Centering ability, canal transportation and surface modifications of ProTaper F2 and F3 used in continuous rotation and reciprocating motion in curved root canals

Jader Vinicius Andreazza, Miguel Assis Martins dos Santos, Lucas Siqueira Pinheiro, Júlia Eick Iglesias, Fernanda Ulmann Lopez, Fabiana Soares Grecca

Abstract


Aims: To evaluate the centering ability, canal transportation and surface modifications of F2 and F3 ProTaper Universal (PT) instruments used in continuous rotation (CR) and reciprocating motion (RM) for the preparation of curved root canals. Material and methods: sixty mesiobuccal root canals of upper molars with curvatures between 25º and 35° were divided into three groups: I - PT in CR up to F3; II - PT in RM up to F3; III - F2 and F3 PT instruments in RM. Cone Beam Computed Tomography images were obtained before and after instrumentation. The scans were superimposed to determine the centering ability and canal transportation in apical, medium and cervical thirds. The apical 6 mm of the F2 and F3 files were evaluated under Scanning Electron Microscope before and after 1, 3 and 6 uses to assess distortion, surface wear and fracture. The statistical analysis of centering ability and canal transportation were performed by Kruskal–Wallis and ANOVA, respectively. The scores for deformation and surface wear were compared using ANOVA. Fisher’s exact test was used for the evaluation of instrument fracture. Results: there were no significant differences between groups regarding centering ability and canal transportation, as well as, for distortion, surface wear and fracture (p>.05). Conclusion: F2 and F3 instruments can be used for curved canals instrumentation. However, when used for entire canal preparation, F2 and F3 should be discarded after single use.

Keywords


Endodontics; Root canal preparation; Cone beam computed tomography

Full Text:

PDF

References


Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am. 1974;18(2):269-96.

Lim Y, Park J, Kim C. Comparison of the centering ability of Wave·One and. 2013;7658:21-5.

Esposito PT, Cunningham CJ. A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and stainless steel instruments. J Endod. 1995;21(4):173-6.

Parashos P, Messer HH. Rotary NiTi Instrument Fracture and its Consequences. J Endod. 2006;32(11):1031-43.

Walia H, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of nitinol root canal files. J Endod. 1988;14(7):346-51.

Sonntag D, Peters OA. Effect of Prion Decontamination Protocols on Nickel-Titanium Rotary Surfaces. J Endod. 2007;33(4):442-6.

Yared G. Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: Preliminary observations. Int Endod J. 2008;41(4):339-44.

Bürklein S, Benten S, Schäfer E. Shaping ability of different single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J. 2013;46(6):590-7.

De-Deus G, Moreira EJL, Lopes HP, Elias CN. Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 ProTaper instruments used in reciprocating movement. Int Endod J. 2010;43(12):1063-8.

Varela-Patiño P, Ibañez-Párraga A, Rivas-Mundiña B, Cantatore G, Otero XL, Martin-Biedma B. Alternating versus Continuous Rotation: A Comparative Study of the Effect on Instrument Life. J Endod. 2010;36(1):157-9.

You SY, Bae KS, Baek SH, Kum KY, Shon WJ, Lee W. Lifespan of one nickel-titanium rotary file with reciprocating motion in curved root canals. J Endod. 2010;36(12):1991-4.

Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971;32(2):271-5.

Gambill JM, Alder M, del Rio CE. Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography. J Endod. 1996;22(7):369-75.

Troian CH, Só MVR, Figueiredo JAP, Oliveira EPM. Deformation and fracture of RaCe and K3 endodontic instruments according to the number of uses. Int Endod J. 2006;39(8):616-25.

Siqueira JF. Endodontic infections: Concepts, paradigms, and perspectives. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;94(3):281-93.

Signoretti FGC, Endo MS, Gomes BPFA, Montagner F, Tosello FB, Jacinto RC. Persistent extraradicular infection in root-filled asymptomatic human tooth: Scanning electron microscopic analysis and microbial investigation after apical microsurgery. J Endod. 2011;37(12):1696-700.

Tziafas D, Alraeesi D, Hormoodi R Al, Ataya M, Fezai H, Aga N. Preparation prerequisites for effective irrigation of apical root canal: A critical review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(10):e1256-63.

Borlina SC, De Souza V, Holland R, Murata SS, Gomes-Filho JE, Dezan Junior E, et al. Influence of apical foramen widening and sealer on the healing of chronic periapical lesions induced in dogs’ teeth. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology. 2010;109(6):932-40.

Elayouti A, Dima E, Judenhofer MS, Löst C, Pichler BJ. Increased apical enlargement contributes to excessive dentin removal in curved root canals: A stepwise microcomputed tomography study. J Endod. 2011;37(11):1580-4.

Estrela C, Holland R, Estrela C R A, Alencar A H G, Sousa-Neto M D PJD. Characterisation of Successful Root Canal Treatment. Braz Dent J. 2014;25(1):3-11.

