Osteotomy Gap Consolidation in Dogs after Tibial Tuberosity Advancement with and without Cancellous Bone Graft

Authors

  • Cassio Ricardo Auada Ferrigno Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Tennessee (UT), Knoxville, TN, United States https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9805-989X
  • Márcio Poletto Ferreira Medicina Animal, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4336-2485
  • Olicies da Cunha Ciência Animal, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Palotina, PR, Brazil.
  • Daniela Fabiana Izquierdo Caquias Unidad de Cirugía y Anestesia de Pequeños Animales, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la República Oriental del Uruguay (Udelar), MTV, Uruguay. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2369-8678
  • Jaqueline França dos Santos Private practice, Canamara, MT, Brazil.
  • Alexandre Navarro Alves de Souza Faculdade de Veterinária, Instituto Federal do Amazonas (IFAM), Manaus, AM, Brazil.
  • Kelly Cristiane Ito Yamauchi Private practice (Ortopedia 360), Santos, SP, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8200-3341
  • Vanessa Couto de Magalhães Ferraz College of Veterinary Medicine, Lincoln Memorial University (LMU), Harrogate, TN, United States. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6478-4030
  • Valentine Verpaalen Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Georgia (UGA), Athens, GA, United States. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9917-9829

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.143635

Keywords:

stifle, knee, TTA, cranial cruciate ligament, rupture

Abstract

Background: Cranial cruciate ligament disease is the leading cause of lameness in dogs. The application of autogenous cancellous bone graft within the osteotomy gap has been indicated to accelerate bone healing, but prospective clinical studies evaluating the effects of autogenous cancellous bone graft on osteotomy gap healing after TTA have produced mixed results. The aim of this study was evaluate bone healing time in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease that underwent osteotomy for tibial tuberosity advancement with or without autogenous cancellous bone graft. We hypothesized that an autogenous cancellous bone graft would accelerate bone consolidation after tibial tuberosity advancement. 

Materials, Methods & Results: A total of 30 dogs (8 male; 22 female) of various breeds with unilateral or bilateral cranial cruciate ligament disease (CCLD), a minimum weight of 20 kg (44 lbs), and a tibial plateau angle up to 25° were randomly assigned to Group A [15 dogs; graft] or B [15 dogs; control]. Dogs underwent tibial tuberosity advancement (TTA) with [Group A] or without [Group B] autogenous cancellous bone graft harvested from their tibia. All surgical procedures were performed by the same experienced orthopedic surgeon. They were assessed through monthly radiographs (at postoperative [PO] day 30, 60, 90, and, as required to cover complete healing, 120, 150, 180, and 210 days). Radiographic evaluation was conducted by an experienced veterinarian who was familiar with the TTA procedure and was blinded to the treatment group (images without identification - name/group). Significantly more dogs in Group A achieved 100% osteotomy gap consolidation at 30 days PO (P = 0.0002) and 60 days PO (P = 0.0016) than Group B. The average time to 100% bone consolidation was 56 days (± 15.4) for Group A and 108 days (± 46.47) for Group B, and was significantly shorter for group A (P < 0.0001). 

Discussion: Our results have showed bone consolidation time in dogs with CCLD undergoing the surgical technique of TTA is significantly faster when aided by an autogenous cancellous bone graft at 30 and 60 days PO. Therefore, we accept our hypothesis that autogenous cancellous bone graft accelerates bone consolidation. These results support the findings of another study, that noted that the use of autograft resulted in significantly higher osteotomy healing scores at 6 and 10 weeks postoperatively. The divergence of results between studies evaluating osteotomy gap consolidation following TTA may be partly explained by the subjective and different methods of bone consolidation evaluation used in these investigations. This is a standard limitation when using radiographic evaluation, however, the selection of this method is justified by the fact that this imaging modality is commonly used in routine clinical practice to evaluate bone consolidation – it is, therefore, clinically representative. The present study is subject to certain limitations. Firstly, variables other than bone graft treatment may have influenced bone consolidation time, such as age, weight, and cage size. However, these variables were not significantly different between the evaluated groups (P > 0.05), thus eliminating the effects of these potentially confounding variables. Secondly, the investigator evaluating radiographic bone consolidation could not be completely blinded to the treatment group, as some degree of radiation attenuation was associated with the cancellous bone graft. In conclusion, one consolidation time in dogs with CCLD undergoing the surgical technique of TTA is significantly faster when aided by an autogenous cancellous bone graft.

Keywords: stifle, knee, TTA, cranial cruciate ligament, rupture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barnes K., Lanz O., Werre K., Clapp K. & Gilley R. 2015. Comparison of autogenous cancellous bone grafting and extra-corporeal shock wave therapy on osteotomy healing in the tibial tuberosity advancement procedure in dogs. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 28(3): 207-214. DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-14-10-0156.

Bisgard S.K., Barnhart M.D., Shiroma J.T., Kennedy S.C. & Schertel E.R. 2011. The effect of cancellous autograft and novel plate design on radiographic healing and postoperative complications in tibial tuberosity advancement for cranial cruciate-deficient canine stifles. Veterinary Surgery. 40(4): 402-407. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2011.00829.x

Boudrieau R.J. 2009. Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy or tibial tuberosity advancement? Veterinary Surgery. 38(1): 1-22. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2008.00439.x

Dal-Bo I.S., Ferrigno C.R.A., Caquias D.F.I., Della-Nina M.I., Ferreira M.P., Figueiredo A.V., Cavalcanti R.A.O., Santos J.F. & Ferraz V.C.M. 2014. Correlação entre ruptura de ligamento cruzado cranial e lesão de menisco medial em cães. Ciencia Rural. 44(8): 1426-1430. DOI: 10.1590/0103-8478cr20130670

