percentage of blood vessels in the interstitium were higher in boars as compared to immunocastrated males (P < 0.01). Seminiferous tubule lumen diameter was greater (P < 0.01), and percentage of lumen in the seminiferous tubules as well as percentage of non-blood vessel tissue in the interstitium were higher in immunocastrated males than boars (P < 0.01).
Discussion: Vaccination against GnRH, as used in this study, reduced the synthesis of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH), which led to decreased spermatogenesis and androgen production. The smaller diameter of the seminiferous tubules as well as germinal epithelium thickness, and lower percentage of germinal epithelium in the seminiferous tubules in immunocastrated males could be explained by reduced FSH synthesis, and subsequent reduced spermatogenesis. The described testicular malformations in immunocastrated animals caused their lower weight, and greater diameter of the lumen as well as a higher lumen percentage of the seminiferous tubules. The vaccine reduced LH synthesis, so the Leydig cells of immunocastrated animals had lower activity than the same cells in boars. The percentage of blood vessels in the interstitium of boar testes was higher, which was related to the blood supply required for normal function of Leydig cells. It was concluded that differences existed in the structure of the seminiferous tubules and interstitium between boars and immunocastrated males , which were reflected in values of the examined histological and morphometric parameters. The development of these differences was related to the inhibition of GnRH synthesis and secretion.
Downloads
Referências
Babol J., Squires J. & Lundström K. 1999. Relationship between metabolism of androstenone and skatole in intact male pigs. Journal of Animal Science. 77(1): 84-92.
Bilskis R. 2014. Immunocastration of young and mature boars with Improvac®. 63p. Kaunas, RL. Dissertação (Mestrado em Veterinary Sciences) - Veterinary Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences.
Borell E.V., Baumgartner J., Giersing M., Jäggin N., Prunier A., Tuyttens F.A.M. & Edwards S.A. 2009. Animal welfare implications of surgical castration and its alternatives in pigs. Animal. 3(11): 1488-1496.
Burity C.H.F., Pissinatti A. & Mandarim-de-Lacerda C.A. 2004. Stereology of the liver in three species of Leontopithecus (Lesson, 1840) Callitrichidae – Primates. Anatomia Histologia Embryologia. 33(3): 183-187.
Claus R., Weiler U. & Herzog A. 1994. Physiological aspects of androstenone and skatole formation in the boar: A review with experimental data. Meat Science. 38(2): 289-305.
Counis R., Laverriere J.N., Garrel G., Bleux C., Cohen-Tannoudji J., Lerrant Y., Kottler M.L. & Magre S. 2005. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone and the control of gonadotrope function. Reproduction Nutrition Development. 45: 243-254.
Davidoff M.S., Middendorff R., Müller D. & Holstein A.F. 2009. The Neuroendocrine Properties of the Leydig Cells. In: The Neuroendocrine Leydig Cells and their Stem Cell Progenitors, the Pericytes. Berlin: Springer, pp.23-44.
Dunshea F.R., Colantoni C., Howard K., McCauley I., Jackson P., Long K.A., Lopaticki S., Nugent E.A., Simons J.A., Walker J. & Hennessy D.P. 2001. Vaccination of boars with a GnRH vaccine (Improvac) eliminates boar taint and increases growth performance. Journal of Animal Science. 79: 2524-2535.
Edwards S.A., Borell E.V. & Bonneau M. 2009. Guest editorial: Scientific and practical issues associated with piglet castration. Animal. 3(11): 1478-1479.
Fang F., Su S., Liu Y., Zhang Y., Pu Y., Zhao X., Li Y., Cao H., Wang J., Zhou J. & Zhang X. 2013. Immunization against recombinant GnRH-I alters ultrastructure of gonadotropin cell in an experimental boar model. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. 11: 63-66.
Fuchs T., Thun R., Parvizi N., Nathues H., Koehrmann A., Andrews S., Brock F., Klein G., Sudhaus N. & Beilage E.G. 2009. Effect of a gonadotropin-releasing factor vaccine on follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone concentrations and on the development of testicles and the expression of boar taint in male pigs. Theriogenology. 72: 672-680.
Haider S.G. 2004. Cell biology of Leydig cells in the testis. International Review of Cytology. 233: 181-241.
Hansson K.E., Lundström K., Fjelkner-Modig S. & Persson J. 1980. The importance of androstenone and skatole for boar taint. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research. 10(4): 167-173.
Hedger M.P. 2015. The Immunophysiology of Male Reproduction. In: Plant T.M. & Zeleznik A.J. (Eds). Knobil and Neill’s Physiology of Reproduction. 4th edn. Amsterdam: Academic Press, pp.805-894.
