Protection Efficacy of the rLTB-R1 Chimera against Experimental Swine Mycoplasmal Pneumonia

Marcos Roberto Alves Ferreira, Paula Fonseca Finger, Carolina Georg Magalhães, Carlos Eduardo Pouey da Cunha, Clóvis Moreira Júnior, Jalusa Deon Kich, Nelson Morés, Ângela Nunes Moreira, Odir Antônio Dellagostin, Fabricio Rochedo Conceição

Abstract


Background: Mycoplasma hyopneumoniaeis the etiological agent of the Swine Mycoplasmal Pneumonia (SMP), one of the most economically significant diseases in the swine industry worldwide. Commonly used vaccines for SMP control consist of inactivated whole cells (bacterins). These vaccines are efficacious against M. hyopneumoniaechallenge, but do not prevent colonization by the pathogen or completely eliminate pneumonia. P97 adhesin is conserved in the M. pneumoniae virulent strains, therefore it is an attractive target to be used in recombinant vaccines against M. hyopneumoniae. The aim of the present study was to evaluate protection afforded by rLTB-R1, a recombinant chimera composed by LTB fused with the R1 repeat region of P97 adhesin of M. hyopneumoniae, in specific-pathogen-free (SPF) piglets vaccinated by intranasal or intramuscular route and challenged with a pathogenic strain of M. hyopneumoniae.

Materials, Methods & Results:PCR products of the LTB and R1 coding sequences were fused, then cloned into pETDEST42™ expression vector. The rLTB-R1 was expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) Salt induction (SI).They were allocated into three groups: four piglets were intranasally vaccinated with 1 mg of rLTB-R1 solubilized in 1 mL of PBS at 0 and 14 days (IN rLTB-R1 group); four piglets were intramuscularly vaccinated with 1 mg of rLTB-R1 solubilized in 1 mL of PBS at 0 and 14 days (IM rLTB-R1 group);three piglets were intranasally and intramuscularly inoculated with 1 mL of PBS (control group).Two weeks after the last immunization (28 day), piglets were intratracheally challenged with 10 mL of a suspension containing 109color-changing unit (CCU) of pathogenic M. hyopneumoniae 7448 strain on three consecutive days. Until the challenge (28 days), intranasal and intramuscular vaccination with rLTB-R1 induced seroconversions of anti-R1 systemic antibodies of 1.6 and 4.6 ×, respectively. The IN rLTB-R1 group had no pulmonary lesion, rLTB-R1 conferred protection against experimental SMP. On the other hand, IM rLTB-R1 and control groups had on average 7.24% and 8.46% of pulmonary lesion, respectively, showing that intramuscular vaccination with rLTB-R1 did not confer protection.

Discussion:The rLTB-R1, when intranasally administrated to mice, elicited production of anti-R1 IgA in trachea and bronchi as well as specific Th1 response, suggesting an adequate stimulation of the mucosal immune system. We believe that rLTB-R1 induced a similar immune response in piglets intranasally vaccinated, conferring protection against experimental SMP. The present study, the rLTB-R1 alone, without any chemical adjuvant, stimulated a significant seroconversion of anti-R1 systemic antibodies in pigs intramuscularly vaccinated, showing the potential of LTB as a parenteral adjuvant in swine vaccination.Previous work has shown that the intramuscular administration route was evaluated in pigs because mice intramuscularly vaccinated with rLTB-R1 presented significant levels of anti-R1 IgA in trachea and bronchi, suggesting that rLTB can stimulate some degree of mucosal immunity even if not delivered by a mucosal route.However, in the present study, piglets intramuscularly vaccinated with rLTB-R1 presented high levels of anti-R1 systemic antibodies, they were not protected.On the other hand, intranasal vaccination of piglets with rLTB-R1 elicited low levels of anti-R1 systemic antibodies (1.6 × at 28 days), but it conferred full protection against experimental SMP. The present study demonstrated that intranasal vaccination of piglets with rLTB-R1 conferred protection against experimental SMP. A more detailed analysis of the protective immune response induced by rLTB-R1 in pigs is currently being performed.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Avakian A.L.& Ley D.H. 1993.Protective immune response to Mycoplasma gallisepticumdemonstrated in respiratory-tract washings from M. gallisepticum-infected chickens. AvianDiseases. 37(3): 697-705.

