Cardiovascular Evaluation in Bitches in Oestrus, Pregnancy and Puerperium

Mayara Cristini Ferreira Aguiar, Karina Preising Aptekmann, Leandro Egert, Afonso Cassa Reis, Paula Madureira, Márcio Paiva Barcellos

Abstract


Background: Pregnancy may change maternal hemodynamic, which is considered a physiological mechanism for adaptation. Cardiac output tends to be influenced by reductions in vascular resistance and increases in uterine vasculature, as well as reduced autonomic tone combined with gestational physiological anaemia and increased blood volume due to increased plasma volume and hormonal mechanisms. In bitches, few studies have been conducted investigating the changes of the system and the clinical implications for the mother and foetuses due to poor cardiac adaptation during pregnancy.

Materials, Methods & Results: Systolic blood pressure (SBP), electrocardiographic and Doppler echocardiographic measurements and serum sodium (Na), potassium (K), calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P) levels were evaluated in six bitches of reproductive age. An evaluation was performed in oestrus (M0), followed by evaluations at 25 (M1), 45 (M2), and 60 days (M3) after the last natural or artificial insemination and 15 days after delivery (M4). For the statistical analysis, the means, medians and the standard deviation were calculated. The data were analysed using ANOVA and the Tukey test, with significance level of 5%. A descriptive analysis was performed for color Doppler in echocardiogram evaluation, cardiac axis and rhythm in electrocardiogram evaluation. In the electrolytic evaluation, significant differences were found only in the serum levels of Na, noticed as a reduction in M0-M1 and M3-M2 and an increase in M1-M2 and M3-M4. No significant differences were observed in the SBP, although there was a tendency to SBP reduction. ECG parameters were not significantly different, with no rhythm or conduction disturbances. There was not a significant difference in HR. Four animals (66.6%) had axis deviation to the right when comparing the oestrous phase with the final quarter of pregnancy. The echocardiographic parameters did not show significant changes.

Discussion: The reduction observed in Na can occur by salt depletion, by dilutional or metabolic mechanisms. In contrast, the elevation in Na concentration could occur as a result of fluid and electrolyte retention by kidneys during gestation. The absence of electrocardiographic changes may be justified by the stability of mean serum potassium concentrations. An increase in HR five days before the expected calving time, demonstrating the maximum cardiac activity in this gestational phase, is related by other authors, therefore, in the present study, the absence of significant change in HR can be explained by the period in which the data collection was performed, 45 days of gestation, being therefore prior to the period of greatest HR. The cardiac axis deviation can be explained by the distension of the gravid uterus that cause compression of the adjacent organs, leading to diaphragmatic compression and consequent repositioning of the thoracic structures. A tendency to SBP reduction observed is directly influenced by peripheral vascular resistance and cardiac output that occur during pregnancy. Although the echocardiographic findings did not show changes, it is suggested that there are changes related to increased blood volume in pregnancy to provide an appropriate blood flow to the conceptus. It was concluded that pregnancy and the postpartum period in bitches did not cause changes in electrolytes levels, SBP values, echocardiographic and electrocardiographic parameters as compared to values obtained during oestrus.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abbott J.A. 2010. The effect of pregnancy on echocardiographic variables in healthy bitches. Journal of Veterinary Cardiology: The Official Journal of the European Society of Veterinary Cardiology. 12(2): 123-128.

Almeida V.T., Uscategui R.A.R., Silva P.D.A., Avante M.L., Simões A.P.R. & Vicente W.R.R. 2017. Hemodynamic gestational adaptation in bitches. Ciência Rural. 47(7): 1-7.

Barra S., Cachulo M.D.C., Providência R. & Leitão-Marques A. 2012. Hypertension in pregnancy: The current state of the art. Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia (English Edition). 31(6): 425-432.

Blanco P.G., Batista P.R., Re N.E., Mattioli G.A., Arias D.O. & Gobello C. 2012. Electrocardiographic changes in normal and abnormal canine pregnancy. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 47(2): 252-256.

Blanco P.G., Tórtora M., Rodríguez R., Arias D.O. & Gobello C. 2011. Ultrasonographic assessment of maternal cardiac function and peripheral circulation during normal gestation in dogs. Veterinary Journal. 190(1): 154-159.

Bonagura J.D. 2000. Kirk’s Current Veterinary Therapy XIII: Small Animal Practice. 13rd edn. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1214p.

Boon J.A. 2011. Veterinary echocardiography. Philadelphia: Wiley-Blackwell, 610p.

D’Amico E.J., Neilands T.B. & Zambarano R. 2001. Power analysis for multivariate and repeated measures designs: A flexible approach using the SPSS MANOVA procedure. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers. 33(4): 479-484.

Eghbali M., Deva R., Alioua A., Minosyan T.Y., Ruan H., Wang Y., Toro L. & Stefani E. 2005. Molecular and functional signature of heart hypertrophy during pregnancy. Circulation Research. 96(11): 1208-1216.

Gobello C., Colombani M., Scaglia H., de La Sota R.L. & Goya R.G. 2001. Heterogeneity of circulating prolactin in the bitch. Reproduction Nutrition Development. 41(6): 505-511.

Gordon M.C. 2002. Maternal physiology in pregnancy. In: Gabbe S.G., Niebyl J.R., Galan H.L., Jauniaux E.R.M., Landon M.B., Simpson J.L. & D.A. Driscoll (Eds). Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies. 6th edn. New York: Churchill Livingstone, pp.42-65.

Gowda R.M., Khan I.A., Mehta N.J., Vasavada B.C. & Sacchi T.J. 2003. Cardiac arrhythmias in pregnancy: clinical and therapeutic considerations. International Journal of Cardiology. 88(2-3): 129-133.

Hameed A.B. & Sklansky M.S. 2007. Pregnancy: maternal and fetal heart disease. Current Problems in Cardiology. 32(8): 419-494.

Longo L.D. 1983. Maternal blood volume and cardiac output during pregnancy: a hypothesis of endocrinologic control. American Journal of Physiology - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 245(5): R720-729.

Masumoto A., Masuyama H., Takamoto N., Akahori Y. & Hiramatsu Y. 2010. Expression of antiangiogenic prolactin fragments in the placentas of women with pregnancy induced hypertension. Acta Medica Okayama. 64(4): 249-255.

Mone S.M., Sanders S.P. & Colan S.D. 1996. Control Mechanisms for Physiological Hypertrophy of Pregnancy. Circulation. 94(4): 667-672.

Naves L.A., Vilar L., Costa A.C.F., Domingues L. & Casulari L.A. 2003. Distúrbios na secreção e ação do hormônio antidiurético. Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia. 47(4): 467-481.

Ouzounian J.G. & Elkayam U. 2012. Physiologic Changes During Normal Pregnancy and Delivery. Cardiology Clinics. 30(3): 317-329.

Prestes N.C. & Landim-Alvarenga F.C. 2017. Obstetrícia Veterinária. 2.ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, 236p.

Tilley L.P. & Goodwin J.K. 2002. Manual of Canine and Feline Cardiology. 3rd edn. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 464p.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.82436

Copyright (c) 2018 Mayara Cristini Ferreira Aguiar, Karina Preising Aptekmann, Leandro Egert, Afonso Cassa Reis, Paula Madureira, Márcio Paiva Barcellos

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.