Dorea H.C., Mclaughlin R.M., Cantwell H.D., Read R., Armbrust L., Pool R., Roush J.K. & Boyle C. 2005. Evaluation of healing in feline femoral defects filled with cancellous autograft, cancellous allograft or bioglass. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 18(3): 157-168. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632947

Duval J.M., Budsberg S.C., Flo G.L. & Sammarco J.L. 1999. Breed, sex, and bodyweight as risk factors for rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament in young dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 215(6): 811-814. DOI: 10.2460/javma.1999.215.06.811

Ferreira M.P, Ferrigno C.R.A., Souza A.N., Caquias D.F.I. & Figueiredo A.V. 2016. Short term comparison of tibial tuberosity advancement and tibial plateau levelling osteotomy in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease using kinetic analysis. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 29(3): 209-213. DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-15-01-0009

Grierson J., Asher L. & Grainger K. 2011. An investigation into risk factors for bilateral canine cruciate ligament rupture. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 24(3): 192-196. DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-10-03-0030

Griffon D. 2005. Fracture healing. In: Johnson A.J., Houlton J.E.F. & Vannini R. (Eds). AO Principles of Fracture Management in the Dog and Cat. Davos: AO Publishing, pp.73-97.

Guerrero T.G., Makara M.A., Katiofsky K., Fluckiger M.A. & Morgan J.P. 2011. Comparison of healing of the osteotomy gap after tibial tuberosity advancement with and without the use of autogenous cancellous bone graft. Veterinary Surgery. 40(1): 27-33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2010.00772.x

Guthrie J.W., Keeley B.J., Maddock E., Bright S.R. & May C. 2012. Effect of signalment on the presentation of canine patients suffering from cranial cruciate ligament disease. Journal of Small Animal Practice. 53(5): 273-277. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2011.01202.x

Hackett M., Germaine L.S., Carno M.A. & Hoffmann D. 2020. Comparison of Outcome and Complications in Dogs Weighing Less Than 12 kg Undergoing Miniature Tibial Tuberosity Transposition and Advancement versus Extracapsular Stabilization with Tibial Tuberosity Transposition for Cranial Cruciate Ligament Disease with Concomitant Medial Patellar Luxation. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 34(2): 99-107. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1719118

Hoffman D.E., Miller J.M., Ober C.P., Lanz O.I., Martin R.A. & Shires P.K. 2006. Tibial tuberosity advancement in 65 canine Stifles. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 19(4): 219-227. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1633004

Kim S.E., Pozzi A., Kowaleski M.P. & Lewis D.D. 2008. Tibial osteotomies for cranial cruciate ligament insufficiency in dogs. Veterinary Surgery. 37(2): 111-125. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2007.00361.x

Lafaver S., Miller J.M., Stubbs W.P., Taylor R.A. & Boudrieau R.J. 2007. Tibial tuberosity advancement for stabilization of the canine cranial cruciate ligament-deficient joint: surgical technique, early results, and complications in 101 dogs. Veterinary Surgery. 36(6): 573-586. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2007.00307.x

Lampman T.J., Lund E.M. & Lipowitz A.J. 2003. Cranial cruciate disease: current status of diagnosis, surgery, and risk for disease. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 16(3): 122-126. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632767

Livet V., Baldinger A., Viguier É., Taroni M., Harel M., Carozzo C. & Cachon T. 2019. Comparison of Outcomes Associated with Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomy and a Modified Technique for Tibial Tuberosity Advancement for the Treatment of Cranial Cruciate Ligament Disease in Dogs: A Randomized Clinical Study. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 32(4): 314-323. DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1684050

Mario Costa B.S., Craig D., Cambridge T., Sebestyen P., Su Y. & Fahie M.A. 2017. Major complications of tibial tuberosity advancement in 1613 dogs. Veterinary Surgery. 46(1): 1-7. DOI: 10.1111/vsu.12649

Montavon P.M., Damur D.M. & Tepic S. 2002. Advancement of the tibial tuberosity for the treatment of cranial cruciate deficient canine stifle. In: Proceedings of the 1st World Orthopaedic Veterinary Congress (Munich, Germany). pp.152-152.

Risselada M., Winter M.D., Lewis D.D., Griffith E. & Pozzi A. 2018. Comparison of three imaging modalities used to evaluate bone healing after tibial tuberosity advancement in cranial cruciate ligament-deficient dogs and comparison of the effect of a gelatinous matrix and a demineralized bone matrix mix on bone healing – a pilot study. BMC Veterinary Reasearch. 22:164. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-018-1490-4

Santos F.C. & Rahal S.R. 2004. Enxerto ósseo esponjoso autólogo em pequenos animais. Ciência Rural. 34(6): 1969-1975. DOI: 10.1590/S0103-84782004000600049

Tepic S., Damur D.M. & Montavon P.M. 2002. Biomechanics of the stifle joint. In: Proceedings of the 1st World Orthopaedic Veterinary Congress (Munich, Germany). pp.189-190.

Voss K., Damur D.M., Guerrero T., Haessig M. & Montavon P.M. 2008. Force plate gait analysis to assess limb function after tibial tuberosity advancement in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 21(3): 243-249.

Additional Files

Published

2025-04-23

How to Cite

Ferrigno, C. R. A., Poletto Ferreira, M., Cunha, O. da, Caquias, D. F. I., Santos, J. F. dos, Souza, A. N. A. de, Yamauchi, K. C. I., Ferraz, V. C. de M., & Verpaalen, V. (2025). Osteotomy Gap Consolidation in Dogs after Tibial Tuberosity Advancement with and without Cancellous Bone Graft . Acta Scientiae Veterinariae, 53. https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.143635

Issue

Section

Articles