Dog with Dioctophymatosis: an Alarm for this Disease in Humans

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.133212

Palavras-chave:

Dictiophyme renale, zoonotic disease, parasite, nematode

Resumo

Background: The disease dioctophymatosis caused by the parasite Dictiophyma renale is a matter of veterinary public health, mainly in the control of zoonoses, monitoring of environmental pollution related to animals, hygiene and protection of animals. It is the largest known nematode. The Fish and frogs are paratenic hosts after ingestion of parasitized annelids. Humans and animals are definitive hosts after ingestion of intermediate or paratenic hosts with infective larvae. The objective was to describe a case of  Canis lupus familiaris infested by a free adult parasite in the abdominal cavity of a rural region, indicating an alert for this zoonosis.

Case: A dog, female, mixed breed, weight 15,700 kg, two years old, from the rural area of the city of Miguel Pereira, state of Rio de Janeiro, to undergo elective hysterectomy surgery. Routine preoperative tests were requested (hemogram, Alt, Ast, urea, creatinine, EAS and echocardiogram), with all results unchanged, eight-hour fasting and four-hour water fasting The animal was sent to the operating room and submitted to pre anesthesia, induction and maintenance of anesthesia. At laparotomy, a dark red cylindrical worm was seen that was immobile inside the abdominal cavity over the viscera, which was removed with the aid of anatomical tweezers, identified as a female Dioctophyma renale, 51 cm long. The abdominal cavity was visualized to check for further peritoneal and kidney damage. Based on the physical clinical examination and the results of the laboratory tests, it was decided to perform the initial elective surgical indication. The laparotomy suture was performed in the midline with 2-0 nylon thread, subcutaneously with 2-0 polyglactin thread, both with continuous sutures, and the skin suture was with simple stitches separated with nylon. The immediate postoperative protocol consisted of analgesia and abdominal ultrasound was requested, which was not authorized by the tutor. Mediate postoperative analgesia, anti-inflammatory and antibiotic and healing ointment in the surgical wound. Healing was by primary intention and the skin stitches were removed ten days after the surgical procedure. After 24 hours of removal of the stitches, the dog, when urinating, expelled a dark red cylindrical worm with a length measured at 25 cm when the person responsible for the animal again claimed the need for an ultrasound. After the arguments, he agreed and authorized the imaging exam.

Discussion: The reported case drew attention to municipalities that have rural areas with freshwater springs and that receive visits from wild animals and stray dogs. We agree with research related to the importance of carrying out new studies involving Dioctophyma renale and epidemiological data to better understand and facilitate the prevention and control of zoonosis, especially with regard to the capture, commercialization and consumption of fish from these regions which would make the disease very difficult in humans. The zoonosis dictyophymatosis needs to be investigated on the epidemiological aspects of a certain region where domestic and wild animals cohabit and that there are favorable conditions such as freshwater sources for infestations of this parasite to occur, in addition to strict control of hygiene and inspection of food and of products of animal origin.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Renteria, JM, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

Associate professor

Rousso Filho, R, Hospital Veterinário Jardim Guanabara, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

Veterinarian autonomous

Referências

Bizhani N., Najafi F.,. Rokni M.B., Sharifi A.M., Kiapi M.F., Paknezhad N., Mohtasebi S., Mowlavi G., Otranto D. & Dupouy-Camet J. 2023. Tracking the existence of Dioctophyma renale in Parthian Empire of Iran (247 bc-224 ad). Parasitology Research. 122(2): 413-418. DOI: 10.1007/s00436-022-07735-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-022-07735-w

Caye P., Tavares Novo T.S., Oliveira Cavalcanti G.A. & Rappeti J.C.S. 2020. Prevalência do Dioctophyme renale (Goeze, 1782) em cães de uma organização não governamental do sul do Rio Grande do Sul – Brasil. Archives of Veterinary Science. 25(2): 46-55. DOI: 105380/avs. v25i2.67468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5380/avs.v25i2.67468

