Campylobacter coli in Swine Slaughtering Flowchart and Research of cdt Genes

Authors

  • Camile Milan Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
  • Thamíris Pereira de Moraes Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
  • Marina de Mattos Ferrasso Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
  • Celina Nunes Ebersol Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
  • Amilton Clair Pinto Seixas Neto Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
  • Éverton Fagonde da Silva Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
  • Cláudio Dias Timm Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas, RS, Brazil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.80490

Keywords:

carcass, contamination, food safety, public health.

Abstract

Background: Campylobacter spp. are among the microorganisms most commonly associated with foodborne disease. Campylobacter spp. isolation from pigs during the slaughter and final products have been reported in several countries, including Brazil. However, very little is known about the sources of contamination in the slaughtering flowchart and how these microorganisms are spread in processing plants. Considering the possibility of the pigs carry Campylobacter spp. since the farm or its products are contaminated in the slaughterhouse, this study had as aim to track Campylobacter spp. in pig slaughtering flowchart to understand the behavior of these pathogens in the production line.

Materials, Methods & Results: Forty animals of 10 lots, four from each lot, were followed during slaughter. Stool samples were collected from the floor of each enclosure where the pigs were housed on the farm and immediately after stunning on slaughterhouse. Samples from carcass surface were collected after removal of the animals from scrap machine, after evisceration and before the refrigeration chamber. It was also collected surface samples from jowls and samples from the scalding tank water before and after the passage of animals. The swabs containing samples were plated onto Columbia agar supplemented with activated charcoal, oxygen reduction solution and antibiotics supplement, and incubated at 42°C for 48 h under microaerobic conditions. The colonies which presented with a shiny and moist appearance were analyzed by Gram staining for identification of Campylobacter by morphology, and then tested for catalase and oxidase. The Campylobacter isolates were identified for species C. jejuni or C. coli by PCR. Bands profiles were determined by rep-PCR and used to compare the strains. Campylobacter was isolated from 19 (9.5%) of the 200 pig samples analyzed, seven (36.8%) of the rectum, seven (36.8%) after evisceration and five (26.3%) before the refrigeration chamber. Campylobacter was not isolated from jowls and from scalding tank water. All isolates were C. coliand cdtnegative.Persistence of strains originating from the farm and cross contaminations during the slaughtering flowchart was identified by the analysis of the bands profiles obtained by rep-PCR.

Discussion: C. coli was the species of Campylobacter present in the swine intestinal tract and in the swine slaughterhouse. The animals, once contaminated, can carry the microorganism during the stages of the slaughtering flowchart. The farm where the animals came from is an important source of contamination during processing, however cross contamination also plays a relevant role. The evisceration was considered the most critical stage, due to the greater number of isolates obtained after this procedure, what emphasize the importance of the hygienic-sanitary management in this stage. Campylobacter spp. can survive, despite not being able to multiply, in foods at refrigeration temperatures (-1 to 5°C) for one to three weeks. Therefore, the high percentage of isolates obtained from the carcass before the refrigeration chamber may represent a problem, since the contamination of the carcasses that enter in this sector can be maintained until the food reaches the consumer. There was no similarity between strains isolated from different lots, indicating that there were no persistence of strains both in the farm and in the slaughterhouse.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alter T., Gaull F., Kasimir S., Gürtler M., Mielke H., Linnebur M. & Fehlhaber K. 2005. Prevalences and transmission routes of Campylobacter spp. strains within multiple pig farms. Veterinary Microbiology.108: 251-261.

Andrade L.A.F., Esteves W.T.C., Thomé J.D.S. & Filgueiras A.L.L. 2014. Bactérias termofílicas do gênero Campylobacter em suínos do estado do Rio de Janeiro. Vigilância Sanitária em Debate. 2(1): 46-50.

Biasi R.S., Macedo R.E.F., Malaquias M.A.S.& Franchin P.R. 2011. Prevalence, strain identification and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. isolated from slaughtered pig carcasses in Brazil. Food Control. 22(5): 702-707.

Bohaychuk V.M., Gensler G.E. & Barrios P.R. 2011. Microbiological baseline study of beef and pork carcasses from provincially inspected abattoirs in Alberta, Canada. Canadian Veterinary Journal. 52(10): 1095-1100.

Bolton D.J., Pearce R.A., Sheridan J.J., Blair I.S., McDowell D.A. & Harrington D. 2002. Washing and chilling as critical control points in pork slaughter hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) systems. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 92: 893-902.

George H.A., Hoffmann P.S., Krieg N.R. & Smimbert R.M. 1978. Improved media for growth and aerotolerance of Campylobacter fetus. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 8: 36-41.

