Detection of Maedi-Visna Virus from Sheep Bronchoalveolar Lavage by Nested PCR Evaluation of Different Primers Pairs

Rebeca Cavalcante Marinho, Gabrielle Rosemblit Martins, Kelma Costa de Souza, Rosivaldo Quirino Bezerra Júnior, Maria Fátima da Silva Teixeira

Abstract


Background: Small ruminant lentiviruses (SRLV) are characterized by a high degree of genetic variability related to your replication process, resulting in several strains in different geographic regions. The Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) is very successful in the detection of proviral DNA of SRLV, however, due to the high variability of the lentivirus genome, the efficiency and sensibility of PCR depends mainly on the specificity of the primers designed and the choice of the amplified target viral region. The aim of this study was to compare detection of Maedi Visna Virus (MVV) from bronco alveolar lavage samples of sheep by Nested PCR using primers for the gag and LTR genes.

Materials, Methods & Results: Samples of sheep bronchoalveolar lavage (n = 58) from slaughterhouse in the Metropolitan Region of Fortaleza were previously tested by nested PCR using primers for region gag. Thereafter, these samples were tested by nested PCR with primers designed for the LTR region. Both tests were conducted using thermocycler (Biocycler®) under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing of primers at 56°C for 1 min and extension of DNA at 72°C for 45 s with a final extension at 72 for 7 min. The first and second round were performed under the same conditions. Every amplification was performed using a positive control MVV-K1514 and water RNA/DNA free with a negative control. After the amplification, the PCR products were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis at 1% stained with ethidium bromide in TBE buffer. The tests revelead only 1 sample (P1) was detected exclusively for the primer of gag gene, while 8 samples were positive only for the test performed with primers of the LTR region, 5 samples were positive for both sets of primers tested and 30 samples were negative for all tests. The test with the LTR gene demonstrated 37.93% (22/58) positives of Maedi Visna in the samples studied.

Discussion: In recent years, with advances in molecular biology techniques, some PCR protocols have been developed for the diagnosis of SRLV. However, these viruses exhibit a high instability and mutation rate becomes very difficult to use the same primers in different geographic regions. In this study, comparing the MVV detection capability by nested PCR with differents primer sets was possible to demonstrate that primers LTR gene were more efficient in detecting positive animals when compared with the primers designed for the gag region. In all tests, only the animal (P1) was positive for the nested PCR performed with the primers for the gag gene, not being detected by the LTR gene. Some studies suggest success in the detection of MVV using primers for the gag gene. However, for more efficient detection of MVV in sheep samples, many studies have shown that the choice of primers for the LTR region is more accurate, since these primers have better MVV detection capability even when it has a large range of circulating virus strains. it is known that the genetic diversity of SRLV generate difficulties in carrying out molecular tests, since the molecular diagnostic tests depend on factors such as the percentage of identity of nucleotides of the viral populations circulating in the herds and the sequences used for testing. In this study it is possible to conclude that the effective control of lentiviruses diagnostic methods should be chosen properly in order to be applied in disease control programs.


Keywords


LTR; Lung; MVV; genes; sensitivity; variability.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Almeida N.C., Aprígio C.J.L., Ferreira R.C.S. & Teixeira M.F.S. 1999. Levantamento sorológico de lentivírus ovino em animais destinados ao abate na região metropolitana de Fortaleza. In: IV Semana Universitária da Universidade Estadual do Ceará (Fotaleza, Brazil). 1 CD-ROM.

Angelopoulou K., Brellou G.D., Greenland T. & Vlemmas I. 2006. A novel deletion in the LTR region of a Greek small ruminant lentivirus may be associated with low pathogenicity. Virus Research. 18(1-2): 178-84.

Araújo S.A.C. 2004. Estudo histológico de pulmões ovinos sorologicamente positivos para Maedi-Visna. 78f. Fortaleza Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Veterinárias) - Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Veterinárias (PPGCV), Universidade Estadual do Ceará.

Barquero N., Domenech A., Arjona A., Fernández-Garayzabal J.F., Ruiz-Santa-Quiteria J.A. & Gomez-Lucia E. 2013. Comparison of two PCR and one ELISA techniques for the detection of small ruminant lentiviruses (SRLVs) in milk of sheep and goats. Research in Veterinary Science. 94(3): 817-819.

Blacklaws B.A. 2012. Small ruminant lentiviruses: Immunopathogenesis of visnamaedi and caprine arthritis and encephalitis virus. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 35(3): 259-269.

Brinkhof J.M., Van Maanen C., Wigger R., Peterson K. & Houwers D.J. 2008. Specific detection of small ruminant lentiviral nucleic acid sequences located in the proviral long terminal repeat and leader-gag regions using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Virological Methods. 147(2): 338-344.

Carroza M.L., Mazzei M., Bandecchi P., Fraisier C., Pérez M., Suzan-Monti M., Andres D., Amorena B., Rosati S., Andresdottir V., Lujan L., Pepin M., Blacklaws B., Tolari F. & Harkiss G.D. 2010. Development and comparison of strain specific gag and pol real-time PCR assays for the detection of Visna/maedi vírus. Journal of Virological Methods. 165(2): 161-167.

