Influence of Male to Female Ratio on Hormone Profiles and Reproductive Performance of Anestrus Postpartum Ewes Subjected to the Male Effect


  • José Carlos Ferreira-Silva Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE), Recife, PE, Brazil.
  • Tracy Anne Burnett Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Paulo Francisco Maciel Póvoas Souto Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE), Recife, PE, Brazil.
  • Jorge Motta Rocha Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal RN, Brazil.
  • Heder Nunes Ferreira Faculdade Pio Decimo, Aracaju, SE, Brazil.
  • Marcelo Tigre Moura Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE), Recife, PE, Brazil.
  • Eduardo Luiz Cavalcanti Caldas Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS), São Cristóvão, SE.
  • Marcos Antonio Lemos Oliveira Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE), Recife, PE, Brazil.



bioestimulation, LH, P4, ovulation, pregnancy, prolificacy.


Background: Complete isolation of genders allows intense estrous induction and synchronization once rams are introduced in ewe flocks at the onset of the breeding season (BS). This management practice, defined as the male effect, results from a neuroendocrine process mediated by pheromones. The male effect is a straightforward procedure to induce estrous in noncycling ewes, but conditions for its use have not been fully explored. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate hormone levels and ovarian activity of postpartum ewes in anestrus which are subjected to the male effect under different male to female ratios.

Material, Methods & Results: Pospartum females were selected according to body condition score and cyclicity status. Females were kept apart from males during 30 days at a distance of 10 m. Anestrus and ovulation were determined by P4 measures on days 10, 20 and 30 after isolation from males. After P4 concentration diagnosis, anestrus ewe (n = 99) were subjected to male to ewe ratios (MFR) of 1:20 (MFR20), 1:30 (MFR30) and 1:40 (MFR40). Santa Inês rams
 (n = 3) of proven fertility were used. Three females of each group were randomly subjected to blood collection for LH concentration analysis. Ovarian activity was performed by ultrasonography after estrus manifestation in six ewe of each group. Estrus events were observed twice a day during the BS of 35 days, and estrus were considered synchronized when it occured within the initial five days of the BS. Pregnancy diagnosis was performed by ultrasonography on days 35 and 60 after the last mating. All ewe were in a non-cycling condition before BS onset, based upon P4 analysis. After initiation of the BS, P4 concentrations increased for all groups. Irrespectively of male to female ratio, male effect induced LH pre-ovulatory peaks within the initial 26 to 86 h of the BS. Synchronization of estrus reached 50% for MFR20, 40% for MFR30 and 20% for MFR40 for all ewe. Moreover, overall estrus incidence was 100% (MFR20), 90% (MFR30) and 65% (MFR40) within the initial 15 days of the BS. However, incidence of ewe that had repeated estrus events was lower for MFR20 than for MFR30. Follicular growth and number of ovulations was similar between groups. Conception rates on first service was higher than that of second service for MFR20 and MFR30, although there was no difference between services for MFR40. In contrast, overall conception rates, delivery type and prolificacy were similar between groups.

Discussion: P4 increased to cyclicity levels after contact between genders, demonstrating the potential of the male effect to induce estrus in non-cycling ewes. Most ewe ovulated within three days after the male effect, possibly due to elevated basal LH levels. Moreover, the LH preovulatory peak varied within groups, possibly due to greater interactions between genders, which ultimately may have led to earlier ovulation anticipation under lower MFR. Estrus parameters were similar between groups, suggesting low or negligible effects of MFR. Ovulatory follicle size and growth and the number of ovulations were similar between all groups; previous reports have suggested that this may be due to a strong effect of their genetic background. Conception rates were higher at first than second services, demonstrating the potential of male effect. In conclusion, male to female ratio affects the efficiency of the male effect to induce and synchronize estrus in ewes under postpartum anestrus, but it does not affect conception rates and prolificacy.


Download data is not yet available.


Almeida-Irmão J.M., Ferreira-Silva J.C, Silva P.G.C., Freitas Neto LM., Moura M.T., Oliveira L.R.S. & Lima P.F. &Oliveira M.A.L. 2014. Efeito do desaleitamento temporário e do efeito macho sobre a reprodução de caprinos. Medicina Veterinária. 8: 24 - 30.

