Schirmer’s Test I and Determination of Intraocular Pressure in Healthy Common Buzzards (Buteo buteo)

Authors

  • Rahime Yaygingul Veterinary Faculty, Department of Surgery, Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Turkey.
  • Zeynep Bozkan Veterinary Faculty, Department of Surgery, Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Turkey.
  • Osman Bulut Veterinary Faculty, Department of Surgery, Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Turkey.
  • Eser Cakmakci Veterinary Faculty, Department of Surgery, Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Turkey.
  • Ali Belge Veterinary Faculty, Department of Surgery, Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Turkey.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.96108

Abstract

Background: The structure of the eye in wild birds is 45% larger than that in humans, which provides excellent visual capacity but also makes them vulnerable to eye trauma. Trauma, neoplasia, infectious diseases of the ocular surface, uveitis, glaucoma, and corneal diseases in wild birds, but mainly trauma, can cause a reduction in their tear production; therefore, determining the amount of tear production in the wild birds is very important. Studies have shown that the results of the Schirmer’s tear test (STT) and intraocular pressure (IOP) values differ among wild bird species, and that both anesthesia and sedation affects these parameters. The main objective of the present study was to determined IOP and STT I values in healthy common buzzards (Buteo buteo).

Materials, Methods & Results: Thirty healthy common buzzards were selected for the study following clinical and ophthalmic examinations. Following physical and clinical examinations of all subjects, routine ophthalmologic examinations were conducted, including reflex examinations (pupillary, palpebral, menace, dazzle) and direct ophthalmoscopy for the eyelids, conjunctiva, cornea, iris, lens, and fundus. All examinations were conducted without anesthesia or sedation while the birds were in the dorsal recumbent position, and the results of STT I and IOP were recorded. Both tests were repeated for the right and left eyes. The mean ± SE STT I values for the right and left eyes were 12.63 ± 0.51 and 12.43 ± 0.54 mm/min, respectively. A comparison between STT I values of the right and left eyes revealed no statistically significant differences (P > 0.620). The means and ranges of the TonoVet® IOP results for the right and left eyes were 32.06 ± 1.58 and 32.60 ± 1.51 mmHg, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the results of the test on the two eyes (P > 0.05).

Discussion: Tear production is either increased or decreased in wild birds as a result of several types of eye diseases or trauma (1, 6). The most common method by which to determine tear production is either STT I (3), which is conducted without topical anesthesia, or STT II, which is conducted with topical anesthesia. As in our study, previous studies have used STT I as their method by which to determine tear production of wild birds. In a study conducted on 20 common buzzards, STT I values were 12.47 ± 2.66 mm/min. In our study using 30 common buzzards, the STT I value was 12.63 ± 0.51 mm/min for the right eye and 12.43 ± 0.54 mm/min for the left eye. There was no statistically significant difference between the results of the tests on the two eyes. In previous study with 25 common buzzards, IOP measured rebound tonometry was 5-30 (35-60). In our study, rebound tonometry results for IOP of 30 common buzzards were 32.06 ± 1.58 mmHg (16-47) for the right eye and 32.60 ± 1.51 mmHg (17-50) for the left eye. There was no statistically significant difference in IOP values between right and left eyes. Given that there are few studies on tear production and IOP in common buzzard, we believe that the results of this study will provide valuable new information to the literature.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barsotti G., Briganti A., Spratte J.R., Ceccherelli R. & Breghi G. 2013. Schirmer tear test type I readings and intraocular pressure values assessed by applanation tonometry (Tonopen® XL) in normal eyes of four European species of birds of prey. Veterinary Ophthalmology. 16(5): 365-369.

Cousquer G. 2005. Ophthalmological findings in free-living tawny owls (Strix aluco) examined at a wildlife veterinary hospital. Veterinary Record. 156: 734-739.

Featherstone H.J. & Heinrich C. 2012. The Eye Examination and Diagnostic Procedures. In: Gelatt K.N., Gilger B.C. & Kern T.J. (Eds). Veterinary Ophthalmology. Chapter 10. 5th edn. Ames: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 976-1060.

Harris M.C., Schorling J.J., Herring I.P., Elvinger F., Bright P.R. & Pickett J.P. 2008. Ophthalmic examination findings in a colony of Screech owls (Megascops asio). Veterinary Ophthalmology. 11(3): 186-192.

Jeong M.B., Kim Y.J., Yi N.Y., Park S.A., Kim W.T., Kim S.E., Chae J.M., Kim J.T., Lee H. & Seo K.M. 2007. Comparison of the rebound tonometer (TonoVet ®) with the applanation tonometer (TonoPen XL®) in normal Eurasian Eagle owls (Bubo bubo). Veterinary Ophthalmology. 10(6): 376-379.

Labelle A. L., Whittington J.K., Breaux C.B., Labelle P., Mitchell M.A., Zarfoss M.K., Schmidt S.A. & Hamor R.E. 2012. Clinical utility of a complete diagnostic protocol for the ocular evaluation of free-living raptors. Veterinary Ophthalmology. 15(1): 5-17.

Meekins J.M., Stuckey J.A., Carpenter J.W., Armbrust L., Higbie C. & Rankin A.J. 2015. Ophthalmic Diagnostic Tests and Ocular Findings in a Flock of Captive American Flamingos (Phoenicopterus ruber ruber). Journal Avian Medicine and Surgery. 29(2): 95-105.

Pacheco R.E., Bauer B.S. & Sadar M.J. 2018. Measurement of tear production and intraocular pressure in conscious captive European fallow deer (DAMA dama). The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science. 4: 227-236.

Reuter A., Muller K., Arndt G. & Eule J.C. 2010. Accuracy and reproducibility of the TonoVet rebound tonometerin birds of prey. Veterinary Ophthalmology. 13(1): 80-85.

Reuter A., Müller K., Arndt G. & Eule J.C. 2011. Reference intervals for intraocular pressure measured by rebound tonometry in ten raptor species and factors affecting the intraocular pressure. Journal Avian Medicine and Surgery. 25(3): 165-172.

Rodarte-Almeida A.C.V., Machado M., Baldotto S.B., Santos L.D.L., Lima L., Lange R.R, Froes T.R. & Montiani-Ferreira F. 2013. The eye of the striped owl: morphologic observations, biometric findings and reference values for selected ophthalmic diagnostics tests. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira. 33(10): 1275-1289.

Rusanen E., Florin M., Hassig M. & Spiess B.M. 2010. Evaluation of a rebound tonometer (Tonovet) in clinically normal cat eyes. Veterinary Ophthalmology. 13(1): 31-36.

Storey E.S., Carboni D.A., Kearney M.T. & Tully T.N. 2009. Use of phenol red thread tests to evaluate tear production in clinically normal Amazon parrots and comparison with Schirmer tear test findings. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 235(10): 1181-1187.

Wills S., Pinard C., Nykamp S. & Beaufrère H. 2016. Ophtalmic reference values and lesions in two captive populations of northern owls: great grey owls (Strix nebulosa) and snowy owls (Bubo scandiacus). Journal of Zoo Wildlife Medicine. 47(1): 244-255.

Published

2019-01-01

How to Cite

Yaygingul, R., Bozkan, Z., Bulut, O., Cakmakci, E., & Belge, A. (2019). Schirmer’s Test I and Determination of Intraocular Pressure in Healthy Common Buzzards (Buteo buteo). Acta Scientiae Veterinariae, 47(1). https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.96108

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)