Guise H.J., Penny R.H.C., Baynes P.J., Abbott T.A., Hunter E.J. & Johnston A.M. 1995. Abattoir observations of the weights of stomachs and their contents in pigs slaughtered at known time after their last feed. British Veterinary Journal. 151(6): 659-670.

Harmon K.M., Ransom G.M. & Wesley I.V. 1997. Differentiation of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli by polymerase chain reaction. Molecular Cell Probes. 11: 195-200.

Hunt J.M., Abeyta C. & Tran T. 2001. Campylobacter. Food and Drug Administration, Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM). Chapter 7. Disponível em: https://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodScienceResearch/LaboratoryMethods/ ucm072616.htm. [Accessed online in January 2017].

Jain D., Prasad K.N., Sinha S. & Husain N. 2008. Differences in virulence attributes between cytolethal distending toxin positive and negative Campylobacter jejuni strains. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 57: 267-272.

Malakauskas M., Jorgensen K., Nielsen E.M., Ojeniyi B. & Olsen J.E. 2006. Isolation of Campylobacter spp. from a pig slaughterhouse and analysis of cross-contamination. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 108: 295-300.

Martinez I., Mateo E., Churruca E.,Girbau C., Alonso R. & Fernandez-Astorga A. 2006. Detection of cdtA, cdtB, and cdtC genes in Campylobacter jejuni by multiplex PCR. International Journal of Medicine Microbiology. 296: 45-48.

Nesbakken T., Ecner K., Hoidal H.K. & Rotterud O.J. 2003. Ocurrence of Yersinia enterocolitica and Campylobacter spp. in slaughter pigs and consequences for meat inspection slaughtering, and dressing procedures. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 80: 231-240.

Brasil. 1995. Ministério da Agricultura Pecuária e Abastecimento. Portaria n°711, de 01/11/1995. Aprova as normas técnicas de instalações e equipamentos para abate e industrialização de suínos. Diário Oficial da União. 03 nov. 1995, Secção I, p.17625.

Rasschaert G., Houf K., Imberechts H., Grijspeerdt K., De Zutter L. &Heyndrickx M. 2005. Comparison of Five Repetitive-Sequence-Based PCR Typing Methods for Molecular Discrimination of Salmonella enterica Isolates. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 43(8): 3615-2623.

Rosenvold K. & Andersen H.J.A. 2003. Factors of significance for pork quality - a review. Meat Science. 64: 219-237.

Sambrook J. & Russel D.W. 2001. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 3rd edn. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1200p.

Silva D.T., Tejada T.S., Cunha C.C., Lopes N.A., Agostinetto A., Collares T., Leon P.P.M. & Timm C.D. 2014. Ocorrência de Campylobacter em carne de frango, fezes de frango e humanas e pesquisa dos genes cdt. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia. 66(1): 297-304.

Silva G.O., Carvalho A.F., Miyashiro S., Nassar A.F.C., Piatti R.M. & Scarcelli E. 2012. Detecção de fatores de virulência em estirpes de Campylobacter spp. isoladas de carcaças de suínos abatidos em frigoríficos. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia. 64(5): 1209-1215.

Steinhauserova I., Fojtikova K. & Matiasovic J. 2001. Subtyping of Campylobacter spp. strains and their incidence in piglets. Acta Veterinaria Brunensis. 70: 197-201.

Varela N.P., Friendship R.M. & Dewey C.E. 2007. Prevalence of Campylobacter spp. isolated from grower-finished pigs in Ontario. Canadian Veterinary Journal. 48(5): 515-517.

Versalovic J., Schneider M., De Bruijn F.J. & Lupski J.R. 1994. Genomic fingerprinting of bacteria with repetitive sequencebased polymerase chain reaction. Methods in Molecular and Cellular Biology. 5: 25-40.

Wang J.P., YehK.S., Hsieh M.W., Fang C.Y., Chen Z.W. & Lin J.H. 2013. Pathogenic microbiological baseline survey of pork carcasses in Taiwan. Journal of Food Protection. 6: 928-1108.

Young K.T., Davis L.M. & Dirita V.J. 2007. Campylobacter jejuni: molecular biology and pathogenesis. Nature Reviews. 5: 665-679.

Published

2017-01-01

How to Cite

Milan, C., Moraes, T. P. de, Ferrasso, M. de M., Ebersol, C. N., Neto, A. C. P. S., Silva, Éverton F. da, & Timm, C. D. (2017). Campylobacter coli in Swine Slaughtering Flowchart and Research of cdt Genes. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae, 45(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.80490

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)