Alves C.G.T., Ferreira-Silva J.C., Almeida-Irmão J.M., Moura M.T., Bartolomeu C.C., Lima P.F. & Oliveira M.A.L. 2015. Reproductive outcomes using different distances for preconditioning for the male effect in Anglo Nubian goats during two distinct climate seasons. Boletim de Indústria Animal. 72(1): 69-76.

Azzarini M. 2004. Potencial reproductivo de los ovinos. Producción Ovina. 16: 5-17.

Caldas E.L.C., Ferreira-Silva J.C., Freitas Neto L.M., Veloso Neto H.F., Moura M.T., Lima P.F., Santos M.H.B. & Oliveira M.A.L. 2015. Male effect associated with suckling interruption on the reproductive performance of Santa Inês ewes. Boletim de Indústria Animal. 72: 117-123.

Caldas E.L.C., Freitas Neto L.M., Almeida-Irmão J.M., Ferreira-Silva J.C., Silva P.G.C., Veloso Neto H.F., Neves J.P., Moura M.T., Lima P.F. & Oliveira M.A.L. 2015. The influence of separation distance during the preconditioning period of the male effect approach on reproductive performance in sheep. Veterinary Science Development. 4: 1-9.

Chemineau P., Pellicer-Rubio M.T., Lassoued N., Khaldi G.E. & Monniaux D. 2006. Male-induced short oestrous and ovarian cycles and sheep and goats: a working hypothesis. Reproduction NutritionDevelopment. 46: 417-429.

De St. Jorre T.J., Hawken P. & Martin G.B. 2014. New understanding of an old phenomenon: uncontrolled factors and misconceptions that cast a shadow over studies of the ‘male effect’on reproduction in small ruminants. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences. 38(6): 625-636.

Evans A.C.O., Duffy P., Hynes N. & Boland M.P. 2000. Waves of follicle development during the estrous cycle in sheep. Theriogenology. 53: 699-715.

Falcão D.P., Santos M.H.B., Freitas Neto L.M., Neves J.P., Lima P.F. & Oliveira M.A.L. 2008. Uso da PGF2η no puerpério para reduzir o anestro pós-parto de cabras em aleitamento contínuo e controlado. Ciência Animal Brasileira. 9: 512-518.

Fonseca J.F. 2005. Estratégias para o controle do ciclo estral e superovulação em ovinos e caprinos. Revista Brasileira de Reprodução Animal. 16: 1-9.

Ginther O.J., Kot K. & Wiltbank M.C. 1995. Associations between emergence of follicular waves and fluctuations in FSH concentrations during the estrous cycle in ewes. Theriogenology. 43: 689-703.

Machado I.B.B., Fernandes A.A.O. & Selaive-Villarroel A.B. 1999. Parâmetros reprodutivos de ovinos deslanados Morada Nova e Santa Inês mantidos em pastagem cultivada no estado do Ceará. Revista Científica de Produção Animal. 1: 81-87.

Martin G.B. & Kadokawa H. 2006. “Clean, Green and Ethical” Animal Production. Case Study: Reproductive Efficiency in Small Ruminants. Journal of Reproduction and Development. 52: 145-152.

Martin G.B., Oldham C.M. & Lindsay D.R. 1980. Increased plasma LH levels in seasonally anovular Merino ewes following the introduction of rams. Animal Reproduction Science. 3: 25-132.

Martin G.B., Oldham C.M., Cognié Y. & DT Pearce. 1986. The physiological responses of an ovulatory ewes to the introduction of rams-A review. Livestock Production Science. 15: 219-247.

Martin G.B., Scaramuzzi R.J. & Henstridge J.D. 1983. Effects of oestradiol, progesterone and androstenedione on the pulsatile secretion of luteinizing hormone in ovariectomized ewes during spring and autumn. Journal of Endocrinology. 96: 181-193.

Mexia A.A., Macedo F.A.F, Alcalde C.R., Sakaguti E.S., Martins E.N., Zundt M., Yamamoto S.M. & Macedo R.M.G. 2004. Desempenhos Reprodutivo e Produtivo de Ovelhas Santa Inês Suplementadas em Diferentes Fases da Gestação. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 33: 658-667.

Morales J.U., Vaquez H.G.G. & Andrade. B.M.R. 2003. Influencia del pastoreo restringido en el efecto macho em cabras em baja condición corporal durante la estación de anestro. Técnica Pecuária en México. 41: 251-260.

