Salmonella Heidelberg Isolated from Poultry Shows a Novel Resistance Profile

Gabriella Bassi das Neves, Lenita Moura Stefani, Eduarda Pick, Denise Nunes Araujo, Jéssica Giuriatti, Cleverson Percio, Maiara Cristiane Brisola

Abstract


Background: The development of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria is a serious public health issue worldwide. Salmonella spp. is considered a leader cause of gastrointestinal disease in animals and humans, and poultry products have been reported as an important reservoir of the bacterium. S. Heidelberg became lately one of the most prevalent serovars found in several countries. However, hardly any information is available about the epidemiology and the resistance profile of it. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the antibiotic resistance profile of S. Heidelberg (SH) and to compare to S. Enteritidis (SE) and S. Typhimurium (ST) isolated from the Southern part of Brazil.

Materials, Methods & Results: A total of 162 Salmonella isolates of poultry origin serotyped as SH (54), SE (54), and ST (54) were submitted to the disk-diffusion test with disks containing 10 antibiotics of 7 different classes, routinely used in veterinary and human medicine such as: enrofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, gentamicin, ceftiofur, ceftriaxone, nalidixic acid, tetracycline, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, and chloramphenicol. In addition, the Multi-drug Resistance Pattern (MDRP) and the Multiple-Drug Resistance Index (MDRI) were determined. The Chi-square (χ2) test with 1% of significance level was used to statistically evaluate the results. All isolates were susceptible to norfloxacin, enrofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin. The majority of the isolates were resistant to the quinolone class (68%), more specifically to nalidixic acid, which is considered a synthetic quinolone, followed by penicillin (47%) and cephalosporin (16%). Overall, SH isolates showed higher resistance compared to ST and SE (18, 16.5, and 9.6%, respectively). SH isolated from field samples, mainly drag swabs, showed higher resistance levels (24.2%) than those isolated from slaughterhouses (5.6%). SH showed the highest percentage of resistance to ceftiofur (31.5%), ceftriaxone (9.3%), and tetracycline (64.8%) in comparison to the other two serotypes. Most of the SH isolates were resistant to at least two (66.7%), three or more antibiotics (33.3%). A different scenario was observed for ST and SE, where 25.9 and 9.3% were susceptible to at least one drug, respectively. The most common pattern of resistance (MDRP) was C (gentamicin - nalidixic acid - tetracycline) for 14 SH isolates, and A (ceftiofur - nalidixic acid - tetracycline) for 12 SH isolates. MDRI indicated that 22.8% of all isolates were multidrug resistant. SH was the isolate with the largest variety of resistance patterns compared to ST and SE, where 11.7% of the isolates were resistant to more than three antibiotics. In addition, SH showed the greatest MDRI (0.25) ranging from 0.2 to 0.5.

Discussion: SH was resistant to almost all antibiotics tested and showed multi-drug resistant profile, therefores, it showed a potential for horizontal transmission of resistance genes. Additionally, SH showed a higher resistance profile for ceftiofur, an important antibiotic used in poultry, which can cross-resist to ceftriaxone, commonly used to treat salmonellosis in children. Our results showed that SH is a real challenge regarding antimicrobial resistance. This scenario leads to the need for rational and judicious use of antimicrobials in poultry and, as an alert to the medical community.


Keywords


antibiotics; multidrug resistance; public health; resistance; Salmonella.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA). 2003. Padronização dos Testes de Sensibilidade a Antimicrobianos por Disco-difusão: Norma Aprovada. 8.ed. 23(1): 58p.

Associação Brasileira de Proteína Animal. 2015. Disponível em: . [Accessed online September 2015].

Berchieri Júnior A. & Oliveira G.H. 2006. Salmoneloses aviárias. In: Andreatti Filho R.L. (Ed). Saúde Aviária e Doenças. São Paulo: Roca, pp.84-111.

