Osteotomy Gap Consolidation in Dogs after Tibial Tuberosity Advancement with and without Cancellous Bone Graft
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.143635Keywords:
stifle, knee, TTA, cranial cruciate ligament, ruptureAbstract
Background: Cranial cruciate ligament disease is the leading cause of lameness in dogs. The application of autogenous cancellous bone graft within the osteotomy gap has been indicated to accelerate bone healing, but prospective clinical studies evaluating the effects of autogenous cancellous bone graft on osteotomy gap healing after TTA have produced mixed results. The aim of this study was evaluate bone healing time in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease that underwent osteotomy for tibial tuberosity advancement with or without autogenous cancellous bone graft. We hypothesized that an autogenous cancellous bone graft would accelerate bone consolidation after tibial tuberosity advancement.
Materials, Methods & Results: A total of 30 dogs (8 male; 22 female) of various breeds with unilateral or bilateral cranial cruciate ligament disease (CCLD), a minimum weight of 20 kg (44 lbs), and a tibial plateau angle up to 25° were randomly assigned to Group A [15 dogs; graft] or B [15 dogs; control]. Dogs underwent tibial tuberosity advancement (TTA) with [Group A] or without [Group B] autogenous cancellous bone graft harvested from their tibia. All surgical procedures were performed by the same experienced orthopedic surgeon. They were assessed through monthly radiographs (at postoperative [PO] day 30, 60, 90, and, as required to cover complete healing, 120, 150, 180, and 210 days). Radiographic evaluation was conducted by an experienced veterinarian who was familiar with the TTA procedure and was blinded to the treatment group (images without identification - name/group). Significantly more dogs in Group A achieved 100% osteotomy gap consolidation at 30 days PO (P = 0.0002) and 60 days PO (P = 0.0016) than Group B. The average time to 100% bone consolidation was 56 days (± 15.4) for Group A and 108 days (± 46.47) for Group B, and was significantly shorter for group A (P < 0.0001).
Discussion: Our results have showed bone consolidation time in dogs with CCLD undergoing the surgical technique of TTA is significantly faster when aided by an autogenous cancellous bone graft at 30 and 60 days PO. Therefore, we accept our hypothesis that autogenous cancellous bone graft accelerates bone consolidation. These results support the findings of another study, that noted that the use of autograft resulted in significantly higher osteotomy healing scores at 6 and 10 weeks postoperatively. The divergence of results between studies evaluating osteotomy gap consolidation following TTA may be partly explained by the subjective and different methods of bone consolidation evaluation used in these investigations. This is a standard limitation when using radiographic evaluation, however, the selection of this method is justified by the fact that this imaging modality is commonly used in routine clinical practice to evaluate bone consolidation – it is, therefore, clinically representative. The present study is subject to certain limitations. Firstly, variables other than bone graft treatment may have influenced bone consolidation time, such as age, weight, and cage size. However, these variables were not significantly different between the evaluated groups (P > 0.05), thus eliminating the effects of these potentially confounding variables. Secondly, the investigator evaluating radiographic bone consolidation could not be completely blinded to the treatment group, as some degree of radiation attenuation was associated with the cancellous bone graft. In conclusion, one consolidation time in dogs with CCLD undergoing the surgical technique of TTA is significantly faster when aided by an autogenous cancellous bone graft.
Keywords: stifle, knee, TTA, cranial cruciate ligament, rupture.
Downloads
References
Barnes K., Lanz O., Werre K., Clapp K. & Gilley R. 2015. Comparison of autogenous cancellous bone grafting and extra-corporeal shock wave therapy on osteotomy healing in the tibial tuberosity advancement procedure in dogs. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 28(3): 207-214. DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-14-10-0156.
Bisgard S.K., Barnhart M.D., Shiroma J.T., Kennedy S.C. & Schertel E.R. 2011. The effect of cancellous autograft and novel plate design on radiographic healing and postoperative complications in tibial tuberosity advancement for cranial cruciate-deficient canine stifles. Veterinary Surgery. 40(4): 402-407. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2011.00829.x
Boudrieau R.J. 2009. Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy or tibial tuberosity advancement? Veterinary Surgery. 38(1): 1-22. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2008.00439.x
Dal-Bo I.S., Ferrigno C.R.A., Caquias D.F.I., Della-Nina M.I., Ferreira M.P., Figueiredo A.V., Cavalcanti R.A.O., Santos J.F. & Ferraz V.C.M. 2014. Correlação entre ruptura de ligamento cruzado cranial e lesão de menisco medial em cães. Ciencia Rural. 44(8): 1426-1430. DOI: 10.1590/0103-8478cr20130670
Dorea H.C., Mclaughlin R.M., Cantwell H.D., Read R., Armbrust L., Pool R., Roush J.K. & Boyle C. 2005. Evaluation of healing in feline femoral defects filled with cancellous autograft, cancellous allograft or bioglass. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 18(3): 157-168. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632947
Duval J.M., Budsberg S.C., Flo G.L. & Sammarco J.L. 1999. Breed, sex, and bodyweight as risk factors for rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament in young dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 215(6): 811-814. DOI: 10.2460/javma.1999.215.06.811
Ferreira M.P, Ferrigno C.R.A., Souza A.N., Caquias D.F.I. & Figueiredo A.V. 2016. Short term comparison of tibial tuberosity advancement and tibial plateau levelling osteotomy in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease using kinetic analysis. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 29(3): 209-213. DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-15-01-0009
Grierson J., Asher L. & Grainger K. 2011. An investigation into risk factors for bilateral canine cruciate ligament rupture. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 24(3): 192-196. DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-10-03-0030
Griffon D. 2005. Fracture healing. In: Johnson A.J., Houlton J.E.F. & Vannini R. (Eds). AO Principles of Fracture Management in the Dog and Cat. Davos: AO Publishing, pp.73-97.