Notter D.R. & Copenhaver J.S. 1980. Performance of Finnish Landrace crossbred ewes under accelerated lambing. II. Lamb growth and survival. Journal Animal Science. 51: 1043-1050.

Okamura H., Murata K., Sakamoto K., Wakabayashi Y., Ohkura S., Takeuchi Y., Mori Y. 2010. Male Effect Pheromone Tickles the GonadotrophinηReleasing Hormone Pulse Generator. Journal of Neuroendocrinology. 22: 825-832.

Oldham C., Martin. G.B. & Knight T.W. 1979. Stimulation of seasonally anovular Merino ewes by rams. I. Time from introduction of the rams to the preovulatory LH surge and ovulation. Animal of Reproduction Science. 1: 283-290.

Oliveira L.R.S., Ferreira-Silva J.C., Chaves M.S., Freitas Neto L.M., Moura M.T., Caldas E.L.C., Lima P.F. & Oliveira M.A.L. 2015. Male Efect and Breeding Season Shortening Under Contrasting Climatic Conditions Upon Reproduction of Nulliparous Anglo-Nubians. Ciência Veterinária nos Trópicos. 18: 43-48.

Pacheco A., Quirino C.R. & Oliveira A.F.M. 2010. Assessment of sexual behavior of young rams of Santa Inês breed, with and without prior experience with females. Archivos Latinoamericanos de Producción Animal. 17: 15-24.

Pearce D.T. & Oldham C.M. 1988. Importance of non-olfatory ram stimuli in mediating ram-induced ovulation in the ewe. Journal of Reproduction and Infertility. 84: 333-339.

Perkins A. & Fitzgerald J.A. 1994. The Behavioral Component of the Ram Effect: The Influence of Ram Sexual Behavior on the Induction of Estrus in Anovulatory Ewes. Journal of Animal Science. 72: 51-55.

Ramirez L.A. & Quintero L.A.Z. 2001. Los fenómenos de bioestimulacion sexual en ovejas y cabras. Veterinaria Mexico. 32: 117-129.

Rosa H.J.D. & Bryant M.J. 2002. The ‘ram effect’ as a way of modifying the reproductive activity in the ewe. Small Ruminant Research. 45: 1-16.

Saunders G.D.A., Alves N.G., Pérez J.R.O., Souza J.C.D., Muniz J.A. & José Neto A. 2010. Effect of flushing with sources of protein with different degratability on ovulation in Santa Inês ewes. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 39: 2731-2738.

Silva Filho M.L., Bezerra L.R., Ferreira-Silva J.C., Souto, P.F.M.P., Paula, N.R.O., Lima, P.F., Bartolomeu C.C. & Oliveira M.A.L. 2015. Influence of biostimulation and temporary weaning on follicular dynamics and pregnancy rates in Nelore cows (Bos taurus indicus). Tropical Animal Health and Production. 47: 1-7.

Tenório Filho F., Ferreira-Silva J.C., Nascimento P.S., Freitas Neto L.M., Moura M.T., Almeida Irmão J.M. & Oliveira M.A.L. 2016. Ação do efeito macho sobre a eficiência reprodutiva de ovelhas nulíparas das raças Santa Inês e Morada Nova criadas em diferentes regiões. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae. 44: 1353.

Tenório Filho F., Santos M.H.B., Carrazzoni P.G., Bartolomeu C.C., Lima P.F. & Oliveira M.A.L. 2007. Follicular dynamics in Anglo-Nubian goats using transrectal and transvaginal ultrasound. Small Ruminant Research. 72: 51-56.

Ungerfeld R., Dago A.L., Rubianes E. & Forsberg M. 2004. Response of anestrous ewes to the ram effect after follicular wave synchronization with a single dose of estradiol-17η. Reproduction Nutrition Development. 44: 89-98.



How to Cite

Ferreira-Silva, J. C., Burnett, T. A., Souto, P. F. M. P., Rocha, J. M., Ferreira, H. N., Moura, M. T., Caldas, E. L. C., & Oliveira, M. A. L. (2017). Influence of Male to Female Ratio on Hormone Profiles and Reproductive Performance of Anestrus Postpartum Ewes Subjected to the Male Effect. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae, 45(1), 8.




Most read articles by the same author(s)