Effects of PEEP on Hemodynamic Variables of Pigs Submitted to Volume-controlled Ventilation under Pneumoperitoneum associated to Cephalodeclive
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.113720Abstract
Background: Videolaparoscopic procedures have gained prominence due to their low invasiveness, causing less surgical trauma and better post-surgical recovery. However, the increase in intra-abdominal pressure due to the institution of pneumoperitoneum can alter the patient's homeostasis. Therefore, volume-controlled ventilation, associated with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), improves arterial oxygenation and prevents pulmonary collapse, but it can lead to important hemodynamic changes. The aim of this study was to evaluate, comparatively, the effects of positive end expiratory-pressure (PEEP) on hemodynamic variables of pigs submitted to volume-controlled ventilation, during pneumoperitoneum and maintained in head-down tilt and determine which PEEP value promotes greater stability on hemodynamic variables.
Materials, Methods & Results: Twenty-four pigs were used, between 55 and 65-day-old, weighing between 15 and 25 kg, randomly divided into 3 distinct groups differentiated by positive end-expiratory pressure: PEEP 0 (volume-controlled ventilation and PEEP of 0 cmH2O), PEEP 5 (volume-controlled ventilation and PEEP of 5 cmH2O) and PEEP 10 (volume-controlled ventilation and PEEP of 10 cmH2O). Volume-controlled ventilation was adjusted to 8 mL/kg of tidal volume and a respiratory rate of 25 movements per min. Anesthesia was maintained with continuous infusion of propofol (0.2 mg/kg/min) and midazolam (1 mg/kg/h). Pneumoperitoneum was performed with carbon dioxide (CO2), keeping the intra-abdominal pressure at 15 mmHg and the animals were positioned on a 30° head-down tilt. The evaluations of hemodynamic variables started 30 min after induction of anesthesia (M0), followed by measurements at 15-min intervals (from M15 to M90), completing a total of 7 evaluations. The variables of interest were collected over 90 min and submitted to analysis of variance followed by Tukey´s post-hoc test, with P < 0.05. The PEEP 10 group had higher values of CVP and mCPP, while the PEEP 5 group, mPAP and PVR were higher. The PEEP 0 group, on the other hand, had higher means of CI. Regarding the moments, there were differences in HR, SAP, DAP, MAP, CO, IC and TPR.
Discussion: According to the literature, important hemodynamic effects due to pneumoperitoneum are reported, which can be caused by the pressure used in abdominal insufflation, CO2 accumulation, duration of the surgical procedure, hydration status and patient positioning. Mechanical ventilation associated with PEEP can also cause an increase in intrathoracic pressure and, therefore, reduce cardiac output. Cardiovascular changes are proportional to the PEEP used. Central venous pressure (PVC) measure the patient's preload, and intrathoracic pressure can interfere with this parameter. The peak pressure values in the PEEP 10 group were higher than the other groups, demonstrating that the increase in intrathoracic pressure results in higher PVC values. Regarding PAPm and PCPm, these variables can be influenced according to the PEEP values and the patient's position. In relation to CI, the increase in PEEP may reflect on intrathoracic pressure, resulting in greater compression of the heart, with a consequent reduction in cardiac output and cardiac index. Therefore, it is concluded that the PEEP effects of 0 cmH2O and 5 cmH2O on hemodynamics are discrete, under the proposed conditions.
Keywords: mechanical ventilation, PEEP, head-down tilt, VCV, swine.
Descritores: ventilação mecânica, PEEP, posição de Trendelenburg, suínos.
Downloads
References
Barbosa V.F. 2011. Avaliação de diferentes frações inspiradas de oxigênio em coelhos submetidos ao pneumoperitônio e mantidos em cefalodeclive. 109 f. Jaboticabal, SP. Tese (Doutorado em Cirurgia Veterinária) - Programa de Pós-Graduação em Cirurgia Veterinária, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Campus Jaboticabal.
Biteli E.G.D.F. 2017. Diferentes frações inspiradas de oxigênio associado ao ar comprimido ou óxido nitroso, em leitões anestesiados com propofol e mantidos sob ventilação controlada e peep. 220f. Jaboticabal, SP. Tese (Doutorado em Cirurgia Veterinária) - Programa de Pós-Graduação em Cirurgia Veterinária, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Campus Jaboticabal.
Branche P.E., Duperret S.L., Sagnard P.E., Boulez J.L., Petit P.L. & Viale J.P. 1988. Left ventricular loading modifications induced by pneumoperitoneum: A time course echocardiographic study. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 86(3): 482-487.