Ferreira V. L., Medeiros F. P., July J.R. & Raso T.F. 2010. Dioctophyma renale in a dog: clinical diagnosis and surgical treatment. Veterinary Parasitology. 16(1/2): 151-155. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.10.013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.10.013

Kano F.S., Shimada M.T., Suzuki S.N., Osaki S.C., Menarim B.C., Ruthes F.R.V. & Laidane Filho M.A. 2003. Ocorrência da dioctofimose em dois cães no município de Guarapuava - PR. Semina Ciências Agrárias. 24(1): 177-179. DOI:10.5433/1679-0359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2003v24n1p177

Katafigiotis I., Fragkiadis, E., Pournaras C., Nonni A. & Stravodimos K.G. 2013. A rare case of a 39 year old male with a parasite called Dioctophyma renale mimicking renal cancer at the computed tomography of the right kidney. A case report. Parasitology International (62): 459-460. DOI: 10.1016/j.parint.2013.06.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2013.06.007

Li G., Liu C., Li F., Zhou M., Liu X. & Niu Y. 2010. Fatal bilateral dioctophymosis. Journal of Parasitology. 96(6): 1152-1154. DOI: 10.1645/GE-2132.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1645/GE-2132.1

Martins I.V.F. 2019. Superfamília Dioctophymatoidedea. In: Classe Adenophorea Parasitologia Veterinária. 2.ed. Vitória: EDUFES, pp.177-178.

Monteiro S.G., Sallis L.S.V. & Staink D.R. 2002. Infecção natural por trinta e quatro helmintos da espécie Dioctophyma renale (Goeze, 1782) em um cão. Revista da Faculdade Zootecnia, Veterinária e Agronomia. 9(1): 95-99.

Nunes R.R. 2003. Componentes da atividade anestésica: uma nova visão. Revista Brasileira DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942003000200001

de Anestesiologia. 53(2): 145-149.

Pedrassani D., Hoppe E.G.L., Avancini N. & Nascimento A.A. 2009. Morphology of eggs of Dioctophyme renale Goeze, 1782 (Nematoda: Dioctophymetidae) and influences of temperature on development of first-stagelarvae in the eggs. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária. 18(1): 15-19. DOI: 10.4322/rbpv.01801003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4322/rbpv.01801003

Puetzenreiter M.R., Zylbetsztajn A. & Avila-Pires F.D. 2004. Evolução histórica da medicina veterinária preventiva e saúde pública. Ciência Rural. 34(5): 1661-1668. DOI:10.1590/S0103-84782004000500055. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782004000500055

Russo Z.H., Callirgos J.M.C. & Wetzel E. 2022. Review of Dioctophyme renale: etiology, morphology, biology, ecoepidemiology, pathogenesis, symptomatology, diagnosis, treatment and prevention. Journal of Parasitology. 108(2): 180-191. DOI: 10.645/21-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1645/21-65

Venkatrajaiah N., Kalbande S.H., Rao G.V.N., Reddy V.C., Reddy S.H., Rao P. R., Babu K. & Keerthi A. 2014. Dioctophymatosis renalis in humans: first case report from India. The Association of Physicians of India. 62(10): 70-77.

Yang F., Zhang W., Gong B., Lan Yao L., Aiqin Liu A. & Ling H. 2019. A human case of Dioctophyma renale (giant kidney worm) accompanied by renal cancer and a retrospective study of dioctophymiasis. Parasite. 26(22): 1-8. DOI:10.1051/parasite/ 2019023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2019023

Arquivos adicionais

Publicado

2024-02-05

Como Citar

Ferreira, M. L., de Carvalho, B. G., Silva, P. C., Renteria, J. M., Rousso , R., Absalão, R. V., … Ferreira Manso, J. E. (2024). Dog with Dioctophymatosis: an Alarm for this Disease in Humans. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae, 52. https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.133212

Edição

Seção

Case Report

Artigos Semelhantes

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.