Hemonic A. & Courboulay V. 2009. Evaluation of the safety, efficacy and production benefits of vaccination against boar taint in male pigs raised under commercial field conditions in France. Revue de Médecine Vétérinaire. 160(8-9): 383-393.
Howroyd P., Hoyle-Thacker R., Lyght O., Williams D. & Kleymenova E. 2005. Morphology of the fetal rat testis preserved in different fixatives. Toxicologic Pathology. 33(2): 300-304.
Metz C., Hohl K., Waidelich S., Drochner W. & Claus R. 2002. Active immunization of boars against GnRH at an early age: consequences for testicular function, boar taint accumulation and N-retention. Livestock Production Science. 74: 147-157.
Pauly C., Spring P., O’Doherty J.V., Kragten S.A. & Bee G. 2009. Growth performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of group-penned surgically castrated, immunocastrated (Improvac®) and entire male pigs and individually penned entire male pigs. Animal. 3(7): 1057-1066.
Pissinatti A., Burity C.H.F. & Mandarim-De-Lacerda C.A. 2003. Stereology of the myocardium in Leontophitecus (Lesson, 1840) in Callitrichidae – primates. Journal of Medical Primatology. 32(3): 139-147.
Slaoui M. & Fiette L. 2011. Histopathology procedures: from tissue sampling to histopathological evaluation. Methods in Molecular Biology. 691: 69-82.
Stanislaus D., Pinter J.H., Janovick J.A. & Conn P.M. 1998. Mechanisms mediating multiple physiological responses to gonadotropin-releasing hormone. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 144: 1-10.
Stojanovic S., Uscebrka G., Zikic D. & Kanacki Z. 2013. Skeletal muscle characteristics of broiler chickens under modified incubation factors. Avian Biology Research. 6(4): 281-288.
Tajet H., Andresen O. & Meuwissen T.E. 2006. Estimation of genetic parameters for boar taint: skatole and androstenone and their correlations with sexual maturation. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica. 48(Suppl 1): 22-23.
Taylor A.A. & Weary D.M. 2000. Vocal responses of piglets to castration: identifying procedural sources of pain. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 70(1): 17-26.
Thun R., Gajewski Z. & Janett F. 2006. Castration in male pigs: techniques and animal welfare issues. Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology. 57(Suppl 8): 189-194.
Turkstra J.A. & Meloen R.H. 2006. Active immunisation against gonadotropin-releasing hormone, an active tool to block the fertility axis in mammals. Veterinary Sciences Tomorrow. Disponível em: <http://www.vetscite.org/2006/11/ page/2/>. [Accessed online in January 2017].
Turkstra J.A., Zeng X.Y., Van Diepen J.T.M., Jongbloed A.W., Oonk H.B., Van de Wiel D.F.M. & Meloen R.H. 2002. Performance of male pigs immunized against GnRH is related to the time of onset of biological response. Journal of Animal Science. 80: 2953-2959.
Uscebrka G., Stojanovic S., Zikic D. & Kanacki Z. 2010. Morphodynamics of embryonic development of skeletal musculature of broiler and layer chickens. Avian Biology Research. 3(4): 179-186.
Waites G.M.H., Speight A.C. & Jenkins N. 1985. The functional maturation of the Sertoli cell and Leydig cell in the mammalian testis. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 75: 317-326.
Xue J.L., Dial G.D. & Pettigrew J. 1997. Performance, carcass, and meat quality advantages of boars over barrows: A literature review. Swine Health and Production. 5(1): 21-28.
Zamaratskaia G., Andersson H.K., Chen G., Andersson K., Madej A. & Lundström K. 2008. Effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone vaccine (Improvac) on steroid hormones, boar taint compounds and performance in entire male pigs. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 43(3): 351-359.
Zamaratskaia G. & Squires E.J. 2009. Biochemical, nutritional and genetic effects on boar taint in entire male pigs. Animal. 3(11): 1508-1521.
Zeng X.Y., Turkstra J.A., Meloen R.H., Liu X.Y., Chen F.Q., Schaaper W.M.M., Oonk H.B., Guo D.Z. & Wiel D.F.M. 2002. Active immunization against gonadotrophin-releasing hormone in Chinese male pigs: effects of dose on antibody titer, hormone levels and sexual development. Animal Reproduction Science. 70: 223-233.
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
This journal provides open access to all of its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Such access is associated with increased readership and increased citation of an author's work. For more information on this approach, see the Public Knowledge Project and Directory of Open Access Journals.
We define open access journals as journals that use a funding model that does not charge readers or their institutions for access. From the BOAI definition of "open access" we take the right of users to "read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles" as mandatory for a journal to be included in the directory.
La Red y Portal Iberoamericano de Revistas Científicas de Veterinaria de Libre Acceso reúne a las principales publicaciones científicas editadas en España, Portugal, Latino América y otros países del ámbito latino