Carareto R. 2007. Ventilação controlada a volume ou a pressão em cães anestesiados com infusão contínua de propofol e sufentanil, mantidos em cefalodeclive e submetidos a diferentes pressões positivas expiratórias finais. 175 f. Jaboticabal, SP. Tese (Doutorado em Cirurgia Veterinária) - Programa de Pós-Graduação em Cirurgia Veterinária, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Campus Jaboticabal.
Cavalcanti R.L. 2010. Efeitos cardiorrespiratórios da insuflação torácica associada à pressão positiva expiratória final na toracoscopia experimental de suínos. 179f. Porto Alegre, RS. Dissertação (Mestrado em Fisiologia) - Programa de Pós-Graduação em Fisiologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre.
Cohen R.V., Pinheiro Filho J.C., Schiavon C.A. & Correa J.L.L. 2003. Alterações sistêmicas e metabólicas da cirurgia laparoscópica. Revista Brasileira de Videocirurgia. 1(2): 77-81.
Corrêa C.M.O., Brandão M.J.N., Hirata E.S. & Udelsmann A. 2008. Considerações anestésicas na cirurgia laparoscópica. ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva. 21(3): 136-138.
De Oliveira Torres H., Nunes C.E.L. & Araújo Neto J.P. 1995. Anestesia em cirurgia vídeo-laparoscópica. Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia. 45(1): 21-32.
Fransson B.A. 2015. The laparoscopic working space: Pneumoperitoneum techniques and patient positioning In.: Fransson B.A. & Mayhew P.D. (Eds). Small Animal Laparoscopy and Thoracoscopy. Hobboken: Wiley-Blackwell, pp.88-92.
Gianotti G.C., Beheregaray W.K., Bianchi S.P., Mombach V.S., Carregaro A.B. & Contesini E.A. 2010. Suíno como modelo experimental na pesquisa biomédica: valores fisiológicos normais. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae. 38(2): 133-137.
Gutt C.N., Oniu T., Mehrabi A., Schemmer P., Kashfi A., Kraus T. & Büchler M.W. 2004. Circulatory and respiratory complications of carbon dioxide insufflation. Digestive surgery. 21(2): 95-105.
Guyton A.C. & Hall J.E. 2011. Débito cardíaco, retorno venoso e suas regulações. In: Guyton A.C. & Hall J.E. (Eds). Tratado de Fisiologia Médica. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier Brasil, pp.241-254.
Hannon J.P., Bossone C.A. & Wade C.E. 1990. Normal physiological values for conscious pigs used in biomedical research. Laboratory animal Science. 40: 293-298.
Johannsen G., Andersen M. & Juhl B. 1989. The effect of general anaesthesia on the haemodynamic events during laparoscopy with CO2–insufflation. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 33(2): 132-136.
Joris J.L., Noirot D.P., Legrand M.J., Jacquet N.J. & Lamy M.L. 1993. Hemodynamic changes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 76(5): 1067-1071.
Kraut E.J., Anderson J.T., Safwat A., Barbosa R. & Wolfe B.M. 1999. Impairment of cardiac performance by laparoscopy in patients receiving positive end-expiratory pressure. Archives of Surgery. 134(1): 76-80.
Koivusalo A.M. & Lindgren L. 2000. Effects of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 44(7): 834-841.
Leme M.C., Natalini C.C., Beck C.A.C., Brun M.V., Contesini E.A., Lima D.A.S. & Stedile R. 2002. Pneumoperitônio com dióxido de carbono associado a três posições para laparoscopia em cães. Ciência Rural. 32(2): 281-287.
Loeckinger A., Kleinsasser A., Hoermann C., Gassner M., Keller C. & Lindner K.H. 2000. Inert gas exchange during pneumoperitoneum at incremental values of positive end-expiratory pressure. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 90(2): 466-471.
Luz C.M., Polarz H., Böhrer H., Hundt G., Dörsam J. & Martin E. 1994. Hemodynamic and respiratory effects of pneumoperitoneum and PEEP during laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in dogs. Surgical Endoscopy. 8(1): 25-27.
Mama K. & Rezende M.L. 2015. Anesthesia Management of Dogs and Cats for Laparoscopy. In.: Fransson B.A. & Mayhew P.D. (Eds). Small Animal Laparoscopy and Thoracoscopy. Hobboken: Wiley-Blackwell, pp.75-80.
Mcdonell W.N. & Kerr C.L. 2017. Fisiologia, fisiopatologia e conduta anestésica em pacientes com doença respiratória. In: Tranquilli W.J., Thurmon J.C. & Grimm K.A. (Eds). Lumb & Jones’ Anestesiologia e Analgesia Veterinária. 5.ed. São Paulo: Roca, pp. 1514-1633
Muir W.W. & Mason D. 1996. Cardiovascular System. In.: Thurmon J.C., Tranquilli W.J. & Benson G.J. (Eds). Lumb & Jones’ Veterinary Anesthesia. 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, pp.62-114.
