Viability of Equine Semen Stored in a Polyethylene System for Transport for Eight Hours

Authors

  • Alisson Ceccato Maciel
  • Vinicius Camargo Acadêmico, FaVet, UFRGS, Porto Alegre.
  • Rodrigo Costa Mattos Programa de Pós-graduação em Medicina Animal: Equinos (PPG-MAE), Faculdade de Veterinária (FaVet), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
  • Sandra Fiala Rechsteiner Programa de Pós-graduação em Medicina Animal: Equinos (PPG-MAE), Faculdade de Veterinária (FaVet), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. HISTOREP, Departamento de Morfologia (DM), Instituto de Biologia (IB), Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas, RS.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.79380

Keywords:

equine, cooled semen, passive cooling device.

Abstract

Background: Equine semen storage and shipment, being it colled or frozen, allows the veterinarian to direct matings, providing the use of genetically superior stallions, which are mostly located in breeding stations or training centers. Achieving good pregnancy rates depends, beyond the moment of artificial insemination (AI), on factors related to the semen cooling, such as: system used for transport, cooling rate, final storage temperature, storage time and individual variation among stallions, such as age and resistance to cooling. Based on these aspects, this experiment was conducted in order to test a polyethylene system to ship equine semen.

Materials, Methods & Results: A total of 87 ejaculates from five stallions with known fertility were used. The stallions aged between 6 to 14 years old, being three Thoroughbred and two Miniature Pony horse. The ejaculates were collected twice a week using a Hannover artificial vagina. After each collection, the semen sample was macroscopically evaluated for appearance, color and smell. A semen sample was used to evaluate the parameters of total motility, vigor and concentration, being these last three parameters assessed by counting 100 sperm cells for analysis. These analysis were performed using an optical microscope, being the concentration taken with a Neubauer chamber after dilution of 1:20 (semen: citrate formol). Subsequently to this, the semen was diluted 1+1 (diluent+semen) with skim UHT milk, and divided into four aliquots of equal volume, yielding a total of four groups. In the control group (GC) the semen was analyzed immediately after dilution (zero h - 0-h). Samples from other groups were stored for eight h (8-h) in three different devices: Equitainer® (GE), BotuFLEX® (GB) or Polyethylene System - Cooled (SP) and non-Cooled (SPN). During storage of the samples the cooling curve of the system under study was evaluated, using a digital thermometer. To estimate the sperm viability, the parameters of total sperm motility and vigor were evaluated, the integrity of plasma membrane  were evaluated using CFDA / PI, and the plasma membrane functionality using the hiposmotic test (HOST), being also examined the percentage of spermatozoa considered morphologically normal (sperm morphology). The SP showed a PM integrity and sperm morphology as the only parameters that did not occur a statistical difference  when compared to Equitainer® and the BotuFLEX® (averages of the CFDA/PI = 71.12%, 73.29%, 71.32 and averages of morphology = 80.50%, 82.29% and 81.28%, respective values of each parameter to SP, GE and GB, while SPN showed mean values lower than the GC and GE for all parameters (averages of total motility = 50.65% and 62, 60%; averages of vigor = 1.78 and 2.43; averages of CFDA/PI = 72.56% and 78.30%; averages of HOST = 43.56% and 48.87%; averages of morphology = 77.17% and 84.82%, respectively for SPN and GE). Compared to BotuFLEX®, the SPN had no significant difference only for the parameter of PM functionality (HOST).

Discussion: The average temperature of SP was 18.0°C, and the SPN was 18.2°C. The SP was equal or similar to the other used systems, but the SPN showed no difference when compared to PS. However NPS was worse than the other systems from this experiment. These results show that the PS might be an alternative to ship equine semen for eight h, compared to the other cooled systems studied in this work.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amann R.P. & Pickett B.W. 1987. Principles of cryopreservation and a review of cryopreservation of stallion spermatozoa. Equine Veterinary Science. 7: 145-173.

Aurich C. 2005. Factors affecting the plasma membrane function of cooled-stored stallion spermatozoa. Animal Reproduction Science. 89(1-4): 65-75.

Aurich C. 2008. Recent advantages in cooled-semen technology. Animal Reproduction Science. 107(3-4): 268-275.

Aurich J.E. 2012. Artificial Inseminationin Horses – More than a century of practice and research. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science. 32: 458-463.

Brinsko S., Varner D. & Blanchard T. 2000. Transported Equine Semen. In: Ball B.A. (Ed). International Veterinary Information Service (OVIS). New York: Recent Advances in Equine Reproduction, pp.207-400.

CBRA - Colégio Brasileiro de Reprodução Animal. 2013. Manual para exame andrológico e avaliação de sêmen animal. 3.ed. Belo Horizonte: CBRA, 91p.

Foster M.L., Varner D.D., Hinrichs K., Teague S., Lacaze K. & Blanchard T.L. 2011. Agreement between measures of total motility and membrane integrity in stallion sperm. Theriogenology. 75(8): 1499-1505

Harrison R.A.P. & Vickers S.E. 1990. Use of fluorescente probe to assess membrane integrity in mammalian spermatozoa. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 88: 343-352.

Heckenbichler S., Deichsel K., Peters P. & Aurich C. 2011. Quality and fertility of cooled-shipped stallion sêmen at the time of insemination. Theriogenology. 75: 849-856.

Katila T., Combes G.B., Varner D.D. & Blanchard T.L. 1997. Comparison of three containers used for the transport of cooled stallion semen. Theriogenology. 48: 1085-1092.

Loomis P.R. 2006. Advanced methods for handling and preparation of stallion Semen. Veterinary Clinics North American Equine Practice. 22(3): 663-676.

Love C.C. & Kenney R.M. 1998. The relationship of increased susceptibility of sperm DNA to denaturation and fertility in the stallion. Theriogenology. 50: 955-972.

Love C.C. 2011. Relationship between sperm motility, morphology and the fertility of stallions. Theriogenology. 76: 547-557.

Mies Filho A. 1975. Reprodução dos animais e inseminação artificial. 4.ed. Porto Alegre: Livraria Sulina editora, pp.463-513.

Moran D.M., Jasko D.J., Squires E.L. & Amann R.P. 1992. Determination of temperature and cooling rate which induce cold shock in stallion spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 38: 999-1012.

Nie G.J. & Wensel J.G.W. 2001. Adaptation of hipoosmotic swelling test to assess functional integrity of stallion spermatozoal plasma membranes. Theriogenology. 55: 1005-1018.

Pickett, B.W. 1993. Seminal extenders and cooled semen. In: Mckinnon A.O. & Voss J.L. (Eds). Equine Reproduction. 2nd edn. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, pp.746-754.

Samper J.C. & Morris C.A. 1998. Current methods for stallion semen cryopreservation: a survey. Theriogenology. 49: 895-903.

Tartaglione C.M. & Ritta M.N. 2004. Prognostic value of spermatological parameters as predictors of in vitro fertility of frozen-thawed bull semen. Theriogenology. 62: 1245-1252.

Varner D.D. 2008. Developments in stallion semen evaluation. Theriogenology. 70 (3): 448-462.

Watson P.F. 1995. Recent developments and concepts in the cryopreservation of spermatozoa and the assessment of their post-thawing function. Reproduction, Fertility and Development. 7: 871-891.

Published

2017-01-01

How to Cite

Maciel, A. C., Camargo, V., Mattos, R. C., & Rechsteiner, S. F. (2017). Viability of Equine Semen Stored in a Polyethylene System for Transport for Eight Hours. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae, 45(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.79380

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)