Pacemaker Implant in a Dog with Sick Sinus Syndrome

Amanda Sarita Cruz Aleixo, Angélica Alfonso, Bárbara Keiko Kichise, Francisco Teixeira Neto, Carolina Hagy Girotto, André Monti Garzesi, Leonardo Rufino Garcia, Rubens Ramos de Andrade, Maria Lúcia Gomes Lourenço

Abstract


Background: Sick sinus syndrome is characterized by the presence of arrhythmias, including persistent sinus bradycardia, sinus arrest and paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmia. It commonly occurs in elderly dogs, especially miniature schnauzers; however, it is also detected in dachshunds and pugs. Reports of clinical signs by animal owners are not always clear and precise, which may result in erroneous interpretations by veterinarians; consequently, the use of inappropriate therapies. The present work aims to describe clinical aspects and findings from tests related to sick sinus syndrome (SSS) and presents the case of a female schnauzer with SSS.

Case: A 10-year-old female dog (schnauzer, 8.6 kg) attended the Veterinary Hospital of the FMVZ-UNESP - Botucatu. The owner mentioned convulsive episodes, but a thorough medical history and patient assessment revealed that the dog exhibited episodes of syncope. During the physical examination, cardiac auscultation revealed the heart rate to be 56 beats per minute (bpm), and there was a presence of pauses. Also during cardiac auscultation, a holosystolic heart murmur was verified, with a focus on the mitral and tricuspid valves. The electrocardiogram showed the presence of sinus arrest with escape rhythms, pauses of 10 s and the presence of bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome. A Holter monitor was used to establish the diagnosis of SSS. The patient presented with significant episodes of syncope during outpatient care, and based on the clinical manifestation, drug therapy was initiated. The prescribed medications were aminophylline 20 mg/ kg TID, enalapril maleate 0.5 mg/kg BID, spironolactone 1 mg/kg SID and furosemide 2 mg/kg BID. After the start of treatment, there was a reduction in the frequency of episodes of syncope. Three weeks after diagnosis, a pacemaker device was implanted. Currently, clinical signs are absent.

Discussion: Sinus node dysfunction is one of the main reasons for pacemaker implantation. It is usually diagnosed based on clinical signs and the presence of sinus bradycardia and sinus pauses in electrocardiograms or Holter monitoring. The diagnosis of SSS is limited to cases in which the patient does not present with abnormalities in an electrocardiogram. Syncope is a clinical sign commonly present in patients with dysfunction of the sinus node, and episodes of syncope were reported by the owner of the dog referred to in the present report. A thorough medical history and physical examination must be performed to diagnose SSS because erroneous diagnosis and incorrect interpretations of clinical signs can lead to the misuse of medications. The treatment of choice for SSS is an implantable pacemaker device; however, because the method is not widely used in Brazil, a second option is drug treatment. In the present report, after implantation of a pacemaker, clinical signs ceased, and the patient was in good general health and could return to her normal activities. Sick sinus syndrome is a disease commonly found in schnauzers. There is a need for detailed histories and complementary exams because the clinical signs do not always correlate with electrocardiographic findings. The implantation of a pacemaker is the treatment of choice and is effective for the condition, but its use is not uniformly accessible throughout the country.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Adán V. & Crown L.A. 2003. Diagnosis and Treatment of Sick Sinus Syndrome. American Family Physician. 67(8): 1725-1732.

Andrade J.N.B.M., Lempek M.R. & Ferian P.E. 2012. Síndromedo nó sinusal em um schnauzer - relato de caso. In: 22º Seminário de Iniciação Cientifica da UDESC (Florianópolis, Brasil). p.118.

Aung T.T., Roberto E.S. & Wase A. 2016. Absent Left Main Coronary Artery and Separate Ostia of Left Coronary System in a Patient with Holt-Oram Syndrome and Sinus Node Dysfunction. American Journal Case Reports. 17:93-96.

Cheng A. & Tereshchenko L.G. 2011. Evolutionary innovations in cardiac pacing. Journal of Electrocardiology. 44: 611-615.

Choudhury M., Boyett M.R. &Morris G.M. 2015. Biology of the Sinus Node and its Disease. Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology

Review. 4(1): 28-34.

Conde C.A., Leppo J., Lipski J., Stimmel B., Litwak R., Donoso E. & Dack S. 1973. Effectiveness of Pacemaker Treatment in the Bradycardia-Tachycardia Syndrome.The American Journal of Cardiology. 32: 209-214.

Estrada A. H., Pariaut R., Hemsley S., Gatson B.H. & Moise N.S. 2012. Atrial-Based Pacing for Sinus Node Dysfunction in Dogs: Initial Results. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine.

: 558-564.

Freitas R.R., Stopiglia A.J., Fantoni D.T., Simões E.A., Larsson M.H.M.A., Jatene F.B., Barbusci L.O.D., Aneli E. & Irino E.T. 2002. Implantation of pacemaker in dog - Case report. Continuous Education Journal. 5(2): 164-170.