Haapasalo M, Endal U, Zandi H, Coil JM. Eradication of endodontic infection by instrumentation and irrigation solutions. Endod Top. 2005;10(1):77-102.

Widmer C, Skutas J, Easson C, Lopez J V., Torneck C, Flax M, et al. Culture-independent Characterization of the Microbiome of Healthy Pulp. J Endod. 2018;44(7):1132-1139.e2.

Pasqualini D, Alovisi M, Cemenasco A, Mancini L, Paolino DS, Bianchi CC, et al. Micro–Computed Tomography Evaluation of ProTaper Next and BioRace Shaping Outcomes in Maxillary First Molar Curved Canals. J Endod. 2015;41(10):1706-10.

Gagliardi J, Versiani MA, De Sousa-Neto MD, Plazas-Garzon A, Basrani B. Evaluation of the shaping characteristics of ProTaper Gold, ProTaper NEXT, and ProTaper Universal in curved canals. J Endod. 2015;41(10):1718-24.

Elnaghy AM, Al-Dharrab AA, Abbas HM, Elsaka SE. Evaluation of root canal transportation, centering ratio, and remaining dentin thickness of TRUShape and ProTaper Next systems in curved root canals using micro-computed tomography. Quintessence Int. 2017;48(1):27-32.

Paqué F, Zehnder M, De-Deus G. Microtomography-based comparison of reciprocating single-file F2 ProTaper technique versus rotary full sequence. J Endod. 2011;37(10):1394-7.

Do Amaral ROJF, Leonardi DP, Gabardo MCL, Coelho BS, Oliveira KV De, Baratto Filho F. Influence of cervical and apical enlargement associated with the wave one system on the transportation and centralization of endodontic preparations. J Endod. 2016;42(4):626-31.

Jardine AP, Rosa RA, Santini MF, Zaccara IM, Só MVR, Kopper PMP. Shaping ability of rotatory or reciprocating instruments in curved canals: a micro-computed tomographic study. Braz Oral Res. 2016;30(1):1-8.

Arslan H, Khalilov R, Doğanay E, Karatas E. The effect of various kinematics on postoperative pain after instrumentation: a prospective, randomized clinical study. J Appl Oral Sci. 2016;24(5):503-8.

Navós B, Hoppe C, Mestieri L, Böttcher D, Só MR, Grecca F. Centering and transportation: in vitro evaluation of continuous and reciprocating systems in curved root canals. J Conserv Dent. 2016;19(5):478-81.

Giuliani V, Di Nasso L, Pace R, Pagavino G. Shaping ability of waveone primary reciprocating files and ProTaper system used in continuous and reciprocating motion. J Endod. 2014;40(9):1468-71.

De-deus G, Belladonna FG, Nogueira EJ, Lopes RT, Versiani MA, Paciornik S, et al. Micro-CT Evaluation of Non-instrumented Canal Areas with Different Enlargements Performed by NiTi Systems. Braz Dent J. 2015;26(6):624-9.

Kim HC, Hwang YJ, Jung DW, You SY, Kim HC, Lee W. Micro-computed tomography and scanning electron microscopy comparisons of two nickel-titanium rotary root canal instruments used with reciprocating motion. Scanning. 2013;35(2):112-8.

Arantes WB, Da Silva CM, Lage-Marques JL, Habitante S, Da Rosa LCL, De Medeiros JMF. SEM analysis of defects and wear on Ni-Ti rotary instruments. Scanning. 2014;36(4):411-8.

Murali Krishna Chakka N V., Ratnakar P, Das S, Bagchi A, Kumar S, Anumula L. Do NiTi instruments show defects before separation? Defects caused by torsional fatigue in hand and rotary nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments which lead to failure during clinical use. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012;13(6):867-72.

Kaval ME, Capar ID, Ertas H, Sen BH. Comparative evaluation of cyclic fatigue resistance of four different nickel-titanium rotary files with different cross-sectional designs and alloy properties. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21(5):1527-30.

Tokita D, Ebihara A, Miyara K, Okiji T. Dynamic Torsional and Cyclic Fracture Behavior of ProFile Rotary Instruments at Continuous or Reciprocating Rotation as Visualized with High-speed Digital Video Imaging. J Endod. 2017;43(8):1337-42.

Ferreira FG, Barbosa IB, Scelza P, Montagnana MB, Russano D, Neff J, et al. Noncontact three-dimensional evaluation of surface alterations and wear in NiTi endodontic instruments. Braz Oral Res. 2017;31:1-9.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22456/2177-0018.86208

Licença Creative Commons

e-ISSN 2177-0018 / ISSN 0566-1854.

descrição da foto descrição da foto descrição da foto descrição da foto descrição da foto descrição da foto descrição da fotodescrição da foto