Thermal Stress Indices in Young Nellore Bulls Raised in Tropical Environments

Andressa Alves Storti, Maria Regina Bueno de Mattos Nascimento, Carina Ubirajara de Faria, Natascha Almeida Marques da Silva

Abstract


Background: Thermal stress indices are important in predicting and choosing means for mitigating heat stress and defining critical environmental conditions for animal welfare and performance. The aim of this study was to determine the association between 16 thermal stress indices and thermophysiological variables in young Nellore bulls raised in a tropical pasture to determine the most effective parameter of heat stress to assist in the management of the thermal environment and animal welfare.

Materials, Methods & Results: Seventy-eight young Nellore bulls (Bos taurus indicus), with a mean age of 10.5 months and mean body weight of 242.09 ± 32.17 kg at first collection, and 17.92 months and body weight 335.80 ± 39.02 kg at last collection, were used. During the experimental period, rectal temperature (RT) and surface temperature at the forehead, scapula, and groin, from which the average surface temperature (AST) was calculated, were measured. The difference between the AST and air temperature (i.e., AST – AT) and between the RT and AST (i.e., RT – AST) defined the thermal gradient. For the evaluation of thermal environment, the dry bulb, wet bulb, and globe temperatures, and wind speed were measured. Relative humidity, mean radiant temperature, solar radiation, temperature humidity index (THI), black global temperature humidity index (BGHI), equivalent temperature index (ETI), environmental stress index (ESI), respiratory rate predictor (PRR), heat load index (HLI), comprehensive climate index (CCI), and index of thermal stress for cows (ITSC) were calculated. The average and maximum air temperatures were above thermal comfort levels, while the average relative humidity was within the ideal limit for cattle. The average globe temperature was higher than the air temperature. Solar radiation presented very high values and wind speeds were very low. RT indicated normothermia in the cattle, and AST and thermal gradient (i.e., AST – AT) indicated thermal comfort. The 16 thermal stress indices demonstrated a significant positive and moderate correlation with AST, but were not significantly correlated with RT.

Discussion: The average (28.14°C) and maximum (31.90°C) air temperatures indicated discomfort, since the ideal temperature for cattle is ≤ 27°C. The high thermal load of this region can contribute to poor animal welfare, thus requiring the provision of natural or artificial shade for pasture farming. The cattle in this study were in thermal equilibrium given that they maintained RT within the normal range, and the maximum limit was higher. If RT is maintained within physiological limits, the mechanisms of thermoregulation are able to eliminate excess heat (i.e., thermolysis is equivalent to thermogenesis). The AST was 5.4°C below the RT. It is important to note that deep body temperature (i.e., RT) is more stable than the surface body temperature, which is influenced by ambient temperature. Considering that there was no correlation between thermal stress indices and RT, and that the cattle were able to maintain RT within physiological limits, the Nellore bulls in this study were adapted to the environment. The thermal stress indices evaluated in this study adequately reflected heat stress in young Nellore bulls raised in pastures in a tropical environment. Surface temperature was the physiological parameter that responded most significantly to environmental conditions.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Baeta F.C., Meador N.F., Shanklin M.D. & Johnson H.D. 1987. Equivalent temperature index at temperatures above the thermoneutral for lactating cows. In: Proceedings of the Meeting of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers (Baltimore, U.S.A.). p.21.

Baêta F.C. & Souza C.F. 2010. Ambiência em edificações rurais: Conforto animal. 2.ed. Viçosa: UFV, 269p.

Berman A., Horovitz T., Kaim M. & Gacitua H.A. 2016. Comparison of THI indices leads to a sensible heat-based heat stress index for shaded cattle that aligns temperature and humidity stress. International Journal of Biometeorology. 60(10): 1453-1462.

Bertocchi L., Vitali A., Lacetera N., Nardone A., G. Varisco G. & Bernabucci U. 2014. Seasonal variations in the composition of Holstein cow’s milk and temperature-humidity index relationship. Animal. 8(4): 667-674.

Bianca W. 1962. Relative importance of dry- and wet-bulb temperatures in causing heat stress in cattle. Nature. 195(4838): 251-252.