Michard F., Boussat S., Chemla D., Anguel N., Mercat A., Lecarpentier Y., Richard C., Pinsky M.R. & Teboul J.L. 2000. Relation between Respiratory Changes in Arterial Pulse Pressure and Fluid Responsiveness in Septic Patients with Acute Circulatory Failure. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 162: 134-138.
Nunes N. 2010. Monitoração da Anestesia. In: Fantoni D.T. & Cortopassi S.R.G. (Eds). Anestesia em Cães e Gatos. 2.ed. São Paulo: Roca, pp.83-101.
Odeberg S., Ljungqvist O., Svenberg T., Gannedahl P., Bäckdahl M., Rosen A.V. & Sollevi A. 1994. Haemodynamic effects of pneumoperitoneum and the influence of posture during anaesthesia for laparoscopic surgery. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 38(3): 276-283.
Ogilvie G.K. 1996. Chemotherapy. In.: Withrow S.J. & Macewen E.G. (Eds). Small Animal Clinical Oncology. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 75p.
Perel A. 2005. The physiological basis of arterial pressure variation during positive-pressure ventilation. Réanimation. 14(3): 162-171.
Posso I.P. 2001. Anestesia para laparoscopia e histeroscopia. Anestesiologia SAESP. 1(1): 731-743.
Rebuglio R., Rebuglio G. & Rebuglio R. 2004. Anestesia para cirurgias videolaparoscópicas de grande porte. Medicina Perioperatoira. Rio de Janeiro: SAERJ, pp.825-829.
Rodrigues J.C. 2016. Efeitos do pneumoperitônio e de uma manobra de recrutamento alveolar seguida por pressão positiva no final da expiração na função cardiopulmonar em ovinos anestesiados com isoflurano e fentanil 98f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Anestesiologia) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatu.
Romaldini H. 2006. Repercussões cardiovasculares da ventilação mecânica. In: Auler Jr. J.O.C. & Amaral R.V.G. (Eds). Assistência Ventilatória Mecânica. São Paulo: Atheneu, pp.115-119.
Santos P.S.P. 2003. Efeitos hemodinâmicos, eletrocardiográficos e hemogasométricos do butorfanol em cães anestesiados pelo desfluorano. 141f. Jaboticabal, ST. Tese (Doutorado em Cirurgia Veterinária) - (Doutorado em Cirurgia Veterinária). Programa de Pós-Graduação em Cirurgia Veterinária, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Julio de Mesquita Filho”, Campus Jaboticabal.
Shoemaker W.C. 1995. Diagnosis and tratament of the shock syndromes. In: Ayres S.M., Grenvik A., Holbrook P.R. & Shoemaker W.C. (Eds). Textbook of Critical Care. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders pp.85-102.
Smith J.C. & Danneman P.J. 2008. Monitoring of Anesthesia. In: Fish R.E., Brown M.J., Danneman P.J. & Karas A.Z. (Eds). Anesthesia and Analgesia in Laboratory Animals. 2nd edn. London: Elsevier, pp.171-182.
Smith A.C. & Swindle M.M. 2008. Anesthesia and Analgesia in Swine. In: Fish R.E., Brown M.J., Danneman P.J. & Karas A.Z. (Eds). Anesthesia and Analgesia in Laboratory Animals. 2nd edn. London: Elsevier, pp.414-440.
Torres M.L.A. & Bonassa J. 2002. Princípios básicos da ventilação mecânica. In.: Fantoni D.T. & Cortopassi S.R.G. (Eds). Anestesia em Cães e Gatos. São Paulo: Roca, pp.95-105.
Wahba R.W.M., Béïque F. & Kleiman S.J. 1995. Cardiopulmonary function and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia. 42(1): 51-63.
Weil A.B. 2009. Anesthesia for endoscopy in small animals. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice. 39(5): 839-848.
Woolley D.S., Puglisi R.N., Bilgrami S., Quinn J.V. & Slotman G.J. 1995. Comparison of the hemodynamic effects of gasless abdominal distention and CO2 pneumoperitoneum during incremental positive end-expiratory pressure. Journal of Surgical Research. 58(1): 75-80.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This journal provides open access to all of its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Such access is associated with increased readership and increased citation of an author's work. For more information on this approach, see the Public Knowledge Project and Directory of Open Access Journals.
We define open access journals as journals that use a funding model that does not charge readers or their institutions for access. From the BOAI definition of "open access" we take the right of users to "read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles" as mandatory for a journal to be included in the directory.
La Red y Portal Iberoamericano de Revistas Científicas de Veterinaria de Libre Acceso reúne a las principales publicaciones científicas editadas en España, Portugal, Latino América y otros países del ámbito latino