Hesselson A.B., Parsonnet V., Bernstein A.D. & Bonavita G.J. 1992. Deleterious Effects of Long-Term SingleChamber

Ventricular Pacing in Patients with Sick Sinus Syndrome: The Hidden Benefits of Dual-Chamber Pacing. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 19:1542-1549.

Yamaki F.L. & Larsson M.H.M.A. 2015. Cardiac arrhythmias. In: Jericó M.M., Andrade Neto J.P. & Kogica M.M. (Eds). Tratado de Medicina Interna de Cães e Gatos. Rio de Janeiro: Roca,

pp.1147-1148.

Johnson M.S., Martin M.W.S. & Henley W. 2007. Results of pacemaker implantation in 104 dogs. Journal of Small Animal Practice. 48: 4-11.

Kaplan B.M., Langendorf F., Lev M. & Pick A. 1973. Tachycardia-Bradycardia Syndrome (So-Called “Sick Sinus

Syndrome”). The American Journal of Cardiology. 31: 497-508.

Medical A.S. 2005. Biventricular pacing (cardiac resynchronization therapy): an evidence-based analysis. Ontario

Health Technology Assessment Series. 5(13): 21-53.

Mitrani R.D., Simmons J.D., Interian A., Castllanos A. & Myerburg R.J. 1999. Cardiac pacemakers: current and future status. CurrentProblems in Cardiology. 24(6): 348-355.

Moreira D.A.R., Sousa A.G.M.R., Valente P. & Leone E.H. 2004. Efeitos da estimulação com corrente elétrica contínua pulsátil sobre as propriedades eletrofisiológicas atriais. Estudo experimental da fibrilação atrial em cães. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia.

: 26-33.

Muzzi R.A.L., Muzzi L.A.L., Araújo R.B. & Lázaro D.A. 2009. Doença crônica da valva mitral em cães: avaliação clínica funcional e mensuração ecocardiográfica da valva mitral. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia. 61(2): 337-344.

Nakayama T., Wakao Y., Nemoto H., Uechi M., Kageyama T., Muto M. & Takahashi M. 1996. Mitral valveprotrusionassessedby

use ofB-modeechocardiography in dogswith mitral regurgitation. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 57: 791-797.

Park J.K., Park J., Uhm J.S., Pak H.N., Lee M.H. & Joung B. 2015. Combined Algorithm Using a Poor Increase in Inferior

P-Wave Amplitude During Sympathetic Stimulation and Sinus Node Recovery Time for the Diagnosis of Sick Sinus Syndrome. Circulation Journal. 79: 2148-2156.

Qu J., Plotnikov A.N., Danilo P., Shlapakova I., Cohen I.S., Robinson R.B. & Rosen M.R. 2003. Expression and Function of a Biological Pacemaker in Canine Heart. Circulation.

: 1106-1109.

Rubenstein J.J., Schulman C.L., Yurchak P.M. & Desanctis R.W. 1972. Clinical Spectrum of the Sick Sinus Syndrome. Circulation. 46: 5-13.

Soares E.C., Larsson M.H.M.A. & Yamato R.J. 2005. Chronic valvular disease: correlation between clinical, electrocardiographic,

radiographic and echocardiographic aspects in dogs. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia. 57: 436-441.

Sweeney M.O., Hellkamp A.S., Ellenbogen K.A., Greenspon A.J., Freedman R.A., Lee K.L. & Lamas G.A. 2003. Adverse Effect of Ventricular Pacing on Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation among Patients With Normal Baseline QRS Duration in a Clinical Trial of Pacemaker Therapy for Sinus Node Dysfunction. Circulation.

: 2932-2937.

Tasaki H., Ashizawa N., Nagao S., Fukushima F., Furukawa R., Fukae S. & Maemura K. 2015. Effective Management of Atrioventricular Interval for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation That Developed After DDDR Pacemaker Implantation in a Sick Sinus Syndrome Patient. International Heart Journal Association.

(5): 558-563.

Teshima K., Asano K., Iwanaga K., Koie H., Uechi M., Kato Y., Kutara K., Kanno N., Edamura K., Kasegawa A. & Tanaka S. 2007. Evaluation of left ventricular Tei Index (Index of myocardial performance) in healthy dogs and dogs with mitral regurgitation. The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science. 69: 117-123.

Tilley L.P. & Smith Jr. F.W.K. 2015. Sick Sinus Syndrome. In: Tilley L.P. & Smith Jr. F.W.K. (Eds). Blackwell´s five minutes veterinary consult: canine and feline. 6th edn. Rio de Janeiro: Wiley Blackwell, pp.1225-1226.

Toff W.D., Camm J. & Skehan D.J. 2005. Single-Chamber versus Dual-Chamber Pacing for High-Grade Atrioventricular

Block. The New England Journal of Medicine. 353(2): 145-155.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.85851

Copyright (c) 2018 Amanda Sarita Cruz Aleixo, Angélica Alfonso, Bárbara Keiko Kichise, Francisco Teixeira Neto, Carolina Hagy Girotto, André Monti Garzesi, Leonardo Rufino Garcia, Rubens Ramos de Andrade, Maria Lúcia Gomes Lourenço

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.