Barate A.K., Cho Y., Truong Q.L. & Hahn T.W. 2014. Immunogenicity of IMS 1113 plus soluble subunit and chimeric proteins containing Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae P97 C-terminal repeat regions. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 352(2): 213-220.

Blanchard B., Vena M.M., Cavalier A., Le Lannic J., Gouranton J. & Kobisch M. 1992.Electron microscopic observation of the respiratory tract of SPF piglets inoculated with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae.Veterinary Microbiology. 30(4): 329-341.

Chen A.Y., Fry S.R., Daggard G.E. &Mukkur T.K. 2008. Evaluation of immune response to recombinant potential protective antigens of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae delivered as cocktail DNA and/or recombinant protein vaccines in mice. Vaccine. 26(34): 4372-8.

Chen A.Y., Fry S.R., Forbes-Faulkner J., Daggard G. &Mukkur T.K.S. 2006. Evaluation of the immunogenicity of the P97R1 adhesin of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae as a mucosal vaccine in mice. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 55(7): 923-929.

Chen J.R., Liao C.W., Mao S.J. & Weng C.N. 2001. A recombinant chimera composed of repeat region RR1 of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniaeadhesin with Pseudomonas exotoxin: in vivo evaluation of specific IgG response in mice and pigs. Veterinary Microbiology. 80(4): 347-357.

Conceição F.R., Moreira A.N. & Dellagostin O.A. 2006. A recombinant chimera composed of R1 repeat region of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniaeP97 adhesin with Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin B subunit elicits immune response in mice. Vaccine. 24(29-30): 5734-5743.

Galli V., Simionatto S., Marchioro S.B., Fisch A., Gomes C.K., Conceicão F.R. & Dellagostin O.A. 2012. Immunisation of mice with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae antigens P37, P42, P46 and P95 delivered as recombinant subunit or DNA vaccines. Vaccine. 31(1): 135-140.

King K.W., Faulds F.F., Rosey E.L. & Yancey R.J. 1997. Characterization of the gene encoding Mhp1 from Mycoplasma hyopneumoniaeand examination of Mhp1’s vaccine potential. Vaccine.15(1): 25-35.

Maes D., Deluyker H., Verdonck M., Castryck F., Miry C., Vrijens B., Verbeke W., Viaene J. & Kruif A. 1999.Effect of vaccination against Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in pig herds with an all-in/all-out production system. Vaccine. 179(9-10): 1024-1034.

Marchioro S.B., Maes D., Flahou B., Pasmans F., Sacristán R.P., Vranckx K., Melkebeek V., Cox E., Wuyts N. &Haesebrouck F. 2013. Local and systemic immune responses in pigs intramuscularly injected with an inactivated Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae vaccine. Vaccine. 31(9): 1305-1311.

Marchioro S.B.,Sácristan R.P., Michiels A., Haesebrouck F., Conceição F.R., Dellagostin O.A. &Maes D. 2014. Immune responses of a chimaeric protein vaccine containing Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae antigens and LTB against experimental M. hyopneumoniae infection in pigs. Vaccine. 32(36): 4689-4694.

McGhee J.R.,Mestecky J., Dertzbaugh M.T., Eldridge J.H., Hirasawa M. &Kiyono H. 1992. The mucosal immune system: from fundamental concepts to vaccine development. Vaccine. 10(2): 75-88.

Morrison R.B., Hilley H.D. & Leman A.D. 1985. Comparison of methods for assessing the prevalence and extent of pneumonia in market weight swine. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research. 26(12): 381-387.

Neutra M.R.& Kozlowski P.A. 2006.Mucosal vaccines: the promise and the challenge. Nature Reviews Immunology.6(2): 148-158.

Nicolet J., Paroz P. &Bruggmann S. 1980. Tween 20 soluble proteins of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae as antigen for an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. Research in Veterinary Science. 29(3): 305-309.