Extramiana A.B., Gonzalez L., Cortabarria N., Garcia M. & Juste R.A. 2002. Evaluation of a PCR technique for the detection of maedi-visna proviral DNA in blood, milk and tissue samples of naturally infected sheep, Small Ruminant Research. 44(2): 109-118.

Gogolewski R.P., Adams D.S., Mcguire T.C., Banks L.K & Cheevers W.P. 1985. Antigenic cross-reactivity between caprine arthritis-encephalitis, Visna and progressive pneumonia viruses involves all virion-associated proteins and glycoproteins. Journal of General Virology. 66(6): 1233-1240.

Instituto de Pesquisa e Estratégia Econômica do Ceará (IPECE). 2015. Disponível em: http://www.ipece.ce.gov. br/publicacoes/perfil_basico/pbm-2014/Fortaleza.pdf. [Acessed September 2015].

Martins G.R., Teixeira M.F.S., Barroso I.C. Souza K.C., Marinho R.C. & Bezerra Junior R.Q. 2014. Detecção do vírus Maedi-visna, por Nested-PCR, no lavado bronco-alveolar de pulmões ovinos provenientes de abatedouro da região metropolitana de Fortaleza. Revista Brasileira de Medicina Veterinária. 36(3): 312-316.

Minardi da Cruz J.C., Singh D.K., Lamara A. & Chebloune Y. 2013. Small Ruminant Lentiviruses (SRLVs) Break the Species Barrier to Acquire New Host Range. Viruses. 5(7): 1867-1884.

Minguijón E., Reina R., Pérez M., Polledo L., Villoria M., Ramírez H., Leginagoikoa I., Badiola J.J., García-Marín J.F., de Andrés D., Luján L., Amorena B. & Juste R.A. 2015. Small ruminant lentivirus infections and diseases. Veterinary Microbiology.181(1-2): 75-89.

Moojen V. 2001. Maedi-Visna dos ovinos. In: Riet-Corrêa F. (Ed). Doenças de Ruminantes e Equinos. São Paulo: Varela, pp.138-144.

Murphy F.A., Gibbs E.P.J., Horzinek M.C. & Studdert M.J. 1999. Laboratory diagnosis of viral diseases. In: Murphy F.A, Gibbs E.P, Studdert M.J. & Horzinek M.C. (Eds). Veterinary Virology. 3rd edn. San Diego: Academic Press, 641p.

Oguma k., Tanaka C., Harasawa R., Kimura A., Sasaki J., Goryo M. & Sentsui H. 2014. Isolation of Maedi/Visna Virus from a Sheep in Japan. The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science. 76(2): 211-218.

Pasick J. 1998. Maedi-visna virus and caprine arthritis-encephalitis virus: Distinct species or quasispecies and its implications for laboratory diagnosis. Canadian journal of Veterinary Research = Revue Canadienne de Recherche Veterinaire. 62(4): 241-244.

Reddy P.G., Sapp W.J. & Heneine W. 1993. Detection of caprine arthritisencephalitis virus by polymerase chain reaction. Journal Clinical Microbiology. 31(11): 3042-3043.

Rimstad E., East N.E., Torten M., Higgins J., Derock E. & Pedersen N.C. 1993. Delayed seroconversion following naturally acquired caprine arthritis-encephalitis virus infection in goats. American Journal Veterinary Research. 54(11): 1858-1862.

Rosati S., Kwang J. & Keen J.E. 1995. Genome analysis of North American small ruminant lentiviruses by polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme analysis. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation. 7(4): 437-443.

Ryan S., Tiley L., McConnell I. & Blacklaws B.A. 2000. Infection of dendritic cells by the Maedi-Visna lentivirus. Journal of Virology. 74(21): 10096-10103.

Saltarelli M., Querat G., Konings D.A., Vigne R. & Clements J.E. 1990. Nucleotide sequence and transcriptional analysis of molecular clones of CAEV which generate infectious virus. Virology.179(1): 347-364.

Wagter L.H.A., Jansen A., Bleumink-Pluym J.A., Lenstra J.A. & Houwers D.J. 1998. PCR detection of lentiviral gag segment DNA in the white blood cells of sheep and goats. Veterinary Research Communication. 22(5): 355-362.

Zanoni R.G. 1998. Phylogenetic analysis of small ruminant lentiviruses. Journal of General Virology. 79(8): 1951-1961.

Zanoni R., Pauli U. & Peterhans E. 1990. Caprine arthritis-encephalitis (CAE) and Maedi-Visna viruses detected by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Veterinary Microbiology. 23(1-4): 329-1329.

Zanoni R.G., Nauta I.M., Kuhnert P., Pauli U., Pohl B. & Peterhans E. 1992. Genomic heterogeneity of small ruminant lentiviruses detected by PCR. Veterinary Microbiology. 33(1-4): 341-351.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.81074

Copyright (c) 2018 Rebeca Cavalcante Marinho, Gabrielle Rosemblit Martins, Kelma Costa de Souza, Rosivaldo Quirino Bezerra Júnior, Maria Fátima da Silva Teixeira

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.