Equine Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells -

Evaluation of Muscle Inflammatory Response Following Intramuscular Transplantation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.151944

Abstract

Background: Horses hold significant value in sports and the economy, requiring rapid recovery from musculoskeletal injuries. Cell-based therapies, particularly those using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), have emerged as promising tools due to their regenerative, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory properties, as well as their capacity for self-renewal. However, their therapeutic efficacy may be influenced by host immune responses, particularly in allogeneic settings. Thus, this study aimed to morphologically evaluate the acute inflammatory response in equine muscle tissue following intramuscular transplantation of autologous and allogeneic bone marrow-derived MSCs (EqBM-MSCs).

Materials, Method & Results: Fifteen clinically healthy adult horses (6-12 years; 300-500 kg) were randomly assigned to 3 groups (n = 5 each): Control (intramuscular injection of phosphate-buffered saline - PBS), Auto-MSCs (intramuscular transplantation of autologous EqBM-MSCs), and Allo-MSCs (intramuscular transplantation of allogeneic EqBM-MSCs). EqBM-MSCs were isolated from bone marrow, expanded under standard culture conditions, and characterized by plastic adherence, fibroblastoid morphology, expression of CD44 and CD90, absence of CD34, and their differentiation potential into adipogenic, osteogenic, and chondrogenic lineages. An average of 2×10⁶ cells in 100 µL of PBS were transplanted into the right gluteus medius muscle under ultrasound guidance. Two muscle biopsies were collected per horse before transplantation (D0) and 24 h post-transplantation (D24). Histological hematoxylin and eosin (H&E); Gomori’s trichrome (GT)) and histochemical (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide tetrazolium reductase (NADH-tr)) analyses demonstrated preserved muscle architecture and normal fiber organization in both MSC-treated groups. No evidence of inflammation, such as fiber morphological alterations or inflammatory cell infiltration, was observed in any group.

Discussion: MSCs possess self-renewal capacity and secrete bioactive factors that support tissue repair and modulate inflammation. In equines, bone marrow is a commonly used MSC source, and intramuscular delivery has been associated with efficient administration and prolonged local retention. The absence of acute muscle inflammatory changes observed in this study is consistent with previous reports in equine tendon following MSC transplantation. In contrast, inflammatory responses have been described in rat muscle after autologous bone marrow MSC administration, typically characterized by muscle fiber alterations and inflammatory cell infiltration. Such changes were not observed in the present study, and NADH-tr staining confirmed preserved metabolic activity. These findings indicate that intramuscular administration of both autologous and allogeneic EqBM-MSCs is well-tolerated and does not induce acute inflammation. The lack of acute response may be related to the immunomodulatory properties of MSCs, including secretion of factors such as transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). The absence of inflammatory changes supports the immunomodulatory properties of MSCs and may reinforces their potential for clinical application in equine muscle injury. Nevertheless, the evaluation performed at 24 h reflects only the acute phase, and longer-term responses remain to be elucidated. Further studies are necessary to investigate the long-term safety and therapeutic potential of intramuscular MSC transplantation in equine musculoskeletal disorders.

Keywords: autologous, cell therapy, gluteus medius, histology, histochemistry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1 Andrzejewska A., Lukomska B. & Janowski M. 2019. Concise Review: Mesenchymal Stem Cells: From Roots to Boost. Stem Cells. 37: 855-864. DOI: 10.1002/stem.3016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.3016

2 Berglund A.K., Fortier L.A., Antczak D.F. & Schnabel L.V. 2017. Immunoprivileged no more: measuring the immunogenicity of allogeneic adult mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Research & Therapy. 8: 288. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-017-0742-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-017-0742-8

3 Cequier A., Sanz C., Rodellar C. & Barrachina L. 2021. The usefulness of mesenchymal stem cells beyond the musculoskeletal system in horses. Animals. 11: 931. DOI: 10.3390/ani11040931 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11040931

4 Crawford K.L., Finnane A., Greer R.M., Phillips C.J.C., Woldeyohannes S.M., Perkins N.R. & Ahern B.J. 2021. Appraising the welfare of Thoroughbred racehorses in training in Queensland, Australia: the incidence, risk factors and outcomes for horses after retirement from racing. Animals. 11: 142. DOI: 10.3390/ani11010142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010142

5 Dias M.C., Landim-Alvarenga F.D., Moraes C.N., Costa L.D., Geraldini C.M., Vasconcelos Machado V.M. & Maia L. 2016. Intramuscular transplantation of allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells derived from equine umbilical cord. International Journal of Stem Cells. 9: 239-249. DOI:10.15283/ijsc16011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15283/ijsc16011

6 Dubowitz V. & Sewry C.A. 2007. Histological and histochemical stains and reactions. In: Dubowitz V. & Sewry C.A. (Eds). Muscle Biopsy: A Practical Approach. 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Saunders/Elsevier, pp.21-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4160-2593-1.50007-3