Bohmanova J., Misztal I. & Cole J.B. 2007. Temperature-Humidity Indices as Indicators of Milk Production Losses due to Heat Stress. Journal of Dairy Science. 90(4): 1947-1956.

Buffington D.E., Collasso-arocho A., Canton G.H., Pitt D., Thatcher W.W. & Collier R.J. 1981. Black globe humidity index (BGHI) as comfort equation for dairy cows. Transactions of the ASAE. 24(3): 711-714.

Cardoso C.C., Peripolli V., Amador S.A., Brandão E.G., Esteves G.I.F., Sousa C.M.Z., França M.F.M.S., Gonçalves F.G., Barbosa F.A., Montalvão T.C., Martins C.F., Fonseca Neto A.M. & McManus C. 2015. Physiological and thermographic response to heat stress in zebu cattle. Livestock Science. 182: 83-92.

Costa A.N.L., Feitosa J.V., Montezuma P.A., Souza P.T. & Araújo A.A. 2015. Rectal temperatures, respiratory rates, production, and reproduction performances of crossbred Girolando cows under heat stress northeastern Brazil. International Journal of Biometeorology. 59(11): 1647-1653.

Costa C.C.M., Maia A.S.C., Brown-Brandl T.M., Chiquitelli Neto M., Fonsêca V.F.C. 2018. Thermal equilibrium of Nellore cattle in tropical conditions: an investigation of circadian pattern. Journal of Thermal Biology. 74: 317-324.

Costa C.C.M., Maia A.S.C., Nascimento S.T., Nascimento C.C.N., Chiquitelli Neto M. & Fonsêca V.F.C. 2017. Thermal balance of Nellore cattle. International Journal of Biometeorology. 62(5): 723-731.

Da Silva R.G. & Maia A.S.C. 2013. The Environment. In: Principles of animal biometeorology. New York: Springer, pp. 1-37.

Eigenberg R.A., Brown-brandl T.M., Nienaber J.A. & Hahn G.L. 2002. Dynamic response of feedlot cattle to shade and no-shade. In: Proceedings of the Meeting of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers (Baltimore, U.S.A.). Paper no. 024050.

Eigenberg R.A., Nienaber J.A. & Brown-brandl T.M. 2003. Development of a livestock safety monitor for cattle. In: Proceedings of the Meeting of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers (Baltimore, U.S.A.). Paper no. 032338.

Façanha D.A.E., Da Silva R.G., Maia A.S.C., Guilhermino M.M. & Vasconcelos A.M. 2010. Variação anual de características morfológicas e da temperatura de superfície do pelame de vacas da raça Holandesa em ambiente semiárido. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 38(4): 837-844.

Ferreira F., Pires M.F.A., Martinez M.L., Coelho S.G., Carvalho A.U., Ferreira P.M., Facury Filho E.J. & Campos W.E. 2006. Parâmetros fisiológicos de bovinos cruzados submetidos ao estresse calórico. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia. 58(5): 732-738.

Gaughan J., Goopy J. & Spark J. 2002. Excessive heat load index for feedlot cattle. In: Meat and Livestock-Australia Project Report, Flot 316. (Sydney, N.S.W.). pp.1-33.

Gaughan J.B., Mader T.L., Holt S.M. & Lisle A. 2008. A new heat load index for feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science. 86 (1): 226-234.

Hahn G.L., Gaughan J.B., Mader T.L. & Eigenberg R.A. 2009. Thermal indices and their applications for livestock environments. In: DeShazer J.A. (Ed). Livestock energetics and thermal environmental management. St. Joseph: ASBE, pp.113-130.

Li S., Gebremedhin K.G., Lee C.N. & Collier R.J. 2009. Evaluation of Thermal Stress Indices for Cattle. In: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting (Reno, USA). pp.2283-2302.

Maia A.S.C., Silva R.G., Nascimento S.T., Nascimento C.C.N., Pedroza H.P. & Domingos H.G.T. 2015. Thermoregulatory responses of goats in hot environments. International Journal of Biometeorology. 59(8): 1025-1033.