Guerrero T.G., Makara M.A., Katiofsky K., Fluckiger M.A. & Morgan J.P. 2011. Comparison of healing of the osteotomy gap after tibial tuberosity advancement with and without the use of autogenous cancellous bone graft. Veterinary Surgery. 40(1): 27-33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2010.00772.x
Guthrie J.W., Keeley B.J., Maddock E., Bright S.R. & May C. 2012. Effect of signalment on the presentation of canine patients suffering from cranial cruciate ligament disease. Journal of Small Animal Practice. 53(5): 273-277. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2011.01202.x
Hackett M., Germaine L.S., Carno M.A. & Hoffmann D. 2020. Comparison of Outcome and Complications in Dogs Weighing Less Than 12 kg Undergoing Miniature Tibial Tuberosity Transposition and Advancement versus Extracapsular Stabilization with Tibial Tuberosity Transposition for Cranial Cruciate Ligament Disease with Concomitant Medial Patellar Luxation. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 34(2): 99-107. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1719118
Hoffman D.E., Miller J.M., Ober C.P., Lanz O.I., Martin R.A. & Shires P.K. 2006. Tibial tuberosity advancement in 65 canine Stifles. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 19(4): 219-227. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1633004
Kim S.E., Pozzi A., Kowaleski M.P. & Lewis D.D. 2008. Tibial osteotomies for cranial cruciate ligament insufficiency in dogs. Veterinary Surgery. 37(2): 111-125. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2007.00361.x
Lafaver S., Miller J.M., Stubbs W.P., Taylor R.A. & Boudrieau R.J. 2007. Tibial tuberosity advancement for stabilization of the canine cranial cruciate ligament-deficient joint: surgical technique, early results, and complications in 101 dogs. Veterinary Surgery. 36(6): 573-586. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2007.00307.x
Lampman T.J., Lund E.M. & Lipowitz A.J. 2003. Cranial cruciate disease: current status of diagnosis, surgery, and risk for disease. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 16(3): 122-126. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632767
Livet V., Baldinger A., Viguier É., Taroni M., Harel M., Carozzo C. & Cachon T. 2019. Comparison of Outcomes Associated with Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomy and a Modified Technique for Tibial Tuberosity Advancement for the Treatment of Cranial Cruciate Ligament Disease in Dogs: A Randomized Clinical Study. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 32(4): 314-323. DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1684050
Mario Costa B.S., Craig D., Cambridge T., Sebestyen P., Su Y. & Fahie M.A. 2017. Major complications of tibial tuberosity advancement in 1613 dogs. Veterinary Surgery. 46(1): 1-7. DOI: 10.1111/vsu.12649
Montavon P.M., Damur D.M. & Tepic S. 2002. Advancement of the tibial tuberosity for the treatment of cranial cruciate deficient canine stifle. In: Proceedings of the 1st World Orthopaedic Veterinary Congress (Munich, Germany). pp.152-152.
Risselada M., Winter M.D., Lewis D.D., Griffith E. & Pozzi A. 2018. Comparison of three imaging modalities used to evaluate bone healing after tibial tuberosity advancement in cranial cruciate ligament-deficient dogs and comparison of the effect of a gelatinous matrix and a demineralized bone matrix mix on bone healing – a pilot study. BMC Veterinary Reasearch. 22:164. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-018-1490-4
Santos F.C. & Rahal S.R. 2004. Enxerto ósseo esponjoso autólogo em pequenos animais. Ciência Rural. 34(6): 1969-1975. DOI: 10.1590/S0103-84782004000600049
Tepic S., Damur D.M. & Montavon P.M. 2002. Biomechanics of the stifle joint. In: Proceedings of the 1st World Orthopaedic Veterinary Congress (Munich, Germany). pp.189-190.
Voss K., Damur D.M., Guerrero T., Haessig M. & Montavon P.M. 2008. Force plate gait analysis to assess limb function after tibial tuberosity advancement in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 21(3): 243-249.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Cassio Ricardo Auada Ferrigno, Márcio Poletto Ferreira, Olicies da Cunha, Daniela Fabiana Izquierdo Caquias, Jaqueline França dos Santos, Alexandre Navarro Alves de Souza, Kelly Cristiane Ito Yamauchi, Vanessa Couto de Magalhães Ferraz, Valentine Verpaalen

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides open access to all of its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Such access is associated with increased readership and increased citation of an author's work. For more information on this approach, see the Public Knowledge Project and Directory of Open Access Journals.
We define open access journals as journals that use a funding model that does not charge readers or their institutions for access. From the BOAI definition of "open access" we take the right of users to "read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles" as mandatory for a journal to be included in the directory.
La Red y Portal Iberoamericano de Revistas Científicas de Veterinaria de Libre Acceso reúne a las principales publicaciones científicas editadas en España, Portugal, Latino América y otros países del ámbito latino