Duarte D.A.M., Ribeiro A.R., Vasconcelos A.M.M., Santos S.B., Silva J.V.D., Andrade P.L.A. & Falcão L.S.P.C.A. 2009. Occurrence of Salmonella spp. in broiler chicken carcasses and their susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 40: 569-573.

Frye J.G. & Cray P.J. 2007. Prevalence, distribution and characterization of ceftiofur resistance in Salmonella enterica isolated from animals in the USA from 1999 to 2003. Antimicrobial Agents. 30: 134-142.

Gyles C.L., Prescott J.F., Songer G. & Thoen C.O. 2012. Pathogenesis of Bacterial Infection in Animals. 3rd edn. Ames: Blackwell Publishing, pp.143-160.

Krumperman P.H. 1983. Multiple antibiotic resistance indexing of Escherichia coli to identify high-risk sources of fecal contamination of foods. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 46(1): 165-170.

Malorny B., Chroeter A. & Helmuth R. 1999. Incidence of Quinolone Resistance Over the Period 1986 to 1998 in Veterinary Salmonella Isolates from Germany. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 43(9): 2278-2282.

Medeiros L.M. 2006. Estudo sobre cepas de Salmonella enterica sorovar Typhimurium resistentes a antimicrobianos isoladas de diferentes fontes da cadeia alimentar no Brasil. 127f. Rio de Janeiro, RJ. Dissertação (Pós-graduação Vigilância Sanitária) - Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde Fundação Oswaldo Cruz.

Medeiros M.A.N., Oliveira D.C.N., Rodrigues D.P. & Freitas D.R.C. 2011. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella in chicken carcasses at retail in 15 Brazilian cities. Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica. 30(6): 555560.

Mion L., Colla F.L., Cisco I.C., Webber B., Diedrich L.N., Pilotto P., Rodrigues L.B., Nascimento V.P. & Santos L.R. 2014. Perfil de resistência a antimicrobianos por Salmonella Heidelberg isoladas de abatedouro avícola em 2005 e 2009. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae. 42: 1197.

Nunes I.A. 2009. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Enteritidis strains from different sources. Ciência Animal Brasileira. 10(1): 166-173.

Quinn P.J., Markey B.K., Carter M.E., Donnelly W.J. & Leonard F.C. 2005. Microbiologia Veterinária e Doenças Infecciosas. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 512p.

Seyfarth A.M., Wegener H.C. & Frimodt-moller N. 1997. Antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella enterica subesp. enterica serovar Typhimurium from humans and production animals. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 40: 6775.

Silbergeld E., Graham J. & Price L.B. 2008. Industrial food animal production, antimicrobial resistance, and human health. Annual Review of Public Health. 29: 15-169.

Sola M.C., Oliveira A. P., Feistel J.C. & Rezende C.S.M. 2012. Manutenção de microrganismos: conservação e viabilidade. Enciclopédia Biosfera. 8(14): 1398-1418.

Vaz C.S.L., Streck A.F., Michael G.B., Marks F.S., Rodrigues D.P., Reis E.M.F., Cardoso M.R.I. & Canal C.W. 2010. Antimicrobial resistance and subtyping of Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serovar Enteritidis isolated from human outbreaks and poultry in southern Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science. 89: 1530-1536.

Voss-Rech D., Vaz C.S.L., Alves L., Coldebella A., Leão J.A., Rodrigues D. & Back A. 2015. A temporal study of Salmonella enterica serotypes from broiler farms in Brazil. Poultry Science. 94: 433-441.

Welker C.A.D., Both J.M.C., Longaray S.M., Haas S., Soeiro M.L.T. & Ramos R.C. 2010. Análise microbiológica dos alimentos envolvidos em surtos de doenças transmitidas por alimentos (DTA) ocorridos no estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Biociências. 8(1): 44-48.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.81294

Copyright (c) 2018 Gabriella Bassi das Neves, Lenita Moura Stefani, Eduarda Pick, Denise Nunes Araujo, Jéssica Giuriatti, Cleverson Percio, Maiara Cristiane Brisola

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.