Mader T.L., Davis M.S. & Brown-Brandl T. 2006. Environmental factors influencing heat stress in feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science. 84(3): 712-719.

Mader T.L., Johnson L.J. & Gaughan J.B. 2010. A comprehensive index for assessing environmental stress in animals. Journal of Animal Science. 88 (6): 2153-2165.

Marai I.F., El-Darawany A.A., Fadiel A. & Abdel-Hafez M.A. 2007. Physiological traits as affected by heat stress in sheep - a review. Small Ruminant Research. 71: 1-2.

Moran D.S., Pandolf K.B., Shapiro Y., Heled Y., Shani Y., Mathew W.T. & Gonzalez R.R. 2001. An environmental stress index (ESI) as a substitute for the wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT). Journal of Thermal Biology. 26: 427-431.

Montanholi Y.R., Swanson K.C., Schenkel F.S., McBride B.W., Caldwell T.R. & Miller S.P. 2009. On the determination of residual feed intake and associations of infrared thermography with efficiency and ultrasound traits in beef bulls. Livestock Science. 125(1): 22-30.

National Research Council. 1971. A guide to environmental research on animals. Washington: National Academic Science. 361p.

Oliveira C.C., Alves F.V., Almeida R.G., Gamarra E.L., Villela S.D.J. & Martins P.G.M.A. 2018. Thermal comfort indices assessed in integrated production systems in the Brazilian savannah. Agroforestry Systems. 92(6): 1659-1672.

Poikalainen V., Prak J., Veermäe L & Kokin E. 2012. Infrared temperature patterns of cow’s body as an indicator for health control at precision cattle farming. Agronomy Research Biosystem Engineering Special. 1: 187-194.

Rashamol V.P., Sejian V., Bagath M., Krishnan G., Archana P.R. & Bhatta R. 2018. Physiological adaptability of livestock to heat stress: an updated review. Journal of Animal Behavior Biometereology. 6: 62-71.

Silva R.G. 2000. Introdução à bioclimatologia animal. São Paulo: Nobel, 286 p.

Silva E.M. & Assunção W.L. 2004. O clima na cidade de Uberlândia - MG. Sociedade & Natureza. 12: 91-107.

Silva R.G., Guilhermino M.M. & De Morais D.A. 2010. Thermal radiation absorbed by dairy cows in pasture. International Journal of Biometeorology. 54 (1): 5-11.

Silva R.G., Maia A.S.C. & Costa L.L.M. 2014. Index of thermal stress for cows (ITSC) under high solar radiation in tropical environments. International Journal of Biometeorology. 59(5): 551-559.

Silva R.G., Morais D.A.E.F. & Guilhermino M.M. 2007. Evaluation of thermal stress indexes for dairy cows in tropical regions. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 36(4): 1192-1198.

Souza B.B., Silva I.J.O., Mellace E.M., Santos R.F.S., Zotti C.A. & Garcia P.R. 2010. Avaliação do ambiente físico promovido pelo sombreamento sobre o processo termorregulatório em novilhas leiteiras. Agropecuária Científica no Semiárido. 6(2): 59-60.

Souza Junior J.B.F., Silva R.B., Domingos H.G.T. & Maia A.S.C. 2008. Temperatura da superfície corporal e fluxo de calor convectivo em vacas holandesas expostas à radiação solar direta no Semiárido. Revista Científica de Produção Animal. 12(1): 6-9.

Thom E.C. 1959. The discomfort index. Weatherwise. 12: 7-59.

Wang W., Bjerg B.S., Choi C.Y., Chao Zong C. & Zhang G. 2018. A review and quantitative assessment of cattlerelated thermal indices. Journal of Thermal Biology. 77: 24-37.

Yousef M.K. 1985. Stress physiology in livestock. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 159p.

Yadav B., Singh G. & Wankar A. 2015. Adaptive capability as indicated by redox status and endocrine responses in crossbred cattle exposed to different thermal stresses. Journal of Animal Research. 5(1): 67-73.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.93605

Copyright (c) 2019 Andressa Alves Storti, Maria Regina Bueno de Mattos Nascimento, Carina Ubirajara de Faria, Natascha Almeida Marques da Silva

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.