Ogawa Y., Oishi E., Muneta Y., Sano A., Hikono H., Shibahara T., Yagi Y. & Shimoji Y.2009. Oral vaccination against mycoplasmal pneumonia of swine using a live Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae vaccine strain as a vector. Vaccine. 27(33): 4543-4550.

Okamba F.R., Arella M., Music N., Jia J.J., Gottschalk M. & Gagnon C.A. 2010. Potential use of a recombinant replication-defective adenovirus vector carrying the C-terminal portion of the P97 adhesin protein as a vaccine against Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in swine. Vaccine. 28(30): 4802-4809.

OkambaF.R.,Moreau E., Bouh K.C., Gagnon C.A., Massie B. &Arella M. 2007. Immune responses induced by replication-defective adenovirus expressing the C-terminal portion of the Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae P97 adhesin. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. 14(6): 767-774.

Opriessnig T., Thacker E.L., Yu S., Fenaux M., Meng X.J. &Halbur P.G. 2004. Experimental reproduction of post weaning multisystemic wasting syndrome in pigs by dual infection with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and porcine Circovirus type 2. Veterinary Pathology. 41(6): 624–640.

Simecka J.W., Davis J.K., Davidson M.K., Ross S.E., Stadtlander C.T.K.H. &Cassell G.H. 1992. Mycoplasma diseases of animals. In: Maniloff J., McElhaney R.N., Finch L.R. & Baseman J.B. (Eds). Mycoplasmas: molecular biology and pathogenesis. Washington: American Society for Microbiology. pp.391-416.

Simionatto S., Marchioro S.B., Galli V., Brum C.B., Klein C.S., Rebelatto R., Silva E.F., Borsuk S., Conceição F.R. & Dellagostin O.A. 2012. Immunological characterization of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae recombinant proteins. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 35(2): 209-216.

Thacker E.L. 2006. Mycoplasmal Diseases.In: Straw B.E., Zimmerman J.J., D’Allaire S. & Taylor D.J. (Eds). Diseases of Swine. 9thedn. Blackwell Publishing, pp. 701-717.

Thacker E.L., Thacker B.J., Boettcher T.B. &Jayappa H. 1998. Comparison of antibody production, lymphocyte stimulation and production induced by four commercial Mycoplasma hyopneumoniaebacterins. Journal of Swine Health and Production. 6(3): 107-112.

Thacker E.L., Thacker B.J., Kuhn, M., Hawkins P.A. & Waters W.R. 2000.Evaluation of local and systemic immune responses induced by intramuscular injection of a Mycoplasma hyopneumoniaebacterin to pigs. American Journal of Veterinary Research.61(11): 1384-1389.

Villarreal I., Meyns T., Dewulf J., Vranckx K., Calus D., Pasmans F., Haesebrouck F. & Maes D. 2011. The effect of vaccination on the transmission of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in pigs under field conditions. The Veterinary Journal. 188(1): 48-52.

Weltzin R., Guy B., Thomas W.D., Giannasca P.J. &Monath T.P. 2000. Parenteral adjuvant activities of Escherichia coli heat-labile toxin and its B subunit for immunization of mice against Helicobacter pylori infection. Infection and Immunity. 68(5): 2775-2782.

Wilton J.L., Scarman A.L., Walker M.J. &Djordjevic S.P. 1998. Reiterated repeat region variability in the ciliary adhesin gene of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae. Microbiology,144(7): 1931–1943, 1998.

Xiong Q., Wei Y., Xie H., Feng Z., Gan Y., Wang C., Liu M., Bai F., Xie F. & Shao G. 2014. Effect of different adjuvant formulations on the immunogenicity and protective effect of a live Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae vaccine after intramuscular inoculation. Vaccine. 32(27): 3445-3451.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.90862

Copyright (c) 2019 Marcos Roberto Alves Ferreira, Paula Fonseca Finger, Carolina Georg Magalhães, Carlos Eduardo Pouey da Cunha, Clóvis Moreira Júnior, Jalusa Deon Kich, Nelson Morés, Ângela Nunes Moreira, Odir Antônio Dellagostin, Fabricio Rochedo Conceição

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.