7 Gala K., Burdzińska A., Idziak M., Wilczek E. & Pączek L. 2013. Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells into the skeletal muscle induces cytokine generation. Cytokine. 64: 243-250. DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2013.06.314 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2013.06.314

8 Guest D.J., Smith M.R. & Allen W.R. 2008. Monitoring the fate of autologous and allogeneic mesenchymal progenitor cells injected into the superficial digital flexor tendon of horses: preliminary study. Equine Veterinary Journal. 40: 178-181. DOI: 10.2746/042516408X276942 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2746/042516408X276942

9 Jahromi H.S., Estrada C., Li Y., Cheng E. & Davies J.E. 2018. Human Umbilical Cord Perivascular Cells and Human Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Transplanted Intramuscularly Respond to a Distant Source of Inflammation. Stem Cell and Development. 27: 415-429. DOI: 10.1089/scd.2017.0248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2017.0248

10 Jahromi S.H. & Davies J.E. 2019. Concise Review: Skeletal Muscle as a Delivery Route for Mesenchymal Stromal Cells. Stem Cells Translational Medicine. 8: 456-465. DOI: 10.1002/sctm.18-0208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sctm.18-0208

11 Maia L., Landim-Alvarenga F.C., Mota L.S., Assis Golim M., Laufer-Amorim R., Vita B., Barberini D.J., Listoni A.J., Moraes C.N., Heckler M.C. & Amorim R.M. 2013. Immunophenotypic, immunocytochemistry, ultrastructural, and cytogenetic characterization of mesenchymal stem cells from equine bone marrow. Microscopy Research and Technique. 76: 618-624. DOI:10.1002/jemt.22208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.22208

12 Maličev E. & Jazbec K. 2024. An overview of mesenchymal stem cell heterogeneity and concentration. Pharmaceuticals. 17: 350. DOI:10.3390/ph17030350 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17030350

13 Mishra V.K., Shih H.H., Parveen F., Lenzen D., Ito E., Chan T.F. & Ke L.Y. 2020. Identifying the Therapeutic Significance of Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Cells. 9: 1145. DOI: 10.3390/cells9051145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9051145

14 Pezzanite L.M., Fortier L.A., Antczak D.F., Cassano J.M., Brosnahan M.M., Miller D. & Schnabel L.V. 2015. Equine allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells elicit antibody responses in vivo. Stem Cell Research & Therapy. 6:54. DOI:10.1186/s13287-015-0053-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-015-0053-x

15 Pigott J.H., Ishihara A., Wellman M.L., Russell D.S. & Bertone A.L. 2013. Inflammatory effects of autologous, genetically modified autologous, allogeneic, and xenogeneic mesenchymal stem cells after intra-articular injection in horses. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 26: 453-460. DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-13-01-0008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-13-01-0008

16 Reis I.L., Lopes B., Sousa P., Sousa A.C., Caseiro A.R., Mendonça C.M., Santos J.M., Atayde L.M., Alvites R.D. & Maurício A.C. 2024. Equine Musculoskeletal Pathologies: Clinical Approaches and Therapeutical Perspectives-A Review. Veterinary Sciences. 11: 190. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci11050190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci11050190

17 Shah K., Shah N., Ghassemi F., Ly C., George T., Lutz C. & Sumer H. 2022. Alloreactivity of allogeneic mesenchymal stem/stromal cells and other cellular therapies: a concise review. Stem Cells International. 2022: 9589600. DOI: 10.1155/2022/9589600 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9589600

18 Valentine B.A. 2012. Skeletal Muscle. In: Zachary J.F. (Ed). Pathologic Basis of Veterinary Disease. 7th edn. St. Louis: Elsevier,pp.992-1036.

19 Villagrán C.C., Schumacher J., Donnell R. & Dhar M.S. 2016. A Novel Model for Acute Peripheral Nerve Injury in the Horse and Evaluation of the Effect of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Applied In Situ on Nerve Regeneration: A Preliminary Study. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 3: 80. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00080 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2016.00080

20 Zahedi M., Parham A., Dehghani H. & Mehrjerdi H.K. 2017. Stemness signature of equine marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. International Journal of Stem Cells. 10: 93-102. DOI: 10.15283/ijsc16036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15283/ijsc16036

Additional Files

Published

2026-07-05

How to Cite

Freitas, N. P. P., Ferreira, L. V. de O., Jaqueta Barberini, D., Maia, L., Heckler, M. C. T., Golim, M. de A., … Amorim, R. M. (2026). Equine Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells - : Evaluation of Muscle Inflammatory Response Following Intramuscular Transplantation. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae, 54. https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.151944

Issue

Section

Articles